CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   C3 General (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c3-general-119/)
-   -   how did GM determine the shim #s for body mounts (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c3-general/2155419-how-did-gm-determine-the-shim-s-for-body-mounts.html)

Smokin Joe 10-11-2008 04:28 PM

how did GM determine the shim #s for body mounts
 
I have photos that show what I think I took off of the car during disassembly. Does anyone know the logic GM used when leveling the body/determining the number of shims at each body mount location?

Thanks

Road-Race Vette 10-11-2008 05:00 PM

I believe that they put as many shims as needed to get the gaps and general fit of body to frame adequate to fit within their guidelines. Some required more, some less, depending on the particular car.

Unfortunately, for the most part their guidelines and QC were not very strict, so there is a ton of variance between cars.

Most nicely restored these days are fit far better than GM ever fit them.:thumbs:

Alan 71 10-11-2008 05:58 PM

Hi SJ and RRV,
I believe that the factory had a method of measuring each frame. The number of shims needed at each mount location to bring the mount height to a certain dimension was marked in crayon on the frame and later that number of shims was put on the mount and held in place with a strip of paper tape. I believe the frame was measured while it was still upside but the shims were put on after it was flipped. (I Think.)
After the body was dropped the gaps were adjusted (or so they say) to standards shown in the Body Checking Section of the AIM.
The gaps were pretty bad.
Regards,
Alan

nutsy 10-11-2008 08:40 PM

wouldnt it be nice to have someone that actually worked on these from the factory here. there has got to be ex employees around but where are they ?

Scott Marzahl 10-11-2008 08:51 PM

You can find some on the NCRS board but once in awhile there is a few that chime in here.

LYLE 10-11-2008 08:56 PM

The factory had a large jig that was read and shim count marks put on the frame as Allen said. If you don't know put two shims on both #2&3 mounts. On convertibles fit the front of the doors to the fender. Then shim #4 mount to make the door gap the same at the rear from top to bottom. Fit shims at #1 to make them tight.

Scott Marzahl 10-11-2008 09:15 PM

Here is the description John Hinckley posted recently on the C2 board:

"The shim pack was determined by a master gage fixture in the first station on the frame upside-down line which showed the number of shims needed at each location to position each mount at the zero vertical design datum; the body was already at zero design datum, as the underbody was bolted solid to machined pedestals on a precision steel build truck in the Body Shop. The shim determination fixture was moved to the last station on the Chassis Line before Body Drop in 1969 in order to get a more accurate datum measurement with all the chassis components and the complete drivetrain installed."

hunt4cleanair 10-12-2008 05:12 AM

I wrote this up after an interview with a St Louis plant engineer who worked on several lines during the 70's:

Shims were used to ensure the body would retain its flat, level plane, as designed and built when mated with the chassis…that when mounted to the chassis, this platform would not be distorted by the tightening of body mounts. Careful attention was paid to the elimination of stress, twisting or distortion of the body once mounted on the chassis and the plant used a “Shim Predictor” fixture (geometrical fixture) to accomplish this task. Frames were more likely to be out of alignment than the body and the shims absorbed the tolerance differential.

The shim predictor with plunger like devices at each body mount position was attached to the frame. A shim indicator was inserted between the plunger and frame, and referenced the number of shims required. The shim indicator was wedge shaped and indexed for the number of shims required to align the frame with the body.

Workers would write with grease pencil the number of shims needed from 0-5. Various colors were used including yellow, green and red. In later years, colors were used to denote one side from the other. Rarely were more than five shims required. Until 1969, vertical grease pencil marks were marked on the frame at the body mount location. The workers taped the shim pack at each body mount position in place so they did not get lost as the chassis moved along the line. The tape ran vertical to the horizontal frame. Once the body was in place on the chassis, the bolts would be shot and pushed through the tape and tightened. Today tape can still be seen in low mileage original Corvettes and used as a clue to determine whether the body was removed.

Steve's74 10-12-2008 07:29 AM

Interesting information. Last year I replaced all of the original body mounts (trust me, they have never been out). There weren't any shims on any of the mounts and rust was minimal, so I don't think they rusted out and fell away. The doors and fenders all seem to be in reasonable alignment with the car sitting on the tires (gaps reasonable, etc). Has anyone else ever seen a Vette without any shims? Or did I just have a very lucky, very straight frame and body?

Steve

LYLE 10-12-2008 10:14 AM

The frame was the only thing checked for shims so you may have had a perfect frame or somehow the frame did not get checked so no shims were installed. I would say this is rarer than an L88 but won't get any extra resale money.

Alan 71 10-12-2008 04:56 PM

Hi...
I've seen some factory pictures with a '0' at a mount but not '0s' on the entire side. Plus I don't think I've ever seen factory photos of BOTH sides of the same frame. So could there be a whole frame with no shims...I guess so? Would it matter????????????
Regards,
Alan

Steve's74 10-12-2008 05:44 PM


Originally Posted by Alan 71 (Post 1567439467)
Hi...
I've seen some factory pictures with a '0' at a mount but not '0s' on the entire side. Plus I don't think I've ever seen factory photos of BOTH sides of the same frame. So could there be a whole frame with no shims...I guess so? Would it matter????????????
Regards,
Alan

Nope. As I noted, doors and fenders look good. Just curious.

Smokin Joe 10-12-2008 09:34 PM

Thanks guys. Body went on fine with not too much drama. This was just a test fit.

Body and paint haven't been done. I'm going to use the time to seat the rings and put some miles on the new suspension. When I'm done. We'll pull the body for prep and paint. then I'll recheck all the torques on the body.

Damn it rides high, but I guess that's to be expected missing several hundred pounds of interior, doors, glass, headlights, spare, etc.

rjag 10-28-2009 11:18 PM

This may be a stupid question, but what do these shims look like? Any pics?

76 VETTE 10-29-2009 12:24 AM

My 76 did not have any shims when I did my frame off.

Easy Mike 10-29-2009 10:03 AM


Originally Posted by LYLE (Post 1567435971)
The frame was the only thing checked for shims so you may have had a perfect frame or somehow the frame did not get checked so no shims were installed...

The frame got checked and would have been marked if shims were needed. No shims only means the body mounts on the frame were within GM design tolerances.

The A.O. Smith company made the frames, massed produced, and welded up in jigs. The perfect frame would meet all the GM design tolerances. Less than perfect frames were still usuable frames, but required a shim or two.

For Your Consideration: I attended a seminar at Bloomington conducted by Dave Burroughs concerning assembly at St. Louis. He smiled when recalling the sound of shims dropping off frames before body drop. Folks on the line were not stopping to pick up dropped shims.

:)

GD70 10-29-2009 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by rjag (Post 1571975386)
This may be a stupid question, but what do these shims look like? Any pics?

They are square with a hole in the center for the mount bolt to go through, and the corners are bent up (or down) depending how you hold it.

Alan 71 10-29-2009 04:49 PM

Hi RJ,
You can see some shims sitting on the #4 mount in this picture. They're as GD described. The factory used a strip of 1 1/2" wide tape (kinda like masking tape) that was supposed to hold the shim stack in place.
Regards,
Alan

http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/c...MG_0001-34.jpg

leadfoot4 10-29-2009 05:40 PM


Originally Posted by Steve's74 (Post 1567435027)
Interesting information. Last year I replaced all of the original body mounts (trust me, they have never been out). There weren't any shims on any of the mounts and rust was minimal, so I don't think they rusted out and fell away. The doors and fenders all seem to be in reasonable alignment with the car sitting on the tires (gaps reasonable, etc). Has anyone else ever seen a Vette without any shims? Or did I just have a very lucky, very straight frame and body?

Steve

From October 1978, to May of 1997, my wife owned a '79 C3, and around 1993-4, I replaced the crumbling rubber mounts with Energy Suspension polyurethane mount cushions. To the best of my ability (at the time) I never was able to find any shims either...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands