Poor stereo reception
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: KC, MO Missouri
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Poor stereo reception
I wondered if anyone else noticed this issue? I also can't see a built in antenna other than the navigation ant above the mirror. ANy obstruction brings in static on any FM channel.
#2
Burning Brakes
I would see this as a problem for someone who should be getting good reception in a large metropolitan area (D/FW)
The M-B SLK engineers finally dropped their internal antenna in favor of the external antenna due to all the reception problems (even though, of course, it was not as an elegant of a solution to radio reception [translation: UGLY])
It's always a compromise...
The M-B SLK engineers finally dropped their internal antenna in favor of the external antenna due to all the reception problems (even though, of course, it was not as an elegant of a solution to radio reception [translation: UGLY])
It's always a compromise...
#3
Team Owner
Originally Posted by Quick Brick
I wondered if anyone else noticed this issue? I also can't see a built in antenna other than the navigation ant above the mirror. ANy obstruction brings in static on any FM channel.
#4
Drifting
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Sparta NJ
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AM/FM reception sux because it's a conspiracy between GM and XM (and perhaps Castro/Saddam/Osama are involved as well) to push XM on everyone so that we can proudly display their 'wart' antenna. Or, I could be wrong
#6
I have this same issue. Here's my thread:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=918275
It's not even the least bit tolerable, and I never had this issue with other cars that have hidden antennas so I believe it's something that has to be fixed. I will take my car in next week and post an update.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=918275
It's not even the least bit tolerable, and I never had this issue with other cars that have hidden antennas so I believe it's something that has to be fixed. I will take my car in next week and post an update.
#7
Instructor
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Plainville MA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can attest that my C6 seems to get worse reception than the car I traded in ('96 Sunfire with an external antena).
Where I live in Cedar Park, TX (near Austin, TX), there's a station that I am just able to receive (with a little breakup/crackle) coming out of San Antonio (105.3). In my C6, I am unable to receive this same station at all.
Where I live in Cedar Park, TX (near Austin, TX), there's a station that I am just able to receive (with a little breakup/crackle) coming out of San Antonio (105.3). In my C6, I am unable to receive this same station at all.
Last edited by Runesabre; 10-05-2004 at 05:57 PM. Reason: fix grammar
#8
Team Owner
Again technology and complexibility working against you and wait until it is time for service then you will have some real $$$$$ headaches. The antennas are located in the rear tail lamps for some reason.
#10
Drifting
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: NYC / Naples, FL C5 under construction! Arancio Atlas (Lamborghini Metallic Orange) comming soon! :)
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guys as much as I love the way the C6 looks, and applaud the efforts GM has made, I do not understand how this quality issue can go un noticed. I don't really listen to the radio but that dosent mean I shouldnt be able to if I wanted. Many owners get upset when questioning quality but I think it's stupid to ignore these so things don't get fixed (like the C5). It was always the small things that plagued our cars and it's a little annoying IMHO. Oh well, I guess that leaves room for aftermarket fixes
#12
Safety Car
Originally Posted by LS WON
Again technology and complexibility working against you and wait until it is time for service then you will have some real $$$$$ headaches. The antennas are located in the rear tail lamps for some reason.