DRM coilover users - inside please
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
DRM coilover users - inside please
hi guys - i bought a c5 recently with DRM coilovers.
I'd like to see your combo if you run these.
swaybars - T1's
wheels- CCW's 18x10.5 front, 11.5 rear
tires - toyo r888's, 295/30 front, 315/30 rear.
alignment - getting it done next week. -2.5 front, -1.5 rear approx are my goals.
corner weights - getting it done next week.
ride height - measured to top of fender lip? I'm asking because my toyo's stick out slightly so I want to make sure the height it high enough to prevent any contact.
type of racing - will be doing HPDE's and maybe autocross. street driving too
miles on your coilovers - unknown, bought car used.
spring rates - stock AFAIK, 450 front, 600 rear. have you changed these?
any other suspension mods to compliment them? DRM 4 point chassis bar.
any suggestions/recommendations?
thanks!
I'd like to see your combo if you run these.
swaybars - T1's
wheels- CCW's 18x10.5 front, 11.5 rear
tires - toyo r888's, 295/30 front, 315/30 rear.
alignment - getting it done next week. -2.5 front, -1.5 rear approx are my goals.
corner weights - getting it done next week.
ride height - measured to top of fender lip? I'm asking because my toyo's stick out slightly so I want to make sure the height it high enough to prevent any contact.
type of racing - will be doing HPDE's and maybe autocross. street driving too
miles on your coilovers - unknown, bought car used.
spring rates - stock AFAIK, 450 front, 600 rear. have you changed these?
any other suspension mods to compliment them? DRM 4 point chassis bar.
any suggestions/recommendations?
thanks!
Last edited by 2MCHPWR; 05-23-2009 at 09:10 AM.
#2
I am putting DRM coil overs on my 02Z right now. I have a very similar set up, except Phadt Comp Bars, and 18x12, 18x11 CCWs. Same rubber. Camber goals are a bit more conservative, (-2.0 F, -1.0 R) but I have poly bushings.
Rear springs are 575, Front 425...at least that is what mine are.
Very interested to see what others are doing.
Rear springs are 575, Front 425...at least that is what mine are.
Very interested to see what others are doing.
#4
Have DRM's coil over, using Pfadt street swaybars and also their camber kit (allows me to change front camber from 1.2 on street to 2.5 on track). Also using DRM's duct system for cooling the front brakes (helped taking temp on brakes down).
#5
Drifting
Thread Starter
#6
Former Vendor
Can't type so well right now something about 4.5 miles down river, and sleeping on a rock. I'm going to be up at the shop on Memorial day to about 4 ish. Tuesday-Friday 8am-8pm
Randy
763-477-9272
Randy
763-477-9272
#8
Former Vendor
Keeping the front end off the fenders due to them sticking out is not the "right" setup. But it's going to have to work until you can get them sucked in. Measuring off the fender lip is the worst place in the world. It's pretty easy to make a mistake in where you are measuring. Cars right off the factory floor are off. The vast amount of tires and wheels will not make this a good place to measure. You should be measuring off the frame rail. There isn't a perfect answer for the ride height question. We suggest setting up the preload on the spring first and get it close. Then after that making fine adjustments.
This will get you pretty damn close.
Here is a video of just a few cars that we set up here. Your car's should be pretty close to this.
Give me a call anytime.
Randy
763-477-9272
www.dougrippie.com
#9
Drifting
Thread Starter
here's my alignment and corner balancing:
http://209.177.55.37/c5align.htm
and some pics on the trailer:
http://209.177.55.37/c5align.htm
and some pics on the trailer:
#11
Drifting
Thread Starter
thanks randy - should i be considered with the rear drivers side sticking out slightly?
any chance the fender can come in contact with it?
any chance the fender can come in contact with it?
#12
Former Vendor
Randy
#13
Drifting
Thread Starter
#14
Former Vendor
#15
I just got back from the track after setting up the coil-overs as suggested, actually went to 3.2" on the fronts. Due to camber plates, my fronts stick out a bit even if I go to 295's and 2.6* neg camber. Well, the front fenders are still hitting the tires. I guess I will try going up 10 threads and see what happens then.
The car felt very solid on the track (The Glen) except going up the esses. I used to be able to hold full throttle from the entrance to 2 all the way to the bus stop. There is a bump where the car is just taking a set into turn 3 and with the stiffer suspension it is a real eye opener even at 10-15 mph slower than before on stock springs and shocks.
Perhaps I just need to get used to the stiffer car, but I felt that I would be slideways next to the Blue Bushes if I pushed any harder.
Alignment is -2.6* Front, -1.8 Rear. 1/16 Toe In Rear, 0 Front. 6* caster.
The car felt very solid on the track (The Glen) except going up the esses. I used to be able to hold full throttle from the entrance to 2 all the way to the bus stop. There is a bump where the car is just taking a set into turn 3 and with the stiffer suspension it is a real eye opener even at 10-15 mph slower than before on stock springs and shocks.
Perhaps I just need to get used to the stiffer car, but I felt that I would be slideways next to the Blue Bushes if I pushed any harder.
Alignment is -2.6* Front, -1.8 Rear. 1/16 Toe In Rear, 0 Front. 6* caster.
#16
Former Vendor
I just got back from the track after setting up the coil-overs as suggested, actually went to 3.2" on the fronts. Due to camber plates, my fronts stick out a bit even if I go to 295's and 2.6* neg camber. Well, the front fenders are still hitting the tires. I guess I will try going up 10 threads and see what happens then.
The car felt very solid on the track (The Glen) except going up the esses. I used to be able to hold full throttle from the entrance to 2 all the way to the bus stop. There is a bump where the car is just taking a set into turn 3 and with the stiffer suspension it is a real eye opener even at 10-15 mph slower than before on stock springs and shocks.
Perhaps I just need to get used to the stiffer car, but I felt that I would be slideways next to the Blue Bushes if I pushed any harder.
Alignment is -2.6* Front, -1.8 Rear. 1/16 Toe In Rear, 0 Front. 6* caster.
The car felt very solid on the track (The Glen) except going up the esses. I used to be able to hold full throttle from the entrance to 2 all the way to the bus stop. There is a bump where the car is just taking a set into turn 3 and with the stiffer suspension it is a real eye opener even at 10-15 mph slower than before on stock springs and shocks.
Perhaps I just need to get used to the stiffer car, but I felt that I would be slideways next to the Blue Bushes if I pushed any harder.
Alignment is -2.6* Front, -1.8 Rear. 1/16 Toe In Rear, 0 Front. 6* caster.
Randy
#17
The big tire/lever theory make sense. I should qualify "the bump" as something that is felt rather than a confirmed physical attribute of the track.
As you transition from turn 2 to 3 you are also cresting a hill. The car typically takes it's set in the turn as you approach the concrete inlay in the track. It is at this point where the "bump" is felt. Substantial care is taken to be very smooth with all inputs to control weight transfer and minimize impulse loads to the suspension.
My student had a stock 2003 Z06 and I could feel the same "bump" in his car, but the effect was muted by his softer setup and slower speed.
Due to a tire ordering screw-up, I was running 305 R888's on all 4 corners. When I set the ride height, leaving the 3.2" of thread exposed on the fronts, I had to substantially back off the rears to get to 3/8" rake measured at the bolt centers on the lower control arms. Perhaps the car, when unweighted and cresting the hill combined with lighter preload on the rear springs is causing the initial spring rate to be very low at the beginning of the turn verses the point where the car sets into the turn. My motivation for this comment is that I was able to easily turn the rear adjusters, by hand, by rotating the spring in desired direction of adjustment. With the suspension relaxed, the springs still had enough load on them that they were retained top and bottom. Perhaps raising the car closer to stock height, with the required additional preload on the springs, would mitigate my turn 3 issue.
Excepting this one turn, I am very happy with the shocks.
As you transition from turn 2 to 3 you are also cresting a hill. The car typically takes it's set in the turn as you approach the concrete inlay in the track. It is at this point where the "bump" is felt. Substantial care is taken to be very smooth with all inputs to control weight transfer and minimize impulse loads to the suspension.
My student had a stock 2003 Z06 and I could feel the same "bump" in his car, but the effect was muted by his softer setup and slower speed.
Due to a tire ordering screw-up, I was running 305 R888's on all 4 corners. When I set the ride height, leaving the 3.2" of thread exposed on the fronts, I had to substantially back off the rears to get to 3/8" rake measured at the bolt centers on the lower control arms. Perhaps the car, when unweighted and cresting the hill combined with lighter preload on the rear springs is causing the initial spring rate to be very low at the beginning of the turn verses the point where the car sets into the turn. My motivation for this comment is that I was able to easily turn the rear adjusters, by hand, by rotating the spring in desired direction of adjustment. With the suspension relaxed, the springs still had enough load on them that they were retained top and bottom. Perhaps raising the car closer to stock height, with the required additional preload on the springs, would mitigate my turn 3 issue.
Excepting this one turn, I am very happy with the shocks.
#18
Drifting
Thread Starter
randy - I'm gonna give you a call today. I just measured the threads and the shop only has 2.5 inches even though I showed them your picture. What are possible issues of keeping it so low besides scraping on every incline?
#19
Former Vendor
Randy