Physics for intake and exhaust
#1
Race Director
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Living in the Hartland
Posts: 11,322
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Physics for intake and exhaust
Was wonder what the diff is between the two and if using an x-pipe type configutation on the intake side would yeild the same results. I am assuming not but wanted input from the best knowledge base I know. Well now that I have asked myself I'll let you guys try now. :p:
BTW This is sparked by the tpi design on the long tube runners, wondering if an x design would do anything.
BTW This is sparked by the tpi design on the long tube runners, wondering if an x design would do anything.
#2
Melting Slicks
Re: Physics for intake and exhaust (Fevre)
David Vizard has, in a couple of his books, gone into the pros and cons of various intake manifold designs. Reading his stuff is very informative.....
#4
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: OKC Oklahoma
Posts: 2,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Physics for intake and exhaust (Fevre)
I believe that the intake is moving slower than the exhaust. The theory is that the exhaust is using the x-pipe by using each pipe to help pull the exhaust faster from the other pipe and vice-versa. On the intake, you are "pushing" air into the engine and the only way to duplicate that on the intake is either "ram air", turbo, or supercharger.
#5
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Las Vegas - Just stop perpetuating myths please.
Posts: 7,098
Received 373 Likes
on
356 Posts
Re: Physics for intake and exhaust (Fevre)
Independent runners on the intake provide the most cylinder filling and least charge dilution. This is how engine builders/tuners can increase volumeteric efficency greater than 1. Independent runners are what make weber carbs so effective. Also allows greater cam overlap/bigger cam with smother idle and better fuel economy. Detroit used for barrels due to cost and seviceability/maintenance.
Exhaust crossovers/X-pipes balance the exhaust pressure and develops better exhaust savaging – to empty the cylinders. There is even more power to develop by matching the idividual cylinders – even accross banks/sides – to maximize savaging.
Most bookstores and usually most libaries will have something to read on this. ;)
Exhaust crossovers/X-pipes balance the exhaust pressure and develops better exhaust savaging – to empty the cylinders. There is even more power to develop by matching the idividual cylinders – even accross banks/sides – to maximize savaging.
Most bookstores and usually most libaries will have something to read on this. ;)
#7
Re: Physics for intake and exhaust (Guru_4_hire)
Arent webers peaky(I know they are pricey)
Using these effects to their maximum isn't something I'd worry about though. It takes serious engineering to get it right. Only OEMs or serious racers have the budget for it. Throwing parts at it will gain you a little after a lot of trial and error tuning, but I'm not sure your gains would even be worth all that work.
#8
C6 the C5 of tomorrow
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Physics for intake and exhaust (aharte)
A good set (the right size and length) of headers will make 100x more difference than a good intake.
assuming the intake is adequate and the rest of the exhaust is ok...
assuming the intake is adequate and the rest of the exhaust is ok...