Corvette ZR1, A Drug Fighting Super Machine
A Corvette ZR1 is now parked at the Clayton County Sheriff's Department, and some citizens are concerned that the department used taxpayer money to buy the car, Even though the car clearly says on the back: "Donated by a Local Drug Dealer." When asked about the purchase of the ZR1, Clayton County Sheriff's Department's Director of Constituency Services, Clarence E. Cox, said the department didn't pay for it and the car was seized from a Local Drug Dealer.According to Cox, the car was used to transport cocaine and that the drug was even sometimes stashed in a taillight. After that dealer was busted, the sheriff's department seized the car.
http://classiccarcollectornews.com/w...Cop-ZR1-21.jpg The ZR1 is being valued at $80,000 and will eventually be sold on auction; the money will go toward replenishing the department's aging fleet. Cox said the Corvette, which wasn't painted but instead covered in removable wrapping with the Clayton County Sheriff Department's insignia, is not used for patrol or chases, but instead for promotional and educational appearances. Still, taxpayers like Menyon Epps said they were concerned about the amount of money it costs to take care of a luxury car. "I just think there are better things the department could do with that money," Epps said. So far the department has only paid for gas in the car and as it gets 14/20 mpg and is about the same, or better then, their normal patrol cars, this concern may be unfounded. Maybe the department should inform the public about the cost of the car as well as fight drug use. Or maybe the press covering this issue should let the public know. Either way, the sell drugs, lose your toys message it getting out. http://classiccarcollectornews.com/w...A-Cop-ZR11.jpg http://classiccarcollectornews.com/b...super-machine/ |
Some people have nothing else better to do! Buddy of mine just told me yesterday, he is LEO, that someone sat outside a fast food restaurant and timed an officer that left his car outside running. The person then called the police dept to report the officer. :crazy2: Nothing else better to do CLEARLY!
|
Originally Posted by LEAVINU
(Post 1581166918)
Some people have nothing else better to do! Buddy of mine just told me yesterday, he is LEO, that someone sat outside a fast food restaurant and timed an officer that left his car outside running. The person then called the police dept to report the officer. :crazy2: Nothing else better to do CLEARLY!
I have been told cops are informed to leave their cars running rather than turn them off. Not sure why, but they must have a reason. As the car uses less than 1 gallon per hour idling, or so I have been told, the cost for 30 minutes is less than $1.50 as there is no tax on their gas. I think there are better ways to save a buck :thumbs: |
Epps is an idiot.
|
Originally Posted by mirage2991
(Post 1581167006)
Epps is an idiot.
Notice it is a 2008 ZR1 :eek: |
So that's what really happened to Fartpipe's ZR1.
:leaving: |
Originally Posted by Corvette Mike Ca
(Post 1581167096)
You think she is dumb, check out the story that CBS is telling here: http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/1887...ments-corvette
Notice it is a 2008 ZR1 :eek: |
Originally Posted by racerns
(Post 1581167511)
So that's what really happened to Fartpipe's ZR1.
:leaving: |
Originally Posted by mirage2991
(Post 1581168080)
It is a well known fact that most journalist and their employers don't report on facts... Lol
|
I'll be sure to tell those haters that the ZR1 gets about the same if not better gas mileage than a Crown Vic and the ZR1 brake pads could last the life of the car if not tracked saving them lots of cash in the long run. :D
Clayton county is not the finest part of GA so it's no wonder they're down there complaining. So sad! :toetap: |
I think it looks awesome!
You have to admit, if that thing rolled up behind someone, it is highly unlikely they would think they had a chance to outrun it... |
Originally Posted by sandstrs
(Post 1581169338)
I think it looks awesome!
You have to admit, if that thing rolled up behind someone, it is highly unlikely they would have a chance to outrun it... |
Originally Posted by mirage2991
(Post 1581168080)
It is a well known fact that most journalist and their employers don't report on facts... Lol
|
Originally Posted by Corvette Mike Ca
(Post 1581166965)
:iagree:
I have been told cops are informed to leave their cars running rather than turn them off. Not sure why, but they must have a reason. As the car uses less than 1 gallon per hour idling, or so I have been told, the cost for 30 minutes is less than $1.50 as there is no tax on their gas. I think there are better ways to save a buck :thumbs: The public in that town obviously doesn't see the positive side of having a car like this represent their department. Some kids who may be on the fence of being delinquents see an officer doing public events or even driving in their neighborhood may think that being a cop can be a cool thing and that the police aren't the enemy. Cars have a way of impressing kids that can really change their future. ( I know this first hand). |
The drug dealer used a yellow ZR1 to run drugs in, I've got no interest in pursuing his "career path" but um, I think a more low-key car could have been used. I'm not a genious, nor did I stay at a Motel 6 last night.
|
Originally Posted by racerns
(Post 1581167511)
So that's what really happened to Fartpipe's ZR1.
:leaving: |
Originally Posted by gonabite
(Post 1581172412)
............. Cars have a way of impressing kids that can really change their future. ( I know this first hand).
|
Luxury car?
|
She wants to know what the purpose of them having a car like this is? Well obviously its so they can do killer burnouts while eating donuts!
|
Originally Posted by MSUGTO
(Post 1581172440)
The drug dealer used a yellow ZR1 to run drugs in, I've got no interest in pursuing his "career path" but um, I think a more low-key car could have been used.
|
Originally Posted by racerns
(Post 1581175636)
Wait... it was a Yellow ZR1! Anyone hear from Kyle lately? Is having drugs in your tail lights still considered stock for the fast list? I will have to think about this. :toetap:
|
I like the idea of using a ZR1, I have no comment on drug dealers etc... but to have a ZR1 just sitting there, no way i'd cry.
Also, its funny about the gas, those crown vics probably eat more gas, and sits two? usually there is only 1 or 2 officers riding at any given time, nothing can run from this thing, and the maintenance it probably less than FORDS lol. |
Originally Posted by Corvette Mike Ca
(Post 1581166965)
:iagree:
I have been told cops are informed to leave their cars running rather than turn them off. Not sure why, but they must have a reason. I would like to see how much MPG the cop cars get. With those higher end engines, I would imagine it is not great. |
i think its pretty cool that they are using this car! the officer that drives it is sooo lucky!:rock:
|
Hazard of the profession - drug dealing, that is.
|
Cool car!
|
Originally Posted by LEAVINU
(Post 1581166918)
Some people have nothing else better to do! Buddy of mine just told me yesterday, he is LEO, that someone sat outside a fast food restaurant and timed an officer that left his car outside running. The person then called the police dept to report the officer. :crazy2: Nothing else better to do CLEARLY!
Originally Posted by Corvette Mike Ca
(Post 1581166965)
:iagree:
I have been told cops are informed to leave their cars running rather than turn them off. Not sure why, but they must have a reason. As the car uses less than 1 gallon per hour idling, or so I have been told, the cost for 30 minutes is less than $1.50 as there is no tax on their gas. I think there are better ways to save a buck :thumbs:
Originally Posted by gonabite
(Post 1581172412)
Every agency has different policy's on this. The reason some are told to leave them running come from the days of not so dependable starters. Better to have the car running and burn a little fuel than to have an emergency and not be able to start the car.
The public in that town obviously doesn't see the positive side of having a car like this represent their department. Some kids who may be on the fence of being delinquents see an officer doing public events or even driving in their neighborhood may think that being a cop can be a cool thing and that the police aren't the enemy. Cars have a way of impressing kids that can really change their future. ( I know this first hand).
Originally Posted by ~Stingray
(Post 1581178428)
I was told once by EM that the reason they leave them is so there is a less of chance of it not starting. They are always ready to go. It mostly applies to the winter months so the engine is already warm and ready for fast driving. However, I am not sure how that works for the summer. Anyone else thinking overheating issues?
I would like to see how much MPG the cop cars get. With those higher end engines, I would imagine it is not great.
Originally Posted by mourat
(Post 1581177202)
I like the idea of using a ZR1, I have no comment on drug dealers etc... but to have a ZR1 just sitting there, no way i'd cry.
Also, its funny about the gas, those crown vics probably eat more gas, and sits two? usually there is only 1 or 2 officers riding at any given time, nothing can run from this thing, and the maintenance it probably less than FORDS lol. Right. And they're not exactly putting a ton of miles on it anyways. It's a promotional vehicle. They drive it to and from schools and in parades. Some people just see something they can't have and immediately decide that that's reason to bitch and moan. |
Originally Posted by gonabite
(Post 1581172412)
Cars have a way of impressing kids that can really change their future. ( I know this first hand).
|
Originally Posted by mirage2991
(Post 1581168080)
It is a well known fact that most journalist and their employers don't report on facts... Lol
Originally Posted by bobafett
(Post 1581168964)
so true....just whatever sells their papers....
|
If a tax payer in the community I'd be less concerned about upkeep and expenses involved in that than I would the idea that this car could have been sold and he money raised might have been more effectively used.
The idea of this car sitting around seems stupid to me. I seriously doubt the "deterrence value" here as the best option. I'm relatively sure the selling price of this used ZR1 would have raised enough cash to pay for a fully functional, brand new, working cruiser on the street. Seems like a far better path to me for both the local PD and the tax payers. A flashy Corvette in a parking lot may look better but if it's really a "deterrence" you want it's a bad joke vs a real Police car out on the street patrolling the neighborhood. It's just my opinion but this ZR1 should have been sold. :leaving: |
Originally Posted by Krystal
(Post 1581181944)
It's just my opinion but this ZR1 should have been sold. :leaving:
|
Originally Posted by Corvette Mike Ca
(Post 1581167096)
You think she is dumb, check out the story that CBS is telling here: http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/1887...ments-corvette
Notice it is a 2008 ZR1 :eek: Lol. Saw that too, a 2008 ZR1 :thumbs: Bunch of ignorant people. Car gets attention and sends a message. Just because its a corvette doesnt meen it guzzles gas. Hell it gets better fuel mileage than 80% of cars on the road prob. Lastly, can you blame the dept? Looks like a great reason to put it to good use. :hide: |
Originally Posted by Krystal
(Post 1581181944)
If a tax payer in the community I'd be less concerned about upkeep and expenses involved in that than I would the idea that this car could have been sold and he money raised might have been more effectively used.
The idea of this car sitting around seems stupid to me. I seriously doubt the "deterrence value" here as the best option. I'm relatively sure the selling price of this used ZR1 would have raised enough cash to pay for a fully functional, brand new, working cruiser on the street. Seems like a far better path to me for both the local PD and the tax payers. A flashy Corvette in a parking lot may look better but if it's really a "deterrence" you want it's a bad joke vs a real Police car out on the street patrolling the neighborhood. It's just my opinion but this ZR1 should have been sold. :leaving: |
Originally Posted by LEAVINU
(Post 1581182349)
Obviously someone didn't read the article. :willy:
What's with the expense of the paint job? Where is the good sense in that? Color me skeptcal. If it'd been my decision the car would have gone straight to auction. |
Originally Posted by Krystal
(Post 1581183027)
No......I read it!
What's with the expense of the paint job? Where is the good sense in that? Color me skeptcal. If it'd been my decision the car would have gone straight to auction. |
Originally Posted by racerns
(Post 1581183193)
Really you read it, because your comprehension is not that great. It was not painted it is just a wrap. Yes there is some cost to that too ,unless they go it donated, but it is small and most likely part of their publicty budget. Also, the article stated that all they have paid for so far is gas.
I "read" the part that says it's just a wrap........but can't comprehend the part my eyes see in the picture .......a picture that does have what looks like lettering and badging that may be a "wrap" thing but that sure looks like Silver Paint to me......or is the idea of a "wrap" so complete it covers the whoe car? Maybe I am completely wrong here and if so I'm not sure where I got it so wrong. Wasn't this a yellow car when they picked it up?:crazy: |
This isn't the first instance of this. When I lived in Raleigh the Wake County Sheriff's Office confiscated a 2007 Z06 but they actually used the car for busting speeders and making drug busts. It made a bunch of public appearances too.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/video...2/#/vid5627632 The county will sell the car after they get some use out of it and the money from the sale will go to Wake County Public Schools. |
Originally Posted by Krystal
(Post 1581183652)
or is the idea of a "wrap" so complete it covers the whoe car?
|
I don't have a problem with police confiscating drug dealers' cars. More power to them. I'm just wondering, if the owner of the car has a loan on the car, what happens with the bank that loaned the money? Are they just out of luck? Anyone know how this works?
|
Originally Posted by Krystal
(Post 1581183652)
My reading comprehension and eye sight are having a conflict here.:willy:
I "read" the part that says it's just a wrap........but can't comprehend the part my eyes see in the picture .......a picture that does have what looks like lettering and badging that may be a "wrap" thing but that sure looks like Silver Paint to me......or is the idea of a "wrap" so complete it covers the whoe car? Maybe I am completely wrong here and if so I'm not sure where I got it so wrong. Wasn't this a yellow car when they picked it up?:crazy:
Originally Posted by racerns
(Post 1581184105)
Yes you can do wraps that cover the whole car and make a full color change. Many of the cars that you see that are rolling ads are wrapped.
|
So all this coke he was "transporting" fit in a tail light? wtf? Sounds like they just wanted to steal his car. Probably after impounding it, found out it was paid for,...then got the idea to confiscate it.
I was stopped just two days ago (63 in a 65 mph zone, fully legal car, following all the rules, ect.), and the leo was looking for cash. I won't go into details, but he violated several of my rights, right off the bat. End result was me driving off with no tickets, or anything. Just left me really pissed off. I know for a FACT that Houston pd takes large sums of money during traffic stops, sends them on their way, and pockets the bread. I went out with one, one weekend, and he told me all kinds of stuff you wouldn't believe. Btw, I have family in law enforcement, and there are some really good cops out there. We need them around. But there's a bunch of bad eggs too. |
That's why I ride with a mounted gopro camera...and without COKAHINA!!!
|
Originally Posted by kh400
(Post 1581184496)
I don't have a problem with police confiscating drug dealers' cars. More power to them. I'm just wondering, if the owner of the car has a loan on the car, what happens with the bank that loaned the money? Are they just out of luck? Anyone know how this works?
And for everyone else crying, calm down. A dope head lost his wheels and the police are parading it to show they won. The vehicle will be used for a short time, then auctioned off and the proceeds have to be used for law enforcement equipment, training and hiring; almost all states have stipulations on how asset forfeiture funds are spent. |
Originally Posted by Na4now
(Post 1581185807)
So all this coke he was "transporting" fit in a tail light? wtf? Sounds like they just wanted to steal his car. Probably after impounding it, found out it was paid for,...then got the idea to confiscate it.
|
Maligator- ********. The whole police confiscation thing is out of hand. I guess that whole idea about unreasonable punishment and equality before the law is just something our betters need not be concerned about. If the guy was transporting drugs, and is CONVICTED, then fine him sufficiently within the law so that he has to sell the car himself. Giving this 'right' to the police is a license to steal. Would the police in the case mentioned have been so eager to seize the vehicle if it was a 1972 Pinto? Would the punishment have been equal?
"The Minnesota Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the right of police to confiscate vehicles from owners who have done nothing wrong. The decision narrowed the applicability of an "innocent owner" defense in cases where a vehicle is jointly owned. The high court considered the case of David and Jean Margaret Laase whose then-brand new 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe was confiscated in 2006. Although David Laase was the Tahoe's primary driver, Jean Laase was driving the SUV alone on May 17, 2007 when she was pulled over and accused of drunk driving. Because Laase refused to submit to a breath test, the $40,000 vehicle was permanently confiscated as punishment for "second-degree criminal test refusal." $40K for refusing to incriminate herself? I don't have any sympathy for drunk drivers, but that is outrageous. One of many cases. Then there is the guy who had ~ $20K cash intended for buying a car seized during a stop because '...it might have been drug money.' The poor guy had a hell of time getting his money back from the police department involved compounded by being out of state. Yeah, the response will be I'm cherry-picking cases...but then one is too many. |
Originally Posted by Steve Snake Driver
(Post 1581192246)
Maligator- ********. The whole police confiscation thing is out of hand. I guess that whole idea about unreasonable punishment and equality before the law is just something our betters need not be concerned about. If the guy was transporting drugs, and is CONVICTED, then fine him sufficiently within the law so that he has to sell the car himself. Giving this 'right' to the police is a license to steal. Would the police in the case mentioned have been so eager to seize the vehicle if it was a 1972 Pinto? Would the punishment have been equal?
