Corvette Forum  


Go Back   Corvette Forum > General Corvette Topics > Engine Mods
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Vendors Buy a Vette Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ PhotosGarage

Engine Mods Outrageous Builds, High-Horsepower Modifications, strokers, and big cams for the Corvette

Corvette Store
 
 
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
 
Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2002, 11:36 PM   #1
Metal Wulf
CF Senior Member
 
Metal Wulf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Bridgeton NJ
Send a message via AIM to Metal Wulf
Default Question about Trick Flows

Which of the heads would be better for low end torque?

23* or G2


TIA :cheers:
Metal Wulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2002, 10:07 PM   #2
Neil350
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: Houston TX
Send a message via AIM to Neil350
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Metal_Wulf)

I used the G2's on my 79, I have no experience with the 23* but I have to say that I'm pushing some series power with mine!
Cary Gallaway

79'Stroked385`
Neil350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2002, 11:14 PM   #3
Ramanstud
CF Senior Member
 
Ramanstud's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati Oh
Send a message via AIM to Ramanstud
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Metal_Wulf)

you know, I would lean towards the G2's. The G2's are "quench" type, which if memory serves aids in combustion efficiency and curbing detonation; and I get slightly better results from DD2000 via the way it differentiates between the wedge and regular 23* heads (who knows if the DD2K is overtly optimistic or if the G2's will actually work better). Interpreting their respective descriptions on trickflow's website, they seem to be of the disposition that the 23* promote more torque "without sacrificing HP," and the G2's are the other way around. Ultimately it will depend on your setup, but there's something to be gained by calling TF up and asking!

If it's any consolation, I'm looking at the G2s for my 383. :lol:

:cheers:
Ramanstud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2002, 11:47 PM   #4
Metal Wulf
CF Senior Member
 
Metal Wulf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Bridgeton NJ
Send a message via AIM to Metal Wulf
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Ramanstud)

Thanks for the info

:cheers:
Metal Wulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2002, 06:52 PM   #5
Bob86ZZ4
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 1999
Location: St. Paul MN
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Metal_Wulf)

I have 23 degrees that have served me fine for a couple years. My buddy put the same heads on his mini-rammed 383, at the same time I bought mine. One of his cracked, they replaced it under warranty. Awhile later the other one dropped a seat outa the valve and it wrecked his engine. They replaced his broken engine parts and bought the heads back from him. He didn't want to have their heads any more. He took the money they gave him back for the heads and bought AFR 210's. It cost him the labor and time without his car. I don't think I would buy another set of Trick Flow's just because I don't want to risk going through what he went through. But, like I said, mine have been working fine so far.
Bob86ZZ4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2002, 07:15 PM   #6
Dominic Sorresso
CF Senior Member
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Send a message via AIM to Dominic Sorresso
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Metal_Wulf)

I have the 23d heads on my Xfire. HAd them for the last 2 years. I believe they are the "best bang for the buck heads available", including the Vortecs. I originally considered the G2 heads but was put off them by several who had used them. The early ones apparently had quality problems and bad guides. Also the issue of getting the valvetrain geometry correct was another issue. The results I have gotten are excellent. They seem to handle whatever mods I throw at them and they just keep generating more power. For a Xfire, they work great and help put down over 430lbft of torque. :cheers:
Dominic Sorresso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2002, 09:43 PM   #7
63FI
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Hamilton Square,NJ ; Mercer
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Metal_Wulf)

I have had a pair of 23s on my 327 since summer 2001 and they are great. Lost NO low end torque and it pulls better on top end. If you are thinking of putting them on a FI car, let me know.
Lou
63FI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2002, 11:30 PM   #8
Stingraycrazy
CF Senior Member
 
Stingraycrazy's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Parish NY
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (63FI)

I had the 23's on my first motor. They were mildly ported and polished. Flow is important but it isn’t everything. The Intake to exhaust port efficiency and the combustion chamber efficiency were excellent. I ran 11:1 compression with 92 octane pump gas and only needed 34 degrees total timing to achieve 475HP/435TQ. I think the Trick Flow 23 heads are a very good head for the money. The G2’s will need special pistons or will need to be fly cut for higher lift cams since the intake valve is canted. Here are the 23 degree numbers:
http://www.stingraycrazy.com/custom.html

Tested on a SuperFlow flow bench @ 28”H20

Intake Ported / Exhaust Ported
0.050 - 32 cfm / 0.050 - 23 cfm
0.100 - 65 cfm / 0.100 - 49 cfm
0.200 - 134 cfm / 0.200 - 112 cfm
0.300 - 198 cfm / 0.300 - 140 cfm
0.400 - 242 cfm / 0.400 - 180 cfm
0.500 - 256 cfm / 0.500 - 202 cfm
0.600 - 267 cfm / 0.600 - 216 cfm

Another good choice would be the Canfield heads. The flow numbers are very good. :crazy:

[Modified by Stingraycrazy, 3:33 AM 11/26/2002]


[Modified by Stingraycrazy, 3:35 AM 11/26/2002]


[Modified by Stingraycrazy, 3:36 AM 11/26/2002]
Stingraycrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2002, 02:59 PM   #9
chewy
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Concord Ca.
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Stingraycrazy)

I have a set of G2s they are a real pain to set up correctly but they make power from idle up because of the small intake runner volume.
chewy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2002, 07:35 PM   #10
Metal Wulf
CF Senior Member
 
Metal Wulf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Bridgeton NJ
Send a message via AIM to Metal Wulf
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (chewy)

I didn't know that about the G2's... Think I'll go 23* just for easier install.

No FI, just a rebuilt and tuned q-jet

:cheers:
Metal Wulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2002, 09:28 PM   #11
tomcat-pilot
CF Senior Member
 
tomcat-pilot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Charleston SC
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (63FI)

63FI- I just installed the 23* heads on my 85 L98. Very nice head for the money, bolted right on, no hassles, drilled for all accesories. Waiting on the chip for the car and I will be doing a dyno pull in about 2 weeks, I'll keep you posted.
tomcat-pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2002, 09:34 PM   #12
Dominic Sorresso
CF Senior Member
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Send a message via AIM to Dominic Sorresso
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (tomcat-pilot)

Tomcat,

I'll be interested in hearing about whether your experience with these heads is the same as what I have gotten. I think you'll be very pleased. :thumbs:
Dominic Sorresso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2002, 02:21 PM   #13
Guest
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Dominic Sorresso)

Im currently running the older style(g2) heads on my camaro, i am very happy with them, and the car runs high 11's low 12's with a very basic combo....the biggest problem thou is you cant run more then 10-1 without special pistons, and you are limited on the lift of the cam....for my new engine i just built i used the 23 degree heads,,,i spoke to the people at trick flow and they told me they have stopped making the orig twisted wedge design due to the the issues i mentioned above,,,also he said that the g2 design only make 10-12 more hp then the regular 23 degree setup....i havnt got the new engine running yet but ill post some #'s once i do......either way i dont think you can go wrong, they are great heads :cheers:
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2002, 07:36 PM   #14
Metal Wulf
CF Senior Member
 
Metal Wulf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Bridgeton NJ
Send a message via AIM to Metal Wulf
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Kamarossrs)

I'm going with the 23* heads, but now the question is get the cnc ones or not... the price is like 150-200 more for the cnc ones. i'm not sure if it's worth it or not. :confused:
Metal Wulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2002, 07:45 PM   #15
Ramanstud
CF Senior Member
 
Ramanstud's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati Oh
Send a message via AIM to Ramanstud
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Metal_Wulf)

I was JUST looking at the website today, and the CNC'd heads seem to flow a bit better, especially at higher valve lift.

Lift Value (in.) Cast l CNC Chamber Option
Intake Flow ExhFlow l Intake Flow Exhaust Flow
---------------------------l-----------------------------------------------------
CFM CFM l CFM CFM
0.100 50.6 57.9 l 64.2 55.9
0.200 135.8 98.3 l 138.5 105.2
0.300 191.0 136.4 l 197.7 145.5
0.400 229.7 162.9 l 237.1 170.7
0.500 253.1 176.9 l 256.8 186.3
0.600 254.3 189.6 l 258.4 195.9


sorry about the chart, but I lose my spacing on posting....



[Modified by Ramanstud, 11:48 PM 12/5/2002]
Ramanstud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2002, 10:22 AM   #16
mountainmotor
CF Senior Member
 
mountainmotor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (Metal_Wulf)

The CNC'd TFS 23's will make up to 17 more HP is what I hear

These heads come with the best valve job I have seen in a aftermarket sub 1k a pair small block head. I really like them FWIW.
They have a pretty good lip where the intake seat is machined and set in,it creates some turbulance " the bad kind " but for the most part they run fine right out of the box but of course some additional port work will see a gain. They have a a really good D-Port exhaust

Neat heads that will get a job done for most street strip needs and the price is right as well imo
mountainmotor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2002, 11:16 AM   #17
Dominic Sorresso
CF Senior Member
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Send a message via AIM to Dominic Sorresso
Default Re: Question about Trick Flows (mountainmotor)

Moutainmotor,

When I got mine, I pulled one of the valves to see if there was anything to be gained from a pocket port. Didn't look like it to me. Any thoughts?
And the valve job, as you described looked excellent. Are you thinking the intake valve could be "unshrouded" further? Anthing else you'd mod on these heads. I realize that after a while, more flow may or may not mean anything or the size motor you have. At a stock block 350, I thought the 195cc runners were plenty. I was pleasantly surprised that the "largish" runner still promoted excellent low end mixture velocity. My motor pulls from 1400rpm on up, no problemo. :chevy :thumbs:
Dominic Sorresso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2002, 11:16 AM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > General Corvette Topics > Engine Mods
Reload this Page Question about Trick Flows
 
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lets talk heads. Stewart's74 C3 Tech/Performance 24 08-21-2003 05:36 PM
Is the 2002 stock exhaust louder than the 2001? FINN II C5 Z06 Discussion 27 02-12-2002 02:49 AM
Anyone using aluminum heads? Johns vette C3 Tech/Performance 16 08-23-2001 03:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Emails & Password Backup