CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   C7 General Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c7-general-discussion-142/)
-   -   12 sec 1/4 1.03G 3.8-60 and VIR in 2.51.7 60-0 107Ft good numbers (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c7-general-discussion/3292107-12-sec-1-4-1-03g-3-8-60-and-vir-in-2-51-7-60-0-107ft-good-numbers.html)

TTRotary 06-20-2013 12:28 PM


Originally Posted by racerns (Post 1584203566)
As others have said you have to be careful when making a comparison to other VIR Grand track times since most of the published times come from the C&D Lightning Lap comparison tests. GM has been able to get much better lap times at VIR with their factory drivers. For comparison the GM factory time for the ZL1 was 2:52.38 while the LL time was 2:57.5. So it would be fair to compare the C7 Z51's 2:51.7 with the ZR1's 2:45.63 and the ZL1's 2:52.38 since they are all factory driver times.

It's too bad we don't have real apples/apples. It would be nice if GM would make a habit of establishing an official lap time at Milford for their cars, but they may consider that too controversial or counter-productive to sales. I'm guessing the Z06/Z07 would be about 3 sec faster on the VIR course than the C7Z51, but the new car certainly seems to put down some impressive numbers for the price. We'll see what the real skinny is once the car is out and winds up in magazine comparos. We can of course expect to hear all about how Chevy uses cheater tires on the Z51 when it clobbers the Porsches and the BMWs around the road course.

While we're nitpicking...swapping out the motorized production seat for a race seat dropped about 25lb, which testing and fire equipment probably added back...

shep29 06-20-2013 12:31 PM

Awesome performance...GM hit it out if the park. Can't wait to see what they do with a high performance Z version.

Snorman 06-20-2013 12:33 PM


Originally Posted by JoesC5 (Post 1584202879)
You tell me; if the Z51 is not quicker than the base model, why offer it as an option, and why would people pay more for that option if they are not going to see any better performance over the base non Z51 model?

Quicker on a drag strip, Joe. I thought that was pretty obvious.
The non-Z51 (and I'll refer to it as that from now on since the term "base" was confusing to you) cars will be slightly lightly, with a higher aspect ratio tire and only slightly less gear in them.
I'm sure I don't need to recite all of the additions the Z51 cars get that make them more suitable for road course use.
S.

Snorman 06-20-2013 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by JoesC5 (Post 1584202952)
FAIL. There are no C7 Z06/ZR1 variants, just the base model and the optional Z51 model, thus the base model C7 is a non Z51 equipped model, not a non Z06/ZR1 model.

I'll start referring to them as non-Z51 and Z51 cars since I know you like to nitpick stupid points in order to appear correct.
S.

CFIVEM3 06-20-2013 12:40 PM

I recall a formula where you could calculate horsepower if you know the weight and 1/4 mile time and/or speed.

Since we know the 1/4 time and horsepower, we should be able to calculate the C7 weight fairly reasonably.

Sorry, I don't have the formula handy. :shrug:

Nitrous Oxide 06-20-2013 12:44 PM


Originally Posted by DJD (Post 1584203181)
The best way for everybody who says that the z51 can't possibly be able to hit 12.0 is by buying the friggin car and taking it to the track. Then do the most important thing....practice, practice, practice. I personally don't care how fast it is in the 1/4 mile, how many times on a daily basis are you going to be drag racing? Plus the other thing to think about.....will be the top HP for the base? Or will GM offer a faster model like they did in 08? If so then an extra 30 ponies would be worth waiting for. What I like is the braking capabilities, with that kind of torque curve I know those brakes will be handy. One last thing to consider....those blind spots are HORRENDOUS!!!!! Will GM be putting in blind spot indicators when switching lanes?

No, just check the Safe Perimeter option. They'll affix this to your rear:

http://www.truckntow.com/images/Prod...ium/TSM019.jpg

:thumbs:

Snorman 06-20-2013 12:49 PM


Originally Posted by CFIVEM3 (Post 1584203767)
I recall a formula where you could calculate horsepower if you know the weight and 1/4 mile time and/or speed.

Since we know the 1/4 time and horsepower, we should be able to calculate the C7 weight fairly reasonably.

Sorry, I don't have the formula handy. :shrug:

I've never seen somebody use one of these to calculate weight since it's probably easier to scale the car at the track, but here you go...
http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm
S.

Nitrous Oxide 06-20-2013 01:07 PM


Originally Posted by Brunotheboxer (Post 1584203345)
What are the c7 haters gonna say now?

"I...I don't like the rear end". Well get used to it cause you're gonna see a LOT of it when you race. Suck on that.

I fully expect them to stay mute. So here's one last reply to them:

http://comedyforanimators.com/wp-con...12/08/PIe2.jpg

johnglenntwo 06-20-2013 01:17 PM

Hmmm!?
 
Chevrolet says the new Stingray will stop 11 feet shorter than before, putting its 60-0-mph braking comparable with that of the mighty ZR1, which we measured at 94 feet.

Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz2WmHS3SKv

The C5 Z06 was 105ft!:ack: Which car did the 107ft?:smash:

:rock:

OnPoint 06-20-2013 01:22 PM

This new C7 is going to be very, very well received.

LT1_E85_Corvette 06-20-2013 01:22 PM

yeah i think the braking state is incorrect on the first aritical, seems really low in regards to the orginal hype. I would think closure to 100', but sadly we will have to wait and see untill GM releases their data

Guibo 06-20-2013 01:24 PM


Originally Posted by Gmumd48 (Post 1584201796)
http://www.autoweek.com/article/2013...NEWS/130619791

Now hows that in comparison to the C6-Z06 and the 911s Hmmm

Now heres Chris Harris Driving a F type against a Porsche and an Aston ( Porsche doesn't win )
Wonder what the Corvette will do !

http://flatsixes.com/cars/porsche-vs...ZXfkBdx2I5gG0L

911 tested in Motor Trend.
0-60: 3.8
1/4 mile: 12.0 @ 117
Skidpad: 1.03g
60-0: 94'
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...n/viewall.html

Variables in test conditions, drivers, etc. Should be close enough.

Harris rated the Jag higher for showroom appeal (looks), but explicitly states the Porsche is the better car. He does like big oversteer and manual transmissions, so the C7 might be right up his alley too.

jbs02somws6 06-20-2013 01:32 PM


Originally Posted by Kappa (Post 1584202809)
No its not. GM times are faster than C/D's time by a lot. Head to head its probably not that close.

I agree here. A more fair comparison would be to see what Randy pobst turns at Laguna seca in the c7 during motor trend's laguna lap special. Then let schlong comparison begin. And I predict a a low 1:37 lap time there. :)

gthal 06-20-2013 01:37 PM

It is funny that some are now questioning the results on the basis of whether the car is a "standard" car or not. Bottom line is the C7 Z51 is faster on a road course than the C6 GS, the ZL1 and is comparable to the Z06. Call it the standard car or the Z51 package car... whatever floats your boat. The performance is incredibly high given the price of the car. We are all lucky it is going to be available to us.

The rest of the argument is semantics.

TurboJunky 06-20-2013 01:38 PM


Originally Posted by BlueOx (Post 1584202800)
...isn't this news release significantly misleading? I mean, this certainly isn't a 'standard' Stingray. The track time especially would be considerably worse w/o Z51, right?

A 'standard' Stingray wouldn't have the Z51 options. It wouldn't have any rear anti-sway bar at all, would it? It wouldn't have the eLSD...or the larger tires...or the better brakes.

yes but don't they mention it will cost just under 57K.

I look at it this way
If you want to track the C7 you will buy it with the Z51 package and exhaust and race seats etc.

If you just want the car to drive daily at the speed limit then that package is just wasted money.

these numbers make me excited again for the C7. Thought for sure it would be a lot slower than a C6 Z06.

johnglenntwo 06-20-2013 01:40 PM

Well that clears everything up?
 
By: Angie Fisher on 6/20/2013 :smash:Unclear writing!
The 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray with an available performance package has been rated as the best performing standard Corvette to date.
Base model with performance exhaust!
The 2014 Vette with the performance-exhaust system can make the 0-60 sprint in 3.8 seconds. Braking from 60-0 mph takes just 107 feet, and the Stingray can sustain 1.03g in cornering.

The Corvette equipped with the performance package is priced at $56,590. The Stingray goes on sale this September with a base $51,995 price (including destination charges).
Included!
The $2,800 optional Z51 performance package adds an electronic limited-slip differential; dry-sump oiling system; integral brake, differential and transmission cooling; and aero package.
Extra!
Magnetic Ride Control with Performance Traction Management is a $1,795 option.
This is with everything!
A Corvette with the performance and magnetic ride-control package lapped the 4.2-mile Virginia International Raceway Grand Concourse in 2 minutes, 51.78 seconds. To achieve those figures, the Stingray was stripped to include just a racing seat and harness, and fire extinguisher system.
56590 is everything, but, it was 73k before?

:rofl:

Achmed 06-20-2013 01:40 PM


Originally Posted by Sin City (Post 1584203232)
It is a bit of an exaggeration to put in $5000 of options and then call it "base".

But, all auto manufacturers do this. It's just apples to apples and as long as it's called out properly, it's not cheating.


I don't mind. This configuration was what I was going to order anyway. They just proved me right! :)

No its not an exaggeration at all, woudl the Z06 with Z07 package no longer be considered a standard Z06 when they quote the Z06's performance?

Auto mags almost always pick all options when quoting performance results of a particular model.

Z51 is not an additional performance model like the C6 grand sport or Z06, its an option to the base model, and therefore the C7 Z51 is indeed base!

Achmed 06-20-2013 01:42 PM


Originally Posted by JoesC5 (Post 1584203297)
You may call it nitpicking, I call it being factual.

The Stingray coupe is a model 1YY07.
The Z51 coupe is a model 1YX07.

The Z51 C7 is a different model than the base C7

All you're doing with these posts is showing how insecure you are about the cheaper C7 performing close to your much more expensive C6.

I will be calling my Z51 C7 the base model, because that's what it is. Nitpicking lettering by GM does not make an option a whole new model lol. :crazy:

Achmed 06-20-2013 01:46 PM

but...but...but...it only has 460 horsepower and that's what's more important than these actual performance results. :rofl:

JerriVette 06-20-2013 01:46 PM

Thanks for the thread to the original poster.

As far as the fact the magazine used the word base car versus standard corvette stingray z51 with MRC is a new low for whining ...

What a great car and exactly how I would order it with the addition of the NPP exhaust....for a total of around 58 grand....or just under 60 large!

Gm outdid themselves with the new c7 z51 with MRC !


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands