C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Horse Power Question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2003, 07:36 AM
  #1  
Steve Adkins
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Steve Adkins's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2002
Location: Dandridge TN
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Horse Power Question?

Back in 1969, did they measure HP at the rear wheels or fly wheel?
Old 02-17-2003, 07:41 AM
  #2  
Ganey
Race Director
 
Ganey's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. TEXAS
Posts: 11,520
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default Re: Horse Power Question? (Steve Adkins)

Flywheel w/ optimum setup.
Old 02-17-2003, 08:49 AM
  #3  
Steve Adkins
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Steve Adkins's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2002
Location: Dandridge TN
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Horse Power Question? (Ganey)

Flywheel w/ optimum setup.
How much loss can you figure by the time it gets to the rear wheels?
Old 02-17-2003, 09:33 AM
  #4  
1Bad69
Safety Car
 
1Bad69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: Maple
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Horse Power Question? (Steve Adkins)

I think you are looking at 15-20% depending on if it's stick or auto ...
Old 02-17-2003, 10:27 AM
  #5  
TTop Tony
Drifting
 
TTop Tony's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Mt Juliet TN
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Horse Power Question? (1bad69)

I'd be willing to bet its more then 15 to 20%. From what I've been told they had no accessories hooked up when they did the tests back then. A modern car has a 15 to 20% loss but they have the accessories hooked up when they measure them at the crank.
Old 02-17-2003, 10:30 AM
  #6  
BB wowbagger
Melting Slicks
 
BB wowbagger's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Sodertalje/Sweden
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Horse Power Question? (TTop Tony)

I'd be willing to bet its more then 15 to 20%. From what I've been told they had no accessories hooked up when they did the tests back then. A modern car has a 15 to 20% loss but they have the accessories hooked up when they measure them at the crank.
:withstupid: ....I belive thats the differens between SAE and DIN standards..When did they start to measure the engines with accesories :confused: :cheers:
Old 02-17-2003, 10:33 AM
  #7  
TTop Tony
Drifting
 
TTop Tony's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Mt Juliet TN
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Horse Power Question? (BB wowbagger)

It seems like someone told my they started in 71 or 72. From what I remember the LT1 went from 370 hp to 320 (or was it 320 to 270) from one year to another without a change in the engine. Just a change in the way they measure it.
Old 02-17-2003, 10:44 AM
  #8  
Steve Adkins
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Steve Adkins's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2002
Location: Dandridge TN
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Horse Power Question? (TTop Tony)

So a stock 69 350/350 with a 15% loss whould only have about 298 at the rear wheels?
Old 02-17-2003, 10:47 AM
  #9  
TTop Tony
Drifting
 
TTop Tony's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Mt Juliet TN
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Horse Power Question? (Steve Adkins)

If I had to guess I'd say more like 250 at the rear wheels. but thats an uneducated guess.
Old 02-17-2003, 10:54 AM
  #10  
Ganey
Race Director
 
Ganey's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. TEXAS
Posts: 11,520
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default Re: Horse Power Question? (Steve Adkins)

No way sto*k.

Gross to net ratings in 72.
71 LT-1 330 Gross 72 255 NET

Another ex. you may not be able to find! Have posted before.
425 Gross 325 Net

:cool:
Old 02-17-2003, 11:02 AM
  #11  
Metal Wulf
Race Director
 
Metal Wulf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Galloway NJ
Posts: 11,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Horse Power Question? (Ganey)

I've always head that you take off 17% for the accessories, then another 15-20% for drivetrain loss.

so a 350/350 would be around 233-245 rwhp

:cheers:
Old 02-17-2003, 11:39 AM
  #12  
sammyb
Burning Brakes
 
sammyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Horse Power Question? (Steve Adkins)

Yes, in 1972, there was a change Gross vs. Net. In addition, in 1972 GM lowered the compression ratio of all of its vehicles to run on lower octane fuel.

For instance, a 1969 427/435hp car was only 435 horsepower running on an engine dyno pulling absolutely nothing except the crank, cam, rods, rockers and pistons. In 1972, they lowered the compression then rated the engines while pulling the alternator, pumps etc. In addition, the horsepower ratings were slightly lowered on some cars to lower the cost of insurance. While I can't say I've ever seen a stock '72 on a dyno, there's a chance that some of the higher horsepower option cars were slightly underrated.

On modern C5s, where stock horsepower rating has been 350 for many years, the average stock dyno pull usually falls between 295-310 rear-wheel horsepower. 6 speed cars tend to pull higher numbers than the power-sapping automatic.

Sam

Get notified of new replies

To Horse Power Question?




Quick Reply: Horse Power Question?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.