Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

[Z06] My cost per RWHP...$75.00 for H/C/I/LT's +107 rwhp gain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2008, 06:55 PM
  #1  
jpandes
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
jpandes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Redwood City CA
Posts: 1,947
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default My cost per RWHP...$76.00 for H/C/I/LT's +107 rwhp gain

I just got my car back from Newtech Performance (I NO LONGER USE THIS SHOP) for my latest batch of mods. Nick & Josh just installed some AFR's & FAST 90/90 on my car. I think I am done with modding my car for a while...I just thought I'd share my cost breakdown with you guys. I was able to pick-up most of my go fast parts used off the forum and/or craigslist. All the installation & tuning was done by Nick @ Newtech Performance(I highly recommend these guys!)

Anywhoo, here's the breakdown...

I don't have a base line dyno so I have assumed that my stock 2003 Z06's RWHP /FT.LBS = 344 rwhp (405BHP / .85=344) / 340 ft.lbs (400/.85=340)

  • Vararam ($275)
  • American Racing 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers w/ catted x-pipe ($1,000)
  • 170 Degree Thermostat
  • Installation & Tune, plugs & wires, plus misc gaskets etc.
    • Cost parts & installation= $2,200
      • Dyno'd 388 rwhp / 378 ft.lbs
      • Gains 44 rwhp / 38 ft.lbs
        • Cost per rwhp $50
  • Cam 228/232 115LSA - emissions sniffer legal
  • Underdrive Pulley
  • High-Volume Oil pump
  • Injectors
  • LS2 Timing Chain
  • Installation & Tune, plus misc gaskets etc
    • Cost parts & installation $2,300
      • Dyno'd 429 rwhp / 394 ft.lbs
      • Gains 41 rwhp / 16 ft.lbs
        • Cost per rwhp $56

  • AFR 205 Heads ($1,875 for the Heads, FAST 90/90, breather & Catch can)
  • FAST 90mm
  • Throttle Body 90mm
  • Hi-perf. Lifters
  • Installation, porting/paint of the FAST & Tune, plus misc gaskets etc
    • Cost parts & installation $3,600
      • Dyno'd 451 rwhp / 405 ft.lbs
      • Gains 22 rwhp / 11 ft.lbs
        • Cost per rwhp = $164
I was hoping for bigger gains, but my choice to have an emissions legal cam may have hurt my peak power gains...That was dumb. They always say, when choosing a cam, go one step bigger.

My stock LS6 clutch was slipping on the dyno due to the added rwhp. I wonder if my dyno numbers will be a little higher with my new LS7 clutch.
Average cost per rwhp gained = $76 [$8,100 (total cost for performance mods/install) / 107 (gained rwhp) = $76 per rwhp]

Last edited by jpandes; 05-01-2014 at 12:44 PM.
Old 10-02-2008, 07:01 PM
  #2  
enigma94
Racer
 
enigma94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That 8 grand is a scary number when you lay it out there like that! Im sure it could be cut down considerably if the work was done yourself though
Old 10-02-2008, 07:17 PM
  #3  
jpandes
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
jpandes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Redwood City CA
Posts: 1,947
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by enigma94
That 8 grand is a scary number when you lay it out there like that! Im sure it could be cut down considerably if the work was done yourself though
I could have saved a lot. But I have opted to leave it to a professional this time. On my last car, 93 rx7tt, I did almost all of the work and street tuning myself. That was fun, but paying a professional is faster & much less frustrating for me

I also saved some serious cash by buying my heads, vararam, LT's & FAST 90/90 used.

Last edited by jpandes; 10-03-2008 at 03:01 AM.
Old 10-02-2008, 07:39 PM
  #4  
enigma94
Racer
 
enigma94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jpandes
I could have saved a lot. But I have opted to leave it to a professional this time. On my last car, 93 rx7tt, I did almost all of the work and street tuning myself. That was fun, but paying a professional is faster much less frustrating for me
I dont blame you in going the professional route after a TT rx7, those things can be a nightmare! You should calculate how much the labor was for each power addition to see how much labor per HP it cost
Old 10-02-2008, 08:02 PM
  #5  
1slo6
Pro
 
1slo6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: West Covina CA
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

put a set of gears in it with a good sticky tire and no one will touch u.....
Old 10-02-2008, 08:13 PM
  #6  
VIPERBLUELX
Drifting
 
VIPERBLUELX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Ringgold GA
Posts: 1,650
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

You only gained 22rwhp swapping from 243's to AFR's AND a FAST? Wow.
Old 10-02-2008, 09:13 PM
  #7  
Quick Silver Z
Team Owner

 
Quick Silver Z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Right Corner Pocket of Illinois
Posts: 32,329
Received 1,506 Likes on 1,014 Posts
No-IL Events Coordinator
2020 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C6 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
2018 C6 of Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

Thanks for that breakdown John, very interesting!
Old 10-02-2008, 10:32 PM
  #8  
Ryan L
Melting Slicks
 
Ryan L's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Jax Florida
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by VIPERBLUELX
You only gained 22rwhp swapping from 243's to AFR's AND a FAST? Wow.
In that case, I am keeping my stock heads and intake forever.

By the way jpandes, most Corvettes only lose about 13% through the driveline, so use 405 / .87 if anything.
Old 10-03-2008, 02:58 AM
  #9  
jpandes
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
jpandes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Redwood City CA
Posts: 1,947
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryan L
In that case, I am keeping my stock heads and intake forever.
Yeah, keep your LS6 Heads/Intake Manifold.
Had I known that I would only gain 20+ rwhp "under the curve" as well as peak rwhp, I wouldn't spent the cash on the AFR 205's and the FAST 90/90. I was hoping for more "oompf" under the curve

Originally Posted by VIPERBLUELX
You only gained 22rwhp swapping from 243's to AFR's AND a FAST? Wow.
Sucks, huh?

Originally Posted by enigma94

I dont blame you in going the professional route after a TT rx7, those things can be a nightmare! You should calculate how much the labor was for each power addition to see how much labor per HP it cost
I had three motors in ten years with that car and I was always working on it. That car was a blast to drive...when it ran.
Old 10-03-2008, 03:53 AM
  #10  
QUIKSILVERZ
Burning Brakes
 
QUIKSILVERZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow makes FI look like a better option. I really thought you would make more power. I had the same thing happen with my 00 lightning. Whipple s/c and supporting mods and it made 450hp/500tq at the wheels with a safe tune. Given i told the tuner i wanted a very safe tune but still i had hoped for more power. Oh well man if you ever add a 400+ci short block you have all the supporting mods.
Old 10-03-2008, 12:23 PM
  #11  
whatsgrip?
Pro
 
whatsgrip?'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Perris SoCal
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your Cam 228/232 115LSA is emmision legal in Cali? Coooool
Old 10-03-2008, 12:45 PM
  #12  
marvinseah
Instructor
 
marvinseah's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Castro Valley California
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I had the same situation happen to me. Cam only I made 440/399. Tfs "as cast", fast 92/ls2 t/b I made 461/410 so I know how you feel. Would of saved my money for bigger cube motor instead of trying to make big power with a 346 if I was going to do it all over. I, too have an rx7 FD. After 2 blown motors I decided to put an ls6 in it. Cam only I made 418/373 and what a blast it is to drive. I also had newtech do all the work to my cars.
Old 10-03-2008, 12:59 PM
  #13  
jpandes
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
jpandes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Redwood City CA
Posts: 1,947
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by marvinseah
I had the same situation happen to me. Cam only I made 440/399. Tfs "as cast", fast 92/ls2 t/b I made 461/410 so I know how you feel. Would of saved my money for bigger cube motor instead of trying to make big power with a 346 if I was going to do it all over. I, too have an rx7 FD. After 2 blown motors I decided to put an ls6 in it. Cam only I made 418/373 and what a blast it is to drive. I also had newtech do all the work to my cars.
I'm glad that it's not just me. I'd love to have an LS6 in an RX7! I originally called Nick about doing the conversion three years ago. I ended up going with the Z06 because I needed a reliable DD and couldn't be without a car while I was out sourcing all the parts for the conversion. I sold my RX7 shell to Mark(GNRX7) and he was dropping a built-LS7 into it....
Old 10-03-2008, 01:08 PM
  #14  
marvinseah
Instructor
 
marvinseah's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Castro Valley California
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I had read that you were planning on installing an ls7 clutch setup on your car. I run this setup and although it's been flawless for 22,000 miles so far it does add about 9 lbs. compared to your stock clutch so you will lose a few hp. I am currently running an ls7 clutch with a fidanza flywheel on my rx7. So far it feels really good not to mention I lost about 7 lbs. from the stock ls1 clutch. The lighter clutch setup makes the car "feel" lighter as well instead of sluggish. Just wanted to share my experience with that clutch.
Old 10-03-2008, 01:14 PM
  #15  
jpandes
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
jpandes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Redwood City CA
Posts: 1,947
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by marvinseah
I had read that you were planning on installing an ls7 clutch setup on your car. I run this setup and although it's been flawless for 22,000 miles so far it does add about 9 lbs. compared to your stock clutch so you will lose a few hp. I am currently running an ls7 clutch with a fidanza flywheel on my rx7. So far it feels really good not to mention I lost about 7 lbs. from the stock ls1 clutch. The lighter clutch setup makes the car "feel" lighter as well instead of sluggish. Just wanted to share my experience with that clutch.
Thanks! Nick also mentioned that I should ditch the LS7 F/W and go with the Fidanza flywheel. I'll do that. I had a lightened F/W on my Rx7 and liked how quick it revved up and down.
Old 10-03-2008, 01:27 PM
  #16  
VetteHunting
Safety Car
 
VetteHunting's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: We cant stop here... this is bat country
Posts: 4,813
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The 20whp gain from heads and fast really blows my mind. Doesn't seem right.
Old 10-03-2008, 01:34 PM
  #17  
ZEEEEOOOOSIC
Drifting
 
ZEEEEOOOOSIC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seems like the baseline dyno is low what kind of dyno was it on ?

Get notified of new replies

To My cost per RWHP...$75.00 for H/C/I/LT's +107 rwhp gain

Old 10-03-2008, 01:47 PM
  #18  
0Tony Mamo @ AFR
Former Vendor
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Valencia CA
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The gains from the heads and intake is waaaay off.

What condition were the heads in (you mentioned used obviously).....who ported the intake?

The heads alone should have been at least what you mentioned and the intake should have doubled that if it was ported properly.

I know of a few "ported" intakes that make alot less than out of the box versions (not kidding). Something was up with the heads, intake, or both to only see the gains you quoted.

Obviously there is a huge amount of previous supporting data to prove the gains you saw wasnt very typical....I have a hunch some of it stems from the fact the heads were used (unqualified) and we dont know who was weilding the grinder on the FAST. The cam you have is plenty big enough to allow both of those mods to work effectively. Hell my first combination with our 205's and the FAST intake only had a 224 cam and put up huge numbers in an optimized well thought out package.

Call me and fill me in on some of the details.....maybe I might be of some assistance concerning your power results or at least shed some light on why they might be lower than expected.

I would throw an LS6 intake on their just for grins and see what happens....if you make the same or more power you know you got a bad intake....if you make alot less power the problem may be in the heads (slightly bent valves....someone tried to "make them better" and hurt the flow....who knows). At least the intake swap which is pretty straightforward will give you some direction.

(661)257-8124 Ext. 109

Thanks,
Tony

Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; 10-03-2008 at 01:51 PM.
Old 10-03-2008, 02:35 PM
  #19  
jpandes
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
jpandes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Redwood City CA
Posts: 1,947
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
The gains from the heads and intake is waaaay off.

What condition were the heads in (you mentioned used obviously).....who ported the intake?

The heads alone should have been at least what you mentioned and the intake should have doubled that if it was ported properly.

I know of a few "ported" intakes that make alot less than out of the box versions (not kidding). Something was up with the heads, intake, or both to only see the gains you quoted.

Obviously there is a huge amount of previous supporting data to prove the gains you saw wasnt very typical....I have a hunch some of it stems from the fact the heads were used (unqualified) and we dont know who was weilding the grinder on the FAST. The cam you have is plenty big enough to allow both of those mods to work effectively. Hell my first combination with our 205's and the FAST intake only had a 224 cam and put up huge numbers in an optimized well thought out package.

Call me and fill me in on some of the details.....maybe I might be of some assistance concerning your power results or at least shed some light on why they might be lower than expected.

I would throw an LS6 intake on their just for grins and see what happens....if you make the same or more power you know you got a bad intake....if you make alot less power the problem may be in the heads (slightly bent valves....someone tried to "make them better" and hurt the flow....who knows). At least the intake swap which is pretty straightforward will give you some direction.

(661)257-8124 Ext. 109

Thanks,
Tony
Thanks Tony. I just left a voicemail.

John
415-609-2341
Old 10-03-2008, 02:38 PM
  #20  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

I really liked the way you did your mods sequentially, and broke down the results step-by-step. I wish I'd done the same thing, just for getting all the data. I wouldn't be disappointed with your numbers, they're not out of line with MOST of the H/C AFR combos, some with, some w/o FAST. Dynos/operators lie, especially if there's expectations/$$ involved. I bought some stuff used when I did my mods, too. I did splurge on my heads, though, and got all new at the time TFS heads, custom massaged by TEA, for $2400. Mine has recorded 477/432,(SAE corrected) and several variations as low as 432/400 (Mustang dyno-slipping clutch), so you can see numbers don't tell the whole story. Enjoy you new found tire shredding ability.


Quick Reply: [Z06] My cost per RWHP...$75.00 for H/C/I/LT's +107 rwhp gain



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 AM.