Stock C8 makes 558whp/515wtq
#22
Instructor
...........10.43 and 134.1.......STOCK 2016 ZO6......maybe red along with chrome wheels is the fastest combo!!!! The second video is PDR of 0-60 time...cough.......2.8.....
Last edited by Skypilot797; 10-27-2019 at 12:58 PM.
The following users liked this post:
chevy corvette (03-12-2020)
#24
Safety Car
The C8 Z51 is quick...it just not going to pull a so-called high trap speed with that amount of horsepower. The real question is......can the C8 Z51 do better than 11.1@123.2 in the real world? Can someone beat the magazine time? 11.1 is crazy fast for what it is. Just my. 02
#25
Race Director
#26
Race Director
The C8 Z51 is quick...it just not going to pull a so-called high trap speed with that amount of horsepower. The real question is......can the C8 Z51 do better than 11.1@123.2 in the real world? Can someone beat the magazine time? 11.1 is crazy fast for what it is. Just my. 02
#27
Safety Car
I agree..... and why hasn't GM revealed a 1/4 time thus far? What is so different about this C8 that GM is unwilling to disclose? For example the C7 Z06.....10.95@127 claim, however many people could not accomplish that time or better. And there may have been some disappointments. So maybe GM is leaving it up to the magazine writers so that we could pound on them instead.
#28
Melting Slicks
...........10.43 and 134.1.......stock 2016 zo6......maybe red along with chrome wheels is the fastest combo!!!! The second video is pdr of 0-60 time...cough.......2.8.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noudqiu9zf8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zzasivg_3u&t=76s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noudqiu9zf8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zzasivg_3u&t=76s
Last edited by BJ67; 10-28-2019 at 08:45 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by BJ67:
chevy corvette (03-12-2020),
vrybad (10-29-2019)
#29
Melting Slicks
The C8 Z51 is quick...it just not going to pull a so-called high trap speed with that amount of horsepower. The real question is......can the C8 Z51 do better than 11.1@123.2 in the real world? Can someone beat the magazine time? 11.1 is crazy fast for what it is. Just my. 02
#30
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,135
Received 2,061 Likes
on
1,313 Posts
The C8 going to be faster off the line on the street sure, just like an awd car is. To me comparing a great driver in great conditions on a great surface is the best way to compare different vehicles as that’s how the PAX index for SCCA is adjusted each year based on Nationals results. The dragstrip takes out traction limited issues which the C8 of course benefits from having gone mid engine and the gearing was increased because of that resulting in faster 0-60mph/60’ times. GM may be waiting for good air to post the best 1/4 mile time it can do like Dodge with the Demon I suppose or maybe the 11.3 in the brochure that was leaked is it given the mag times that are very close to that. Here’s a bone stock C7 trapping 123 and doing a low 3 second 0-60mph...
Last edited by PRE-Z06; 10-28-2019 at 01:37 PM.
#31
Melting Slicks
What’s your definition of real world conditions?
The C8 going to be faster off the line on the street sure, just like an awd car is. To me comparing a great driver in great conditions on a great surface is the best way to compare different vehicles as that’s how the PAX index for SCCA is adjusted each year based on Nationals results. The dragstrip takes out traction limited issues which the C8 of course benefits from having gone mid engine and the gearing was increased because of that resulting in faster 0-60mph/60’ times. GM may be waiting for good air to post the best 1/4 mile time it can do like Dodge with the Demon I suppose or maybe the 11.3 in the brochure that was leaked is it given the mag times that are very close to that. Here’s a bone stock C7 trapping 123 and doing a low 3 second 0-60mph...
https://youtu.be/UEpuJ_JdOoM
The C8 going to be faster off the line on the street sure, just like an awd car is. To me comparing a great driver in great conditions on a great surface is the best way to compare different vehicles as that’s how the PAX index for SCCA is adjusted each year based on Nationals results. The dragstrip takes out traction limited issues which the C8 of course benefits from having gone mid engine and the gearing was increased because of that resulting in faster 0-60mph/60’ times. GM may be waiting for good air to post the best 1/4 mile time it can do like Dodge with the Demon I suppose or maybe the 11.3 in the brochure that was leaked is it given the mag times that are very close to that. Here’s a bone stock C7 trapping 123 and doing a low 3 second 0-60mph...
https://youtu.be/UEpuJ_JdOoM
The following users liked this post:
chevy corvette (03-12-2020)
#32
real world conditions meaning test is done in conditions easily available by most enthusiasts, average temps, average surface conditions and average DA. Also no super prep to the car itself and people with average to above average 1/4 mile driving skills. A average stock A8 C7 Z51 in 2500 to 3000 DA , OE tires, stock rear gear, on a mediocre prepped track, just does not do 11.3's . A 123mph trap indicates some extra horses hidden somewhere.
The following users liked this post:
PRE-Z06 (10-28-2019)
The following users liked this post:
PRE-Z06 (10-28-2019)
#34
Safety Car
The C7 guys on the fast list are not using launch control method. I did not use launch control with my stock convertible. So there is some driving skills even with the auto. And yes some would debate this. But with the C8 this launch control may be the ultimate for everyone. There should be no difference in the 1/4 mile. Let's just hope so.
#35
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,135
Received 2,061 Likes
on
1,313 Posts
real world conditions meaning test is done in conditions easily available by most enthusiasts, average temps, average surface conditions and average DA. Also no super prep to the car itself and people with average to above average 1/4 mile driving skills. A average stock A8 C7 Z51 in 2500 to 3000 DA , OE tires, stock rear gear, on a mediocre prepped track, just does not do 11.3's . A 123mph trap indicates some extra horses hidden somewhere.
SAE correction is ~2000’ DA which sounds like what you’re looking for, but that’s how a dyno number and a mph can be off a little in comparison
#36
Drifting
Thread Starter
What you are all forgetting is they did his at Fontana in Socal in early Sept at Fontana that never has a DA under 2000, not prepped and is uphill...The C8 will certainly be in 10s and over 123s @ MIR, Atco, or a Bradentons of the world...That ET & MPH is impressive to anyone that lives out here.
Greg
Greg
#37
Melting Slicks
What you are all forgetting is they did his at Fontana in Socal in early Sept at Fontana that never has a DA under 2000, not prepped and is uphill...The C8 will certainly be in 10s and over 123s @ MIR, Atco, or a Bradentons of the world...That ET & MPH is impressive to anyone that lives out here.
Greg
Greg
#38
Instructor
What you are all forgetting is they did his at Fontana in Socal in early Sept at Fontana that never has a DA under 2000, not prepped and is uphill...The C8 will certainly be in 10s and over 123s @ MIR, Atco, or a Bradentons of the world...That ET & MPH is impressive to anyone that lives out here.
Greg
Greg
Ford has no problems with the new GT 500 as it has videos running the 1/4 in Vegas @11.49.
Where are the C8 videos running an NHRA dragstrip and showing times/mph at?
We all like the C8 as its a great new platform, just some of us want videos and real numbers and are not drinking this kool-aid....way to much sugar for us old folks.
The following users liked this post:
chevy corvette (03-12-2020)
#39
Team Owner
What you are all forgetting is they did his at Fontana in Socal in early Sept at Fontana that never has a DA under 2000, not prepped and is uphill...The C8 will certainly be in 10s and over 123s @ MIR, Atco, or a Bradentons of the world...That ET & MPH is impressive to anyone that lives out here.
Greg
Greg
#40
Race Director
Originally Posted by osu1978
MT admitted in the article they did not even have the gear ratios until after the dyno and results from their tests would be greatly affected due to this. All the data related to the dyno runs in the article is trash. I credit them for going to plan b after not being able to test MPG however to throw the thing on the dyno without even knowing the final drive ratio is just a waste of time.
Now, the curves will look different, but maintain their corresponding profiles.