0-150-0 Car and Driver
#21
It is hard to embrace the EV's because they lack the thrill and sound of ICE. With that said we also don't have any affordable sports car EV options. It is true the difference in the way they make power is a factor. The Tycan is geared which does help utilize the lower speed torque better in the higher speed range.
#22
Yes, it is. C&D even admitted that ICE's are going to be obsolete when it comes to performance. ICE's will become a thing of the past by 2030, that's almost guaranteed. Like it or hate it (I personally don't like it) but the writing is on the wall. It's like VHS, cassette tapes, Netflix DVD's, telephone booths, typewriters, etc. it's all coming to an end.
Some people are so worried about being obsolete they'll make stupid irrelevant comparisons.
#23
I'm going to disagree, if all is equal it takes the same power. A 1000hp EV has a much faster acceleration than a 500-700hp ice vehicle. A Chiron and Model S are comparable.
#24
Pro
This is useful information in the event I buy one of the cars participating and I find myself hitting the brakes @ 150 mph.
The following users liked this post:
Acpantera (11-22-2023)
#25
Model S isn't a sports car. At Nurburgring even at over 1000 hp it's only running 7:35 lap times (a stock C8 ran 7:30 with rwd and half the hp). The Model S is an example of why EV's are worse than ICE's. 0-60 times is one of the most abused EV attributes that people confuse with a good sports car.
Last edited by Majestic94; 11-22-2023 at 07:26 PM.
#26
This thread was about 0-150-0. May want to go back and check on that. If we compare apples to apples it would be comparing a CTSV to a S on a road course. The S is proportionally faster.
As much as I hate to say it, electric powertrains are a huge advancement over ICE. The difference is much greater than the flat head to ohv. It’s more equivalent to a radial piston aeroplane engine to a turbine. The real limiting factor is the battery tech.
As much as I hate to say it, electric powertrains are a huge advancement over ICE. The difference is much greater than the flat head to ohv. It’s more equivalent to a radial piston aeroplane engine to a turbine. The real limiting factor is the battery tech.
Model S isn't a sports car. At Nurburgring even at over 1000 hp it's only running 7:35 lap times (a stock C8 ran 7:30 with rwd and half the hp). The Model S is an example of why EV's are worse than ICE's. 0-60 times is one of the most abused EV attributes that people confuse with a good sports car.
Last edited by Drew888; 11-22-2023 at 10:10 PM.
#27
There are many fast cars out there and the EVs lead the pack. Tesla Plaid smokes the McLaren in spite of the 720 running 0-150 mph in 10.2.
#28
The Z06s performance would be much better if the gear spacing made more sense. As is, the DCT really is a 5 speed with 3 overdrive gears.
#29
Burning Brakes
Yes, EVs are scorching fast in a line.
But, they're equally bad in translating that to track performance. The Tesla Model S Plaid with "Track Pack" has 1,020 horsepower - more than double the Stingray's - and its Ring time is almost identical. Must be quite a non-confidence-inspiring handful to get around corners to give up all the time gained in the straights.
But, they're equally bad in translating that to track performance. The Tesla Model S Plaid with "Track Pack" has 1,020 horsepower - more than double the Stingray's - and its Ring time is almost identical. Must be quite a non-confidence-inspiring handful to get around corners to give up all the time gained in the straights.
The following users liked this post:
Majestic94 (11-25-2023)
#30
You’re comparing a sports car to a 4 door family sedan. There will be more ev sports cars in the future.
Yes, EVs are scorching fast in a line.
But, they're equally bad in translating that to track performance. The Tesla Model S Plaid with "Track Pack" has 1,020 horsepower - more than double the Stingray's - and its Ring time is almost identical. Must be quite a non-confidence-inspiring handful to get around corners to give up all the time gained in the straights.
But, they're equally bad in translating that to track performance. The Tesla Model S Plaid with "Track Pack" has 1,020 horsepower - more than double the Stingray's - and its Ring time is almost identical. Must be quite a non-confidence-inspiring handful to get around corners to give up all the time gained in the straights.
#31
Melting Slicks
I'm impressed by the stopping power of the fastest stopping cars. The Mustang Dark Horse stopping power confirmed what I thought about my GT350's brakes since they are the same. I've never driven a car that could stop that fast, including my BMW race cars back in the day.
#32
#33
#34
This thread was about 0-150-0. May want to go back and check on that. If we compare apples to apples it would be comparing a CTSV to a S on a road course. The S is proportionally faster.
As much as I hate to say it, electric powertrains are a huge advancement over ICE. The difference is much greater than the flat head to ohv. It’s more equivalent to a radial piston aeroplane engine to a turbine. The real limiting factor is the battery tech.
As much as I hate to say it, electric powertrains are a huge advancement over ICE. The difference is much greater than the flat head to ohv. It’s more equivalent to a radial piston aeroplane engine to a turbine. The real limiting factor is the battery tech.
I've been in and out of the EV market for 10 years now and I've never seen a more overhyped drivetrain technology. The electric motor is great, but it's not new and the reason it's not used in every vehicle for the past 100 years is the horrendous energy storage. Consider the most advanced battery is still 100 times the weight of a gallon of gas. Then add all the limitations (no storing at peak charge or empty charge, slow charge times, battery degradation from charging cycles, fast charging, etc.), excessive energy use during production, and extra cost, and its clear it's never going to be a replacement for ICE. It's terrible in trucks (towing range drops to about 90 miles), terrible in sports cars (extra weight), and terrible in cross country driving (you're guaranteed to get to your destination slower than ICE).
It's more equivalent to 4 cyl vs 8 than radial piston vs turbine,
#35
Racer
To change the discussion slightly - anyone care to guesstimate where a Z51 Stingray would fit in this list? (This interests me more than the discussion of the impending death of ICE. Sorry.)
Car and Driver test results show 0-60 = 2.8, 0-100 =7.2, quarter mile = 11.2 @ 122, and 0-150 = 19.4. Those are "knowns". (Yes, I know. Different test conditions, so not an absolute comparison.)
Where does the braking of the Z51 put the Stingray in the list? Any opinions? I think we can probably out-brake the heavier Cadillac and Bentley. Will it be enough to overcome the speed disadvantage, though, and pass them in the final results? I'm going to say yes, just to start the fight.