C5 Forced Induction/Nitrous C5 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Centrifugal, Twin Screw & Roots Blowers, Twin Turbo Kits, Intercoolers, Wet & Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Boosted PCV gurus step in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2007, 03:29 PM
  #1  
0Jeff @ TPE
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Jeff @ TPE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 10,876
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06 & '12
Default Boosted PCV gurus step in

Here is a layout of the PCV system I designed..

It is set up so that I am able to run and maintain a PCV system, but in the event of excess CC pressure, it blows it off. When the system comes back to a vacuum situation, that BOV closes and stabalizes the CC pressure. (Its actually just a one way zero cracking pressure valve)

The vacuum regultaor is in place so that under extreme vacuum conditions (HEAVY deceleration) the regulator would open and reduce CC vacuum. In turn, this will stop the intake from ingesting oil..

This is on a positive displacement blower that has a MAFLESS SD tune..

Suggestions??


Last edited by Jeff @ TPE; 08-14-2007 at 03:31 PM.
Jeff @ TPE is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 03:41 PM
  #2  
Warp Factor
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Warp Factor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
Posts: 7,078
Received 1,817 Likes on 1,085 Posts

Default

Where does fresh air enter the crankcase, or is the object to maintain a vacuum?
Warp Factor is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 04:54 PM
  #3  
IM QUIKR
Melting Slicks
 
IM QUIKR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I'd reverse it so that the krank vent is on only the front pass. valve cover and the rears connect to the intake. This would balance the vacuum better and be more efficient at clearing the crankcase. If you need two lines to the Krank vent then the motor is probably toast anyway. That's a whole lot of blow-by.

If you don't need actual vacuum in the crankcase then you could eliminate the Krank Vent altogether and use it as a fresh air port.
IM QUIKR is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 07:21 PM
  #4  
0Jeff @ TPE
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Jeff @ TPE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 10,876
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06 & '12
Default

The motors brand new, so its defiantely not toast.
I didnt really think of swapping it around. I guess thats a option. This isnt difinative. We will be testing it out before its 100% final. If we find that it needs to be tweaked, then we will do so..

So what do you think of the overall design??

I mean, hell, normally boosted guys dont run PCV's all together. So ANYTHING is better than nothing right??
Originally Posted by IM QUIKR
I'd reverse it so that the krank vent is on only the front pass. valve cover and the rears connect to the intake. This would balance the vacuum better and be more efficient at clearing the crankcase. If you need two lines to the Krank vent then the motor is probably toast anyway. That's a whole lot of blow-by.

If you don't need actual vacuum in the crankcase then you could eliminate the Krank Vent altogether and use it as a fresh air port.
Jeff @ TPE is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 07:58 PM
  #5  
IM QUIKR
Melting Slicks
 
IM QUIKR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AMERICAN_HP
The motors brand new, so its defiantely not toast.
I didnt really think of swapping it around. I guess thats a option. This isnt difinative. We will be testing it out before its 100% final. If we find that it needs to be tweaked, then we will do so..

So what do you think of the overall design??

I mean, hell, normally boosted guys dont run PCV's all together. So ANYTHING is better than nothing right??
Jeff,

The design is sound. Just to be clear though, the PCV is actually a check valve and not the stock PCV valve. correct? If not you need a real check valve like the McMaster Carr unit. It costs about $10 but it has the Viton seal and low crack pressure of 0.3#s. The stock unit can't hold back boost and you'd be well advised to disconnect it until you have something as strong as the Krank Vent but no need to dump that much cash for a simple check valve unless you need BLING.


IQ
IM QUIKR is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 08:27 PM
  #6  
NemesisC5
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
NemesisC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes on 241 Posts

Default

NemesisC5 is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 08:57 PM
  #7  
Tony @ MPH
Supporting Vendor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Tony @ MPH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2003
Location: http://www.mphparts.com 800-364-1975
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

After much thinking and deliberating on the advantages of crankcase vacuum vs. the disadvantage of swallowing crankcase gasses/oil, I came to the conclusion that for any high power car, elimination of the PCV is the best overall solution, with a remote mount breather to prevent the engine bay from getting oily.

Not trying to poo-poo your design or plans, but no matter what, if you have a PCV -- you're going to suck oil into that intake, and it will degrade your octane.
Tony @ MPH is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 09:03 PM
  #8  
NICK YOSKIN
Le Mans Master
 
NICK YOSKIN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 8,849
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

Originally Posted by diynoob
After much thinking and deliberating on the advantages of crankcase vacuum vs. the disadvantage of swallowing crankcase gasses/oil, I came to the conclusion that for any high power car, elimination of the PCV is the best overall solution, with a remote mount breather to prevent the engine bay from getting oily.

Not trying to poo-poo your design or plans, but no matter what, if you have a PCV -- you're going to suck oil into that intake, and it will degrade your octane.
yeah tony??? what'cha think i did with ya buddie...

see them hiding behind the fog lights?[IMG][/IMG]
NICK YOSKIN is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 09:58 PM
  #9  
RED99
Safety Car
 
RED99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Nick, do you think you can get a bigger picture?

Has anyone tried running just a pair of Krank Vents (One on each side), with no breather, and no PCV, with a sealed motor? The Kank Vent would blow out positive pressure, and keep any negative pressure.
RED99 is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:11 PM
  #10  
Hool97
Burning Brakes
 
Hool97's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: over the water Cali
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My system is identical to yours But i use see through fuel filters(cheap autoparts store stuff) in the two lines. I have vaccum in the crank when I shut down( you can hear a hissing sound from the dipstick). When pressure builds a use the McMaster check valves to make sure pressure is released. My intake is dry after 1000s miles. My catch cans have a little watery/oil in them at times and I can monitor the amount of oil through the system with the filters.

I don't know how it works with >14lbs of boost though.
Hool97 is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:37 PM
  #11  
0Jeff @ TPE
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Jeff @ TPE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 10,876
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06 & '12
Default

I would normally agree with you Tony.

But in my situation, since I am running a KB blower, my intake track isnt pressurized. So my PCV system will ALWAYS be under vacuum. Although I know thats kinda what your talking about, but it will only be a very low vacuum. Not enough to create a problem wil oil contamination.

The port that is running to the intake tube is routed through a catch can. If for some reason I sense that there is vapor passing through the AMW catch can, then I will run a vapor seperator in line.

The main functioning part of the system is off the back of the motor. In the event of excess pressure, the valve will open and blow off to the atmosphere.

IM QUIKR, Your right..After I made this picture, I found a 3/8's barbed check valve that would work perfectly. Again, being that this valve will see less than 1-2psi of pressure, all it really needs to do is seal when the PCV is pulling vacuum. Even then, it will be less than 15".

In a nutshell, this setup will allow me to have a functioning PCV system during normal driving conditions, yet allow me to boost as high as I need without pressurizing my crankcase..
Originally Posted by diynoob
After much thinking and deliberating on the advantages of crankcase vacuum vs. the disadvantage of swallowing crankcase gasses/oil, I came to the conclusion that for any high power car, elimination of the PCV is the best overall solution, with a remote mount breather to prevent the engine bay from getting oily.

Not trying to poo-poo your design or plans, but no matter what, if you have a PCV -- you're going to suck oil into that intake, and it will degrade your octane.

Last edited by Jeff @ TPE; 08-14-2007 at 10:40 PM.
Jeff @ TPE is offline  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:51 PM
  #12  
Tony @ MPH
Supporting Vendor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Tony @ MPH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2003
Location: http://www.mphparts.com 800-364-1975
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AMERICAN_HP
I would normally agree with you Tony.

But in my situation, since I am running a KB blower, my intake track isnt pressurized. So my PCV system will ALWAYS be under vacuum. Although I know thats kinda what your talking about, but it will only be a very low vacuum. Not enough to create a problem wil oil contamination.
I'll admit I don't know anything about the ins and outs of the KB, but it's not crankcase pressure created by a pressurized intake tract that creates the situation I am talking about.

Every motor will always have oily gas in the crankcase and any crankcase ventilation system that creates vacuum on the crankcase through the intake will always suck oil vapor into the intake. That's all I'm saying. Even completely stock C5s end up with oily intakes because of this reason. On stock cars it doesn't necessarily present an issue but on a heavily modified one that will be running a lot of boost and timing, oil in your intake could be meaningful.

JMHO.
Tony @ MPH is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 02:55 AM
  #13  
0Jeff @ TPE
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Jeff @ TPE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 10,876
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06 & '12
Default

I completely understand what your saying.
From my understanding, (and I could be wrong) one of the main reasons most guys who have F/I, eliminate their PCV system due to the fact that the boost creates considerably more blow by. Add the fact that the intake is pressurized, and you get a situation where you need to either risk blowing the dipstick through the hood, OR vent it to atmosphere..

With my car, since my intake isnt pressurized, I can still have some of the benifits of the PCV. I PERSONALLY feel that the benifits of a sealed PCV system outweigh the possible problems. As long as you take the necessary precautions to eliminate the oil in the intake (ie..catch can, vapor filter) you shouldnt have a problem.

Hopefully, being that I will not only be blowing excess boost to atmosphere (just like everyone else) but will also be PULLING the gasses out of the crankcase under vacuum, it will have the best of both worlds.

Because frankly, I am sick of how dirty the engine bay gets by venting to atmosphere.

In a perfect world, I would prefer to run a vacuum pump. But unfortunatly, I havent found a setup that works with an 8 rib pulley system.
Originally Posted by diynoob
I'll admit I don't know anything about the ins and outs of the KB, but it's not crankcase pressure created by a pressurized intake tract that creates the situation I am talking about.

Every motor will always have oily gas in the crankcase and any crankcase ventilation system that creates vacuum on the crankcase through the intake will always suck oil vapor into the intake. That's all I'm saying. Even completely stock C5s end up with oily intakes because of this reason. On stock cars it doesn't necessarily present an issue but on a heavily modified one that will be running a lot of boost and timing, oil in your intake could be meaningful.

JMHO.
Jeff @ TPE is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 03:53 AM
  #14  
RJW
Melting Slicks
 
RJW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Tinker till it blows... then back it off a notch, maybe!!
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

Originally Posted by AMERICAN_HP
I completely understand what your saying.
From my understanding, (and I could be wrong) one of the main reasons most guys who have F/I, eliminate their PCV system due to the fact that the boost creates considerably more blow by. Add the fact that the intake is pressurized, and you get a situation where you need to either risk blowing the dipstick through the hood, OR vent it to atmosphere..

With my car, since my intake isnt pressurized, I can still have some of the benifits of the PCV. I PERSONALLY feel that the benifits of a sealed PCV system outweigh the possible problems. As long as you take the necessary precautions to eliminate the oil in the intake (ie..catch can, vapor filter) you shouldnt have a problem.

Hopefully, being that I will not only be blowing excess boost to atmosphere (just like everyone else) but will also be PULLING the gasses out of the crankcase under vacuum, it will have the best of both worlds.

Because frankly, I am sick of how dirty the engine bay gets by venting to atmosphere.

In a perfect world, I would prefer to run a vacuum pump. But unfortunatly, I havent found a setup that works with an 8 rib pulley system.

It's simple...piggyback onto an idler and run a different belt for the vac pump...if you still had the oem wpump, it makes a nice easy install from either side of the engine bay.

You'll end up with a vac pump sooner or later, so why fight it???

Or go electric and have it come on under boost???

I may get a chance on the dyno to do a with/without comp..unless things get too sticky

RJW is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 10:33 PM
  #15  
NemesisC5
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
NemesisC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes on 241 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AMERICAN_HP
Because frankly, I am sick of how dirty the engine bay gets by venting to atmosphere.

In a perfect world, I would prefer to run a vacuum pump.....
NemesisC5 is offline  
Old 04-04-2009, 02:11 AM
  #16  
c5mtl
Drifting
 
c5mtl's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: montreal quebec
Posts: 1,846
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

c5mtl is offline  
Old 04-04-2009, 02:14 AM
  #17  
bullitt4110
Le Mans Master
 
bullitt4110's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Mt Pleasant, TN
Posts: 6,674
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by c5mtl
Why are you bringing back mulitple treads from 2007 on pcv set-ups?
bullitt4110 is offline  
Old 04-04-2009, 02:24 AM
  #18  
1%r
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
1%r's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Posts: 96,496
Received 82 Likes on 58 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03 through '17


Default

Tis a little older than 45 days.
1%r is offline  

Get notified of new replies

To Boosted PCV gurus step in




Quick Reply: Boosted PCV gurus step in



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM.