Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C8 shutdown cause has US Senators demanding action

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2021, 12:58 PM
  #181  
MYROAD
Instructor
 
MYROAD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 176
Received 71 Likes on 44 Posts
Default Legacy

Originally Posted by LIE2ME
The problems with Jaguars are not limited to the older cars. In 2011 I purchased a 2008 Jaguar XK convertible. By far, the worst POS I ever owned. The first day I owned the car, the heaters and defoggers crapped out during a freezing cold rain & ice storm (bad relay). The next day the battery died. Over the next 18 months, I replaced the battery four times. The convertible top would go halfway up and jam, then it would go half way down & jam. Then I would lose the battery again. The car spent so much time at the local Jaguar dealer, that I used to drive up there on Saturdays for visiting hours. Finally I consulted an automotive electrical engineer. He diagnosed the problem as an "aperiodic parasitical draw". I asked him what I should do, and he replied, "sell the car". Finally after one particularly lousy afternoon of trying to force the electrical top back into its hole behind the seats, my wife (after observing my sweaty bad mood), said, "Why don't you go out and buy yourself a new Corvette?". Two days later, there was a Carlisle Blue C6 sitting in the driveway. That led to my current C7, and now the order for a new C8. Never been happier, and hell WILL freeze over before I ever lay money down for another Jaguar...
The Lucas legacy lives on! My single experience with a British car (Triumph) led me to buy 37 more cars, none of which was British. I've considered and rejected buying an F-type for several years. QC and frequency-of-repair issues persist in UK products.
Old 02-04-2021, 01:10 PM
  #182  
LIE2ME
Le Mans Master
 
LIE2ME's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: Camden SC
Posts: 6,824
Received 4,579 Likes on 1,646 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
Hmmm. I owned an intro year 2014 Jaguar F-Type convertible for 3 years and 30K miles. It never exhibited a single problem, and there was never even a drop of oil on my garage floor.

I also owned 5 Jeeps in the last two decades with never a warranty repair, and they are supposed to be among the worst in terms of reliability.

Single data points are worthless, and with regard to modern vehicles, even the worst on today's reliability lists are better than the best from 20 years ago.
Unfortunately, not a "single" data point:

https://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/...j-d-power.html


Old 02-04-2021, 01:14 PM
  #183  
MMD
Safety Car
 
MMD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 4,754
Received 1,630 Likes on 1,051 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by miroad
As will the free market for EV's. I myself don't want an EV but the proliferation is inevitable. If indeed GM expects to be producing only EV's by 2035 millions of us will buy gasoline or hybrid cars elsewhere. Or, if not, we'll be keeping those V8's running for decades!
Slim chance this will ever happen. Where will the chips come from? Cars are being designed with planned obsolescence in mind. Parts will not be available.
Old 02-04-2021, 02:18 PM
  #184  
thill444
Le Mans Master
 
thill444's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2017
Location: New England
Posts: 5,363
Received 4,100 Likes on 2,003 Posts
Default

Fact. There is not enough engineers and cheap labor workers in the US to "bring it back" to the US. Some years back Apple talked about what it would take to bring the work back. There are almost 1M Chinese workers making Apple products and over 40K engineers. The US simply does not have the labor pool and enough engineers to bring it all back and that is just Apple. And even then prices would skyrocket because cheap American labor would be 2-3 time more expensive, and the cost of all these goods for the American consumer would skyrocket. On average you would pay another $75-100 more for your phone, computer, etc. In some cases more.

The answer to me is to spread the manufacturing out to other countries and rely less on China. Places like Viernam, Mexico, etc. All have cheap labor costs but you will still have issues finding enough qualified workers. Maybe India.
The following users liked this post:
David Spencer (02-06-2021)
Old 02-04-2021, 02:29 PM
  #185  
Trustym
Instructor
 
Trustym's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Posts: 142
Received 108 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MMD
What makes you think I don't have a C2? Also, to do what you suggest ('then buy [sic] and old car") does not provide a buyer with a full B to B warranty. Tech doesn't require Onstar, car play, navigation, etc. These are just creature comforts that have nothing to do with the operation of an automobile. They are put in modern cars and jack up the cost of a vehicle, they increase the probably something will go wrong, and they all are components within the vehicle that after a period of time will no longer be supported by the original manufacturer. When a manufacturer incorporates this types of electronic tech in modern automobiles they are building into the vehicle planned obsolescence. The aftermarket will not come along and offer solutions to maintain the complex software and hardware electronic systems embedded within the modern automobile. These system as exclusively proprietary. The reason why you still see C2s on the road today is because they are much easier to maintain and maintenance costs are more affordable. The chances that today's automobiles will be around 60 years from now and fully operational will be slim to none.
Well good for you.... If you don't want the tech, don't get a C8....
Old 02-04-2021, 02:38 PM
  #186  
MMD
Safety Car
 
MMD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 4,754
Received 1,630 Likes on 1,051 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trustym
Well good for you.... If you don't want the tech, don't get a C8....
Good for you...If you want the tech, go buy a laptop instead.
Old 02-04-2021, 03:03 PM
  #187  
Majestic94
Safety Car
 
Majestic94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2021
Posts: 3,655
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thill444
Fact. There is not enough engineers and cheap labor workers in the US to "bring it back" to the US. Some years back Apple talked about what it would take to bring the work back. There are almost 1M Chinese workers making Apple products and over 40K engineers. The US simply does not have the labor pool and enough engineers to bring it all back and that is just Apple. And even then prices would skyrocket because cheap American labor would be 2-3 time more expensive, and the cost of all these goods for the American consumer would skyrocket. On average you would pay another $75-100 more for your phone, computer, etc. In some cases more.

The answer to me is to spread the manufacturing out to other countries and rely less on China. Places like Viernam, Mexico, etc. All have cheap labor costs but you will still have issues finding enough qualified workers. Maybe India.
Not quite accurate. 99% of electronics manufacturing is done by robots. Any remaining labor cost could easily be traded for shipping cost savings.
It’s poor trade policies that create these problems, not our labor pool.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (02-04-2021)
Old 02-04-2021, 04:23 PM
  #188  
Speednet
Melting Slicks
 
Speednet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Bridgewater NJ
Posts: 2,108
Received 755 Likes on 332 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thill444
Fact. There is not enough engineers and cheap labor workers in the US to "bring it back" to the US. Some years back Apple talked about what it would take to bring the work back. There are almost 1M Chinese workers making Apple products and over 40K engineers. The US simply does not have the labor pool and enough engineers to bring it all back and that is just Apple. And even then prices would skyrocket because cheap American labor would be 2-3 time more expensive, and the cost of all these goods for the American consumer would skyrocket. On average you would pay another $75-100 more for your phone, computer, etc. In some cases more.

The answer to me is to spread the manufacturing out to other countries and rely less on China. Places like Viernam, Mexico, etc. All have cheap labor costs but you will still have issues finding enough qualified workers. Maybe India.
This is a false argument. If you actually knew facts you would know about companies who are currently building advanced chip foundries in the USA. For example, Taiwanese company TSMC is currently building a 5nm chip factory in Arizona. There are literally dozens of chip factories based in the USA.

Just because companies have often taken the easy and cheap way out for decades doesn't mean it will continue happening -- especially if consumers demand that they stop. It's lazy attitudes of "oh, there's nothing we can do about it" that creates the problem and causes it to continue, to our own disadvantage.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (02-04-2021)
Old 02-04-2021, 04:34 PM
  #189  
ArmchairArchitect
Banned Scam/Spammer
 
ArmchairArchitect's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Philadelphia PA (Birthplace of the USA, UNESCO World Heritage City)
Posts: 4,004
Received 3,916 Likes on 1,616 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MMD
Exactly. This is how planned obsolescence works. This is what creates the cycle auto makers want you in. Can't fix that car of yours, well just throw it out and buy another.
All the more reason to support Right to Repair laws in your state. See my signature.
The following users liked this post:
MMD (02-04-2021)
Old 02-04-2021, 04:36 PM
  #190  
RedLS6
Drifting
 
RedLS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 1,936
Received 1,739 Likes on 787 Posts

Default

Forget the robots. It is extremely hard, and expensive, for a new company (or even an existing company) to set up a new chip fab. It's just not as easy as spreading the manufacturing out - very, very, very few chip fabs are good at sub-10-nanometer finFET production. Simpler, slower chips using larger geometries are still hard but not as hard. Intel, once a world leader in this, has lost their edge to TSMC, and it would be risky even for them to try to set up a new fab to compete with them. They are trying, though, but at the same time are likely going to be outsourcing to TSMC as well.

We have a large list of chip fabs that we don't use anymore for our products, or don't like to use, because their fab processes do not have the refinement and are not able to hold the quality, reliability, performance and lifetime standards that many customers require for higher-end performance.

This doesn't mean that we, as a country, shouldn't try to be a world leader here. It just means that scaling this type of manufacturing across geographical areas is a long process, measured in years, lots of failures along the way, and billions of dollars.
The following users liked this post:
VetterFlyer (02-05-2021)
Old 02-04-2021, 05:11 PM
  #191  
Zormecteon
Drifting
 
Zormecteon's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2020
Location: Kelso, Wa
Posts: 1,953
Received 1,376 Likes on 674 Posts
Default

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ication_plants is a list of chip plants around the world. There are plenty in the US, just not the kind used in autos

Apple could easily make phones in the US if it were so inclined, and still sell them for what they cost now, they would just have to reduce their PROFIT. There are many Chinese manufactured phones that are near Apple clones that sell for a couple of hundred dollars rather than over a thousand. Apple sits on one the the biggest cash reserves ever accumulated by a ANY company.
Part of the problem is a stock market fixated on this quarter's profit.

But we digress.

YMMV
My 2¢
Old 02-04-2021, 05:15 PM
  #192  
MYROAD
Instructor
 
MYROAD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 176
Received 71 Likes on 44 Posts
Default Factory clusures

Originally Posted by Zormecteon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ication_plants is a list of chip plants around the world. There are plenty in the US, just not the kind used in autos

Apple could easily make phones in the US if it were so inclined, and still sell them for what they cost now, they would just have to reduce their PROFIT. There are many Chinese manufactured phones that are near Apple clones that sell for a couple of hundred dollars rather than over a thousand. Apple sits on one the the biggest cash reserves ever accumulated by a ANY company.
Part of the problem is a stock market fixated on this quarter's profit.

But we digress.

YMMV
My 2¢
Has anybody heard how long TPWs will be delayed due to the BG plant closure this week? My original 3300 was next week (2/8/21) but this has to be delayed. The Kerbeck and MM order tracking pages still show TPW's for this week and 2/8/21 but these have got to be rescheduled.
Old 02-04-2021, 05:32 PM
  #193  
C8J
Le Mans Master

 
C8J's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2020
Posts: 6,154
Received 3,152 Likes on 1,717 Posts
Default

Suggest post this on 2021 SS thread for a valid reply.
Old 02-04-2021, 05:35 PM
  #194  
Jeff V.
Le Mans Master
 
Jeff V.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,978
Received 4,086 Likes on 1,971 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ArmchairArchitect
All the more reason to support Right to Repair laws in your state. See my signature.
"Right to repair" is not "guarantee to provide me with parts forever".
Old 02-04-2021, 05:44 PM
  #195  
RKCRLR
Le Mans Master
 
RKCRLR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2016
Location: Garden Valley CA
Posts: 9,174
Received 6,200 Likes on 3,401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff V.
"Right to repair" is not "guarantee to provide me with parts forever".
The law says the manufacturer must provide parts for 10 years from date of manufacture. However, there is no limit (that I know of) on how much they can charge for those parts.
Old 02-04-2021, 06:21 PM
  #196  
Jeff V.
Le Mans Master
 
Jeff V.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,978
Received 4,086 Likes on 1,971 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RKCRLR
The law says the manufacturer must provide parts for 10 years from date of manufacture. However, there is no limit (that I know of) on how much they can charge for those parts.

I'm pretty sure that's just emissions related parts. I don't see anyone managing to legally mandate that GM or anyone else needs to provide things like obscure trim parts for 10 years.
Old 02-04-2021, 09:42 PM
  #197  
fastbroshi
Intermediate
 
fastbroshi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2019
Location: Mesquite, TX
Posts: 43
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Xoexoe
Id take a car that I can easily mechanically fix and tune myself most of the entire car over these rolling electronics on wheels anyday. A vehicle is meant to get you from A to B, the same as the first car ever built. All else is literally completely useless fluff. I mean you could have every single add on you could pay for, but if youre in the middle of nowhere and your engine blows, then who cares if you have apple car play, autonomous driving and parking blah blah blah, its all useless.
In addition to your Vette, you might consider an old Honda. Very very few "gotchas" that will fail and leave you stranded, and even then they can be fixed quickly with spares you keep in the glovebox. I present my humble Accord that will never die. I bought it and immediately pulled the trans to change the clutch, redid the brakes and addressed a myriad of leaks while I was there. You wouldn't have believed as to just how bad this car's maintenance had been neglected; the leaks, torn CV boots, the teen-ricer-boy mods, frozen window regulators, flaky distributor, etc. Yet I drove it over an hour home after I bought it and pulled it into the garage with 329k on the clock.

This gen of Hondas remains popular with people because 1. it's cheap to maintain 2. it hardly ever breaks in catastrophic fashion 3. parts can be found easily when it does need work 4. they made so many that junkyards TO THIS DAY still have two or three in the yard to pick from (possibly factoring in here is also the fact that instead of lasting 10 years before people junk them, they've been able to keep them going for 20-30 years).

I bought this car for $600 and I have maybe $2k into it in just parts. That includes a full suspension rebuild and replacing all A/C components amongst other things. Sure it's probably only worth $2k or so on a good day, but if the worst happened and I had to sell the Vette, house, etc. and live in it, it would be running 10 years from now with very little maintenance costs and best of all, I'd have no car payment every month.

Everything but the power antenna works on this car. Did I mention I'm getting it painted Supersonic Blue? Don't get me wrong, I love my Vette, but I love this one too.


Name:  CHBBxqX.jpg
Views: 6
Size:  1.11 MB
The following 3 users liked this post by fastbroshi:
CorvetteBrent (02-06-2021), MMD (02-04-2021), Zormecteon (02-05-2021)

Get notified of new replies

To C8 shutdown cause has US Senators demanding action

Old 02-04-2021, 09:50 PM
  #198  
RKCRLR
Le Mans Master
 
RKCRLR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2016
Location: Garden Valley CA
Posts: 9,174
Received 6,200 Likes on 3,401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff V.
I'm pretty sure that's just emissions related parts. I don't see anyone managing to legally mandate that GM or anyone else needs to provide things like obscure trim parts for 10 years.
After some research I agree with you. Should have verified before I posted.
The following users liked this post:
VetterFlyer (02-05-2021)
Old 02-04-2021, 11:14 PM
  #199  
MitchAlsup
Le Mans Master
 
MitchAlsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 5,042
Received 1,592 Likes on 784 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Speednet
Um, except the Trump responses here were directly based on the article posted by the OP, which included a mistruth about Trump causing the chip shortage. Any issues with China are actually long-standing problems caused by previous administrations that created a dangerous dependency in the first place.
Previous administrations did nothing to make it sufficiently profitable to manufacture semiconductors in USA, and manufactures, in turn, quit the business.

In many ways staying "in" the semiconductor industry takes deep pockets--and if a business circumstance arrizes where the fab is not making any money this year, well you still have to perform the $1-2B investment so you remain relevent for next year. This is not a business model firms traded on stock exchanges can stomache.

Trump began fixing that problem, and the socialist press is confused, thinking that fixing a problem is actually causing a problem.
The only evidence I see is that Samsung is considering putting a $10B DRAM plant in the USA.

What the USA needs is 4 commercial Super-FABs selling wafer starts and tester time at a rate where everyone wins.
But NOBODY is pushing for anything close to this.
The following users liked this post:
CorvetteBrent (02-06-2021)
Old 02-05-2021, 12:38 AM
  #200  
hypntyz
Pro
 
hypntyz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2011
Location: Morristown TN
Posts: 527
Received 117 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MMD
Let's go back to the old days. The hell with chips and China. American autos never have chips (unless we're talking about potato chips) in them back in the day. We are currently in a low intensity war with China. The situation will not improve until major industrial manufacturing production returns in its's totality to the USA. It's in our nation's national security interest to make this happen. Until this is done the USA will never have control over it future. Who is responsible for this situation we are now faced???
So essentially you want a C3 corvette, carburetor, approx 225hp and 15mpg average, no airbags, no navigation, cable operated speedometer, no traction control, no stability control, no ABS, no electronic assist steering, no digital display/cluster, the performance and safety of the car would be severely hampered, and it could never even be sold because it would be incapable of passing modern crash test or emissions standards. Great idea.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:03 PM.