Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

0-150-0 Car and Driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2023, 11:47 AM
  #21  
Drew888
Racer
 
Drew888's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2021
Posts: 367
Received 120 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

It is hard to embrace the EV's because they lack the thrill and sound of ICE. With that said we also don't have any affordable sports car EV options. It is true the difference in the way they make power is a factor. The Tycan is geared which does help utilize the lower speed torque better in the higher speed range.
Old 11-22-2023, 05:46 PM
  #22  
Majestic94
Safety Car
 
Majestic94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2021
Posts: 3,655
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pettrix
Yes, it is. C&D even admitted that ICE's are going to be obsolete when it comes to performance. ICE's will become a thing of the past by 2030, that's almost guaranteed. Like it or hate it (I personally don't like it) but the writing is on the wall. It's like VHS, cassette tapes, Netflix DVD's, telephone booths, typewriters, etc. it's all coming to an end.
Negative: it takes a 1000hp EV to do what ICE's do with almost half the hp. People saying this crap are stupid and don't understand physics.

Some people are so worried about being obsolete they'll make stupid irrelevant comparisons.
Old 11-22-2023, 05:54 PM
  #23  
Drew888
Racer
 
Drew888's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2021
Posts: 367
Received 120 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I'm going to disagree, if all is equal it takes the same power. A 1000hp EV has a much faster acceleration than a 500-700hp ice vehicle. A Chiron and Model S are comparable.


Originally Posted by Majestic94
Negative: it takes a 1000hp EV to do what ICE's do with almost half the hp. People saying this crap are stupid and don't understand physics.

Some people are so worried about being obsolete they'll make stupid irrelevant comparisons.
Old 11-22-2023, 06:43 PM
  #24  
khartford
Pro
 
khartford's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 717
Received 643 Likes on 262 Posts

Default

This is useful information in the event I buy one of the cars participating and I find myself hitting the brakes @ 150 mph.
The following users liked this post:
Acpantera (11-22-2023)
Old 11-22-2023, 06:46 PM
  #25  
Majestic94
Safety Car
 
Majestic94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2021
Posts: 3,655
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drew888
I'm going to disagree, if all is equal it takes the same power. A 1000hp EV has a much faster acceleration than a 500-700hp ice vehicle. A Chiron and Model S are comparable.
Model S isn't a sports car. At Nurburgring even at over 1000 hp it's only running 7:35 lap times (a stock C8 ran 7:30 with rwd and half the hp). The Model S is an example of why EV's are worse than ICE's. 0-60 times is one of the most abused EV attributes that people confuse with a good sports car.

Last edited by Majestic94; 11-22-2023 at 07:26 PM.
Old 11-22-2023, 07:47 PM
  #26  
Drew888
Racer
 
Drew888's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2021
Posts: 367
Received 120 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

This thread was about 0-150-0. May want to go back and check on that. If we compare apples to apples it would be comparing a CTSV to a S on a road course. The S is proportionally faster.

As much as I hate to say it, electric powertrains are a huge advancement over ICE. The difference is much greater than the flat head to ohv. It’s more equivalent to a radial piston aeroplane engine to a turbine. The real limiting factor is the battery tech.

Originally Posted by Majestic94
Model S isn't a sports car. At Nurburgring even at over 1000 hp it's only running 7:35 lap times (a stock C8 ran 7:30 with rwd and half the hp). The Model S is an example of why EV's are worse than ICE's. 0-60 times is one of the most abused EV attributes that people confuse with a good sports car.

Last edited by Drew888; 11-22-2023 at 10:10 PM.
Old 11-22-2023, 09:00 PM
  #27  
swift93
Racer
 
swift93's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 302
Received 230 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

There are many fast cars out there and the EVs lead the pack. Tesla Plaid smokes the McLaren in spite of the 720 running 0-150 mph in 10.2.
Old 11-23-2023, 04:28 PM
  #28  
Mitchell_B
Pro
 
Mitchell_B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2023
Posts: 738
Received 580 Likes on 300 Posts
Default

The Z06s performance would be much better if the gear spacing made more sense. As is, the DCT really is a 5 speed with 3 overdrive gears.
Old 11-23-2023, 10:32 PM
  #29  
Kevin93
Burning Brakes
 
Kevin93's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: North Wales PA
Posts: 768
Received 148 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Yes, EVs are scorching fast in a line.

But, they're equally bad in translating that to track performance. The Tesla Model S Plaid with "Track Pack" has 1,020 horsepower - more than double the Stingray's - and its Ring time is almost identical. Must be quite a non-confidence-inspiring handful to get around corners to give up all the time gained in the straights.
The following users liked this post:
Majestic94 (11-25-2023)
Old 11-24-2023, 10:20 AM
  #30  
Drew888
Racer
 
Drew888's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2021
Posts: 367
Received 120 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

You’re comparing a sports car to a 4 door family sedan. There will be more ev sports cars in the future.

Originally Posted by Kevin93
Yes, EVs are scorching fast in a line.

But, they're equally bad in translating that to track performance. The Tesla Model S Plaid with "Track Pack" has 1,020 horsepower - more than double the Stingray's - and its Ring time is almost identical. Must be quite a non-confidence-inspiring handful to get around corners to give up all the time gained in the straights.
Old 11-24-2023, 01:11 PM
  #31  
proeagles
Melting Slicks
 
proeagles's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Covington LA
Posts: 2,079
Received 2,163 Likes on 899 Posts

Default

I'm impressed by the stopping power of the fastest stopping cars. The Mustang Dark Horse stopping power confirmed what I thought about my GT350's brakes since they are the same. I've never driven a car that could stop that fast, including my BMW race cars back in the day.
Old 11-25-2023, 07:03 AM
  #32  
Majestic94
Safety Car
 
Majestic94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2021
Posts: 3,655
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drew888
You’re comparing a sports car to a 4 door family sedan. There will be more ev sports cars in the future.
It's an EV's battery weight that's the problem, not the number of doors.
Old 11-25-2023, 07:05 AM
  #33  
Majestic94
Safety Car
 
Majestic94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2021
Posts: 3,655
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swift93
There are many fast cars out there and the EVs lead the pack. Tesla Plaid smokes the McLaren in spite of the 720 running 0-150 mph in 10.2.
So does a Dodge Demon. I guess supercharged Hemis are the real technology leap everybody should be banking on?
Old 11-25-2023, 07:17 AM
  #34  
Majestic94
Safety Car
 
Majestic94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2021
Posts: 3,655
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drew888
This thread was about 0-150-0. May want to go back and check on that. If we compare apples to apples it would be comparing a CTSV to a S on a road course. The S is proportionally faster.

As much as I hate to say it, electric powertrains are a huge advancement over ICE. The difference is much greater than the flat head to ohv. It’s more equivalent to a radial piston aeroplane engine to a turbine. The real limiting factor is the battery tech.
So it's a huge advancement but limited by its own power supply? It pretty much negates the advancement.

I've been in and out of the EV market for 10 years now and I've never seen a more overhyped drivetrain technology. The electric motor is great, but it's not new and the reason it's not used in every vehicle for the past 100 years is the horrendous energy storage. Consider the most advanced battery is still 100 times the weight of a gallon of gas. Then add all the limitations (no storing at peak charge or empty charge, slow charge times, battery degradation from charging cycles, fast charging, etc.), excessive energy use during production, and extra cost, and its clear it's never going to be a replacement for ICE. It's terrible in trucks (towing range drops to about 90 miles), terrible in sports cars (extra weight), and terrible in cross country driving (you're guaranteed to get to your destination slower than ICE).
It's more equivalent to 4 cyl vs 8 than radial piston vs turbine,
Old 11-25-2023, 07:49 AM
  #35  
RKTKTV
Racer
Support Corvetteforum!
 
RKTKTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 486
Received 298 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

Tadda - thanks for posting the chart.

To change the discussion slightly - anyone care to guesstimate where a Z51 Stingray would fit in this list? (This interests me more than the discussion of the impending death of ICE. Sorry.)

Car and Driver test results show 0-60 = 2.8, 0-100 =7.2, quarter mile = 11.2 @ 122, and 0-150 = 19.4. Those are "knowns". (Yes, I know. Different test conditions, so not an absolute comparison.)

Where does the braking of the Z51 put the Stingray in the list? Any opinions? I think we can probably out-brake the heavier Cadillac and Bentley. Will it be enough to overcome the speed disadvantage, though, and pass them in the final results? I'm going to say yes, just to start the fight.



Quick Reply: 0-150-0 Car and Driver



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.