Roots or Turbo?
Which one would you prefer for the C7 FI?
|
Neither. Rotrex.
|
Turbos and DI seem to work very well together. However according to Keeks' info it looks like the FI applied to the C7 will be roots.
|
Wasn't an option!
Originally Posted by SBC_and_a_stick
(Post 1582526156)
Neither. Rotrex.
|
TT :cheers:
|
What would you prefer?
Originally Posted by RJ-92
(Post 1582526194)
Turbos and DI seem to work very well together. However according to Keeks' info it looks like the FI applied to the C7 will be roots.
:rock: |
Of course!
Originally Posted by Z_Rocks
(Post 1582526234)
TT :cheers:
:rock: |
Roots... Maybe a cogged roots.
|
Turbo. All day long. Never was a fan of roots.
|
|
Twin turbo. Hands down. Supposed to be up with technology on this thing, might as well dump the roots and go with real boost. Better mpg too.
|
Originally Posted by BuddhaZ06
(Post 1582526738)
Twin turbo. Hands down. Supposed to be up with technology on this thing, might as well dump the roots and go with real boost. Better mpg too.
|
Originally Posted by johnglenntwo
(Post 1582526215)
I know!:D
I'm glad GM isn't going with the popular choice but rather a great choice. :D |
Originally Posted by SBC_and_a_stick
(Post 1582526800)
The TVS would be my second choice. Turbo? Never, I'd rather live with a 450hp NA motor.
I'm glad GM isn't going with the popular choice but rather a great choice. :D |
Originally Posted by JustinStrife
(Post 1582526808)
:crazy2:
Different strokes for different folks :cheers: |
Originally Posted by SBC_and_a_stick
(Post 1582526844)
I would not take a turbo car to the track. I don't like the throttle response. I don't like replacing turbos. I don't like how it muffles the engine symphony. I don't like how it generates massive heat.
Different strokes for different folks :cheers: You shouldn't be taking any boosted Corvette to the track anyway. The root style blowers especially are known for major heat soak issues. :ack: |
PD any day over a turbo for a street engine.
|
Originally Posted by JustinStrife
(Post 1582526903)
And yet they have better fuel economy, more efficiency, don't require a taller hood, and have way more power potential.
Turbos are fantastic for A to B cars. 1.4L turbo diesels make sense. Maybe that way the gas savings vs. other FI will be enough to service those turbines when they blow up or blow up something else. |
Wasn't there a photo of an LT1 on a test stand wearing twin turbos that GM had pulled offline in a serious hurry.
|
Turbos. They don't have nearly the same paralytic drag, so they produce the more horsepowe at the same boost.
They do not "produce" heat. All of the heat of an engine is produced via combustion. Turbos will absorb heat and radiate it to some degree wherever they are located. Proper design and shielding will reduce this issue. They will heat the intake charge due to compression, but do so all forced induction conpressors, no matter how they are driven. The only type of racing where turbos have not dominated roots or other engine driven compressors is drag racing. Do they require a different style of driving? Yes, but any competent driver should be able to master it, if properly trained or they have a desire to learn. Today's DCTs reduce one of the turbo's issues, coming off boost when lifting the throttle for shifting. No lift, no reduced boost. Turbo's are a bit easier to intercool. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands