Originally Posted by glass slipper (Post 1574234221)

Read the owners manual and you'll see 91 is the recommended octane for optimum performance. It also says you can run 87 octane if you want and the computer will pull timing to compensate if needed. Given the low temperatures in your area for the majority of the year, you could run 87 octane year round and likely see only a few tanks where the computer goes to the low octane tables. Why run 91 octane when you can get the same HP/MPG with 87 octane??? Even in Florida, my daughter can run 87 octane during the winter months in her '99 'Vette with zero timing pulled. Running 94 octane where you live is definitely a waste but it isn't hurting anything.:thumbs:

Originally Posted by Easy Rhino (Post 1574237671)

Pull timing with lower octane? Yes.

For daily driving does it matter? Not likely.

Remember that the only difference between 87 and 91/92 (excluding any ethanol) is the anti-knock compounds. All grades are the same quality and have the same cleaning compounds.

Originally Posted by res0n0xg (Post 1574237447)

Dude, you're totally wrong. and LS3 will pull a **** ton of timing with 87 octane, I watched it happen on a dyno to several cars. My LS3 was pulling 6-7 degrees across the band.

You're car will absolutely pull timing with 87 octane, the engine is not designed for that crap fuel.

Originally Posted by res0n0xg (Post 1574240168)

Yep, you'll see tons of knock retard with 87 octane all over the place. Also, the owners manual states that the motor was designed for premium fuel, so why wouldn't you put that in it?

Just because the ECM is smart and can pull timing to save the engine, why in the world would you try to pinch pennies and put 87 in? We're driving Corvette's, not honda civics

Originally Posted by NTMD8R (Post 1574241920)

If you guys will note, I spoke about 91 (which was 92) and 94.

No mention was made about 87 (or even 89).

The owners manual says to use no less than 91 (as long as you can get it).
It also says to use 93 for the LS7 engine.

I was only trying to get a feel for any bad experience from anyone using 91.

But thanks for the info.

Originally Posted by filmjay (Post 1574247101)

'08 LS3 here....and I use 93 exclusively. Then again, I'm at a shade under 600 rwhp and cheap gas could easily destroy my engine.

A higher octane gas helps keep the engine out of detonation as it's less combustible. You CAN put cheaper/lower octane gas in, and it will probably run fine for a long time.
But stock motors can detonate just as easily as any modified engine.

Is $80/year worth maybe losing your motor, maybe not? That's about all that's saved per year on cheaper gas.
Assuming the lower octane gas is .10/gallon cheaper, averaged on a 16 gal fill up, spread across 50 fill ups/year....that's $80/year.
That same $80 would be even less if the price difference was greater, you don't fill-up every time OR fill up every single week without fail...given two weeks for misc.

$80/year is worth the cheap insurance for me to use the best gas I can find. A new motor is vastly more expensive. A stock replacement LS3 is what? $7K? How many fill-ups, over how long is that? ;)

(ps. - that's 87.5 years of fill-ups, assuming gas prices stay static. :rofl: )

Originally Posted by glass slipper (Post 1574247048)

Here's the 2010 Corvette owners manual:
http://www.c6registry.com/Technical/...upe_owners.pdf

On page 6-6:
"You can also use regular unleaded gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, but the vehicle’s acceleration could be slightly reduced, and a slight audible knocking noise, commonly referred to as spark knock, might be heard."

It's also an EPA requirement that all vehicles sold in the USA has to be capable of running 87 octane fuel so the LS3 engine IS designed to run on 87. Maybe you should call the Corvette Engineers and tell them they are wrong.



Here's another link for you:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part3/
Chapter 7 gives details on the effects of different conditions on the octane requirements of an engine. After reading the above link, you will realize an LS7 could run 85 octane in Denver in the middle of the winter and have zero timing pulled due to knock retard at full throttle. Elevation allows a reduction of one octane number per 1000 feet in the LS7 and every 10°F drop in temperature (from the 77°F standard) allows a reduction of ½ octane number. In Denver at 5000+ feet, we get a decrease of 5 octane numbers while a temperature of 17°F allows a decrease of 3 octane numbers for a total of 8 octane numbers...93-8= 85 octane. And that's for full throttle operation, part throttle operation requires less octane due to the reduced pressure ratio at which the engine operates at meaning the overwhelming majority of operation the OP will be using his LS3 at will see zero timing pulled due to knock retard and zero loss of HP/MPG. I bolded this part because I never said anything about full throttle operation on a dyno in the middle of summer in Florida...comprehension is everything, try to keep up. Even if knock retard is required, a 5° reduction of timing will reduce the octane requirement by ~3 octane numbers...easily within the 87 octane capability with minimal HP loss for the OP, maybe 10 HP at most at full throttle. I can tell by your post you have no idea of what you're talking about when it comes to engine knock and and the variables that affect the octane requirements of an engine...please educate yourself before declaring somebody to be "totally wrong".:thumbs:

PS Ever seen the movie "Dude, Where's My Car"? Just two stupid potheads with a limited vocabulary mainly consisting of the word "Dude"...just saying.

Originally Posted by glass slipper (Post 1574249260)

Stock engines will not detonate as easy as modified engines...increased cylinder pressure gives you more HP and is what makes modified engines more susceptible to knock. I don't know what makes you think a stock engine will experience knock as easy as a 600 RWHP modified engine...supercharging increases the pressure ratio which increases an engine's chance of knocking. Centrifugal supercharging is the least likely to experience knock of all the different "power adders" available (turbocharging, nitrous, "roots" style supercharging, centrifugal supercharging, and cam/compression), but any of the above will increase the chances of knock over a stock engine...it's that simple. Look at any of the Pv diagrams for internal combustion engines and you'll see why.

I'm not a tree hugger by any stretch of the imagination but I do believe in the saying "waste not, want not". It takes more energy/oil to make a gallon of premium than a gallon of regular. If all the people in this country alone that are using premium when they should be using regular along with the people with engines optimized for premium that would use regular when conditions warranted, a lot of gas/oil would be saved which would drive down the cost of fuel (not just gasoline) for everybody. So while I can appreciate the small cost savings you showed between 87 and 91, that's not the whole picture. Also, to my daughter the college student seeing a $.20/gallon savings (not $.10), the small $$$ to you and me seems like big $$$ to her....just a matter of perspective.:thumbs:

Originally Posted by res0n0xg (Post 1574240168)

Yep, you'll see tons of knock retard with 87 octane all over the place. Also, the owners manual states that the motor was designed for premium fuel, so why wouldn't you put that in it?


Just because the ECM is smart and can pull timing to save the engine, why in the world would you try to pinch pennies and put 87 in? We're driving Corvette's, not honda civics

Originally Posted by KBoltz (Post 1574253566)

...I guess since the Sancha sits most of the time, I'll just stick to the Premium fuel (with 94 octane top offs before an autocross event) and just leave it at that.

I know I can run 87 octane, but why run the risk, when the throttle is mashed a bit during an autocross event.

Y'all take care now, and have a nice day.

Ken
:cheers: