Corvette Forum  


Go Back   Corvette Forum > General Corvette Topics > Engine Mods
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Vendors Buy a Vette Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ PhotosGarage

Engine Mods Outrageous Builds, High-Horsepower Modifications, strokers, and big cams for the Corvette

Corvette Store
 
 
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
 
Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2008, 02:27 AM   #1
MarkBychowski
CF Senior Member
 
MarkBychowski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Tx
Default Dyno numbers on 370ci LT4 w/AFR heads

I thought I'd post these for anyone interested since several of you helped me out with dyno simulations last summer. I finally got the motor together and had it dynoed (engine dyno only, it's not back in the car yet).

The shop didn't have an FI controller, so we had to run it with an LT1 carb manifold (smaller ports than my heads, but this was really just for break-in and mechanical check) and a Demon 1000CFM carb.

Crank (not RWHP) numbers with NO accessories and open headers:
Torque 485.7 @ 5100RPM
HP 548.8 @ 5900RPM
(I'll try to upload a graph later)

It peaked a bit lower RPM than I was hoping, but the graph started getting a bit rough so there may be a valve control issue. Obviously the small ports on the intake weren't helping either. I'll have it in the car later this month so I'll have better numbers with the right manifold and proper tuning. Even still, I'm pretty happy since the projections were 500HP at best at the crank

Here's a link to the previous post with simulation numbers:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1792878

Engine specs:
Shortblock
LT1 / 4 small block
bore: 4.03"
Stroke 3.625"
6.0" rods
Static compression 10.96:1

Hydraulic roller cam, specs at .05" lift:
Intake duration 230, .622 valve lift
Exhaust duration 236, .624 valve lift
Lobe separation: 112.0
Installed 108.0 intake center line

Intake:
Ported LT4
42lb injectors
58mm throttlebody

Heads:
AFR 210cc LT4 (reverse cooled) competition ported
65cc chamber
2.08 intake valve
1.60 exhaust valve

Oil system:
Dry sump with approximately 10"-15" crankcase vacuum
MarkBychowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 12:24 PM   #2
MarkBychowski
CF Senior Member
 
MarkBychowski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Tx
Default

Here's the graph -- It's not a very detailed sampling (100 RPM segments), but you can see it jumping around a bit just over 6K. Not sure if it's valve float or something to do with the port restriction from the wrong intake.


Last edited by MarkBychowski; 04-02-2008 at 12:30 PM.
MarkBychowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 06:23 PM   #3
Cris
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
Default

Thanks for posting the numbers Mark, you must be pleased you beat your projections. These new AFR heads are generating some nice HP numbers!

Could you post the what dyno you were using? I'll assume your figures are corrected to 29.92 inches Hg and 60F dry air?
Cris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 12:21 AM   #4
MarkBychowski
CF Senior Member
 
MarkBychowski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Tx
Default

Hi Cris,
Yes, corrected to 29.92, 60 degrees, dry air.
I'm actually not sure of the dyno model -- I didn't think to look for the name. It was a water brake dyno. The number F1200 shows on the printout, but not sure if that's a model or something else.
MarkBychowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:50 AM   #5
auctionman256
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: GADSDEN ALABAMA
Default

kool
auctionman256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 06:53 PM   #6
Shurshot
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Wylie SC
Default

You are making some good numbers...... it is going to be fun

Are people still using the accel airbox on these....... I had one on one back in 98 (383) that seemed to add some significant power to it.

Enjoy

Doug
Shurshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 10:05 PM   #7
5abivt
CF Senior Member

 
5abivt's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Toronto ontario
Default

Great Numbers ! My new LT4 stroker is a 370 ci as well ! Your peaks will definitely be affected by the manifold as the motor will cylinder fill at lower rpms if the manifold you used has smaller ports.

What heads did you use? Are these the afr eliminator heads? Just curious what manifold you are using since I was told the LT1 manifold mated to these heads since they are not 'raised' runner.
5abivt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 01:18 AM   #8
MarkBychowski
CF Senior Member
 
MarkBychowski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Tx
Default

Thanks!

Pryderei, yes they're AFR 210 Eliminators with competition porting. I'll be using them with a ported LT4 intake (777 gaskets). The 210s ports are higher than the standard LT1 intake gasket, but not sure how much. They are slightly shorter (about 1/8-3/16") than the 777 LT4 gasket, though. I had to blend the top of the ports on my heads in order to avoid having a ridge between the head and intake.

With the LT1 carb intake on the dyno, though, the intake port of the head was taller than the casting of the intake manifold -- we had to use a smaller intake gasket and offset it a bit just to get the thing to seal well enough to run. So if you're planning on running them with an LT1 intake, definitely mock it up first to make sure everything aligns correctly.

Also, something to check: the driver's side front oil drainback was completely blocked by the deck of the block. I had to grind the block to allow the oil to drain back properly (I found that before running it, thankfully). The other three drainbacks were fine.
MarkBychowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 06:51 AM   #9
SuperL98
CF Senior Member
 
SuperL98's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Mass Mass
Default

Mark,
I still have your files saved, and I went back and ran the same combination but with open headers and a carb manifold & 1000cfm carb.
Most manifolds I've measured have had about 6 inch runners, and I used a diameter slightly less than the cyl-head intake diameter (like you stated).
I also ghosted the new graph on top of yours.
Will be nice to see what the final LT4 manifold does ... I think the 3 inch runners will peak much higher & maybe a bigger throttle body would help move up the peak numbers (I'll run that when I have some time).
Interesting anyway




Last edited by SuperL98; 04-08-2008 at 07:11 AM.
SuperL98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 08:48 AM   #10
SuperL98
CF Senior Member
 
SuperL98's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Mass Mass
Default

Ok .. last graph for today
More equal comparision, like you ran the LT4 on the dyno the same way.
LT4 manifold, no MAF, no air cleaner, open headers, 1000 cfm throttle body.
vs
Carb manifold as before.
SuperL98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 02:54 PM   #11
MarkBychowski
CF Senior Member
 
MarkBychowski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Tx
Default

Thanks! That's actually pretty impressive that the figures track relatively close (the carb manifold graphs). Pretty depressing how much the torque curve suffers with the exhaust and the LT4 intake on there

I'm hoping the top end issues are related more to the intake than valve float, but I have a feeling I'm going to need to get some better springs or possibly a rev kit -- I'd rather keep it simple, though. Hopefully I don't need to go with Ti retainers.
MarkBychowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 04:00 PM   #12
SuperL98
CF Senior Member
 
SuperL98's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Mass Mass
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkBychowski View Post
Pretty depressing how much the torque curve suffers with the exhaust and the LT4 intake on there
The more I look at that last graph, if the LT4 data is right.
The more a single plane EFI comes to mind.
That's a lot of torque to throw away..



That torque would make an sick road race car
SuperL98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 06:30 PM   #13
MarkBychowski
CF Senior Member
 
MarkBychowski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Tx
Default

Yea that seems to be what many of the more wild Camaro guys run. A bit of a trick fitting that under the stock hood, though
MarkBychowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:18 PM   #14
BrianCunningham
CF Senior Member

 
BrianCunningham's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Default

Isn't the LT1 carb intake a dual plane intake?

If so that would explain the drop off.

Well, that and the fact the ports don't match exactly.

Good pull though.
__________________
Polo Green 95 LT1 6-spd

383 LT1/Vortech Supercharger/AFR heads/Rod end suspension/Penske-Hardbar dual rate coilovers/Wilwood 6pot brakes
NCCC Governor/Membership/WebMaster: www.baystatecorvetteclub.com
BrianCunningham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:18 PM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > General Corvette Topics > Engine Mods
Reload this Page Dyno numbers on 370ci LT4 w/AFR heads
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
777, afr, carb, corvette, dyno, gasket, head, heads, intake, lt1, lt4, manifold, match, plane, race, single


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Emails & Password Backup