Go Back   Corvette Forum > Off Topic > Politics, Religion & Controversy
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ Vendor Directory
Search
Politics, Religion & Controversy Politics | Religion | Controversy (Non-Corvette)

Welcome to Corvetteforum.com!
Welcome to Corvetteforum.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Corvetteforum.com today!


Corvette Store
 
 
C7 Parts & Accessories
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
C4 Parts & Accessories
C3 Parts & Accessories
C2 Parts & Accessories
C1 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
  
Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2007, 10:56 PM   #1
ZL1Vette
CF Senior Member
 
ZL1Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Rockland County New York
Default Shhh....don't tell JSUP...NJ Pension Time Bomb....tick tick tick

N.J. Pension Fund Endangered by Diverted Billions By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH NY TIMES

In 2005, New Jersey put either $551 million, $56 million or nothing into its pension fund for teachers. All three figures appeared in various state documents — though the state now says that the actual amount was zero.

The phantom contribution is just one indication that New Jersey has been diverting billions of dollars from its pension fund for state and local workers into other government purposes over the last 15 years, using a variety of unorthodox transactions authorized by the Legislature and by governors from both political parties.

The state has long acknowledged that it has been putting less money into the pension fund than it should. But an analysis of its records by The New York Times shows that in many cases, New Jersey has overstated even what it has claimed to be contributing, sometimes by hundreds of millions of dollars.

The discrepancies raise questions about how much money is really in the New Jersey pension fund, which industry statistics show to be the ninth largest in the nation’s public sector, with reported assets of $79 billion.

State officials say the fund is in dire shape, with a serious deficit. It has enough to pay retirees for several years, but without big contributions, paid for by cuts elsewhere in the state’s programs, higher taxes or another source, the fund could soon be caught in a downward spiral that could devastate the state’s fiscal health. Under its Constitution, New Jersey cannot reduce earned pension benefits.

The Times’s examination of New Jersey’s pension fund showed that officials have taken questionable steps again and again. The state recorded investment gains immediately when the markets were up, for instance, then delayed recording losses when the markets were down. It reported money to pay for health care costs as contributions to the pension fund, though that money would soon flow out of the fund. It claimed it had “excess” assets that allowed it to divert required pension contributions to other uses, like providing financial assistance to poor school districts.

Frederick J. Beaver, director of the Division of Pensions and Benefits in the New Jersey Treasury Department, pointed out that other places had taken similar steps occasionally when dealing with a budget crunch, but acknowledged that New Jersey was unusual. “The problem we had was doing it on a repeat basis,” he said.

An in-depth look at the reporting discrepancies for the teachers’ fund, which covers about 155,000 current teachers and 65,000 retirees, shows how the system ran awry over many years, using many questionable practices.

New Jersey recorded the $551 million contribution for the 2005 fiscal year in a bond offering statement at the end of last year. The $56 million figure appeared in an audited financial statement for the fund.

Treasury officials said that everything had been done legally. But they confirmed in a recent interview that the correct amount for that year’s pension contribution was zero, which appeared in an actuarial report. They explained that the conflicting figures elsewhere had been inflated by other items, like health care contributions.

If New Jersey violated federal securities, tax or other rules, it could be forced to make up some of the contributions. The Internal Revenue Service has very specific rules against mixing pension money with money for other uses, like health care. Federal securities law also requires bond issuers to provide complete and accurate financial information.

The New Jersey Education Association has sued the state for failing to put enough money into the teachers’ pension fund. The lawsuit does not describe all the accounting maneuvers, but a State Superior Court judge has held that the case, now scheduled for trial in May, can proceed.

State law requires New Jersey’s seven pension plans, large and small, for various types of public employees, to be funded according to actuarial standards. Over the last decade, though, the Legislature has passed, and various governors have signed, a series of amendments to statutes that allow smaller contributions or none. These were justified by various maneuvers and approved with little scrutiny. In interviews, officials of the Treasury said the changes were made at the behest of the Legislature, while legislators faulted the Treasury.

Donald T. DiFrancesco, the acting governor in 2001, when the Legislature approved an expensive pension increase for teachers and other state employees, said he recalled that “people thought it was good public policy,” devised to attract the best people. He said he did not think the measure was considered financially unsound and did not recall anyone challenging it or calling it improper. (ZL1Vette Comment: He's FOS....he makes it sound like everyone signed off on it when the only ones clapping were the teachers unions).

The state’s practices have nevertheless left its retirement system in a much more perilous condition than is widely understood.

“If people ran their households like this, they’d be in bankruptcy,” said Lynn E. Turner, a former chief accountant for the Securities and Exchange Commission. “If businesses did, the best example is the old steel mills when they got so far behind and didn’t fund their pensions as they should have. It tipped them into bankruptcy.”

A Governor Seeks Changes

Since taking office in January 2006, Gov. Jon S. Corzine, a former chairman of Goldman Sachs, has been warning that the pension fund is in worse shape than people may realize. “It’s impossible for us to stay on the course that we are on today, and deliver what people are asking for,” he said in an interview late last year. “The money will not be there.”

Governor Corzine has succeeded in getting the Legislature to contribute more to the pension fund, though not enough to meet its future obligations. There appears to be too little money to both restore the pension fund and fulfill the popular promise of property-tax relief without cutting services to an unacceptable level.

Governor Corzine has also pressed to raise the retirement age, increase employee contributions and to institute other changes to stem the growth of future costs. Now his administration is studying novel steps, like the sale of the New Jersey Turnpike.

Such strategies carry risks of their own. If the Corzine administration sells a big asset without first correcting the system’s entrenched problems, the new money could disappear into other government operations, too.

“When you sell the assets of the state, you’d better not use them for current spending. You’re eating your seed corn,” said Douglas A. Love, a member of the system’s investment oversight board. Mr. Love recently completed a calculation showing that the fund had not measured its future liabilities properly and estimated it had a $56 billion deficit, much higher than the $18 billion that the state had reported. Of course, the deficit could be greater if the assets have been inflated.

Increasing Federal Scrutiny

New Jersey’s situation may be extreme, but some other state and city governments will come under pressure in the coming years as longtime public workers retire in large numbers and the true cost of their benefit plans becomes more apparent.

The handling of public pension money has not drawn much scrutiny in the past but that is beginning to change. Members of the United States Senate have asked the Government Accountability Office for a review of public pension operations and whether new rules are needed.

The chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Christopher Cox, recently said he wants to step up enforcement in the municipal bond markets and to improve financial reporting. He said he had come to this conclusion after a scandal in San Diego, where officials put false information about the pension fund into bond offering statements. After an investigation, the S.E.C. found it amounted to securities fraud.

The Internal Revenue Service may also be flexing some muscles. It intervened in San Diego after learning that the city was using its pension fund to pay other expenses, like retiree health care costs. The money in pension funds gets preferred tax treatment and must be spent solely on pensions.

Andy Zuckerman, the I.R.S.’s director for employee plans, rulings and agreements, said he could not discuss New Jersey’s situation because of rules on tax confidentiality. But in general, when local laws conflicted with the rules in the tax code, “the federal law applies, period.”

When asked about the discrepancies in the records for New Jersey’s pension plans, Treasury officials who met with two reporters at a conference room at an office building in Trenton last month acknowledged some unusual practices.

“We were not the ultimate decision-makers,” said John D. Megariotis, the deputy director of the Division of Pensions and Benefits. “We were the bean-counters.”

Mr. Megariotis was asked about the reference to the $551 million contribution to the teachers’ pension fund. He said that most of that amount had been the state’s payments for health care benefits.

The items were combined, he said, because New Jersey’s health plan for retired teachers lies within their pension fund. It is not clear whether New Jersey’s practices satisfy I.R.S. rules on the commingling of such assets.

Mr. Beaver, the division’s director since 2003, asked Mr. Megariotis why he had accounted for health care costs that way.

“Those are not my numbers,” Mr. Megariotis, a certified public accountant, responded emphatically. He added that New Jersey would not do it again. Both officials said the numbers had been approved by outside counsel.

As for the $56 million pension contribution listed in the audited financial statements, Mr. Beaver said he preferred the state’s actuarial reports — the ones showing a contribution of zero.

Seizing on $5.3 Billion

To explain the $56 million, though, Mr. Beaver and Mr. Megariotis recounted a bit of history. In 2001, the Legislature voted to increase teachers’ pensions by 9 percent, raising the plan’s total cost by an estimated $3.1 billion. Because New Jersey’s Constitution forbids creating debts without creating a funding source, the lawmakers needed to pay for it. They looked back to June 30, 1999, the height of the bull market.

Records showed that the pension investments were worth $5.3 billion more on that day than the plan’s actuary showed, because actuaries phase in gains and losses slowly to avoid sudden swings in market value. The lawmakers seized on this paper gain of $5.3 billion, and voted to channel it as an actual windfall into a new reserve in the pension fund, to pay for the new benefits.

I.R.S. officials said that a company would not be permitted to do this with a pension fund.

By the time the Legislature did this in 2001, of course, the stock market had tumbled and much of the $5.3 billion had melted away. That appeared not to have concerned the Legislature. An election was looming, and the teachers’ union was complaining bitterly about past failures to put money into their pension fund.

John O. Bennett, the Republican who was co-president of the State Senate in 2001, said the DiFrancesco administration had pushed for the increase and said there would be money to cover it.

“Now history has shown that that hasn’t been the case,” said Mr. Bennett, who abstained from voting on the bill because it also increased the pensions of legislators.

Mr. Beaver, of the Treasury, said he thought the Legislature “went back and rewrote history” when it passed the 2001 bill.

This unusual arrangement did not last long. Two years later, the state needed to make a big contribution to the pension fund as those earlier market declines showed up in its overall value.

Lacking the resources, the state laid claim to the special reserve. The assets were recycled back into the main body of the pension fund — and labeled a state contribution. That was $56 million in one year, Mr. Beaver said pointing to the state’s audited financial report. The state did this three years in a row, until fiscal 2007, when the reserve was empty.

Independent experts said they could not understand how New Jersey could designate this a pension contribution. “It’s a real misnomer,” said Mr. Turner, the former S.E.C. official. “The reality is, there was no new money.”

Because steps like these were taken over many years, it is difficult to judge the accumulated damage to the New Jersey system, experts said.

“It would be a really shocking picture, to show it all in one place, all the money that’s been taken out of the retirement system at precisely the times when the benefits were increased,” said Douglas R. Forrester, who ran New Jersey’s pension fund years ago, in the administration of Thomas H. Kean. In 2005, Mr. Forrester, a Republican, ran for governor against Mr. Corzine.

The state has about $31 billion of long-term debt outstanding, most of it in bonds. But Mr. Forrester said he thought that if all the unfunded debts of the state retirement system were correctly measured and added to that, “you’d get a number that’s about $175 billion.”

“I don’t see how we’re going to get out of this,” he said.
ZL1Vette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 10:58 PM   #2
ZL1Vette
CF Senior Member
 
ZL1Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Rockland County New York
Default

BTW, what NJ Democrats (and any Republicans) did was akin to what Enron officials did. It dwarfs anything that Dennis Koslowski did at Tyco.

Koslowski is rotting in an upstate NY jail.

The politicians who gave NJ this pension debacle got raises, higher pensions, and accolades from liberal NJ newspaper editorial writers.
ZL1Vette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:01 PM   #3
jsup
CF Senior Member
 
jsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Note the last line:
Quote:
“I don’t see how we’re going to get out of this,” he said.
Bullsh1t. they know EXACTLY how they are going to get through it. RAISE MY TAXES AGAIN!!!

This is why public pensions are a crime perpitrated on the taxpayer.

You put money where a politician can get their hands on it. They take it, then the taxpayers have to fix it.

Ya know, I know that these people were promised pensions but I am really starting not to give a ship.

Privatize the dam pensions today!!!
jsup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:01 PM   #4
jsup
CF Senior Member
 
jsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZL1Vette View Post
BTW, what NJ Democrats (and any Republicans) did was akin to what Enron officials did. It dwarfs anything that Dennis Koslowski did at Tyco.

Koslowski is rotting in an upstate NY jail.

The politicians who gave NJ this pension debacle got raises, higher pensions, and accolades from liberal NJ newspaper editorial writers.
Typical. Same thing with SS.

Watch all these pension supporters, rkhelger and Ponch, defend this criminal system while rk was screaming about Enron and Tyco.

Hypocrits.
jsup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:10 PM   #5
65Z01
CF Senior Member
Cruise-In II Veteran
 
65Z01's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: SE NY
Send a message via AIM to 65Z01
Default

Quote:
— though the state now says that the actual amount was zero.
No problemo, the NJ tax payers will gladly poney up to support retired state employees...
__________________
My 1988 Z01 #65 Site

------------------
65Z01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:10 PM   #6
Steve439
CF Senior Member
 
Steve439's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Austin TX
Default

Cliff notes please....
Steve439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:12 PM   #7
jsup
CF Senior Member
 
jsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve439 View Post
Cliff notes please....
Money went into a public pension

Politicians stole it

Taxpayers have to suck it up

Politicians should be in jail.
jsup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:14 PM   #8
Jaybo
CF Senior Member
 
Jaybo's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 1999
Location: Back in the liberal Mecca of Texas! Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsup View Post
Money went into a public pension

Politicians stole it

Taxpayers have to suck it up

Politicians should be in jail.
Surely this couldn't have happened with the Dems ending the culture of corruption!
Jaybo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:17 PM   #9
jsup
CF Senior Member
 
jsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybo View Post
Surely this couldn't have happened with the Dems ending the culture of corruption!
In NJ, it's ALL corruption. Regardless of party. But I have to say, the crats are FAR more corrupt. It's a matter of degree.
jsup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:20 PM   #10
Steve439
CF Senior Member
 
Steve439's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Austin TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsup View Post
Money went into a public pension

Politicians stole it

Taxpayers have to suck it up

Politicians should be in jail.


PS Politicians suck.
Steve439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:22 PM   #11
Jaybo
CF Senior Member
 
Jaybo's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 1999
Location: Back in the liberal Mecca of Texas! Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsup View Post
In NJ, it's ALL corruption. Regardless of party. But I have to say, the crats are FAR more corrupt. It's a matter of degree.
Are there elected Republicans in NJ?
Jaybo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:25 PM   #12
jsup
CF Senior Member
 
jsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybo View Post
Are there elected Republicans in NJ?
Yes, they are both nice guys.

Most of the REAL ESTATE in NJ is conservative. But the high concentration of votes in cities isn't. And we have REAL cities here, not like Cleveland. Like Newark, Jersey City, Paterson, Trenton, ect.... Those skew heavy democrat. And those votes are bought and paid for.

Corzine is Governor becuase he spread money around the state. The same way he got to the Senate.
jsup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:28 PM   #13
Jaybo
CF Senior Member
 
Jaybo's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 1999
Location: Back in the liberal Mecca of Texas! Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsup View Post
Yes, they are both nice guys.


Quote:
Most of the REAL ESTATE in NJ is conservative. But the high concentration of votes in cities isn't. And we have REAL cities here, not like Cleveland. Like Newark, Jersey City, Paterson, Trenton, ect.... Those skew heavy democrat. And those votes are bought and paid for.

Corzine is Governor becuase he spread money around the state. The same way he got to the Senate.
Wow. I just have the liberal oasis of Texas to deal with.
Jaybo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:30 PM   #14
jsup
CF Senior Member
 
jsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybo View Post




Wow. I just have the liberal oasis of Texas to deal with.
Our republicans are to the right of Mc Cain. Their policies are kinda like Olympia Snow.
jsup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:32 PM   #15
Jaybo
CF Senior Member
 
Jaybo's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 1999
Location: Back in the liberal Mecca of Texas! Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsup View Post
Our republicans are to the right of Mc Cain. Their policies are kinda like Olympia Snow.
My cat is to the right of John McCain.
Jaybo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:34 PM   #16
jsup
CF Senior Member
 
jsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybo View Post
My cat is to the right of John McCain.
I meant left. Sorry, it's a hard word to type.
jsup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:35 PM   #17
Jaybo
CF Senior Member
 
Jaybo's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 1999
Location: Back in the liberal Mecca of Texas! Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsup View Post
I meant left. Sorry, it's a hard word to type.
Only that you have to stop before the "ist".
Jaybo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 12:06 AM   #18
ZL1Vette
CF Senior Member
 
ZL1Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Rockland County New York
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve439 View Post
Cliff notes please....
Benefits increased now, costs deferred until later....liberal (!) accounting rules manipulated.

Do it as a corporate CEO ? Securities fraud....racketeering...felonies....10-20 years behind bars.

Do it as an elected official? Campaign contributions from ASFCME....teachers union endorsement....sweep to victory in November by a huge margin...talking heads say it is 'a victory for The People.'
ZL1Vette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 12:21 AM   #19
SilverBulletZ06
CF Senior Member
 
SilverBulletZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Send a message via AIM to SilverBulletZ06
Default

That is why when offered a NYS pension or a private 403B plan I chose the latter.
SilverBulletZ06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 12:32 AM   #20
Snoopysvet
CF Senior Member
 
Snoopysvet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Occupied San Diego Calif
Default

Employee Pension misuse has the city of San Diego on the brink of bankruptcy.
The city's credit has been downgraded.
Three city councilman have been convicted, one mysteriously died, he was only in his thirties?
The incumbent mayor was next defeated by a write in candidate.
It went to court.
Many write in voters neglected to check the box after writing her name.
Those votes were not counted.
The incumbent kept his job.
After a few weeks he resigned.
Snoopysvet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 12:32 AM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > Off Topic > Politics, Religion & Controversy
Reload this Page Shhh....don't tell JSUP...NJ Pension Time Bomb....tick tick tick
 
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Emails & Password Backup

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2