Originally Posted by 99C5JA1
(Post 1584783318)
Did you have anything constructive to add here or is it more a place to simply be negative when any opportunity presents itself?
Very soon, once those of us buying C7's get them, I'm sure Sam and his ilk will slink away from this section. :yesnod: S. |
Originally Posted by sam90lx
(Post 1584783338)
I can row gears for the right $$$'s.
S. |
Two things I learned from the article:
1) The numerous side-by-side photos makes me feel the C7 has better exterior styling than the Viper 2) I should get the auto not the m7 for more consistent times. |
Originally Posted by Snorman
(Post 1584783367)
Very soon, once those of us buying C7's get them, I'm sure Sam and his ilk will slink away from this section.
|
Originally Posted by Achmed
(Post 1584783395)
Two things I learned from the article:
1) The numerous side-by-side photos makes me feel the C7 has better exterior styling than the Viper 2) I should get the auto not the m7 for more consistent times. S. |
A lot of the Vipers you see for sale were factory ordered by dealers ahead of the regular customers. They ordered the most expensive GTS model, all the bells and whistles and were shocked when they didn't just jump off the lots at 140K. They thought there would be a huge demand for the new Gen 5 and it was lukewarm at best. No one, not even the diehards were going to pay 140K for a Dodge, period. But these cars are heavily optioned so they can offer 10K off and still make money. Those are the ones being discounted. But you are still talking about 130K cars.
|
Originally Posted by Snorman
(Post 1584783367)
Sam never has anything constructive to add in this section except to cheerlead people who post negative comments about the C7 and post smileys. He hides behind the excuse that he is here to get info on the "hipo" version of the C7 and claims if it's offered in an "auto" he'll get one (but now presumably he has an "interest" in buying a 2013 Viper).
Very soon, once those of us buying C7's get them, I'm sure Sam and his ilk will slink away from this section. :yesnod: S. |
Originally Posted by jvp
(Post 1584783414)
The better solution is to just put him and others on your ignore list and go about your enjoyment of the forum. If folks stop quoting and replying to them, their trolling will result in nothing. And they'll go away.
S. |
Good article, thanks for posting. These articles day by day just keep getting better for the C7! Wow, when we get the next Z06 type version, watch out!
|
Originally Posted by flatcrank
(Post 1584780054)
the Stingray has raise the bar and all the above named makers are surely staring into the black night sky and muttering to themselves about bloody Americans and their bloody V8's.
Their bloody pushrod V8's, no less!:lol: Michael |
Originally Posted by PDCjonny
(Post 1584783425)
A lot of the Vipers you see for sale were factory ordered by dealers ahead of the regular customers. They ordered the most expensive GTS model, all the bells and whistles and were shocked when they didn't just jump off the lots at 140K. They thought there would be a huge demand for the new Gen 5 and it was lukewarm at best. No one, not even the diehards were going to pay 140K for a Dodge, period. But these cars are heavily optioned so they can offer 10K off and still make money. Those are the ones being discounted. But you are still talking about 130K cars.
|
Originally Posted by Silver05GTO
(Post 1584783559)
Dodge should've improved the Viper in price.....bragging rights alone won't sell them. Unless they are OK with the limited sales, the people who can swing the purchase certainly have an exclusive car.
S. |
The other thing I get out of that review is that the brakes in the Z51 are ample. I was budgeting on upgrades, but it doesn't look like it. I'm buying the Stingray as a sole purpose track car, so that's literally money in my pocket if I don't have to upgrade the brakes. Of course that money will be out of my pocket in the form of a cage and seat and suspension anyway. So if anyone has those things solved for the C7, I'm all ears ... impatient ears ... just itching to drive this thing!
|
I'm actually surprised the Mustang Shelby GT500 is #9! Either Willow Springs has some good straits, the suspension was modified or the driver really had a good day and let it hang out to the ragged edge.
|
Originally Posted by Michael A
(Post 1584783555)
:rofl:
Their bloody pushrod V8's, no less!:lol: Michael ps. I agree with your avatar message. 65mph "one size fits all" and a ticket whether you're in a new Vette or a $800 minivan that someone bought off Craigslist with four different tires bought by four different owners, and nobody has checked the brakes or the steering in the last 30K miles, and the kids are playing tag in the back, the driver is eating and changing radio stations, steering with the inside of his left wrist, it's night and it's raining ... |
Originally Posted by Snorman
(Post 1584783442)
I have around 6-8 people on ignore now. Sam was on it a few months ago. At one point I took him off and never added him again. That's being fixed right now. :lol:
S. |
Originally Posted by Snorman
(Post 1584783367)
Sam never has anything constructive to add in this section except to cheerlead people who post negative comments about the C7 and post smileys. He hides behind the excuse that he is here to get info on the "hipo" version of the C7 and claims if it's offered in an "auto" he'll get one (but now presumably he has an "interest" in buying a 2013 Viper).
Very soon, once those of us buying C7's get them, I'm sure Sam and his ilk will slink away from this section. :yesnod: S. Also, I'm not going anywhere...get use to it! |
Originally Posted by Snorman
(Post 1584783381)
I guess new C6Z's selling in the $60's and $70's isn't the "right $$$'s", eh Sam?
S. |
Originally Posted by Big Dan 427
(Post 1584781110)
It also appears to me the C7 was a Z51 and the viper a base w/out the track pack, yes it's 30k more but it's not a mass produced dime a dozen car.
Originally Posted by JoesC5
(Post 1584781471)
I thought you guys were saying that the skinny tires on the C7 were just as good as the wide tires on the C6 Z06. Now you're saying the C7 needs wide tires to keep up with a car that has wide tires. Which is it?
Originally Posted by JerriVette
(Post 1584782360)
Hate to say it but I'm less than impressed with the c7 performance...
Something's off ...maybe the driver? I'm sure the c7 is a great car etc....but I'm just less than impressed.... Elevation (ft.) 1,121 Temperature (°F) 91 Relative humidity (%) 28.00 Barometric pressure (in. Hg) 28.81 Wind (mph, direction) 3, headwind Odometer (mi.) 1,621 Fuel used for test 91 octane High elevation, mediocre octane, high ambient temp and low humidity could cause the knock sensors to send a signal to the ECU that power should be dialed back. Edmunds does corrections, but no correction is absolutely perfect, and you cannot predict how one car will be affected compared to another.
Originally Posted by 99C5JA1
(Post 1584783318)
As in that is one factor they choose the C7 for. Not the only factor.
|
Originally Posted by Guibo
(Post 1584783917)
I don't think it's the driver. It's probably the test conditions: Elevation (ft.) 1,121 Temperature (°F) 91 Relative humidity (%) 28.00 Barometric pressure (in. Hg) 28.81 Wind (mph, direction) 3, headwind Odometer (mi.) 1,621 Fuel used for test 91 octane High elevation, mediocre octane, high ambient temp and low humidity could cause the knock sensors to send a signal to the ECU that power should be dialed back. Edmunds does corrections, but no correction is absolutely perfect, and you cannot predict how one car will be affected compared to another. . Sh*t - Great catch... look at that Elevation! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands