Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY
12-12-2001, 12:58 AM
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(apology for) Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY
Never Mind for i have been misled to think that there can be such thing as an ugly vette. I apologize for dissin out the late c3s. ThanK you and have a good day!!:)
[Modified by garagedweller2, 5:54 AM 12/12/2001]
[Modified by garagedweller2, 5:54 AM 12/12/2001]
12-12-2001, 01:01 AM
#2
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Westfield Indiana
Posts: 6,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (garagedweller2)
Kiss my plastic bumpered rear!!! Personally, I like all C3's (and all other vettes). There really is no need to get personal on this forum. Since you're new, I might let it slide but you need to have some respect for the rest of us.
12-12-2001, 01:01 AM
#4
Burning Brakes
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (garagedweller2)
Don't take this the wrong way bro, but that sure isn't the way to make friends in the Forum.
Except for maybe the Big Block chrome-bumper C3 guys like myself.
To each his own!
Except for maybe the Big Block chrome-bumper C3 guys like myself.
To each his own!
12-12-2001, 01:06 AM
#5
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs CO
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (ddn)
what do u expect from someone from brooklyn??? poetic eloquence???
no!
:lol: :lol: :lol:
hes prolly a rice boy with a big 12 inch clock around his neck.
"yo man dat be phhhhaaaatt"
daayyyummm!
:lol: :lol:
:blueangel: :blueangel:
no!
:lol: :lol: :lol:
hes prolly a rice boy with a big 12 inch clock around his neck.
"yo man dat be phhhhaaaatt"
daayyyummm!
:lol: :lol:
:blueangel: :blueangel:
12-12-2001, 01:09 AM
#8
Race Director
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (garagedweller2)
It's all good... how many chrome bumpers do you see on today's sports cars? ...today's luxury cars? ...today's trucks? :)
-Steve
-Steve
12-12-2001, 01:19 AM
#10
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (garagedweller2)
first of all i destroy rice. easily done, surrounded by 'em. impossible not to hear the loud farts.
Accept my apology about C3s.
Then again who cares about how the car looks like when you blow em away.
now a question.
What is the rating for the stock engine (78)
MIght get one(they 're cheap to start off with)
:(
Accept my apology about C3s.
Then again who cares about how the car looks like when you blow em away.
now a question.
What is the rating for the stock engine (78)
MIght get one(they 're cheap to start off with)
:(
12-12-2001, 01:19 AM
#11
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Reston VA
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (garagedweller2)
This C3 forum is for ALL C3 lovers. Chrome bumper, plastic bumper, Big Block, Small Block, Vert, T-Top. The works. You should learn to appreciate them all cause it just may be a plastic bumper man that saves your hide when you need a post to a problem you are having with your ride. Or you could just remain a pompus a** with an attitude and never really understand what the whole Vette experience is about anyway. Friendship, fun, sport, hobbie, fellowship and an endearing lover for Americas greatest sports car " In all configurations and Years" Everyone is entitled to an opinion and a preference in vettes but to slam one year or style is missing the boat entirely. :bs
12-12-2001, 01:27 AM
#15
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Westfield Indiana
Posts: 6,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (garagedweller2)
Since I said I might let it slide, I'll go ahead and answer your question.
L-82 was 220HP, L-48 was 190 (I think). L-82 was also a 4 bolt main with forged crank. L-48 was 2 bolt with cast (again, not positive).
[Modified by sharklover, 11:36 PM 12/11/2001]
L-82 was 220HP, L-48 was 190 (I think). L-82 was also a 4 bolt main with forged crank. L-48 was 2 bolt with cast (again, not positive).
[Modified by sharklover, 11:36 PM 12/11/2001]
12-12-2001, 01:27 AM
#16
Team Owner
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Riverview FL
Posts: 36,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cruise-In I Veteran
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (garagedweller2)
Early Big Blocks were beauties. Late c3 models with the new rear end are ugly!!!!(stutters) :cuss
12-12-2001, 01:30 AM
#17
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Westfield Indiana
Posts: 6,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (garagedweller2)
I AM EXTREMELY SORRY TO U PLASTIC BUMPERED OWNERS!!! ENOUGH HATE MAIL. :confused:
[Modified by sharklover, 11:36 PM 12/11/2001]
12-12-2001, 01:32 AM
#18
Safety Car
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (SRitger)
Can we see a pic of your car? Or is that NOT POSSIBLE. :mad
:troll :troll :troll
Just to prove a point, you are getting alot of static from guys WITH chrome bumper sharks, instead of us agreeing with you. What does that tell you.
[Modified by 71,454,4spd, 11:35 PM 12/11/2001]
:troll :troll :troll
Just to prove a point, you are getting alot of static from guys WITH chrome bumper sharks, instead of us agreeing with you. What does that tell you.
[Modified by 71,454,4spd, 11:35 PM 12/11/2001]
12-12-2001, 01:33 AM
#20
Team Owner
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Various places in California. Not currently aflame.
Posts: 20,504
Received 631 Likes
on
389 Posts
Re: Plastic Bumpered C3's are UGLY (sharklover)
Since I said I might let it slide, I'll go ahead and answer your question.
L-82 was 220HP, L-48 was 190 (I think). L-82 was also a 4 bolt main with forged crank. L-48 was 2 bolt with cast (again, not positive).
L-82 was 220HP, L-48 was 190 (I think). L-82 was also a 4 bolt main with forged crank. L-48 was 2 bolt with cast (again, not positive).