"The Minnesota Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the right of police to confiscate vehicles from owners who have done nothing wrong. The decision narrowed the applicability of an "innocent owner" defense in cases where a vehicle is jointly owned. The high court considered the case of David and Jean Margaret Laase whose then-brand new 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe was confiscated in 2006. One of many cases. Then there is the guy who had ~ $20K cash intended for buying a car seized during a stop because '...it might have been drug money.' The poor guy had a hell of time getting his money back from the police department involved compounded by being out of state. Yeah, the response will be I'm cherry-picking cases...but then one is too many. Although David Laase was the Tahoe's primary driver, Jean Laase was driving the SUV alone on May 17, 2007 when she was pulled over and accused of drunk driving. Because Laase refused to submit to a breath test, the $40,000 vehicle was permanently confiscated as punishment for "second-degree criminal test refusal." $40K for refusing to incriminate herself? I don't have any sympathy for drunk drivers, but that is outrageous. |
Flip your scab back since I seem to have gotten right under your skin. Actually, it does affect my life in the taxes I pay. And you avoid the equality before the law comment.
Oh, so very nice of you to not only be the officer, but also judge and jury!... You know who doesn't submit to a breath test? Guilty drunk people............ |
Originally Posted by Steve Snake Driver
(Post 1581193835)
Flip your scab back since I seem to have gotten right under your skin. Actually, it does affect my life in the taxes I pay. And you avoid the equality before the law comment.
Oh, so very nice of you to not only be the officer, but also judge and jury!... but while checking my scab, I noticed that your string is hanging out.................. |
Steve, Maligator is mostly right about the law. Everything he's said is based in sound legal theory. You may not like it, but take that up with your local legislator. LEOs enforce the laws as written, decided, or informed to the best of their knowledge by their DA. They DON'T create them.
|
Correct LEO's just enforce the laws given...are they enforced equally all the time? NO, and this is where the problem occurs...that pinto probably wouldn't have been siezed, but you damn right this ZR1 will be!!! The woman that refused a breathalyzer, shouldn't have had her car confiscated, but if it's legal to take it it's probably going to happen. That's not the LEO's fault, even tho he probably could have let her keep it...so it's really not the LEO's fault that the law exists and he CHOSE to in force the portion of the law. I'm sure had he explained the consequences of her actions she woulda just took the DWI.
|
Originally Posted by Maligator
(Post 1581198693)
under my skin? doubtful..............but please continue, you are very amusing............
but while checking my scab, I noticed that your string is hanging out.................. All this legal rhetoric Coming from someone "if I understand correctly" that lives in the state of Illinois and possibly works as a government employee maybe in law enforcement -- widely theorized to be one of the most corrupt if not most corrupt State in our nation. almost every government employee, official or lobbyist looking for an angle to tax or jam anyone including law abiding people. Everyone in Illinois has their hand out asking for something. Thank You Mr. Rob Blagojevich & maybe its a possibility one of these days Maligator will join you in your cell.:lol: |
Originally Posted by kh400
(Post 1581184496)
I don't have a problem with police confiscating drug dealers' cars. More power to them. I'm just wondering, if the owner of the car has a loan on the car, what happens with the bank that loaned the money? Are they just out of luck? Anyone know how this works?
Cops are instructed to seize cars like this, is all about money. If this was indeed a guy selling drugs than good for the police, just remember some police(seems like more in today's age) simply think they can do anything. There was a guy out in Il a few years back that made the paper, as he was speeding in his brand new dodge viper early in the morning, he was doing something like 80 in a 45. Cops seized his car, put it in an auction gone. A couple years ago I was getting service at dodge for my viper, when I dropped off the car I saw this brand new viper engine out with LE plates on it. I asked wait was the deal with that car, guys told me the cop who owned the car bragged about how he had the car seized than bought it at the auction, for half value. The people at the dealership didn't like him very much, as the car was in there for it's second blown engine, had 3 tranny failures, they said he beats the living piss out of the car(obviously) I looked at the car tires were bald smelled like smoke, it just put a bad taste in my mouth. Take a mans car for speeding , then acquire it yourself and do much worse. When I see stuff like thIs it makes me wonder, how they really got it, I would think a drug dealer who sells enough drugs to be driving a $100,000+ car wouldn't want to draw attention . Drug dealers belong in jail, but police are getting arrogant these days, sell the car in a private auction, and give the money to a good charity, or a program to keep kids off drugs This is just a spectical that may not even be true, the news is not bible, it's a great media of reporters , who are run by the powers above to report story's to scare the public . We are losing are civil rights every day it's sickens me Please don't think I'm bashing LE, my father( who was gunned down when I was 3) was Chicago police, as well ass all my uncles and my grandfather. It's just different now, I know good retired police who are also sickened by all these 20 year old police officers , who join with a chip on their shoulder. |
Once all those drug dealers are back to driving Vega's and clapped out Pinto's, maybe it might be worthwhile to start seizing speeder's cars...ya' know they are such scofflaws and dangers to society...and what law-abiding citizen REALLY needs 638 hp?
I guess my bottom line question is: When did law enforcement become a profit-driven enterprise? And my second question would be if YOU vote for the a-holes that sanction this, then do you consider yourself part of the problem? Swale - If I understand it correctly, the person making the decisions is the local district attorney, not the LE in the patrol car...and seeing maligator's comments, that's a small comfort. Ah...our militarized police - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48018051.../#.T-8YzpKVCy9 So maligator, the cops get to do a victory dance in the media over the seized ZR1, are they going to fire the supervisors who authorized this? You know...like a losing coach. I'm also not comforted by the idea of every police department getting access to UAS technology in the near future...you wife/daughter sunbathing will probably be real popular video within the police department. maligator, enjoy your string watching...no doubt while training your dog to alert on a subtle signal from you...makes seizing stuff so much easier. |
Originally Posted by Mr. Gizmo
(Post 1581206239)
Thank You Mr. Rob Blagojevich & maybe its a possibility one of these days Maligator will join you in your cell.:lol:
Originally Posted by Steve Snake Driver
(Post 1581207885)
maligator, enjoy your string watching...no doubt while training your dog to alert on a subtle signal from you...makes seizing stuff so much easier.
lets just agree to disagree; you dont like cops and that is perfectly fine with me, because in no way do you effect my income and me coming home to my family and enjoying my corvette. You make 1% assumptions that you believe 99% of law enforcement follow. I will continue to do the right thing, work hard, arrest those who indeed need to be arrested and show good judgement, discretion and fairness. The words, actions and viewpoints of people like you will never cause me to lose my integrity in ANY situation causing me to lose my job and perform and illegal action. I sleep easy every-night buddy, haven't slipped up one bit in 13 years, and my next 13 will be just as spotless............later........... |
Originally Posted by Steve Snake Driver
(Post 1581207885)
maligator, enjoy your string watching...no doubt while training your dog to alert on a subtle signal from you...makes seizing stuff so much easier.
|
Originally Posted by Maligator
(Post 1581208383)
right, im going to make some ******** arrest and unlawfully seize a car because in some messed up way, it will personally benefit me. Not to have a penis whipping out contest, but do you know how I afforded a near new Z06 at the age of 33? Keeping my nose clean and doing the right thing and working my arse off, not some Illinois political game like pocketing bond money. Your comparison of the state of illinois and a law enforcement officer is worse than the chicken and the egg theory............
|
Originally Posted by Mr. Gizmo
(Post 1581208645)
And Mr. Rob Blagojevich exhibited similar exuberance and zeal for his job too.:salute:
|
Originally Posted by Maligator
(Post 1581208658)
thats awesome, I cant tell you how often I want to do that to people...........:lurk:
don't slip up and get caught -- Mr. Blagojevich and his husband will be waiting for you in their cell. |
I don't care for any of the property seizure laws.
If the guy is a criminal, he will be convicted in court, and the court may impose a financial fine to recover money that was illegally earned. The property seizure laws are simply enticement for bad officers to do their worst, and temptation to drag good officers into the muck. |
:lol:
|
Originally Posted by jmc5
(Post 1581208726)
I don't care for any of the property seizure laws.
If the guy is a criminal, he will be convicted in court, and the court may impose a financial fine to recover money that was illegally earned. The property seizure laws are simply enticement for bad officers to do their worst, and temptation to drag good officers into the muck. |
Originally Posted by Mr. Gizmo
(Post 1581208711)
don't slip up and get caught -- Mr. Blagojevich and his husband will be waiting for you in their cell.
|
Originally Posted by Maligator
(Post 1581208784)
all joking aside, because you dont seem to abrasive, there isnt a damn thing that will make me go to the dark side of the force and lose my job.............Im in it to make it to retirement, collect my sweet pension and watch my kids grow up.
|
Originally Posted by Mr. Gizmo
(Post 1581208821)
I know - just having a little fun. :cheers: to a fellow Z owner.
Even though he was a crook, he was good to our department. We are so thin on officers we can barely provide the services to people, he at least saw that and let us hire people. There are parts of the state where you can get in an accident and wait 2-3 hours for a trooper to respond. Imagine if that was a lifesaving incident where someone needed immediate medical attention (we are usually first on scene), very sad........... |
Originally Posted by Maligator
(Post 1581208850)
cheers buddy! and btw Gov Quinn is more f'd up than Rod...........Free Rod, Free Rod!!!!!!!
Even though he was a crook, he was good to our department. We are so thin on officers we can barely provide the services to people, he at least saw that and let us hire people. There are parts of the state where you can get in an accident and wait 2-3 hours for a trooper to respond. Imagine if that was a lifesaving incident where someone needed immediate medical attention (we are usually first on scene), very sad........... Several years back, I was really put off by being told I had to align myself with Lobbyists, that were the biggest bunch of crooks ever that only wanted money and for me to raise my prices so they could skim off the top. I wouldn't go down that path. -- Now with Senate Bill 51 the State is at a great stand still contributing even more so to the issues you describe above. good luck to you and I hope that state can live up to its future pension obligations. |
Originally Posted by Mr. Gizmo
(Post 1581208984)
I have tried to do business with the State of Illinois to provide technology that would help the state identify welfare and workers comp fraud. we could save the state a lot so that money could be put to better use. It was frustrating.
Several years back, I was really put off by being told I had to align myself with Lobbyists, that were the biggest bunch of crooks ever that only wanted money and for me to raise my prices so they could skim off the top. I wouldn't go down that path. -- Now with Senate Bill 51 the State is at a great stand still contributing even more so to the issues you describe above. good luck to you and I hope that state can live up to its future pension obligations. |
The sheriff dept in Raleigh seized a black Z06 a few years ago and have been busting peoples asses since with traffic tickets.
|
Originally Posted by NC_EB_Z06
(Post 1581209995)
The sheriff dept in Raleigh seized a black Z06 a few years ago and have been busting peoples asses since with traffic tickets.
|
Originally Posted by Maligator
(Post 1581208763)
I agree with you that a majority of it is screwed up, but how do you think it entices us to do bad things? I personally dont benefit in anyway from making a seizure. If I come to work and do 8 hours of nothing or 8 hours of (on my level) police work, my paycheck is the same...........are you referring to the actual seizing of currency and bad cops taking money????
a decision that the person is guilty of what they have been charged with. Many of the most egregious offenses reported here are committed by departments that do benefit directly from the seizures. These tend to be what you see on flashy news media "60 minutes" style expose pieces. However, even in the case of no direct benefit, someone in the government is benefitting (profitting) from the police department taking property without a trial. Often times recovery of property wrongly seized is impossible due to the financial means of the people the property is seized from. Even for those with means, if a 35k car is stolen, and it costs 30k + a year or two in court to recover the property, the smart move is to write it off and just let your property be taken. As to the temptation, it can be very subtle and indirect. Higher up #1 says "Hey, we can profit from seizing more property, just like the law says we can!" This gets passed down the line, and down the line. Finally, you're getting your daily pep talk from your direct supervisor, and he says "Hey, the bosses are really paying attention to our seizure numbers, and we aren't doing our job. You guys should be able to find more of this stuff, there are bad guys out there! Go get em!" This is the sort of temptation I'm talking about. Do you press a bad situation into a seizure? Its not really clear that the guy is 100% guilty, but you know that he isn't innocent. And if the bosses are watching, your choices are full court press or let him go. Maybe he isn't guilty, but letting him go doesn't seem right either... Tempting to just shaft the guy and let him deal with it... |
Originally Posted by jmc5
(Post 1581210396)
I'm referring to any seizure of property prior to an actual trial and
a decision that the person is guilty of what they have been charged with. Many of the most egregious offenses reported here are committed by departments that do benefit directly from the seizures. These tend to be what you see on flashy news media "60 minutes" style expose pieces. However, even in the case of no direct benefit, someone in the government is benefitting (profitting) from the police department taking property without a trial. Often times recovery of property wrongly seized is impossible due to the financial means of the people the property is seized from. Even for those with means, if a 35k car is stolen, and it costs 30k + a year or two in court to recover the property, the smart move is to write it off and just let your property be taken. As to the temptation, it can be very subtle and indirect. Higher up #1 says "Hey, we can profit from seizing more property, just like the law says we can!" This gets passed down the line, and down the line. Finally, you're getting your daily pep talk from your direct supervisor, and he says "Hey, the bosses are really paying attention to our seizure numbers, and we aren't doing our job. You guys should be able to find more of this stuff, there are bad guys out there! Go get em!" This is the sort of temptation I'm talking about. Do you press a bad situation into a seizure? Its not really clear that the guy is 100% guilty, but you know that he isn't innocent. And if the bosses are watching, your choices are full court press or let him go. Maybe he isn't guilty, but letting him go doesn't seem right either... Tempting to just shaft the guy and let him deal with it... |
and jmc5 as a perfect example a "criminal" last night we had which was his 9th time caught while driving with his license suspended, had six thousand dollars in currency on him. All neatly wrapped in rubber bands in 100 dollar increments, like he worked for the IRS. When asked what he did for a living he said "unemployed" and when he was asked to post bond he tried to use a link card. This, is the vomit that I work with; on its face for what im posting it looks like joe shmo with some money. On my end I see a sbird with drug money on him trying to use a link card (our tax dollars) to get out of jail. Really? Here us vet owners are getting into a pissing match (not you and I) when many hardened criminals are continuing there way of life on our dime!!!!!!!!!! This society, government and judicial system makes me want to puke. Most people think cops are the reason society is jacked beyond repair and let me go off on a tangent: There are bad, half brained cops that couldn't tell a green light from a red light; I will give you guys that. BUT there are IDIOTS who are picking the cops to be cops!!!! I swear this is worse than the chicken and the egg argument. Personally, I go out and try to prove people wrong........Hopefully that lands me in heaven and not hell...........
|
Originally Posted by Maligator
(Post 1581210768)
Personally, I go out and try to prove people wrong........Hopefully that lands me in heaven and not hell...........
we had a masserati taken from a dealer a few years back but we sent it back to CA...right now we have approx 50 cars in our lot just sitting there...owners in prison or already done with their sentences but the cars are still sitting...three auctions but no buyers...i guess they want the cars for $1...ahem, oh well...new DARE car coming! |
jmc5...we don't have to press or lie about drug seizures...often times, they are flaunting their ill-gotten gains so much, you have to be blind to miss it! one of the last ones i had was a guy riding a land rover...very clean...ran a redlight...clearly...truck reeks of weed...yeah, a nice bundle inside, with baggies and a scale...with an AK47...blessed that he respected LEO's enough to not try and shoot me...he took his charge and lost his ride...that same guy is out now and has...guess what? a frickin c6 vert now!!!...lol...i still wave at him from my c5 now that i'm off the street...is he still dealing? dunno...if it is meant for him to get caught again, it will happen
|
Originally Posted by Maligator
(Post 1581210664)
\HOWEVER, the word temptation should be replaced with pressure, deadlines, quotas or any other synonymous term that is used in the workplace. I dont feel temptation when im working, I feel pressure from the higher ups to produce. \.......
Similiar situation for me, we have contracts our customers have to abide by, - I guess I can compare that to the law. Sometimes customers knowingly and unknowingly breach the contract. Its tempting to shaft the customer and let them deal with it when the issue is vague or ambiguous. It burns lots of bridges, but it helps make quota deadlines. And when your company is reporting to shareholders and you are trying to keep your stock price high, you do what you have to do to make the higher ups happy. The big difference for me is I don't have to worry about fortune 100 companies or government entities that I deal with pulling a gun on me and blowing my brains out. |
Maligator???
Maligator??....where is Kevin and what have you done to him?
|
Originally Posted by GOLD72
(Post 1581172349)
:iagree: Especially if it is NBC, MSNBC, CBS, NY Times, etc. Also good at lying by omission and taking content out of context.
I never listen to the lame stream media. It's all propaganda. |
Originally Posted by KNIPPS
(Post 1581238679)
Maligator??....where is Kevin and what have you done to him?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands