safe rpm
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Eldridge Iowa
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
safe rpm
What is a safe RPM limit for a stock ls1 short block that has good heads, 238/640 cam, headers and some other stuff, plus a built automatic. 6200? 6500?
Thanks, Dave
Thanks, Dave
#5
Race Director
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 16,477
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
15 Posts
CI 6-7-8-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '03
My stock bottom end 2001 sees 7000 rpm often. Not been a problem yet.
I'm not guaranteeing a failure can't happen at or below that point, just sharing my experience.
#6
Race Director
I set my rev limited on the conservative side in my 460RWHP stock bottom end 346 build. 6600 RPM. No sense tempting fate.
On my forged 403 build I still leave it low at 6800RPM.
With 3.90's my shifts still leave me in the power band.
My $.02
Kevin
On my forged 403 build I still leave it low at 6800RPM.
With 3.90's my shifts still leave me in the power band.
My $.02
Kevin
#7
Safety Car
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
St. Jude Donor '08
Based on your profile you have a pre-2001 vette and one of the known issues with them are weak rod bolts. I would not venture to much past the stock rev limit unless you upgrade the rod bolts.
FYI - Katech makes a replacement rod bolt that is a simple swap out.
FYI - Katech makes a replacement rod bolt that is a simple swap out.
#10
Drifting
#11
Premium Supporting Vendor
Wow, you guys rev your cars to the moon! SAfe for an extended period of time, nowhere near 7k. I personally don't like going over 6600 max if you want long term safety, and on my own cars I don't go past 6400
Last edited by SDPC; 04-09-2008 at 12:31 PM.
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes
on
24 Posts
Umm I did mention 6500 UNLESS there are light wt sodium filled valves and better springs.
Now that said, GM did RPM tests a few times, a 1999 LS1 did 100 continuous hours at 6500 rpms with NO problems and the 2001 LS6 at 6900 rpms for 100 continuous hours with no problems
Now that said, GM did RPM tests a few times, a 1999 LS1 did 100 continuous hours at 6500 rpms with NO problems and the 2001 LS6 at 6900 rpms for 100 continuous hours with no problems
#13
Drifting
Umm I did mention 6500 UNLESS there are light wt sodium filled valves and better springs.
Now that said, GM did RPM tests a few times, a 1999 LS1 did 100 continuous hours at 6500 rpms with NO problems and the 2001 LS6 at 6900 rpms for 100 continuous hours with no problems
Now that said, GM did RPM tests a few times, a 1999 LS1 did 100 continuous hours at 6500 rpms with NO problems and the 2001 LS6 at 6900 rpms for 100 continuous hours with no problems
#14
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Goldsboro NC
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you crazy? stock ls6 redline is 6600....6200 is stock ls1....upgraded springs and cam....easy 6800 on 97-00's....7000 on 01 up due to the upgraded bolts...you guys worry too much...your only at 6800 for like 3 seconds anyways
#15
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Goldsboro NC
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
btw if you dont want to spin high...pick a different cam because that one will peak 6500ish and you want your redline a few hundred rpms above peak power