Poor Top-end Acceleration
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Spartanburg SC
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Poor Top-end Acceleration
My mods are listed in my sig. When the car is in 3rd gear and gets up higher in the rpms its really sluggish. I'll usually have the petal about 3/4 down, and then press it all the way down, but the car doesn't accelerate any faster than the slow pace it was already going. It does fine off the line, and at lower speeds. Is this just a lack of horsepower, or could it be something else? The timing is still stock on the car, if it was adjusted for more performance would it help correct this problem?
#2
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Spartanburg SC
Posts: 831
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10
Re: Poor Top-end Acceleration (SCVetteGuy)
What gear is in the rear end? That's a start plus keep in mind these year models don't have a lot of top end. At 5k rpm mine's running about 105 and I don't won't to push it much more than that
#3
Intermediate
Member Since: May 2004
Location: cedar creek tx.
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Poor Top-end Acceleration (SCVetteGuy)
What kind of speed are we talking about 110 120?
what rpm are you running in high gear?
166 hp at the rear axle just a gues but i would say 110 to 120 is all she's got.
what rpm are you running in high gear?
166 hp at the rear axle just a gues but i would say 110 to 120 is all she's got.
#4
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Spartanburg SC
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Poor Top-end Acceleration (377vette)
The rear should be a 3.08, and the speed I'm talking about is around 70 mph or so. I've never really taken it more than 90. I can't really tell you what rpm, b/c I strongly believe my tach is off, since it says 4k at 60 mph, and I know the rear gear isn't that high.
#6
Re: Poor Top-end Acceleration (Corey_68)
I'd imagine part of the problem is the stock L48 cam, great street/DD cam, but it's fote is NOT in the upper rpm band.
A simple thing is that the throttle cable brackets often get bent (usually at the pedal). Make sure that full throttle is actually full throttle.
Also check that your distributor is advancing properly, it has the right dwell, etc. Your carb could be set up improperly too.
Does the engine sound like its revving that high? Maybe your rear gear is really steep or your transmission is slipping (probably not). Its also fairly likely that you're not going 60 mph when the gauge says you are. The speedo is more commonly off than the tach is (people change gears without recalibrating etc). I said all that because an L48 does get sluggish much over ~4000/4500 rpm, but that shouldn't come until over 100 mph with 3.08's.
#7
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Spartanburg SC
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Poor Top-end Acceleration (aharte)
I'm fairly certain the rear gear isn't very steep, I can't even break the tires loose. The speedo is probably off too, but only by about 5 mph or so. The engine does sound like its revving as high as it should be though.
#8
Re: Poor Top-end Acceleration (SCVetteGuy)
I read your mods; did you tune the new carb or just bolt it on? The engine may be running lean at WOT. If timing is correct and the air filter is new, rule that out. Was the fuel filter changed? Are the carb secondaries opening fully? Things to check out...
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 26,485
Received 258 Likes
on
172 Posts
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified 2020
C2 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
St. Jude Donor 03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
Re: Poor Top-end Acceleration (Master Ho)
3.08 is not exactly gonna get you going quick, but I love the way that sucker runs at highway speeds. :)
[Modified by OHSIXX, 11:48 AM 5/24/2004]
[Modified by OHSIXX, 11:48 AM 5/24/2004]
[Modified by OHSIXX, 11:48 AM 5/24/2004]
[Modified by OHSIXX, 11:48 AM 5/24/2004]