[Z06] I'd say this pretty much proves 7.0L
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Insert Wittty Comment here
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
11 Posts
I'd say this pretty much proves 7.0L
This came from LS1tech. But, I think it shows pretty clearlysome things that should help settle some of the discussions...
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=228949
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=228949
Originally Posted by Chris442
Looks like the Caddy team forgot to use some duct tape. I was at the World Challenge race at Laguna Seca over the weekend, and I got to see the Pratt & Miller boys change an engine in one of the CTS-vR's. Look what was cast into the block:
Here's a pic of the top of the motor:
Look at the big runners and the 90mm TB. This is the same setup that was on the GTO show car.
This is the head casting number:
You can also see the big exhaust port. You can't see in this pic, but its a D-port.
This is a knock sensor in the side of the block:
This is what makes me think that this must be a production Gen 4 block. The exhaust ports can also be seen.
The car:
Here's a pic of the top of the motor:
Look at the big runners and the 90mm TB. This is the same setup that was on the GTO show car.
This is the head casting number:
You can also see the big exhaust port. You can't see in this pic, but its a D-port.
This is a knock sensor in the side of the block:
This is what makes me think that this must be a production Gen 4 block. The exhaust ports can also be seen.
The car:
#4
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Normal IL
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
very impressive and reassuring, but to play devils advocate, that is a race car, and the c5r has been using the 7L engine for a few years now. Just because a race car has the engine doesnt mean that the production car will get it as well. I have my fingers crossed still.
#6
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Normal IL
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by #001 2001 Z06
Except, that isn't a C5R motor.
#7
Burning Brakes
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Clearwater, FL, USA
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It does prove that LG was right back in March when he said that they are running a de-stroked engine. 4.120 bore and a 3.25 stroke.
Still a 5.7 liter with a lot of rpms not unlike the 302 of the late 60s.
Still a 5.7 liter with a lot of rpms not unlike the 302 of the late 60s.
#10
Safety Car
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Leesburg Va
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FRC Tom
It does prove that LG was right back in March when he said that they are running a de-stroked engine. 4.120 bore and a 3.25 stroke.
Still a 5.7 liter with a lot of rpms not unlike the 302 of the late 60s.
Still a 5.7 liter with a lot of rpms not unlike the 302 of the late 60s.
That is correct, there was an article in Car and Driver or Road & Track where they were discussing the CTS-V program. Lots of work done to those cars incliuding trimming pinch welds, moving engine back (as much as rules allow), moving the driver, etc.. getting the car as low as possible with a better weiight distribution.
But they also mentioned using the the 7L C5R block, and is destroked to get 5.7 and rev much higher than the stock engine. It does use the factory ECM as well....
Doesn't, necessarily, prove that there will be a 7.0L engine... Just shows that they can get a 7.0 L motor out of that block. At Petit someone asked DOug Fehan how much horsepower they get out the the 7.0L C5R engine.. His answer, with restrictors ..about 600, unrestricted, about 900.....
Last edited by John Wiz; 10-19-2004 at 12:42 PM.
#11
Le Mans Master
Originally Posted by FNC80
Nice catch indeed. Can someone tell me what is this assembly?
It's on the C6 TB as well.
It's on the C6 TB as well.
#16
Originally Posted by FNC80
Nice catch indeed. Can someone tell me what is this assembly?
It's on the C6 TB as well.
It's on the C6 TB as well.
zo6vettepilot
#19
Le Mans Master
Originally Posted by Outsider
they could do that for inventory purposes and block identification and other tracking purposes.