Some more C8 Z06 engine info
#42
The following users liked this post:
Race Prepared (04-21-2020)
#43
Instructor
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...8906/overview/
Last edited by Rock0720; 04-21-2020 at 11:16 AM.
#44
Le Mans Master
I strongly suspect those who have the manuals will hold onto them for the foreseeable future. I don't ever plan to get rid of my C6 ZR1 for that reason even when I park a C8 next to it. But there are scores of auto C7 ZR1s out there. Some people go through cars like fashion. I have a friend who switches out his "toy" every few years because he gets bored with it and wants the latest and greatest. Sadly, I don't have that kind of mad money to throw around, so I pick my battles with the wife very carefully.
Last edited by VetteVinnie; 04-21-2020 at 11:17 AM.
#45
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Ft Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 3,034
Received 361 Likes
on
216 Posts
I'm sure the c8Z will be faster 0-60 and will have a better Nurburgring time. That being said many single guys like me who live in Florida use a c7 z06 as a daily driver and their only car. I don't care for the seats in the back but I like the big trunk in case I need to pick up something large. In addition to that, we have no curvy roads here and its all straight-line fun but I love the look of a Corvette way more than a Challenger, Mustang or Camaro and also the fact that not everyone and their grandmother has it thats why my first Vette was my brand new 2018 2lz Z06 A8. I'm very interested in the c8z even though I will lose cargo space but it has to be fun when you are cruising at 50 and suddenly floor it.
#46
What do you mean? There are 35 for sale right now that I could go buy if i was ready to buy. I've had my eye on this specific one for 2 weeks now as this is exactly how I would have spec'd it.
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...8906/overview/
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...8906/overview/
The following users liked this post:
Rock0720 (04-21-2020)
#47
Instructor
I doubt there will ever be much more for sale than 50-60 at a time. Definitely more autos and a surprising amount of Verts. I'm still torn between the auto and M7 myself. I'm an ok driver but I feel the M7 in my Z06 is nearly too much for me at 90+% throttle.
#48
@rob62 The early C6 Z06 cars were very stripped down and barley cracked 3000lbs. I own an early 2007 1LZ. She has no sound deadening material (must have come a little later?), the thinnest carpet and mats I've ever seen in a car, no NAV, no power passenger seat -- nothing. Just the way I like it, and just the way a Z06 should be.
I really pray the C8 Z06 is at least available stripped down. Hell, I think they could even offer a limited-options, fixed-roof, cloth sport seat, lightweight version and call it the Z06-L (lightweight), or Z06-T (track) something along those lines. I'd be the first in line. Oh, and please keep it NA!
Finally starting to get excited about the C8.
The following 3 users liked this post by CorsoZ06:
#49
Le Mans Master
What do you mean? There are 35 for sale right now that I could go buy if i was ready to buy. I've had my eye on this specific one for 2 weeks now as this is exactly how I would have spec'd it.
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...8906/overview/
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...8906/overview/
Last edited by VetteVinnie; 04-21-2020 at 11:54 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Rock0720 (04-21-2020)
#50
So a quick question for all the forced induction fans out here that are whining that a FPC NA engine is a step backwards. Question is: "If the C7ZR1 did ~ 3.0 0-60mph and 11.2-11.4 1/4 mile consistently(10.9 best) whereas the C8 Stingray does 2.8-2.9 0-60 and 11.2 1/4" mile, how is a more powerful C8 with more rubber going to be slower?" The current Stingray is already quicker and faster than your C7 Z06 except maybe around a German Racetrack most of us can't spell or pronounce.
Quote from Randy Pobst ""While the car has a big bump in power [over the Z06], it's still twitchy trying to accelerate in the lower gears. And that's the 'Vette's great downfall."
Too much torque is NOT a good thing. You have to be able to put it down. With a close ratio PDK we'll be able to roast the tires in lower gears, but use the HP at hand without turning it into tire smoke unintentionally.
/Fire-proof Undies engaged.....
Quote from Randy Pobst ""While the car has a big bump in power [over the Z06], it's still twitchy trying to accelerate in the lower gears. And that's the 'Vette's great downfall."
Too much torque is NOT a good thing. You have to be able to put it down. With a close ratio PDK we'll be able to roast the tires in lower gears, but use the HP at hand without turning it into tire smoke unintentionally.
/Fire-proof Undies engaged.....
Last edited by fzust; 04-21-2020 at 01:38 PM. Reason: More
The following 3 users liked this post by fzust:
#51
So a quick question for all the forced induction fans out here that are whining that a FPC NA engine is a step backwards. Question is: "If the C7ZR1 did ~ 3.0 0-60mph and 11.2-11.4 1/4 mile consistently(10.9 best) whereas the C8 Stingray does 2.8-2.9 0-60 and 11.2 1/4" mile, how is a more powerful C8 with more rubber going to be slower?" The current Stingray is already quicker and faster than your C7 Z06 except maybe around a German Racetrack most of us can't spell or pronounce.
Quote from Randy Pobst ""While the car has a big bump in power [over the Z06], it's still twitchy trying to accelerate in the lower gears. And that's the 'Vette's great downfall."
Too much torque is NOT a good thing. You have to be able to put it down. With a close ratio PDK we'll be able to roast the tires in lower gears, but use the HP at hand without turning it into tire smoke unintentionally.
/Fire-proof Undies engaged.....
Quote from Randy Pobst ""While the car has a big bump in power [over the Z06], it's still twitchy trying to accelerate in the lower gears. And that's the 'Vette's great downfall."
Too much torque is NOT a good thing. You have to be able to put it down. With a close ratio PDK we'll be able to roast the tires in lower gears, but use the HP at hand without turning it into tire smoke unintentionally.
/Fire-proof Undies engaged.....
I just hope its more than 600hp though. Porsche is getting about 125hp/L out of their GT3 motors and 130hp/L out of the RS version. If they make 650 hp NA with this car will be the one to get.
The following 3 users liked this post by TurboJunky:
#52
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Oviedo Florida
Posts: 8,818
Received 1,257 Likes
on
819 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2016 C5 of Year Finalist
Well, I am a little disappointed in the C8ZO6
prediction. Frankly , most old men want their
factory vettes to be easy to drive, comfortable,
and showy. Forget,all the bells and whistles,
Give me,a strip down vette, Power window on pass side,
roll up,on drivers. No,power anything except brakes. No
dumbtoys,to play with , no cruise control. I will give you,
the luxcery of a,fm radio and thats it. Strip, strip it down.
Put a forged engine and running gear in it. Free flowing heads,
a decent cam and you should have,around 650hp. Then I can
put a TT/SC on the engine and a set of headers. C8ZO6 will be light &
capable of more power. Maybe GM could offer a rollcage for $1000
that would be a deal.
I don't care how it sounds and there are no bragging right s on the track
when it comes to hp. Some of the lowest hp cars,pass me,sometimes.
prediction. Frankly , most old men want their
factory vettes to be easy to drive, comfortable,
and showy. Forget,all the bells and whistles,
Give me,a strip down vette, Power window on pass side,
roll up,on drivers. No,power anything except brakes. No
dumbtoys,to play with , no cruise control. I will give you,
the luxcery of a,fm radio and thats it. Strip, strip it down.
Put a forged engine and running gear in it. Free flowing heads,
a decent cam and you should have,around 650hp. Then I can
put a TT/SC on the engine and a set of headers. C8ZO6 will be light &
capable of more power. Maybe GM could offer a rollcage for $1000
that would be a deal.
I don't care how it sounds and there are no bragging right s on the track
when it comes to hp. Some of the lowest hp cars,pass me,sometimes.
#53
Instructor
So a quick question for all the forced induction fans out here that are whining that a FPC NA engine is a step backwards. Question is: "If the C7ZR1 did ~ 3.0 0-60mph and 11.2-11.4 1/4 mile consistently(10.9 best) whereas the C8 Stingray does 2.8-2.9 0-60 and 11.2 1/4" mile, how is a more powerful C8 with more rubber going to be slower?" The current Stingray is already quicker and faster than your C7 Z06 except maybe around a German Racetrack most of us can't spell or pronounce.
Quote from Randy Pobst ""While the car has a big bump in power [over the Z06], it's still twitchy trying to accelerate in the lower gears. And that's the 'Vette's great downfall."
Too much torque is NOT a good thing. You have to be able to put it down. With a close ratio PDK we'll be able to roast the tires in lower gears, but use the HP at hand without turning it into tire smoke unintentionally.
/Fire-proof Undies engaged.....
Quote from Randy Pobst ""While the car has a big bump in power [over the Z06], it's still twitchy trying to accelerate in the lower gears. And that's the 'Vette's great downfall."
Too much torque is NOT a good thing. You have to be able to put it down. With a close ratio PDK we'll be able to roast the tires in lower gears, but use the HP at hand without turning it into tire smoke unintentionally.
/Fire-proof Undies engaged.....
. The c8 is slower than the current Z06 in every measurement aside from 0-60. I get it you're excited about the C8 but use facts please.
Last edited by Rock0720; 04-21-2020 at 03:17 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Rock0720:
ls7plus (05-24-2021),
Telepierre (04-22-2020)
#54
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. PLEASE GIVE US A LIGHTER CAR. PLEASE!
3800+ lbs is too heavy. Why can't we have a 3200 lbs GT3RS competitor Corvette? There is a market for this car where people will not want heated/cooled seats, magnaride, front axle lift, removable top. Make all modular body panels CF. Put on CF wheels. Do something to show that you care.
And please give us proper "bucket" seats. We still don't have good seats that can compete with bucket seats of Ferrari, Porsche, Lambo. Heck, forget that, WE DONT EVEN HAVE SEATS THAT CAN COMPETE WITH 2015 Ford GT350's Recaro Seats. That's a $59,000 car!
The most aggressive comp seats of C8 is still not as aggressive as the Ford Recaro seats, or the regular 18 way "sofa" Porsche seats.
3800+ lbs is too heavy. Why can't we have a 3200 lbs GT3RS competitor Corvette? There is a market for this car where people will not want heated/cooled seats, magnaride, front axle lift, removable top. Make all modular body panels CF. Put on CF wheels. Do something to show that you care.
And please give us proper "bucket" seats. We still don't have good seats that can compete with bucket seats of Ferrari, Porsche, Lambo. Heck, forget that, WE DONT EVEN HAVE SEATS THAT CAN COMPETE WITH 2015 Ford GT350's Recaro Seats. That's a $59,000 car!
The most aggressive comp seats of C8 is still not as aggressive as the Ford Recaro seats, or the regular 18 way "sofa" Porsche seats.
Last edited by UnhandledException; 04-21-2020 at 03:19 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by UnhandledException:
Ahmed_otb (05-04-2020),
CorsoZ06 (04-21-2020),
Kodiak Bear (04-21-2020),
kumar75150 (04-25-2020),
SouthernSon (05-03-2020)
The following 2 users liked this post by TurboJunky:
rcooper (05-20-2020),
vettesweetnos (04-21-2020)
#56
Drifting
Member Since: May 2007
Location: EV is like bad sex with no moaning
Posts: 1,549
Received 1,267 Likes
on
578 Posts
The render is very close. Rear intake ducts are spot on. But the power plant information is off. It will be a 4.4L twin turbo fpc V8 with 8400 rpm redline. 705-750 hp 620-638 tq depending on tune.
The following 7 users liked this post by vettesweetnos:
23/C8Z (04-21-2020),
blue_bomber697 (04-21-2020),
C8Zeb06 (04-27-2020),
fzust (04-21-2020),
OnPoint (04-21-2020),
and 2 others liked this post.
#57
C8 is a proper sports car. 3800 lbs is a lot.
How is it that Porsche can pull off 3200 lbs sports cars that are of the same dimension as Corvettes which weigh 400 lbs more? As smart as you make a car's suspension or transmission, you cannot cheat law of physics. Corvette is a fat car compared to mclarens or porsches. There is more to a car than 0-60 times.
But hold on, maybe there isn't. Because 4 out of 10 threads in this forum is about 0-60 times. So maybe Chevy DID hit the nail on the head with C8 because this is the customers of Corvette. This is what they care about. Most of them don't even know what a centerlock wheel is and didn't even know about a dual clutch until the Tremec unit showed up in C8. You see?
Yeah, bury your head in the sand is a common problem these days (everywhere)!
Oh and one last thing. Doing 0-60 in 2.8 seconds is not really a big deal. BMW can do better with a 4400 lbs big *** sedan. It's all about DCT, short gearing, and software that can properly do launch control sequence. I cannot believe what a big hit this 0-60 thing has become. But nobody talks about the fact that C8 now weighs MORE than a Subaru OUTBACK!
Last edited by UnhandledException; 04-21-2020 at 03:34 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by UnhandledException:
Kodiak Bear (04-21-2020),
Rock0720 (04-21-2020)
#58
Drifting
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Fort McMurray Alberta
Posts: 1,746
Received 1,296 Likes
on
479 Posts
2018 C7 of Year Finalist
So a quick question for all the forced induction fans out here that are whining that a FPC NA engine is a step backwards. Question is: "If the C7ZR1 did ~ 3.0 0-60mph and 11.2-11.4 1/4 mile consistently(10.9 best) whereas the C8 Stingray does 2.8-2.9 0-60 and 11.2 1/4" mile, how is a more powerful C8 with more rubber going to be slower?" The current Stingray is already quicker and faster than your C7 Z06 except maybe around a German Racetrack most of us can't spell or pronounce.
Quote from Randy Pobst ""While the car has a big bump in power [over the Z06], it's still twitchy trying to accelerate in the lower gears. And that's the 'Vette's great downfall."
Too much torque is NOT a good thing. You have to be able to put it down. With a close ratio PDK we'll be able to roast the tires in lower gears, but use the HP at hand without turning it into tire smoke unintentionally.
/Fire-proof Undies engaged.....
Quote from Randy Pobst ""While the car has a big bump in power [over the Z06], it's still twitchy trying to accelerate in the lower gears. And that's the 'Vette's great downfall."
Too much torque is NOT a good thing. You have to be able to put it down. With a close ratio PDK we'll be able to roast the tires in lower gears, but use the HP at hand without turning it into tire smoke unintentionally.
/Fire-proof Undies engaged.....
You stated a ZR1 was a low 11 second car? They were running mid-10's good sir out of the box. And had gone 9's with tires and an exhaust basically.
I expect the C8 Z06 to run a mid-10 (10.4-10.5) out of the box consistently, similar to the C7 ZR1. But only if its a Twin Turbo. If its an NA car with 600hp... probably about an 10.7.
You then state the C8 Stingray is faster than the C7Z around any track except the Ring? Not a chance. The C7Z will be significantly faster around any track around the world. There is no question about that and zero evidence to support your claim.
Yes Randy did say that about the ZR1. Hence the entire shift to mid-engine... That is the entire purpose of them doing that. Now that they have done that... guess what. Now they can put that power to the ground effectively.
The following 2 users liked this post by blue_bomber697:
Rock0720 (04-21-2020),
Telepierre (04-22-2020)
#59
Instructor
That's possible. But then they can still make progress elsewhere. This car is too heavy. Way too heavy. My GT350 weighs 3760 lbs and it seats 4 people. Heck I carried 6 (six) 4x4s with it in one shot. Its like a sedan. In fact, its bigger than the sedans of 15 years ago.
C8 is a proper sports car. 3800 lbs is a lot.
How is it that Porsche can pull off 3200 lbs sports cars that are of the same dimension as Corvettes which weigh 400 lbs more? As smart as you make a car's suspension or transmission, you cannot cheat law of physics. Corvette is a fat car compared to mclarens or porsches. There is more to a car than 0-60 times.
But hold on, maybe there isn't. Because 4 out of 10 threads in this forum is about 0-60 times. So maybe Chevy DID hit the nail on the head with C8 because this is the customers of Corvette. This is what they care about. Most of them don't even know what a centerlock wheel is and didn't even know about a dual clutch until the Tremec unit showed up in C8. You see?
Yeah, bury your head in the sand is a common problem these days (everywhere)!
Oh and one last thing. Doing 0-60 in 2.8 seconds is not really a big deal. BMW can do better with a 4400 lbs big *** sedan. It's all about DCT, short gearing, and software that can properly do launch control sequence. I cannot believe what a big hit this 0-60 thing has become. But nobody talks about the fact that C8 now weighs MORE than a Subaru OUTBACK!
C8 is a proper sports car. 3800 lbs is a lot.
How is it that Porsche can pull off 3200 lbs sports cars that are of the same dimension as Corvettes which weigh 400 lbs more? As smart as you make a car's suspension or transmission, you cannot cheat law of physics. Corvette is a fat car compared to mclarens or porsches. There is more to a car than 0-60 times.
But hold on, maybe there isn't. Because 4 out of 10 threads in this forum is about 0-60 times. So maybe Chevy DID hit the nail on the head with C8 because this is the customers of Corvette. This is what they care about. Most of them don't even know what a centerlock wheel is and didn't even know about a dual clutch until the Tremec unit showed up in C8. You see?
Yeah, bury your head in the sand is a common problem these days (everywhere)!
Oh and one last thing. Doing 0-60 in 2.8 seconds is not really a big deal. BMW can do better with a 4400 lbs big *** sedan. It's all about DCT, short gearing, and software that can properly do launch control sequence. I cannot believe what a big hit this 0-60 thing has become. But nobody talks about the fact that C8 now weighs MORE than a Subaru OUTBACK!
#60
Le Mans Master
Well what he’s looking for if he’sa street driver is low end torque. That’s something you feel in the seat of the pants when driving on street. Lt4 has allot of that making it fun in short bursts for street driving. Fpc motor with out turbos as well all know needs to open up before you feel The torque. Even then 470 at whatever rpm is less than we currently have Ava allot less available at very low (streetable) rpm. You teach guys know this. This Shouldn’t be a surprise. While it’s arrive to sound like a Ferrari we still like the low end grunt we currently have and with out fi you’re probably not going to get that feel. Unless they lighten the car to 3100-3200 lbs? That’s not happening without a tremendous additional cost we know this.
I Still think they are going tt no matter what engine they use. Just my feeling. They need to make the track rats happy as well as the drag guys and the street guys. Fi is the only way to hit all those bullet points.
I Still think they are going tt no matter what engine they use. Just my feeling. They need to make the track rats happy as well as the drag guys and the street guys. Fi is the only way to hit all those bullet points.