Corvette Forum  


Go Back   Corvette Forum > General Corvette Topics > Engine Mods
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Vendors Buy a Vette Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ PhotosGarage

Engine Mods Outrageous Builds, High-Horsepower Modifications, strokers, and big cams for the Corvette

Corvette Store
 
 
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
 
Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2007, 10:16 AM   #1
Steve85
CF Senior Member
Cruise-In V Veteran
 
Steve85's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Winchester, VA "The benefit is better acceleration, the drawback is it isn't free" - Beach Bum
Default Can't do 112 LSA on 50mm core w/sm. base

For my new engine we needed a 50mm core cam on a small base circle.
Because it is EFI, we wanted to do a 112LSA, the duration is in the mid 250's @.050 with about .630 lift at the valve with 1.55 rockers.

Several manufacturers, in fact all but one, either cam motion or bullet cams, said they cannot get a 112lsa on that cam. 109-110 at best. The reason is "not enough heel".

With my amatuer view of a camshaft, I am having trouble understanding what they mean. If looking at a cam from the nose, it would seem no probem to shift the lobe top (or peak) left or right (counter- or clockwise) to achieve this lobe seperation.

What am I missing??

(I'm off to do some research, but is always good to have an interactive source as well)
Steve85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 11:07 AM   #2
GOSFAST
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RainDelay View Post
For my new engine we needed a 50mm core cam on a small base circle.
Because it is EFI, we wanted to do a 112LSA, the duration is in the mid 250's @.050 with about .630 lift at the valve with 1.55 rockers.

Several manufacturers, in fact all but one, either cam motion or bullet cams, said they cannot get a 112lsa on that cam. 109-110 at best. The reason is "not enough heel".

With my amatuer view of a camshaft, I am having trouble understanding what they mean. If looking at a cam from the nose, it would seem no probem to shift the lobe top (or peak) left or right (counter- or clockwise) to achieve this lobe seperation.

What am I missing??

(I'm off to do some research, but is always good to have an interactive source as well)
Contact Comp, when you talk numbers ask about "B" lobes. I do not grind cams but to date they've delivered about 99.9% of a large assortment of different grinds for us. Your numbers are way under what we normally get with no issues. Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. If you get "nowhere", contact me with an e-mail with specifics.
GOSFAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 11:22 AM   #3
C4Techie
CF Senior Member
 
C4Techie's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Default

That doesn't make any sense to me. You must have misunderstood them. I have one with a 115* LSA.
C4Techie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 12:35 PM   #4
Steve85
CF Senior Member
Cruise-In V Veteran
 
Steve85's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Winchester, VA "The benefit is better acceleration, the drawback is it isn't free" - Beach Bum
Default

Thanks for the responses guys.

I just got off the phone with Comp and the problem is with the cores they use. It appearantly comes in somewhat "pre-ground" if you will, on a 106LSA. It now makes sense why they couldn't do it with an existing core. He did offer to do it for about $800 from a "round" core. I did not ask about B-lobes, my fault. My guess is this is the core Bullet was going to use and the price tag is for the extra machining.

Do you guys know where I might get a core that could be used?

C4 techie, where did you get yours and how much?

GOSFAST, I will talk to my builder to get the exact specs and drop you an email. Thank you.
Steve85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 10:30 PM   #5
gkull
CF Senior Member
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C4Techie View Post
That doesn't make any sense to me. You must have misunderstood them. I have one with a 115* LSA.

It does make sense if you consider that the major companies like Crane sell blanks to smaller companies. The ruff lobes are only so big especially on a small base circle blank. Then factor in 250 duration and trying to spread them 112. Just not enough metal.

I just bought a billet custom Small base cam of 248/250 110 with about .665 lift with 1.6. 4&7 swap. I also considered 112
gkull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 08:58 AM   #6
danno85
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: Austin TX
Default

I think you shouldn't be hung up on 112LSA just "because it's EFI". For factory programming it's helpful to keep the overlap down as you start to move up from stock cams in order to keep the tuning easier for idle and part throttle operation, and keeping the LSA at 112 is one way to do that. It also gives you a bit flatter torque curve. With the amount of duration you are looking at you're going to have to run richer than stoic at idle anyway, so specify a LSA that maximizes your power and then tune for it. You can make EFI work just fine with tighter LSAs.

Dan
danno85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 12:46 PM   #7
C4Techie
CF Senior Member
 
C4Techie's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gkull View Post
It does make sense if you consider that the major companies like Crane sell blanks to smaller companies.
It doesn't make sense if you look at the Crane number, HR-306-2S-10.86 IG for N/A engines, which has a LSA pf 110* and one page over check out the HR-240/372-2S1-14.86 IG for nitrous or supercharged engines, which has the same lobes on a 114* LSA. Mine, special ordered by someone else, is that same cam, custom ground on the 115 LSA.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RainDelay
I just got off the phone with Comp and the problem is with the cores they use. It appearantly comes in somewhat "pre-ground" if you will, on a 106LSA. It now makes sense why they couldn't do it with an existing core. He did offer to do it for about $800 from a "round" core.
I wonder why a "round core"? Why not just a conventional base circle cam, machined further? Maybe the problem with yours is the lift. Mine is only .558" with 1.5:1 rockers. Contact Crane and see what they have to say.
C4Techie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 10:31 AM   #8
Steve85
CF Senior Member
Cruise-In V Veteran
 
Steve85's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Winchester, VA "The benefit is better acceleration, the drawback is it isn't free" - Beach Bum
Default

Well the cam is in from Comp.. Highlights added to help you avoid my ramblings.

Lift came in at .593/.573 after lash

Duration at .050 242/248 Lower than I expected, mostly due to my gearing according to comp and the builder. I have a 3.07 rear which they say is very low, unfortunately I have a hard time convinving them that they are in effect nearly 3.73 because of my very low 1st at 3.28. Seems that final drive ratio is what should be considered. This is why I went with the Comp 3 piece cover to ease cam replacement.

LSA came in at 111 which is a few more than they expected.

These specs are very similar to what CORKVETTE1 ran in his very successful 434. (TPIS 700-701). The car was very drivable even on a generic chip in the original 85 ecm through the MAF.
Steve85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 10:31 AM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > General Corvette Topics > Engine Mods
Reload this Page Can't do 112 LSA on 50mm core w/sm. base
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
112, 630, hr3062s1086, ig, lift, lsa


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Emails & Password Backup