Corvette Forum  


Go Back   Corvette Forum > Upcoming Events and Regional Discussion > Southwest
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Vendors Buy a Vette Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ PhotosGarage

Southwest
Arizona | New Mexico | Oklahoma | Texas | Nevada Sponsored by
Xtreme Motorsports

Corvette Store
 
 
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
 
Closed Thread
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-04-2009, 12:20 AM   #1
sheesnaz
CF Senior Member
 
sheesnaz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Mckinney TX
sheesnaz sheesnaz
Default Repeal of Front License Plate Law

SB561 Repeal of front license plate law in Texas

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here we go again. SB 561 has just been filed for the Texas Legislative Session 81 to repeal the requirement for a front license plate in the state of Texas.

The bill is being sponsored by Mike Jackson, R-Pasadena. Let's see it this one does not get attached to some other dog of a bill and get dropped like the last two times.

Email your state rep and show your support.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/Search/...xact=&Exclude=
sheesnaz is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 12:29 AM   #2
1 BAD ZR1
Full size member
Support Corvetteforum!

 
1 BAD ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Death Star
Default

cross your fingers
1 BAD ZR1 is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 08:29 AM   #3
RLYSLO
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '08

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Plano Texas
Default

It isn't going to happen unfortunately. It's extra revenue for the state. unless the cost of producing the 2nd plate outweighs the extra money the can charge for it, they will keep it.

Plus the various cities love having the front plate for traffic and red light cameras. Police love it because it's an extra reason to pull you over and give you a citation (which is increased revenue), and it also gives them a good reflective flat target for radar and laser.
RLYSLO is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 08:44 AM   #4
God-speed
CF Senior Member
 
God-speed's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Austin Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by still-asleep View Post
It isn't going to happen unfortunately. It's extra revenue for the state. unless the cost of producing the 2nd plate outweighs the extra money the can charge for it, they will keep it.

Plus the various cities love having the front plate for traffic and red light cameras. Police love it because it's an extra reason to pull you over and give you a citation (which is increased revenue), and it also gives them a good reflective flat target for radar and laser.
God-speed is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 10:08 AM   #5
schizcat
CF Senior Member

 
schizcat's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Austin TX
Default

yup, wont pass. fortunately i havent been pulled over yet.
schizcat is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 05:09 PM   #6
DFWLCJ
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09
 
DFWLCJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Hurst Texas
Send a message via AIM to DFWLCJ
Default

I agree it likley won't happen but I disagree about the reasons...


Quote:
Originally Posted by still-asleep View Post
It isn't going to happen unfortunately. It's extra revenue for the state. unless the cost of producing the 2nd plate outweighs the extra money the can charge for it, they will keep it.
NOPE They charge the same amount every year whether they issue a new plate or not (I think its 8 yrs for a new plate but maybe 10) ... no $ impact there.

Quote:
Plus the various cities love having the front plate for traffic and red light cameras.
NOPE Red light cameras shoot the rear and may be a thing of the past before too long as they are turning out to cost more than they generate and there are numerous legal challenges as well.

Quote:
Police love it because it's an extra reason to pull you over and give you a citation (which is increased revenue),
MAYBE (at best) ... but unless you are "misbehavin", they usually have better things to do.. and its pretty much just the "staties" that bother anyway.


Quote:
and it also gives them a good reflective flat target for radar and laser.
HUH? Did you think that fiberglass shell shields you from radar and laser ?

While there isnt an "extra" reason for pulling you over, having a front plate does (marginally) help identify a possible stolen or BOLO (ie AMBER ALERT) vehicle. In my opinion that's pretty much it.

BTW My front plate is under the carpet in the rear deck

DFWLCJ is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 05:21 PM   #7
peter pan
Life Time NCM #2196
Support Corvetteforum!

 
peter pan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Converse TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1 BAD ZR1 View Post
cross your fingers
peter pan is online now  
Old 02-04-2009, 06:18 PM   #8
tommie
CF Senior Member

 
tommie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Huffman, Texas txgumballmachine
txgumballmachine
Default

we will see if it passes this time!!
tommie is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 07:06 PM   #9
Bills Z06
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12
 
Bills Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Cypress TX
Default

I'm hoping it passes, but I have my doubts. To much money involved.
Bills Z06 is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 09:16 PM   #10
Silverbullet00
CF Senior Member
 
Silverbullet00's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Norman Oklahoma - The Only State in the Union with no Blue Counties!
Default

Come on my Texan buddies! Get a bill that allows for an exception for the front plate requirement for an added fee that you could choose to pay or not! If it is revenue neutral to the State, the excuse is mute! All they want is your money!
__________________
nonmember of the nonclub club of Oklahoma
Silverbullet00 is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 01:22 AM   #11
RLYSLO
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '08

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Plano Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWLCJ View Post
NOPE They charge the same amount every year whether they issue a new plate or not (I think its 8 yrs for a new plate but maybe 10) ... no $ impact there.
Why do you think they charge this amount? To pay not only for costs of staffing, but also to cover costs to produce the plates, and making 2 plates costs more than just 1. so even if you only get a new plate every 8 years or whatever (unless you change vehicles or personalizations), you're still paying for them to be made, whether for yourself or for others


Quote:
NOPE Red light cameras shoot the rear and may be a thing of the past before too long as they are turning out to cost more than they generate and there are numerous legal challenges as well.
NOPE.. SOME red light cameras only shoot from the rear. A vast majority these days have multiple cameras shooting from various angles, including the FRONT.


Quote:
MAYBE (at best) ... but unless you are "misbehavin", they usually have better things to do.. and its pretty much just the "staties" that bother anyway.
NOPE... I was actually pulled over a few months ago just because I didn't have a front plate on. an officer was in front of me on an entrance ramp onto a freeway. I wasn't speeding, etc. But he saw that I had no front plate, so he pulled me over for it. I now have my front plate on because I don't want the hassle.


Quote:
HUH? Did you think that fiberglass shell shields you from radar and laser ?
I never said fiberglass shell shields you from anything, no reason to be ridiculous. But laser especially works better if given a flat reflective surface. Here is an article that states exactly that: http://www.k40.com/images/pdf/reviews/sml_laserwars.pdf
RLYSLO is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 09:39 AM   #12
roscoe118
CF Senior Member

 
roscoe118's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, Tx.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by still-asleep View Post
Why do you think they charge this amount? To pay not only for costs of staffing, but also to cover costs to produce the plates, and making 2 plates costs more than just 1. so even if you only get a new plate every 8 years or whatever (unless you change vehicles or personalizations), you're still paying for them to be made, whether for yourself or for others
I renewed my registration yesterday, and got new plates. The fee was the same as when I did not need plates. I understand your point about the cost of the second plate being integrated into the registration price. But it everyone is paying "$X" for 2 plates now, and we reduce that to 1 plate, but continue to pay "$X" (which I'm sure we would), wouldn't that save money for the state?

Quote:
Originally Posted by still-asleep View Post
I never said fiberglass shell shields you from anything, no reason to be ridiculous. But laser especially works better if given a flat reflective surface. Here is an article that states exactly that: http://www.k40.com/images/pdf/reviews/sml_laserwars.pdf
If it is a flat reflective surface that they prefer, the front cover fits that bill much better that the actual plate.

roscoe118 is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 02:02 PM   #13
ysb02
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Austin TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by still-asleep View Post
It isn't going to happen unfortunately. It's extra revenue for the state. unless the cost of producing the 2nd plate outweighs the extra money the can charge for it, they will keep it.

Plus the various cities love having the front plate for traffic and red light cameras. Police love it because it's an extra reason to pull you over and give you a citation (which is increased revenue), and it also gives them a good reflective flat target for radar and laser.
They'll probably just charge the same for one plate. The cost of running a 2nd plate is probably in the cents.

I'd love to see timers or something such as a shrinking green circle that indicates how much longer the green light has. It's kinda unsafe to be driving at ~55mph and suddenly catch a red on a highway here. I think this city has their head up their ass when it comes to lights. They recently added a turning lane on south brodie near Advance auto paying the workers over-time to get it done on a schedule (Lots of $$$). It's been sitting there coned off for nearly half a year waiting for the turning light.

Anyone running a front plate in Texas? I'm trying to find something that is removable but isn't unsecured enough to fall off.
ysb02 is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 02:27 PM   #14
MarkRx
CF Senior Member
 
MarkRx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Austin TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schizcat View Post
yup, wont pass. fortunately i havent been pulled over yet.
what do you drive again?


LyleU, look into the removable bracket from top flight productions. i looked at them all and if you follow the instructions, it will stay put. after all that research i bought it and never installed it, ended up selling it with the car. I did a few test runs with it semi in place, with different plate trims, etc and a front plate just doesnt belong on a vette.

