Edelbrock performer or rpm?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Haddon Heights NJ
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Edelbrock performer or rpm?
Getting ready for a top end rebuild and not sure what intake to go with, its been a few years since i've done this. Also anyone using comp cams?
My heads are 76cc with 1.94/1.50 valves are they ok to use with the rpm intake? i guess thats my concern before i do this. Any advice?
My heads are 76cc with 1.94/1.50 valves are they ok to use with the rpm intake? i guess thats my concern before i do this. Any advice?
#2
Re: Edelbrock performer or rpm? (Mikeb690)
i have a performer rpm for sale if you decide to go with a rpm. ($100)
it depends on where what rpm you will be shifting at. if you shift at 5000 then the regular performer would be the best choice, but if you are looking for a little more rpm then use the performer rpm.
comp cams makes some really good products.
it depends on where what rpm you will be shifting at. if you shift at 5000 then the regular performer would be the best choice, but if you are looking for a little more rpm then use the performer rpm.
comp cams makes some really good products.
#3
Melting Slicks
Re: Edelbrock performer or rpm? (Mikeb690)
I'm using the Edelbrock Performer EPS on my 79. Plenty of vacuum for lights, brakes and TH350 tranny. See my sig for other goodies of motor. :cheers:
#4
Le Mans Master
Re: Edelbrock performer or rpm? (marshrat99)
Lots of people overlook the Brodix HVH 1016 intake on flat hooded Vettes. These intakes fit and work well with a deep rear end and manual transmission while clearing the hood. I wouldn't use one on a automatic Vette, the plenum divider is cut away and it is lacking in torque below 2400 RPM but, very good after that range.