When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Pretty damn sure the Z51 is pushing 3400. The base is what 100-125 lbs. lighter. Are you talking dry for the C7? Why all the bitching on here that the C7 was heavier than a C6?
Pretty damn sure the Z51 is pushing 3400. The base is what 100-125 lbs. lighter. Are you talking dry for the C7? Why all the bitching on here that the C7 was heavier than a C6?
The Technology is getting better. The 545HP GTR can do 2.7s at 3900lb.
GM probably stoled that new electronic DIFF from somebody else, and the REV matching for sure already exist elsewhere.
Last edited by johnglenntwo; 06-07-2013 at 07:51 PM.
Base is 3298, add 100 or so to the Z51.
Skank can help you on this or you can look at the post I just brought to the top on the Z51 weight thread...post 49.
Pretty damn sure the Z51 is pushing 3400. The base is what 100-125 lbs. lighter. Are you talking dry for the C7? Why all the bitching on here that the C7 was heavier than a C6?
I think gearing, traction, and torque delivery is going to be more important for 0-60 than the difference of 50-80 pounds. Bet the electronic diff is going to play a factor as well.
If GM said the GS was 3.95 on Goodyears, I have to be good for a 3.8 on Michelins wouldn't you think?
Considering 0-60 is very much a traction race (hence why AWD cars are 0-60 monsters), if the GS on much wider PSS does 0-60 in the same time as the C7 on skinny 285s (which I'm thinking it actually doesn't) then the C7 should be much quicker in the 1/4 mile where transaction from a dig isn't as big of a deal
0-60 is one of the most meaningless stats IMO... nice for bragging... but there are lots of other measures that are much more meaningful.
Considering 0-60 is very much a traction race (hence why AWD cars are 0-60 monsters), if the GS on much wider PSS does 0-60 in the same time as the C7 on skinny 285s (which I'm thinking it actually doesn't) then the C7 should be much quicker in the 1/4 mile where transaction from a dig isn't as big of a deal
0-60 is one of the most meaningless stats IMO... nice for bragging... but there are lots of other measures that are much more meaningful.
This is so true, 0-60 is a waste of time. Now 40-130 might be a nice metric since most fast cars don't go beyond 130 in the quarter mile.