Last edited by MarkRx; 02-05-2009 at 02:31 PM.
MarkRx is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 05:44 PM   #15
DFWLCJ
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09
 
DFWLCJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Hurst Texas
Send a message via AIM to DFWLCJ
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by still-asleep View Post
Why do you think they charge this amount? To pay not only for costs of staffing, but also to cover costs to produce the plates, and making 2 plates costs more than just 1. so even if you only get a new plate every 8 years or whatever (unless you change vehicles or personalizations), you're still paying for them to be made, whether for yourself or for others
Already well answered by roscoe118

Quote:

NOPE.. SOME red light cameras only shoot from the rear. A vast majority these days have multiple cameras shooting from various angles, including the FRONT.
Very rare and even more expensive ...so likley even more doomed. Red light cameras are simply failing to pay their freight in most instances. Many cities are considering or already have deactivated them. They likely get as much mileage out of the signs as they do out of really using the cameras (IMHO)

Quote:
NOPE... I was actually pulled over a few months ago just because I didn't have a front plate on. an officer was in front of me on an entrance ramp onto a freeway. I wasn't speeding, etc. But he saw that I had no front plate, so he pulled me over for it. I now have my front plate on because I don't want the hassle.
Obviously he had littlle else to do. How much was the ticket? What city?

Quote:
I never said fiberglass shell shields you from anything, no reason to be ridiculous. But laser especially works better if given a flat reflective surface. Here is an article that states exactly that: http://www.k40.com/images/pdf/reviews/sml_laserwars.pdf
I seriously doubt it makes any difference...in movng traffic hitting a plate is gonna be a challenge ...especially at the quoted 500 ft range even with an 18" beam but Ill give you a maybe here

Like I said...this was my opinion...and I think ultimately this is gonna pass...just not sure when.
DFWLCJ is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 05:55 PM   #16
ysb02
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Austin TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkRx View Post
what do you drive again?


LyleU, look into the removable bracket from top flight productions. i looked at them all and if you follow the instructions, it will stay put. after all that research i bought it and never installed it, ended up selling it with the car. I did a few test runs with it semi in place, with different plate trims, etc and a front plate just doesnt belong on a vette.
I'm only seeing C6 brackets on their (have a C5z). Was yours a c5?
ysb02 is offline  
Old 02-08-2009, 12:02 AM   #17
DCBE
CF Senior Member
 
DCBE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Granbury TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverbullet00 View Post
Come on my Texan buddies! Get a bill that allows for an exception for the front plate requirement for an added fee that you could choose to pay or not! If it is revenue neutral to the State, the excuse is mute! All they want is your money!


I thought this approach should have been done early on, state makes money and enforcement for no front plate could be more agressive being you have a option. Antique and Dealer plates do not require a front plate, why not pay extra for no front plate. Of course no state boardering TX has front plates.
DCBE is offline  
Old 02-08-2009, 02:27 AM   #18
superalpha
CF Senior Member
 
superalpha's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: McKinney TX
Send a message via Yahoo to superalpha Send a message via Skype™ to superalpha
Default

the front of a car is supposed to be aerodynamic, much like a motorcycle but you do not see front plates on those.....
superalpha is offline  
Old 02-08-2009, 10:35 AM   #19
~Maverick
All Men Die, but Few LIVE
Cruise-In IX Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Support Corvetteforum!
 
~Maverick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Arlington Texas
Send a message via MSN to ~Maverick
Default

The is not now, nor will ther BE a front plate on MY car! Horrid looking things!

That being said...

~Maverick
~Maverick is offline  
Old 02-08-2009, 11:22 AM   #20
gbgary
CF Senior Member
 
gbgary's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: (d/fw) in the centrum-silver C6
gary beatty gbgary54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by superalpha View Post
the front of a car is supposed to be aerodynamic, much like a motorcycle but you do not see front plates on those.....
hmmmm
gbgary is offline  
Old 02-08-2009, 11:22 AM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > Upcoming Events and Regional Discussion > Southwest
Reload this Page Repeal of Front License Plate Law
 
 
 
Closed Thread

Tags
2009, 561, california, front, happened, law, license, plate, repeal, sb, sb561, texas


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To all Illinoisians who complain about the front license plate... wamara C4 General Discussion 20 02-12-2004 01:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Emails & Password Backup