Corvette Forum  
Go Back   Corvette Forum > General Corvette Topics > Factory Correct Resto
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  
Register Vendors Buy a Vette Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ Photo AlbumsGarage

Factory Correct Resto Corvette Restoration Tips, Bodywork, Numbers Matching, Period-Correct Modifications or Original Condition

Corvette Store
 
 
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-08-2008, 05:34 PM   #1
BillyL
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Default '70..f41

While installing a fuel tank, I counted 7 leaf springs. The JM among other books denotes 7 leafs as part of the F41 suspension. The car has no rear sway bar and the front sway bar is a 3/4" unit. Its all original components under the car. Shouldn't it have 9 leaf springs? Its a '70 conv. 350/350 W/AC late June build. Thanks....

Billy

Last edited by BillyL; 12-08-2008 at 05:43 PM.
BillyL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 05:47 PM   #2
Alan 71
CF Senior Member
 
Alan 71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Default

Hi Billy,
Do I remember this question from the Tech Board on Saturday or yesterday?
I would expect your car to have a 9 leaf spring, as did Joe L.
Regards,
Alan
Alan 71 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 06:54 PM   #3
DAN70
Junior Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: PURCELLVILLE VA
Default

Alan, everything under this Corvette is original to the car. Believe it or not we replaced the original bearings in the trailing arms two years ago, did the fuel tank last week and made the determintion to refresh the whole car. Billy has owned the car for 15 years and bought it from a mutual freind who had owned it 15 years. I just don't know why someone would replace the rear spring and nothing else, at least the previous owner didn't.
DAN70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 07:21 PM   #4
wfo76
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Default

Memories fade and all kinds of things happened to these cars over the years. F41 only available as part of ZR1 so no way this car had a factory 7-leaf installed at St Louis. Has to be a service replacement or aftermarket spring. The original owner could have complained to his dealer when new about sagging or squeaking in the rear, and bam, there goes your original spring.
wfo76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 07:46 PM   #5
DAN70
Junior Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: PURCELLVILLE VA
Default

I know stuff happens. Did all 70-72 have the 9 leaf as the standard set up? Should there be a part # stenciled on the spring pack? Bushings need replacing might as well look for a part #. Thanks.
DAN70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 08:39 PM   #6
wfo76
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Default

Yes, all 70 models except the 25 with RPO ZR1 had a 9-leaf spring.
Part numbers on the original springs? Now that, I do not know.
I have seen aftermarket 7 leaf springs with painted stencil numbers.
wfo76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 09:10 PM   #7
mstanton
CF Senior Member
 
mstanton's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego CA
Default

When I rebuilt my 70 LT-1's front suspension, I found, to my surprise, that the car had an F41 front sway bar. The rest of the front suspension was original, but I doubt it was factory installed. Rear springs and sway bars are easy to change.
mstanton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 09:33 PM   #8
LT-1 kid
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Default

i think all 70-72 LT-1s had a 7 leaf spring as standard,with no rear sway bar,except ZR-1-also had the rear sway
LT-1 kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 09:42 PM   #9
wfo76
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Default

No, the LT-1s had the exact same suspension as the base engine car which meant a 9-leaf spring.
No factory rear bars on small blocks til 75.
wfo76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 05:06 AM   #10
DAN70
Junior Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: PURCELLVILLE VA
Default

Thanks for your input. When we get around to pulling the spring pak out and clean it up we'll bring this thread up again an let you all know what we found. May be some markings on it, I've found markings on other cars hopefully these are no different....

Last edited by DAN70; 12-09-2008 at 05:10 AM.
DAN70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 09:14 AM   #11
Easy Mike
CF Senior Member
Cruise-In II Veteran
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Horse Cave KY
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAN70 View Post
...Should there be a part # stenciled on the spring pack?...
Possibly.
Easy Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 07:49 AM   #12
7T1vette
CF Senior Member
 
7T1vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Crossville TN
Default

New guy on the assembly line....didn't know the difference between 7 and 9 leaf springs.... Items like this happened all the time. If it assembled, it got shipped.
7T1vette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 10:38 AM   #13
a560156
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7T1vette View Post
New guy on the assembly line....didn't know the difference between 7 and 9 leaf springs.... Items like this happened all the time. If it assembled, it got shipped.
No offense, but I disagree that "this happened all the time". That is wishful thinking. There has not been one documented case of it ever happening.
a560156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 11:37 AM   #14
gbvette62
CF Senior Member
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Default

I know that common wisdom says that F41 was never available on 70-72's and I agree, but I've seen an awful lot of these cars with 7 leaf springs. A freind of mine bought a real barn find 71 LT-1 rag top about 4 years ago. This car had been stored 20 years and had what seemed like a foot of dust on it. This was an unrestored, 90,000 mile car, green on green, with the original carb, starter, alternator, radio, shifter, seat belts, wheels, spare and convertible top and all shielding was in place. This was an untouched car, and yet it had F41 front and rear bars and the 7 leaf spring. The spring was a GM spring and the rear bar was mounted with correct headmark hardware. The car was not a ZR1, it did not have J56 brakes. I'm not saying that this car came with F41, but it didn't look like a car that anyone had ever been into to modify. Some of the tank sticker was there, but not enough to read all the options. My buddy cleaned the car up and intended to take it for NCRS Bow Tie judging, but sold it instead as he had too many projects. The car went to North Jersey and then showed up on E-bay 2 months later. I don't know where the car went after that.
gbvette62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 12:53 PM   #15
7T1vette
CF Senior Member
 
7T1vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Crossville TN
Default

Exactly how does one "document" something that isn't supposed to happen? The only way is to accept anecdotal evidence from the original owners...many of whom will testify to their cars being "exactly as it came from the factory"....yet built with and occasional incorrect item.

As I stated, this happened all the time. When 'proper' stock ran out, the line used what they had; when new people were dumped on the line, they picked up the wrong part and it fit; when production of a particular part was held up (almost never for a quality problem), they would use whatever was available to keep the line running. If you don't believe it, that's OK...but that IS the way it was.
7T1vette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 04:06 PM   #16
JohnZ
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7T1vette View Post
As I stated, this happened all the time. When 'proper' stock ran out, the line used what they had; when new people were dumped on the line, they picked up the wrong part and it fit; when production of a particular part was held up (almost never for a quality problem), they would use whatever was available to keep the line running. If you don't believe it, that's OK...but that IS the way it was.
No, it didn't happen "all the time", especially substitution of a special low-volume part where usage was only 25 per year and whose configuration was completely different from the only other high-volume production part. That's a convenient excuse for explaining the presence of a service replacement part.

I spent 38 years in assembly plants (including two at St. Louis), from repairman to Plant Manager, and I know a little about documented substitutions, authorized deviations, and inventory control. That spring is not original to the car.

JohnZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 07:58 PM   #17
a560156
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7T1vette View Post
Exactly how does one "document" something that isn't supposed to happen? The only way is to accept anecdotal evidence from the original owners...many of whom will testify to their cars being "exactly as it came from the factory"....yet built with and occasional incorrect item.

As I stated, this happened all the time. When 'proper' stock ran out, the line used what they had; when new people were dumped on the line, they picked up the wrong part and it fit; when production of a particular part was held up (almost never for a quality problem), they would use whatever was available to keep the line running. If you don't believe it, that's OK...but that IS the way it was.

Well, you know what they say about opinions, especially when they are unsupported by empirical evidence.
a560156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 07:58 PM   #18
a560156
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnZ View Post
No, it didn't happen "all the time", especially substitution of a special low-volume part where usage was only 25 per year and whose configuration was completely different from the only other high-volume production part. That's a convenient excuse for explaining the presence of a service replacement part.

I spent 38 years in assembly plants (including two at St. Louis), from repairman to Plant Manager, and I know a little about documented substitutions, authorized deviations, and inventory control. That spring is not original to the car.


Thanks John.
a560156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 10:42 PM   #19
DAN70
Junior Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: PURCELLVILLE VA
Default

Billy and I found this, this past weekend. The JM states that the yellow tag means it's a service replacement spring. It looks like the front springs are service replacements so the rear spring was most likely replaced also. Ball joints and bushings look original though.



DAN70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 02:49 AM   #20
early shark
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Nevada City California
Default

Those front coils have the optional F41 heavy duty tag. It just means that a previous owner had the F41 suspension springs (front & rear) installed. I did the same thing with one of my '71's. I have the correct GM F41 springs installed just as the factory WOULD have done had that option been ordered new.
early shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Go Back   Corvette Forum > General Corvette Topics > Factory Correct Resto
Reload this Page '70..f41
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
69 Coupe For Sale in Iowa 01QuickSilver C3s for Sale/Wanted 18 07-27-2005 02:52 AM
2 '68 BB verts, '70 SB vert. & '72 vert for sale + misc. 68435roadster C3s for Sale/Wanted 14 05-26-2005 09:56 AM
Sway bar suggestions 70 LS1 C3 Tech/Performance 19 03-29-2004 02:26 AM
FS: 1967 427/435 Coupe boerio C1s & C2s for Sale/Wanted 13 08-31-2003 09:35 PM
17" tire question 70 LS1 C3 Tech/Performance 9 04-29-2002 01:04 AM
Hood Clearance On A 70 vette w/ LT1 hood???help Cory1970 Engine Mods 26 02-21-2002 01:33 AM
pic posting question 1980 razz C3 Tech/Performance 13 02-09-2002 01:15 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.

Advertise Here - Contact Us - Corvette Enthusiast Discussion Forum - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2