Probable SOLUTION for most all Stingray DCT problems
#21
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,088
Received 3,840 Likes
on
1,157 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer
Bottom line: If the ZO6 trans can be fitted to a Stingray, DO IT, or at least make a sound and logical argument as to why not! Again, bean counters vs. engineers....
Read that carefully.
#23
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,088
Received 3,840 Likes
on
1,157 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer
It's not essentially the same; it's an entirely different, higher-torque unit from Tremec. I don't know my "Found On Road Dead"s too well: is the DCT in the GT500 a rear mounted transaxle like it is in the Corvette? Or is there a separate diff in the car?
The following users liked this post:
Peavey (11-22-2021)
#24
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2017
Location: Prosper TX/Austin TX
Posts: 10,966
Received 8,883 Likes
on
4,280 Posts
2020 C6 of the Year Winner - Modified
You’re assuming that the transmission in a car that hasn’t been release yet won’t have problems. They also tested the Stingray for ~ a million miles or whatever they said and new owners are having their transmission crap out in as little as 65 miles or some nonsense I’ve seen posted. Why are you so confident that there won’t be similar or different issues with the Z06 version?
#25
Pro
Pretty neat video about dct operation
tr 9080 in c8 has transaxel as well, but assume dct components and operation are very similar as tr 9070 has output shaft for traditional shaft to rear end.
Tremec spec sheet doesn't show design torque or speed for tr 9080.
Tremec spec sheet doesn't show design torque or speed for tr 9080.
#26
[QUOTE=Bird67;1604335972]Greg, I have scoured the spec sheets, build manuals, code references and even the on-line configurator, and I can’t find the option for the manual transmission anywhere! Can you or someone, anyone, direct me to the code???
[/the code OZ an in land of QUOTE]
[/the code OZ an in land of QUOTE]
#27
Instructor
Thread Starter
To JABCAT:
Usually, everything new will have a few unexpected problems, but HOPEFULLY using a newly upgraded tranny from the ZO6 would solve at least some of the problems that are in the Stingray Tremec. And I did NOT say that I was overly confident that there wouldn't be some problems in the new upgraded ZO6 transmission as you implied. To me, it only seems logical that if there is an upgraded version for the ZO6, GM should use it also for the standard Stingray, if it can be done. ANY upgrade as to reliability is better than NONE.
To JVP:
I'm not understanding what you mean when you say that I'm "focused on the wrong thing with the Stingrays' transmission". Please clarify where I'm "focused on the wrong thing". It seems that as long as GM is staying away from the gas-guzzler tax what's the issue? Is recertification really a huge hurdle or cost? Just asking, because to me it sounds like mostly a paperwork and number crunching exercise.
(Many contributors to this forum us initials and acronyms that aren't readily known to the casual reader, so what is the FE you refer to please. (Federal Emissions for CAFE standards?)
I'm simply focused on the many negative comments about the Stingray trans failures, and I'm trying to offer a "fix" to those failures by suggesting that GM use an upgraded version where ever they can in their cars . There are too many comments about C8 Stingray trans failures that take MONTHS to fix or REPLACE, while the internal guts of the car are scattered about (as I experienced with my C7). And for the price of this car (with relatively few miles), waiting months to repair or REPLACE it is unacceptable. Remember, we're talking about GM's "halo" product, and the C8 should be setting a good example and showing the highest standards of quality and reliability.
And JVP, with apologies, if something is failing there IS something wrong with the engineering, somewhere, somehow.
Usually, everything new will have a few unexpected problems, but HOPEFULLY using a newly upgraded tranny from the ZO6 would solve at least some of the problems that are in the Stingray Tremec. And I did NOT say that I was overly confident that there wouldn't be some problems in the new upgraded ZO6 transmission as you implied. To me, it only seems logical that if there is an upgraded version for the ZO6, GM should use it also for the standard Stingray, if it can be done. ANY upgrade as to reliability is better than NONE.
To JVP:
I'm not understanding what you mean when you say that I'm "focused on the wrong thing with the Stingrays' transmission". Please clarify where I'm "focused on the wrong thing". It seems that as long as GM is staying away from the gas-guzzler tax what's the issue? Is recertification really a huge hurdle or cost? Just asking, because to me it sounds like mostly a paperwork and number crunching exercise.
(Many contributors to this forum us initials and acronyms that aren't readily known to the casual reader, so what is the FE you refer to please. (Federal Emissions for CAFE standards?)
I'm simply focused on the many negative comments about the Stingray trans failures, and I'm trying to offer a "fix" to those failures by suggesting that GM use an upgraded version where ever they can in their cars . There are too many comments about C8 Stingray trans failures that take MONTHS to fix or REPLACE, while the internal guts of the car are scattered about (as I experienced with my C7). And for the price of this car (with relatively few miles), waiting months to repair or REPLACE it is unacceptable. Remember, we're talking about GM's "halo" product, and the C8 should be setting a good example and showing the highest standards of quality and reliability.
And JVP, with apologies, if something is failing there IS something wrong with the engineering, somewhere, somehow.
Last edited by LT4 Z51; 11-21-2021 at 08:20 PM. Reason: Spelling and content
#28
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,088
Received 3,840 Likes
on
1,157 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer
It seems that as long as GM is staying away from the gas-guzzler tax what's the issue? Is recertification really a huge hurdle or cost? Just asking, because to me it sounds like mostly a paperwork and number crunching exercise.
[insert the folks who puff up their chests and say something ridiculous like, "If you're worried about FE, drive another car!" Yeah, have fun with that.]
I also don't know what kind of negative impact the shorter gearing will have on the Stingray's emissions, but it will increase. All of that will have to be tested, verified, and certified.
And JVP, with apologies, if something is failing there IS something wrong with the engineering, somewhere, somehow.
The following users liked this post:
JABCAT (11-22-2021)
#29
Melting Slicks