CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   C7 General Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c7-general-discussion-142/)
-   -   LT1 Minimum HP Acceptability Poll (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c7-general-discussion/3263993-lt1-minimum-hp-acceptability-poll.html)

BlueOx 05-02-2013 08:32 AM

LT1 Minimum HP Acceptability Poll
 
What is the minimum horsepower that is acceptable for you in ordering a C7 base/Z51 Corvette, given the price points you have now seen?

B-Myster 05-02-2013 08:56 AM

That's kind of a tough one for me. Although I would prefer for the horsepower to be over 470, if the magazine car jockeys run the c7 in the quarter in the 11's and trap at or above 120, I'd accept a lower hp number. I use the magazine's as a reference as they are usually good for coming up with an average for performance versus owners who beat their times. Everyone wants the most hp, but to me the performance matters more if I can't have both in stock form.

BWF07 05-02-2013 09:00 AM

:lurk:

chaase 05-02-2013 09:06 AM

470+ is what I am hoping for. If it is lower than that, I may continue modding my C5 or go a different direction completely.

BlueOx 05-02-2013 09:07 AM


Originally Posted by B-Myster (Post 1583793225)
That's kind of a tough one for me. Although I would prefer for the horsepower to be over 470, if the magazine car jockeys run the c7 in the quarter in the 11's and trap at or above 120, I'd accept a lower hp number. I use the magazine's as a reference as they are usually good for coming up with an average for performance versus owners who beat their times. Everyone wants the most hp, but to me the performance matters more if I can't have both in stock form.

Clearly, people have a number in mind at which (they say) they wouldn't pull the switch. That is what this poll seeks to find.

It is not necessarily a prediction of what they think it is going to be.

BRCC 05-02-2013 09:26 AM

Being I ordered one I have to accept the estimate (450) as a minimum, but am anticipating more. If NPP adds 6 as in the past then you are above the minimum.

Bottom line for those that ordered and all others we will know when they tell us, but GM stated 450 est, hopefully more and no less.

B Stead 05-02-2013 09:33 AM

I would predict that the direct fuel injection would increase horsepower by 5% on a two-valve-per-cylinder engine.

So that's 452 HP.


Here are two examples of what's happening elsewhere:

Mustang GT, 5.0 V8, 420 HP

2014 Jaguar F Type, supercharged 5.0 V8, 495 HP

.

chaase 05-02-2013 09:42 AM


Originally Posted by B Stead (Post 1583793556)
I would predict that the direct fuel injection would increase horsepower by 5% on a two-valve-per-cylinder engine.

So that's 452 HP.


Here are two examples of what's happening elsewhere:

Mustang GT, 5.0 V8, 420 HP

2014 Jaguar F Type, supercharged 5.0 V8, 495 HP

.

They are adding DI and VVT. I would expect more than 5%. I would expect at least 10%. The CTS gets 10% just getting DI.

tomlink 05-02-2013 09:43 AM

475 for base/Z51
575-600 for Z06 (427 LT1)
700+ for ZR1

DREAMERAK 05-02-2013 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by BlueOx (Post 1583793088)
What is the minimum horsepower that is acceptable for you in ordering a C7 base/Z51 Corvette, given the price points you have now seen?

With or without NPP?..:D

Snorman 05-02-2013 10:46 AM


Originally Posted by DREAMERAK (Post 1583793771)
With or without NPP?..:D

Or E85?
:hide:

sshu 05-02-2013 11:01 AM

Funny how a few hp can make all the difference.

450hp= little disappointed
460hp= acceptable
470hp= happy


The base C6 had 20 less hp than the C5 Z06, I expect something similar. My prediction and hope is 470hp+.

gthal 05-02-2013 11:05 AM

Anything north of 450HP. That is the only real number we have and all anyone should be basing a buying decision on today IMO. Anything higher is gravy.

Having said that, I'm "hoping" for 460 to 470 but won't be upset if it doesn't get there because, IMO, it would be silly to be upset if they actually give us what they have already put on paper.

tuxnharley 05-02-2013 11:10 AM

I went with 470 - 479.

Good poll, no bias in the question or the choices. Good job, Ox! :thumbs:

:cheers:

BlueOx 05-02-2013 11:20 AM


Originally Posted by tuxnharley (Post 1583794490)
I went with 470 - 479.

Good poll, no bias in the question or the choices. Good job, Ox! :thumbs:

:cheers:

:cheers:

Matt26 05-02-2013 11:50 AM

Voted for 470 as the minimum, but I am hoping for 485-490.

Will also take 500 if the corvette team is listening.

Sin City 05-02-2013 12:17 PM

21 people won't buy this car because of 20 HP? Really? 0 -60 under 4 isn't enough for you?

To me HP ratings are overrated. It's overall performance that matters.

If this car had 600 HP and went 0-60 in 7 seconds, I wouldn't buy it for the world.

4thC4at60 05-02-2013 12:21 PM


Originally Posted by Sin City (Post 1583795149)
21 people won't buy this car because of 20 HP? Really? 0 -60 under 4 isn't enough for you?

To me HP ratings are overrated. It's overall performance that matters.

If this car had 600 HP and went 0-60 in 7 seconds, I wouldn't buy it for the world.

:iagree:

CPhelps 05-02-2013 12:28 PM


Originally Posted by sshu (Post 1583794420)

The base C6 had 20 less hp than the C5 Z06, I expect something similar. My prediction and hope is 470hp+.

Huh?
C5 Z06 405 HP (385 in 01)
Base C6 400 HP (430/436 08+)

OHV4LIFE 05-02-2013 12:30 PM


Originally Posted by 4thC4at60 (Post 1583795196)
:iagree:

For those who wouldn't buy it because it lacks 20 extra hp, how many drive the cars to the limit? If you plan to track your car and that extra 20 hp is the difference between winning and losing then this would be a valid consideration. But for day to day and spirited road driving, the extra 50 lb-ft of torque up to 4000 RPM is far more useful than peak hp.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands