Originally Posted by jagamajajaran (Post 1585318427)

Yes, there are some QC issues that need to be solved, and perhaps, have already been solved. And if his theory was designed to start more crap, your post suggests that it worked. :lol:

I, for one, am not into mud-slinging. I work too hard to keep my Corvettes looking good and mud free. :D :cheers:

Originally Posted by jagamajajaran (Post 1585318427)

Yes, there are some QC issues that need to be solved, and perhaps, have already been solved. And if his theory was designed to start more crap, your post suggests that it worked. :lol:

I, for one, am not into mud-slinging. I work too hard to keep my Corvettes looking good and mud free. :D :cheers:

Originally Posted by Stingray Sam (Post 1585318576)

For those of you glass half empty folks who are badmouthing GM, I can only surmise that you've never personally made a mistake, missed an error you made or produced anything that wasn't perfect in every way.

Humans are imperfect and, consequently, make mistakes. Except in cases of life or death, it isn't the mistake that's important but how the person or company that made it responds to correct it. In this case, GM deserves a big :thumbs:!!!

Originally Posted by Cruiter (Post 1585318642)

Jeremy,
You've got a positive outlook on life, keep on keeping on. We all knew going in a first year run is full of production adjustments. The majority are just fine, a few that weren't up to snuff such as yours are being handled. I can't wait till you see her again and drive away :auto:. In a month you won't be thinking about this anymore.

Sometimes it's the journal of life but we keep going.

Originally Posted by lt4obsesses (Post 1585318783)

My take on this situation is that GM had heard enough comments on some of the paint issues, and then when they hear of a car like this, they want to take it back to plant. Why? Well, simply to show it to the peole running the operations. Not for ridicule, but as a forensic analysis of what went wrong and how to correct it. The people at the plant will be able to see exactly what is happening and have first hand knowledge. Hopefully, this will be an end to the paint issues.

Originally Posted by lt4obsesses (Post 1585318783)

My take on this situation is that GM had heard enough comments on some of the paint issues, and then when they hear of a car like this, they want to take it back to plant. Why? Well, simply to show it to the peole running the operations. Not for ridicule, but as a forensic analysis of what went wrong and how to correct it. The people at the plant will be able to see exactly what is happening and have first hand knowledge. Hopefully, this will be an end to the paint issues.

Originally Posted by Glen e (Post 1585318918)

This x 100...I can see every floor manager that touched this car in a room with this car and a lot of GM execs "discussing" this..at least I hope that's the case...

Originally Posted by ZL-1 (Post 1585318269)

After being around car dealers most of my life I've seen cars of various brands arrive with unacceptable paint, my own included . It usually gets corrected locally. My initial impression here was that GM really went above and beyond when they offered to take it back to the plant rather just paying for warranty paint work at a local body shop . I was surprised how many posts here are bashing GM even in spite of this generous and expensive offer . Upon re-reading these negative posts I noticed how many are from C6 owners . Is it possible that there is a subconscious desire to take a little wind out of the sails of this exciting new model that everybody seems so crazy about ?

To the OP, I applaud you for your patient and positive attitude. Your car will be back before you know it and better than ever. :thumbs:

Originally Posted by Sp00ky (Post 1585318991)

The car is going back to the plant, its going to be getting a 'good as new' paintjob..literally.

Originally Posted by mpuzach (Post 1585319168)

Except I highly doubt they're going to paint it. I'm betting that they're going to replace the affected body panel(s).

Originally Posted by jagamajajaran (Post 1585319209)

And likely keep the effective ones for analysis.

Originally Posted by mpuzach (Post 1585319235)

Or possibly the defective ones!

Originally Posted by mpuzach (Post 1585319235)

Or possibly the defective ones!

Originally Posted by gmwindsor (Post 1585292292)

Ridiculous that BG paint inspection let it sail and that it is being sent back. They should build you a new car & deliver it to your driveway. I'd be livid!

Originally Posted by fasttoys (Post 1585292421)

After work today I was going to cancel my C7 order and wait it out or decide to purchase another European car. Its been a long time since I owned a GM product. The GM response to your problem made me decide to allow my order to be placed this coming Tuesday. Way to step it up GM and take responsibility for your mistake :flag::cheers:

Originally Posted by QUAKEJAKE (Post 1585320175)

This is great but I wish GM would have stood behind the ls7 owners that have had problems mine excluded

Originally Posted by ldepalma (Post 1585320656)

This story is very interesting to me because my vin is 1787 and I was next after his vin of 1786. My fit and finish is perfect minus some orange peel. It's hard to believe one car can have so many problems and the next one is fine. I would understand it if we were both early vins but after BG makes 1700+ cars and then go thru QC and miss these items make no sense to me? Anyway, hope everything works out for you....

Originally Posted by oldschoolvette (Post 1585319693)

:rofl::rofl: to the OP good luck:cheers: