Rear differential crossmember?
#1
Pro
Thread Starter
Rear differential crossmember?
Does it matter which way this goes back on? is there a front and back? looks like it doesn't matter. I am about to drill holes in the crossmember for the duel VPB mono spring brackets.
#2
Melting Slicks
Re: Rear differential crossmember? (mpro72vette)
I dont think it matters..Could be wrong though,but i removed mine and didnt check wich way it sat before i removed it. :smash: :smash: :cheers:
#3
Safety Car
Re: Rear differential crossmember? (BB wowbagger)
I think there is a front and back. I may be wrong but isnt one side flat and the other, slighty angled?
#5
Melting Slicks
Re: Rear differential crossmember? (Twin_Turbo)
The crossmember is symmetrical.
#7
Le Mans Master
Re: Rear differential crossmember? (Twin_Turbo)
I don't remember, but check the differential holes to be sure they're equal distance from each other ;) .
#8
Safety Car
Re: Rear differential crossmember? (Twin_Turbo)
By the looks of that particular photo, it appears that the holes for mounting the dif are drilled slightly off center. If so then there is a specific direction for the crossmember to frame. It could be a misleading photo but I see the holes off center.
#9
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
St. Jude Contributor '03 & '04
Re: Rear differential crossmember? (Jvette73)
I have two - a C2 and a C3. The dif mounting holes are symetrical, both front to back, and side to side. All you have to worry about is getting the rubbers up and dif mounting holes down. ;)
I bought the C3 thinking it would go in my C2. But I just noticed that the C3 is virtually straight accross, while the C2 dips in the center. Thus the C3 dif mounts about 1 1/4" higher relative to the frame than the C2. Has anybody else noticed this?
I bought the C3 thinking it would go in my C2. But I just noticed that the C3 is virtually straight accross, while the C2 dips in the center. Thus the C3 dif mounts about 1 1/4" higher relative to the frame than the C2. Has anybody else noticed this?