Notices
C8 Z06/ZR1/Zora Discussion General Z06, ZR1 and Zora Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By: Wheel Designers

Anyone Else Disappointed by the Lack of Lightweighting Features/Options?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2021, 09:29 PM
  #41  
LowcountryVette
Burning Brakes
 
LowcountryVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2019
Location: SC
Posts: 1,154
Received 355 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArmchairArchitect
Let me start off by saying I give GM a ton of credit for keeping the LT6 engine weight the same as the LT2, and offering carbon fiber wheels as an option. However, I'm not seeing as much as I would like as far as lightweighting options, including some fairly low-hanging fruit, for what is supposed to be the "track" model. And I'm going to caveat that by saying these would be "track" lightweighting options which I would also enjoy on spirited drives on twisty public roads, making the car faster and more agile. And lastly, especially since they would contribute towards the impressive lap times of this car which will inevitably be tested in top performance spec.

I would have like to see some of these either in the Z07 package or as additional options. GM would obviously also benefit from the hefty markups they charge on options.
.
  • Lithium-Ion battery instead of lead-acid starter battery (see: Antigravity batteries, vendor on this forum). Porsche offers this currently.
  • Thin all the glass like they did on the C5 Z06. Possibly make the rear engine lid out of Lexan (like on a lot of supercars) instead of glass to save even more weight.
  • Titanium exhaust like they did on the C5 Z06
  • Lighter weight seats.
  • Work with Tremec to lighten the heavy DCT where possible. It appears they planned this but then ditched the magnesium DCT case that was photographed in spy shots (due to known supply constraints?).
  • As an extreme option, ditch all the features/luxuries to save weight- just have a 2.1 speaker stereo, heating, and cooling. Remove leather from all coverings. Remove sound deadening material. Think Ferrari F40-level minimalism.
.
You won't shed hundreds of pounds but you'll shed a LOT, which WILL translate to performance results.
People have been telling you for a while this "low-hanging fruit" you keep bringing up isn't as low-hanging as you think it is. The fact GM didn't do any of those things should hopefully help get that point across.
The following users liked this post:
Sub Driver (10-28-2021)
Old 10-28-2021, 12:08 AM
  #42  
Corvette#2
Safety Car

 
Corvette#2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 3,830
Received 394 Likes on 247 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by r00t61
You answered your own question: GM must have decided that the marginal cost/complexity to the assembly line (plus the NRE required to incorporate into the product) wasn't worth the projected profits from the small percent of buyers that would tick those boxes.
Yeah, a "super leggera" C8 makes no sense.

It's not a Lamborghini, when they add 10hp, deduct 100lbs of weight, they can charge an extra $30 grand.
Old 10-28-2021, 12:13 AM
  #43  
JockItch
Safety Car
 
JockItch's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Western Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 4,300
Received 5,324 Likes on 1,983 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ArmchairArchitect
Once again (and I stated this in the original post), have them as options, not standard. Not sure why this is a difficult concept to grasp and has zero effect on the pricing of the base Z06.

There is a reason GM chose to offer the carbon fiber wheels as an option, and by that same logic they should offer some other lightweight options or a lightweight package as well.

Carbon fiber wheels are an easy and effective way to reduce weight, CCB’s too. But they aren’t going to offer optional light weight glass, magnesium tranny case, etc. Stuff like that is either built into the model or it isn’t. And if they offer things like this as an option, that just further complicates the manufacturing process and would effect the price of both cars optioned with it and without it.

They’ve toyed with the idea of something you seem to be looking for with the de-contented Z06x concept from the C6 days. Hopefully they do a limited production run of these cars this generation later in the models lifecycle to give this niche market what they want and also further help build the brand. This seems like the car to do it on.
Old 10-28-2021, 03:09 AM
  #44  
GettnBetter
Pro
 
GettnBetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Posts: 552
Received 95 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Lately Vette's just keep packing weight. The original Zo6 was around 3000llbs. What is this new ZO6?
Old 10-28-2021, 03:13 AM
  #45  
23c8zo6
Instructor
 
23c8zo6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2021
Posts: 131
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I wanted either twin turbos, or at least a C6 ZO6 curb weight.
We got neither. I'm out.
The following users liked this post:
JockItch (10-29-2021)
Old 10-28-2021, 06:43 AM
  #46  
fzust
Burning Brakes
 
fzust's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Posts: 842
Received 1,129 Likes on 460 Posts

Default

I think the sad reality is that Combination of green police, insurance safety institute have just made cars heavier and heavier. Pedestrian crash protection, rollover protection, increasing front and side crash standards, drive-noise requirements, and emissions. Add to this the effect that Benjamin Franklin mentioned as "A luxury once enjoyed becomes a necessity." All the beautiful leather, ventilated seats, infotainment, NVH, luggage capacity etc etc. It is just the way of the world now.

The good news is that light-weight racing seats, Li batteries, and titanium exhaust will be available in the aftermarket.

The C5Z/C6Z are of a by-gone age. Of course I laugh and point at those "lightweights" in my 1900lb Lotus Elise! Oh and they are way slower than this new C8Z. Embrace the change. Turn on your ventilated seats and enjoy that FPC goodness while planning your C6Z build.....
The following users liked this post:
Samas (10-28-2021)
Old 10-28-2021, 08:24 AM
  #47  
ssmith512
Melting Slicks
 
ssmith512's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 2,632
Received 849 Likes on 443 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hemi Dave
and kung fu grip grab handles for my passenger.
I dont care who you are, that's funny as hell!!!
Old 10-28-2021, 10:20 AM
  #48  
ArmchairArchitect
Banned Scam/Spammer
Thread Starter
 
ArmchairArchitect's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Philadelphia PA (Birthplace of the USA, UNESCO World Heritage City)
Posts: 4,004
Received 3,916 Likes on 1,616 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LowcountryVette
People have been telling you for a while this "low-hanging fruit" you keep bringing up isn't as low-hanging as you think it is. The fact GM didn't do any of those things should hopefully help get that point across.
Except they have on prior Z06s...
Old 10-28-2021, 10:42 AM
  #49  
LowcountryVette
Burning Brakes
 
LowcountryVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2019
Location: SC
Posts: 1,154
Received 355 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArmchairArchitect
Except they have on prior Z06s...
Originally Posted by vndkshn
"past" =/= "present". As made obvious by the fact they didn't do it.
.
All of this has been gone over throughout multiple threads. No need to go in circles.

Also, they’ve done 2 of the 6 things you mentioned in the past and as I understand it the titanium c5 exhaust was only because titanium was cheaper than normal at the time.
The following users liked this post:
fzust (10-28-2021)
Old 10-28-2021, 11:56 AM
  #50  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,265
Received 13,202 Likes on 6,012 Posts

Default

I ordered a 1LT Z51 mag ride car w/ high wing and 5VM splitter (similar to my 2020 coupe) last week to make into a trackday car until my Z06 comes. GM knows that the folks who will really track it, like me, are willing to modify the car. I've already ordered a new custom seat from Ultrashield, spare wheels, track tires, and a harness bar from Paragon. Car will be setup to GM track specs and enjoyed until my Z06 arrives.

I read that they feel a max of 5% of buyers ever go on track and that's including touring charity laps. 1% maybe actually run HPDEs and less than that compete in Timetrials and such.

The lingering question I have is if there was magnesium content planned that was scrapped due to global supply chain issues.

Personally I think they spent their wad on the engine and the wheels and things like the frame and trans were "good enough".
Old 10-28-2021, 12:02 PM
  #51  
TARANTULA
Melting Slicks
 
TARANTULA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,566
Received 1,035 Likes on 468 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rapidc84b

i read that they feel a max of 5% of buyers ever go on track and that's including touring charity laps. 1% maybe actually run hpdes and less than that compete in timetrials .
sad
Old 10-28-2021, 04:05 PM
  #52  
zeke2u
Racer
 
zeke2u's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: lancaster MA
Posts: 394
Received 56 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Read what Oliver Gavin says about the Z' (https://www.imsa.com/news/2021/10/26...023-z06-model/). If it's good enough for him, then it's ludicrous to be so concerned about "lightening"....if you're going to track it, do what everyone else did with their prior Z06's - remove the seats for lighter (less comfortable) ones, remove the windows and motors, and use titanium and CF bits where feasible.
Old 10-28-2021, 04:50 PM
  #53  
vndkshn
Melting Slicks
 
vndkshn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2018
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,666
Received 1,776 Likes on 863 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArmchairArchitect
Man, I'm getting MAJOR deja vu and feel like I'm in the NA versus TT thread again, arguing with the TT guys who just don't get what makes a proper track-focused supercar and the marketing of said supercar's capabilities...
You have deja vu... but you started the thread (despite this being discussed to death before) and refuse to consider any other logic other than your own perspective....

THAT'S hysterical!
Old 10-28-2021, 04:57 PM
  #54  
ArmchairArchitect
Banned Scam/Spammer
Thread Starter
 
ArmchairArchitect's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Philadelphia PA (Birthplace of the USA, UNESCO World Heritage City)
Posts: 4,004
Received 3,916 Likes on 1,616 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RapidC84B
I read that they feel a max of 5% of buyers ever go on track and that's including touring charity laps. 1% maybe actually run HPDEs and less than that compete in Timetrials and such.
Don't need a track to enjoy the better performance and driving characteristics/agility from a lighter weight car. Same logic as you don't need a drag strip (also a track) to enjoy a car that's faster in a straight line. Plenty of public roads with twists and turns.

Originally Posted by zeke2u
Read what Oliver Gavin says about the Z' (https://www.imsa.com/news/2021/10/26...023-z06-model/). If it's good enough for him, then it's ludicrous to be so concerned about "lightening"....if you're going to track it, do what everyone else did with their prior Z06's - remove the seats for lighter (less comfortable) ones, remove the windows and motors, and use titanium and CF bits where feasible.
Yes, if a guy on the GM payroll has the final word, then let's be those sheep and listen. He's literally part of their marketing payroll now. Also where did he say that the car wouldn't further benefit from lightweighting measures? I must have missed it.

Last edited by ArmchairArchitect; 10-28-2021 at 05:00 PM.
Old 10-28-2021, 05:00 PM
  #55  
vndkshn
Melting Slicks
 
vndkshn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2018
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,666
Received 1,776 Likes on 863 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArmchairArchitect
Except they have on prior Z06s...
The thing you continue to ignore, much of this weight is coming from two areas:
1.) Government safety/emissions mandates
2.) Buyers wanting certain content

Nothing you can do about the 1st. It is what it is. Which is why your ideas of different seats and different glass and different exhaust (as an OPTION) makes zero sense. GM would likely have to certify all of that. Are you willing to pay and extra $15k-$20k just to get your titanium exhaust? Because I'm sure that very few would check that checkbox, so it would be up to you and a handful of others to absorb that cost.

The difference with prior cars, there wasn't an option. You got what you got. You couldn't pick thinner or thicker glass for example. GM obviously could have done that with this car, but they also obviously did analysis on it and determined it was not worth the trouble and expense. The sooner you realize it, the sooner you will either accept it and move on or go buy something else. Continue to whinge about it with arguments based on zero reality is just tedious.

The second, really nothing you or GM can do there either. 2LZ/3LZ outsold 1LZ by something like 3 to 1 EVERY SINGLE GENERATION. Chevy knows this, and it certainly factored into their decisions. The very small percentage of people who want a de-contented car with more NVH are in the sub-5% range at best. Again, Chevy knows this and continuing to ignore these facts and whinging about it is ridiculous.

****, I was very much in the "manual or bust" camp, I made my case, explained my reasoning, Chevy has decided to continue down the DCT only route. Hell, you mentioned the DCT/MT thread... it got closed down. I accepted it and have moved on. May or may not pull the trigger on my Z06 spot because of it... time will tell. I'm certainly not going to keep bitching about it.

And you LITERALLY keep offering the EXACT same arguments over and over. You literally copy and paste them at this point. Example your original post, and your recent reply to Rapid... you've typed that exact couple of sentences over and over (or... CTRL-C+CTRL-V is highly likely as well).

Last edited by vndkshn; 10-28-2021 at 05:03 PM.
Old 10-28-2021, 05:02 PM
  #56  
ArmchairArchitect
Banned Scam/Spammer
Thread Starter
 
ArmchairArchitect's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Philadelphia PA (Birthplace of the USA, UNESCO World Heritage City)
Posts: 4,004
Received 3,916 Likes on 1,616 Posts
Default

And I'm going to throw another variable into the equation: if GM wants to be serious about their new GT3 program, they're going to have to offer some/all of these in those customer GT3 cars (which will be based on the C8 Z06), at which point they might as well offer them in the road cars as well.

Last edited by ArmchairArchitect; 10-28-2021 at 05:03 PM.
Old 10-28-2021, 05:08 PM
  #57  
23c8zo6
Instructor
 
23c8zo6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2021
Posts: 131
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArmchairArchitect
Don't need a track to enjoy the better performance and driving characteristics/agility from a lighter weight car. Same logic as you don't need a drag strip (also a track) to enjoy a car that's faster in a straight line. Plenty of public roads with twists and turns.

But, we didnt get a lighweight car, did we?
We got a fat pig, with a gutless motor for the street.
It needed twin turbos at 3700lbs.

But, you guys can keep picking fights with us turbo guys, and making fools of yourselves.
We will get the last laugh when we regularly humiliate you with forced induction on the highways and straighaways.
You'll be left in the dust mumbling incoherently about your $100k 3700lb raaace car and the cool noise it makes, and your imaginary road race career.

Get notified of new replies

To Anyone Else Disappointed by the Lack of Lightweighting Features/Options?

Old 10-28-2021, 05:59 PM
  #58  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,265
Received 13,202 Likes on 6,012 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JockItch
Carbon fiber wheels are an easy and effective way to reduce weight, CCB’s too. But they aren’t going to offer optional light weight glass, magnesium tranny case, etc. Stuff like that is either built into the model or it isn’t. And if they offer things like this as an option, that just further complicates the manufacturing process and would effect the price of both cars optioned with it and without it.

They’ve toyed with the idea of something you seem to be looking for with the de-contented Z06x concept from the C6 days. Hopefully they do a limited production run of these cars this generation later in the models lifecycle to give this niche market what they want and also further help build the brand. This seems like the car to do it on.
Originally Posted by vndkshn
The thing you continue to ignore, much of this weight is coming from two areas:
1.) Government safety/emissions mandates
2.) Buyers wanting certain content

Nothing you can do about the 1st. It is what it is. Which is why your ideas of different seats and different glass and different exhaust (as an OPTION) makes zero sense. GM would likely have to certify all of that. Are you willing to pay and extra $15k-$20k just to get your titanium exhaust? Because I'm sure that very few would check that checkbox, so it would be up to you and a handful of others to absorb that cost.

The difference with prior cars, there wasn't an option. You got what you got. You couldn't pick thinner or thicker glass for example. GM obviously could have done that with this car, but they also obviously did analysis on it and determined it was not worth the trouble and expense. The sooner you realize it, the sooner you will either accept it and move on or go buy something else. Continue to whinge about it with arguments based on zero reality is just tedious.

The second, really nothing you or GM can do there either. 2LZ/3LZ outsold 1LZ by something like 3 to 1 EVERY SINGLE GENERATION. Chevy knows this, and it certainly factored into their decisions. The very small percentage of people who want a de-contented car with more NVH are in the sub-5% range at best. Again, Chevy knows this and continuing to ignore these facts and whinging about it is ridiculous.

****, I was very much in the "manual or bust" camp, I made my case, explained my reasoning, Chevy has decided to continue down the DCT only route. Hell, you mentioned the DCT/MT thread... it got closed down. I accepted it and have moved on. May or may not pull the trigger on my Z06 spot because of it... time will tell. I'm certainly not going to keep bitching about it.

And you LITERALLY keep offering the EXACT same arguments over and over. You literally copy and paste them at this point. Example your original post, and your recent reply to Rapid... you've typed that exact couple of sentences over and over (or... CTRL-C+CTRL-V is highly likely as well).
Why do you keep saying they can't do Titanium exhaust? They did it just fine with the C5Z. Thy could have made the bedfords out of magnesium and done a TI catback and saved a couple hundred pounds. Cost/benefit probably didn't make sense.

Originally Posted by 23c8zo6
But, we didnt get a lighweight car, did we?
We got a fat pig, with a gutless motor for the street.
It needed twin turbos at 3700lbs.

But, you guys can keep picking fights with us turbo guys, and making fools of yourselves.
We will get the last laugh when we regularly humiliate you with forced induction on the highways and straighaways.
You'll be left in the dust mumbling incoherently about your $100k 3700lb raaace car and the cool noise it makes, and your imaginary road race career.
You keep yammering and you haven't watched the engineering videos. They specifically state they went the NA route to achieve their power goals in the lightest package possible. The engine makes 170 horse more than the LT2 and weights 1KG more. How much mass would turbos and liquid/liquid intercoolers add on top of the 5 radiators they had to add to the LT6? They made this car as light as they could reasonable make it.
The following 3 users liked this post by RapidC84B:
ArmchairArchitect (10-29-2021), CorvettoBrando (10-28-2021), PurpleLion (10-29-2021)
Old 10-28-2021, 07:33 PM
  #59  
CorvettoBrando
Instructor
 
CorvettoBrando's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2018
Posts: 222
Received 172 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 23c8zo6
I wanted either twin turbos, or at least a C6 ZO6 curb weight.
We got neither. I'm out.
Byyyyyeeee Felicia. Are you also out of the Forum? Malcontent...
The following 3 users liked this post by CorvettoBrando:
JockItch (10-29-2021), Phil1098 (10-28-2021), Tripjammer (11-02-2021)
Old 10-28-2021, 08:40 PM
  #60  
stevebz06
Melting Slicks
 
stevebz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,075
Received 304 Likes on 205 Posts

Default

If ... Chevrolet loses its mind and decides to do a special light weight version, like BMW, Ferrari, Lamborghini, McLaren, and Porsche have all done, idiots that they are, I think that by far the easiest and cheapest way to do it is ditch the factory seats for some lightweight manually adjustables from Recaro or some other aftermarket manufacturer. I don't know what these C8 seats weigh, but the C7 seats were incredibly heavy, coming in around 60 pounds each. Before people start going off on me, Cadillac made Recaros available on the CTS-V. On one of my earlier Vettes, my manual passenger seat was 15 pounds lighter than the electric drivers seat, and they were both far lighter than what is being stuffed into cars today. So if you spec a Z07 with the CF wheels and ceramic brakes, you're maybe looking at around 80 pounds lighter. Seats could put it at 100 pounds or more. You're probably not going to find big chunks after that, but 100 pounds can legitimately make a claim of being a lightweight version.

Oh, and radio delete too, since the people who really love audio will probably rip it out and replace it anyway.
The following 4 users liked this post by stevebz06:
23c8zo6 (10-28-2021), ArmchairArchitect (10-29-2021), PurpleLion (10-29-2021), Tripjammer (11-02-2021)


Quick Reply: Anyone Else Disappointed by the Lack of Lightweighting Features/Options?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.