C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LT1 engine option?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2003, 01:22 AM
  #1  
L98boy
Racer
Thread Starter
 
L98boy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Franklinville, NJ & Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 330
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default LT1 engine option?

Hello,

I have a question. In 1970 the LT1 engine option was a 350, came with a aluminum block, and aluminum heads right? If this is true why did GM go back to using cast iron blocks and heads in their 350 Corvette engines? It does not make any sense. Isn’t that going kind of backwards? Thank you for your time.

Shaun
Old 09-12-2003, 01:52 AM
  #2  
standup
Drifting
 
standup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: LT1 engine option? (L98boy)

.......don't think they came with alloy blocks/heads.......my understanding is the extra 70HP was made from 11:1 compression, solid lifter cam, maybe some fancy work to the heads.......I'm pretty sure everything was cast iron, which would explain why they didn't continue it.........
Old 09-12-2003, 03:05 AM
  #3  
FinnShark
Burning Brakes
 
FinnShark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal QC
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (L98boy)

At least the LT1 block was iron, but I'm not sure about the heads, my guess would be iron... But wasn't L-88 heads aluminium? And ZL-1 was all aluminium? I think that the main clue in here is the cost... At that time it was much more expensive to do those things from aluminium than from iron.
Old 09-12-2003, 04:19 AM
  #4  
duntovlives
Instructor
 
duntovlives's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Buffalo MO
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (L98boy)

as finnshark stated, im sure cost is a huge factor. no doubt that the 90 lbs (or so) in weight is an advantage. but i read tons about debates on the alum vs iron conflict. seems that some feel that the iron deals with the heat issue better.

in 70 LS5 was the bad boy option. 390hp. but prior to 70, when u could get an L-88 i think it was all iron. the L71 had 5 more hp and u could get it with aluminum head=L-89

i have also read that GM had trouble with porosity in the alum casting process

im going from memory here, which is cloudy at best on a good day :confused: - so, pls no one cuss me if i am way off base. but, i would really like to hear what others have to say on the alum vs iron issue :cheers: :confused:
Old 09-12-2003, 06:41 AM
  #5  
Gordonm
Race Director
 
Gordonm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Forked River NJ
Posts: 19,592
Received 754 Likes on 464 Posts

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (duntovlives)

No LT1 motors were aluminum heads or block. They were iron. The intake was alum. but that was it. I don't recall any small block leaving the factory with alum block or heads until the 86 vette had alum. heads.
Old 09-12-2003, 08:42 AM
  #6  
L98boy
Racer
Thread Starter
 
L98boy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Franklinville, NJ & Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 330
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (L98boy)

Thanks for the information guys. I really appreciate it!

Shaun
Old 09-12-2003, 01:14 PM
  #7  
Robert N
Melting Slicks
 
Robert N's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (Gordonm)

No LT1 motors were aluminum heads or block. They were iron. The intake was alum. but that was it. I don't recall any small block leaving the factory with alum block or heads until the 86 vette had alum. heads.
Correct. Irn block and heads, aluminum intake.
Old 09-12-2003, 01:23 PM
  #8  
stpman
Melting Slicks
 
stpman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: I may be getting old but I refuse to grow up
Posts: 2,865
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (Robert N)

No LT1 motors were aluminum heads or block. They were iron. The intake was alum. but that was it. I don't recall any small block leaving the factory with alum block or heads until the 86 vette had alum. heads.

Correct. Irn block and heads, aluminum intake.
:iagree:

A friend of my has the LT1 in a '73 Camaro Z28, iron block and heads

Steve :steering:
Old 09-12-2003, 02:11 PM
  #9  
jrzvette
Safety Car
 
jrzvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: The reason time exists is so everything doesn't happen at once
Posts: 4,971
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (duntovlives)


in 70 LS5 was the bad boy option. 390hp. but prior to 70, when u could get an L-88 i think it was all iron. the L71 had 5 more hp and u could get it with aluminum head=L-89

The L-88 and L-71 were both offered in 1967-1969. The L-89 was an aluminum head option for the L-71 only. The L-71 with either iron or aluminum heads was rated at 435 hp while the L-88 was quoted at 430. But it is generally acknowledged that the L-88 put out more like 550 to 600 hp. The lowere hp quote was an attempt to keep it out of the hands of the general public as it was a race engine, and GM figured that most hp junkies would opt for the higher rated L-71.
Old 09-12-2003, 02:24 PM
  #10  
Bob K
Melting Slicks<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/3k-4k.gif" border="0">
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Bob K's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Jamison Pa
Posts: 2,843
Received 233 Likes on 179 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11-'24


Default Re: LT1 engine option? (L98boy)

There was a all alum (block and heads) option avail in the early 70's. I beleive it was the ZL2 option.

Just like the L88 it was not meant for everyone. That's why the factory rated the L88's at 430 hp and the Big block with solid lifter and tripower at 435 hp. I drove a "REAL" L88 in 1973 (while I was working at Reedman's). It was the fastest car I have ever driven. Quite a bit faster that the 435 hp cars.

Bob K.

P.S. In the early 70's the Used car lot at Reedman's was neat because all the muscle cars were being traded in all the time. Only the Vette's and Jag's were kept locked.
Old 09-12-2003, 03:07 PM
  #11  
Gordonm
Race Director
 
Gordonm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Forked River NJ
Posts: 19,592
Received 754 Likes on 464 Posts

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (Bob K)

The only factory all aluminum was the 69 ZL1 motor. Only 2 were factory installed. The L88 was an aluminum head iron block 12.5 to 1 high lift solid cam monster. There was an L89 which was a 435 horse motor with aluminum heads. The L88 with headers dynoed around 560 to 580 HP. With a little tweaking they easily went over 600 HP. The early 70s motor was the ZR2 which was a racing package in 71. Only 12 produced. Aluminum heads and iron block but it was a 454 solid cam with 425 HP. Had all the ZR1 components but instead of the 350 LT1 it had a 454 high performance. The Ls6 could be had without the ZR2 package and I think about 188 of these were made.


[Modified by Gordonm, 3:10 PM 9/12/2003]


[Modified by Gordonm, 3:23 PM 9/12/2003]
Old 09-12-2003, 11:18 PM
  #12  
A C
Le Mans Master
 
A C's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Bloomington MN
Posts: 6,493
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default Re: LT1 engine option? (Gordonm)

:iagree: Right on. No all aluminum small blocks were put into Corvettes until the LT1.

Get notified of new replies

To LT1 engine option?




Quick Reply: LT1 engine option?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM.