Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right?
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right?
I went ahead and checked the compression this evening while I was checking valve lash. Here are the numbers with corresponding cylinder:
1 - 185
3 - 185
5 - 184
7 - 184
2 - 186
4 - 185
6 - 190
8 - 185
They are all very consistent, but #6 is a little high. I think the lash may be a little loose on this cylinder, which would cause the intake valve to close sooner/open later, could this cause the higher number?
Also, do these cranking numbers sound right for my calculated 10.6:1 SCR with cam duration: 242/248 @ .050?
Thanks!
:cheers:
1 - 185
3 - 185
5 - 184
7 - 184
2 - 186
4 - 185
6 - 190
8 - 185
They are all very consistent, but #6 is a little high. I think the lash may be a little loose on this cylinder, which would cause the intake valve to close sooner/open later, could this cause the higher number?
Also, do these cranking numbers sound right for my calculated 10.6:1 SCR with cam duration: 242/248 @ .050?
Thanks!
:cheers:
#2
Safety Car
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (VETDRMS)
Looks good. All numbers are plus or minus 10%.
My numbers on my Big Block were in the 145-150 range.
My numbers on my Big Block were in the 145-150 range.
#3
Melting Slicks
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (LAvetteman)
Anytime the compression is within 5%, from ther highest reading to the lowest, the rings and valves are in great shape and doing their job!
:cheers:
:cheers:
#4
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (mbeeman350)
The largest % variance from the mean comes out to be 3.2%.
Excluding the erroneous high cylinder, the highest % variance from the mean is 1.08%.
Assuming there will be some variation between cylinder temperatures, ect., this sounds pretty darn close to me. I could have some gas sitting in the #6 cylinder as the couple times I opened the carb all the way dumped a LOT of gas, should #6 been open it could of got the lion's share of it. :lol:
:cheers:
Excluding the erroneous high cylinder, the highest % variance from the mean is 1.08%.
Assuming there will be some variation between cylinder temperatures, ect., this sounds pretty darn close to me. I could have some gas sitting in the #6 cylinder as the couple times I opened the carb all the way dumped a LOT of gas, should #6 been open it could of got the lion's share of it. :lol:
:cheers:
#5
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (VETDRMS)
Also, do these cranking numbers sound right for my calculated 10.6:1 SCR with cam duration: 242/248 @ .050?
#6
Melting Slicks
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (VETDRMS)
The numbers you have are about the highest you want for a street driven car. Should make some serious power :yesnod:
#7
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: NC,USA
Posts: 16,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (71coupe)
they look nice and even to me...
Might even be one of those "Needs more horsepower on the starter side!"
:cool:
Might even be one of those "Needs more horsepower on the starter side!"
:cool:
#8
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (JJMURFS)
JJMURFS Yes, as expected my DCR is rather high: 8.5:1. This cam does have a lot of duration at .050, but seat-to-seat is kind of low: 280/286. With an intake closing at 66 BTDC.
ZD75blue I am running a 4.41:1 gear reduction starter good to 18:1 compression. It gets the job done and sounds :reddevil:.
Thanks for the input!
ZD75blue I am running a 4.41:1 gear reduction starter good to 18:1 compression. It gets the job done and sounds :reddevil:.
Thanks for the input!
#9
Team Owner
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (VETDRMS)
those numbers look good.. As others mentioned.. there can be a 5% variation...
#11
Race Director
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (Oldguard 7)
My compression was 230-235psi across the board with Sportsman II iron heads and it runs great on pump gas and I run 40 degrees total advance. I did it twice once with the old CC270H cam and then again with CC282 solid and I got pretty much the same numbers. I have been told that up to about 240psi is good for the street then it is track only.
This is the trickiest part of cam/head/piston-compression ratio selection. The higher duration cams require a higher compression ratio to keep the dynamic compression up. That is the reason I am going with 11:1 pistons in my 406ci with the same cam you have, it will be interesting to see what numbers I get. :D
[Modified by MotorHead, 10:07 PM 3/23/2004]
This is the trickiest part of cam/head/piston-compression ratio selection. The higher duration cams require a higher compression ratio to keep the dynamic compression up. That is the reason I am going with 11:1 pistons in my 406ci with the same cam you have, it will be interesting to see what numbers I get. :D
[Modified by MotorHead, 10:07 PM 3/23/2004]
#12
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (MotorHead)
I'm surprised you didn't have any issues with detonation. What was your DCR?
With this cam and my calculated compression of 10.65:1 your 11:1 will most likely not be that much higher. I assume your elevation will have some effect on the compression limit with pump gas.
I am very happy with this cam, I think you'll be pleased. :)
Travis
With this cam and my calculated compression of 10.65:1 your 11:1 will most likely not be that much higher. I assume your elevation will have some effect on the compression limit with pump gas.
I am very happy with this cam, I think you'll be pleased. :)
Travis
#13
Racer
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (MotorHead)
My compression was 230-235psi across the board with Sportsman II iron heads and it runs great on pump gas and I run 40 degrees total advance. I did it twice once with the old CC270H cam and then again with CC282 solid and I got pretty much the same numbers. I have been told that up to about 240psi is good for the street then it is track only.
This is the trickiest part of cam/head/piston-compression ratio selection. The higher duration cams require a higher compression ratio to keep the dynamic compression up. That is the reason I am going with 11:1 pistons in my 406ci with the same cam you have, it will be interesting to see what numbers I get. :D
[Modified by MotorHead, 10:07 PM 3/23/2004]
This is the trickiest part of cam/head/piston-compression ratio selection. The higher duration cams require a higher compression ratio to keep the dynamic compression up. That is the reason I am going with 11:1 pistons in my 406ci with the same cam you have, it will be interesting to see what numbers I get. :D
[Modified by MotorHead, 10:07 PM 3/23/2004]
#14
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Europe , Luxembourg
Posts: 3,304
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: Compression Test: These Numbers Sound Right? (VETDRMS)
Hi
The compression test of my 427 CI .030 over solid lifter engine was from 161 to 177 PSI. Unfortunately, I used a push on type tester and they are known not to seal off so well .
The cam is a original L71 solid lifter cam with .520/.520 lift, 242/242 duration , 114 lobe ctr line angle.
Compression is 11.3 : 1 .
The engine had an overhaul about 10 K ago, .030 bore , new guts. The old heads only got a valve seat grind with creme only.
Gunther :seeya
The compression test of my 427 CI .030 over solid lifter engine was from 161 to 177 PSI. Unfortunately, I used a push on type tester and they are known not to seal off so well .
The cam is a original L71 solid lifter cam with .520/.520 lift, 242/242 duration , 114 lobe ctr line angle.
Compression is 11.3 : 1 .
The engine had an overhaul about 10 K ago, .030 bore , new guts. The old heads only got a valve seat grind with creme only.
Gunther :seeya