Sandbagging on HP...MAYBE
Seeing how GM has been somewhat coy regarding certain aspects of the C7 do any of you guys think they may be reserving the real hp numbers? I think it's fair to say that if the car came out rated 480 plus an awful lot of folks would be real happy!:thumbs:
|
I would say GM is more likely to lowball the final certified number than over estimate. I expect 460.
|
I'm very curious if the track mode enables a higher rev limit and associated power or something as well. The SAE paper had a graph showing over 7k, and numerous reports from the bash reported someone mentioned 7k in 4th. Contrasting that is all the official information from GM so far has said and shown 6600rpm. Either there is a pretty big surprise in store for the C7 /LT1 or something was slipped about future product.
As it sits now though, we were promised at least 450,I'm not expecting significantly more than that, but would love to be pleasantly surprised. |
My guess is that they were conservative with the 450 - rather under promise and over deliver. But I don't picture more than 470. My guess is in the 465 range.
|
Originally Posted by jschindler
(Post 1583803196)
My guess is that they were conservative with the 450 - rather under promise and over deliver. But I don't picture more than 470. My guess is in the 465 range.
|
well, maybe someone, like me, will take their C7 to their speed shop and have it dynoed. Then real numbers will be available. :cheers:
|
Originally Posted by jschindler
(Post 1583803196)
My guess is that they were conservative with the 450 - rather under promise and over deliver. But I don't picture more than 470. My guess is in the 465 range.
It just seems to me that this redesign was not centrally focused around creating more power. I believe the redesign was more about using this power more effectively. |
Actually, I was say less than the stated 450. If history proves itself on the newer model cars, they usually have less to the rear wheels than what they state. I would estimate 425 or in that area. However with the new design and new materials, what is lacking in HP will be made up in road efficiencies.
|
Would anyone here mind it if GM purposely underrated the engine? Based on dyno results, the early GTRs were underrated by Nissan. Also, BMW is notorious for underrating their engines. From what I can tell they underrate their engines 10% across the board.
|
Originally Posted by EBVette
(Post 1583803508)
Actually, I was say less than the stated 450. If history proves itself on the newer model cars, they usually have less to the rear wheels than what they state. I would estimate 425 or in that area. However with the new design and new materials, what is lacking in HP will be made up in road efficiencies.
|
470 to 500.........Actual performance is more important than HP to me
If It will out run a C6 427 ( Awesome car) at 450 HP that's fine with me Dan :) |
Well, GM has said they focused on a flat torque curve that makes great torque over a large rev band. Now, given that the hold over 6 speed autobox is only rated to about 435 lb/ft, there will very likely be torque management. So, overall, the numbers may mean rather less than the actual on road performance.
Still hoping for something closer to 475 hp/ 475 tq. We will know soon enough, and even better, when the first tests in the magazines come out. |
I think 475 will be the final number. It accomplishes everything it needs to do. It guarantees the C7 base will be significantly faster than the C6 base.
And 475 approaches C6Z06 "competitive" territory.. while still leaving plenty of room for a 525+hp C7Z06 and 650+hp C7ZR1. |
Originally Posted by Big Dan 427
(Post 1583803276)
Well I could be wrong but with all of the anticipation GM has created not to mention the secretiveness maybe just maybe they will blow everyone's socks off with a big number. No doubt if they did that it would certainly stimulate more buzz and IMO more buyers!:thumbs:
.Jinx |
Originally Posted by Tullius
(Post 1583803528)
Would anyone here mind it if GM purposely underrated the engine? Based on dyno results, the early GTRs were underrated by Nissan. Also, BMW is notorious for underrating their engines. From what I can tell they underrate their engines 10% across the board.
Originally Posted by Jinx
(Post 1583803659)
I think this is like hoping that the chunky girl your friend fixed you up with has lost a lot of weight since she took that Facebook photo.
.Jinx Thread is off to a good start, lots of excellent posts!:thumbs: |
Originally Posted by Shrike6
(Post 1583803609)
Well, GM has said they focused on a flat torque curve that makes great torque over a large rev band. Now, given that the hold over 6 speed autobox is only rated to about 435 lb/ft, there will very likely be torque management. So, overall, the numbers may mean rather less than the actual on road performance.
Still hoping for something closer to 475 hp/ 475 tq. We will know soon enough, and even better, when the first tests in the magazines come out. |
Originally Posted by schilitj
(Post 1583803365)
well, maybe someone, like me, will take their C7 to their speed shop and have it dynoed. Then real numbers will be available. :cheers:
Originally Posted by Jinx
(Post 1583803659)
I think this is like hoping that the chunky girl your friend fixed you up with has lost a lot of weight since she took that Facebook photo.
.Jinx |
My guess ...
465 Advertised w/ NPP M7 . . 420 RWHP SAE Corrected (DynoJet) A6 . . 402 RWHP SAE Corrected (DynoJet) |
I think that even if GM knows they can wring something like 500HP out of the LT1, it may be wise to take it easy and start it at 460 or so. Even with all the same components they can dial it down a bit.
That way they can sit back and see if the engine has any unknown issues before really leaning on the thing. They can then step it up in later years if the engine proves reliable. They have done that with the LS series but with some minor changes in camshafts and such. |
Originally Posted by Tullius
(Post 1583803811)
How many people would prefer for GM to tune the engine for more peak hp at the expense of a broad torque curve?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands