C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2004, 05:56 PM
  #1  
Cruz 86
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Cruz 86's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Phila. Pa.
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.?

Plan to install VBP" Touring Plus" suspension. Car is smalll block. Consists of 460 lb. coils,frt. & rear sway bars, Bilstein shocks and 330 Lb. composite rear spring. I want the car to handle good but not be too stiff to enjoy highway cruising. Do you guys think it might be a good idea to substitute a 300 lb. rear spring instead of 330 lb.
Old 04-17-2004, 08:26 PM
  #2  
LiveandLetDrive
Melting Slicks
 
LiveandLetDrive's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Boulder Creek California
Posts: 2,999
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (Cruz 86)

330 definitely (or more). 300 is super soft and VBP only recommends it for 63-67 small blocks.
Old 04-17-2004, 08:33 PM
  #3  
phxraptor
Burning Brakes
 
phxraptor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix Az
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (Cruz 86)

Plan to install VBP" Touring Plus" suspension. Car is smalll block. Consists of 460 lb. coils,frt. & rear sway bars, Bilstein shocks and 330 Lb. composite rear spring. I want the car to handle good but not be too stiff to enjoy highway cruising. Do you guys think it might be a good idea to substitute a 300 lb. rear spring instead of 330 lb.
:iagree: I have that same setup on my 81 minus the rear sway bar and I am very happy with it. (with the 330# rear mono spring) :cheers: :seeya By the way,VBP recomends the 330# spring with the 460# coils :cheers:


[Modified by phxraptor, 6:36 PM 4/17/2004]


[Modified by phxraptor, 6:36 PM 4/17/2004]
Old 04-19-2004, 02:08 PM
  #4  
Tom Johnson
Pro
 
Tom Johnson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Oneida WI
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (Cruz 86)

I got mine from Muskegon Brake and they recommended a 340 lb. Like the ride and I don't think there would be much of a difference in ride between the 330 and 340.
Old 04-19-2004, 02:22 PM
  #5  
phxraptor
Burning Brakes
 
phxraptor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix Az
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (Tom Johnson)

I got mine from Muskegon Brake and they recommended a 340 lb. Like the ride and I don't think there would be much of a difference in ride between the 330 and 340.
:eek: What 71 Vette :thumbs: :cheers: :seeya
Old 04-19-2004, 02:59 PM
  #6  
GRAYGHOST
Advanced
 
GRAYGHOST's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: ST AUGUSTINE FL
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (Cruz 86)

I took advantage of the Vansteel GP and have just installed new TA's, Bilstiens and a TRW 315# Monospring. I picked the 315 because I use my 78
for road trips only. No racing or auotcrossing. The ride is a lot better
than the old stock multileaf and I read too many stories on the forum about
members trying to get their car down in the back after intalling the 330 or the
340# spring! Anyway, just my $0.02 worth!
Old 04-19-2004, 03:59 PM
  #7  
GrandSportC3
Team Owner
 
GrandSportC3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 182,997
Received 83 Likes on 58 Posts
Cruise-In IV-V-VI-VII-VIII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '03, '06, '17

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (Cruz 86)

300 lbs/inch is way too soft... 330 lbs/inch is great!! That's what I have.. BTW - mine will be available for sale this summer because I'm planning on having my rear changed to a Ford 9 inch...
Old 04-19-2004, 04:44 PM
  #8  
bence13_33
Safety Car
 
bence13_33's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Clymer PA
Posts: 3,909
Received 26 Likes on 26 Posts

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (GrandSportC3)

:withstupid: I agree with Olivier. 300lb leaf spring is way to soft in my opinion. I went with a 420lb leaf spring for my drag racing purposes but a 330lb spring should suit you fine.
Old 04-20-2004, 06:35 AM
  #9  
Gary79
Race Director
 
Gary79's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Quincy IL
Posts: 18,126
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (bence13_33)

i've run the 460 fronts, 330 composite spring with delco gas shocks since 1996 and wouldn't change a thing.
Old 04-20-2004, 10:53 AM
  #10  
70ZZ3 96LT4
Burning Brakes
 
70ZZ3 96LT4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: TN
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (Gary79)

I have a 68 and 70 and installed the VB 330# spring on both. Using the original front springs on the 68 and like the set up. The original front spings in the 68 have held up since new and I don't see any need in replacing them. When I put the VB 330# spring on my 70 I had already replaced the front springs with the heavy duty "518" springs from GM. I liked this set up. What I do like about having the VB 330# rear springs is not having the traditional Corvette squat on heavy acceleration. About 9 years ago went futher with suspension changes on the 70 and installed the VB's transverse front suspension system with contol arm changeout and everything else. The 70 handles like a slot car with lane changes at speed and its cornering ability. Using the softest adjustment on this front spring is what I like the best for normal daily driving. Since I don't drive in competition with my 70, I have been having thoughts of returning the front suspension to the previous coil spring settup with the "518" springs.
Old 04-20-2004, 12:02 PM
  #11  
Double Aught
Race Director
 
Double Aught's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Posts: 12,940
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (70ZZ3 96LT4)

I went with the 330/550 coils in my 78 Pacecar. Be advised, if you go with any TRW unit, if you decide to add a 16 or 17 inch wheel later, you may have clearance issues. The TRW spring is wider at the ends and would most likely hit the backside of the wheel. My Pace had 17x8.5 wheels with the aformentioned VB 330 and when I jacked up the back of the car, the spring cleared the wheel by about a 1/4inch. It never hit the wheel when on the ground. Good luck.
Old 04-20-2004, 03:20 PM
  #12  
stingry
Drifting
 
stingry's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Canberra AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05-'06

Default Re: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.? (Cruz 86)

A lot of people think the 300LB is too soft. A lot of people think the 330LB sits too high. Your call.

Find someone in a local corvette club and check out the ride hieght and if possible go for a ride in their car. I put a 300LB in my car and it is great. I don't autocross, drag or rally my car. I drive it and cruise in it. It is comfortable.

Get notified of new replies

To COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.?




Quick Reply: COMPOSITE REAR SPRING-300 LB. OR 330 LB.?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 PM.