Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PSA: It was a pre-production C8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2019, 05:18 PM
  #41  
50MileSmile
Burning Brakes
 
50MileSmile's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Posts: 829
Received 213 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lostsoul
First impressions are very important...When I was first tested I took time to prep myself....showered did push ups, combed hair, sprayed BRUT(women love it)...showered, did push ups, combed hair, sprayed BRUT(women love it)...


So you’re saying that on the first shot out the door, you were three-quarters right on guessing what your prospects wanted? Sort of like the release of the C8, according to some of the critics here...
Old 10-18-2019, 02:11 PM
  #42  
Racer X
Le Mans Master
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,468
Received 4,383 Likes on 2,070 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lostsoul
Maybe thats the issue.. The Engineer is there to design and make what drivers want with the budget they are given. Of course they have input but its the test drivers that I want happy. It looks like Chevy's test drivers think and feel different then some of the others outside. OR, it goes back to them releasing incomplete test vehicles. Either way there is a disconnect somewhere.



First impressions are very important...When I was first tested I took time to prep myself....showered did push ups, combed hair, sprayed BRUT(women love it)...
No, engineers are there to engineer the car to the design criteria within the envelope afforded by the body design. Other people set forth the design and criteria. At best they are influencers not decision makers on the design and other criteria, (cost, performance, space, weight, etc.).
Old 10-18-2019, 08:29 PM
  #43  
baron95
Racer
 
baron95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 489
Received 271 Likes on 140 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mr Snappy!
The car having very predictable understeer was only when the car was pushed to the limit
It did NOT have "predictable understeer".

It had "infuriating, plowing understeer", which turned into an "uncatchable oversteer spin" when they tried to correct it with power and went slightly over.

You, sir, should be the one trying to excuse GM for turning the main advantage of the Corvette (class leading handling on C5/C6/C7) into a huge liability, with journalists using language like "infuriating understeer" and "plowing understeer".
The following users liked this post:
PurpleLion (10-28-2019)
Old 10-18-2019, 08:47 PM
  #44  
kratedisease
Melting Slicks
 
kratedisease's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,226
Received 2,088 Likes on 906 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wvanepps
Here is an interesting take on that lap. Worth the read.

https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/20...hey-are-wrong/

That article and Matt Farah's opinion AND a subway token will get you past the turnstiles on to the subway .....

(a NYC street comment meaning they are worth nothing, since the token will get you past the turnstiles regardless)
Old 10-19-2019, 09:29 AM
  #45  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Can someone link the MT article where Randy tested the same car with Pilot Super Sports and Pilot Sport 4S's????
Old 10-19-2019, 09:30 AM
  #46  
thill444
Le Mans Master
 
thill444's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2017
Location: New England
Posts: 5,363
Received 4,100 Likes on 2,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
Can someone link the MT article where Randy tested the same car with Pilot Super Sports and Pilot Sport 4S's????
https://www.motortrend.com/cars/bmw/...term-update-4/
Old 10-19-2019, 09:36 AM
  #47  
fasttoys
Melting Slicks
 
fasttoys's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Big D Dallas TEXAS
Posts: 2,075
Received 1,260 Likes on 558 Posts

Default

Do what Ferrari and others have done. Have different cars for the test to help the numbers.,

https://jalopnik.com/how-ferrari-spins-5760248

Chris Harris
I told the blokes here at Jalopnik I was pissed at Ferrari and wanted to tell a few people. They said I could do it here. Stay with me, this might take a while.

I think it started in 2007 when I heard that Ferrari wanted to know which test track we were going to use for Autocar's 599 GTB road test, but in reality the rot had set in many years earlier. Why would it want to know that? "Because," said the man from the Autocar office, "The factory now has to send a test team to the circuit we chose so that they can optimize the car to get the best performance from it." They duly went to the track, tested for a day, crashed the car, went back to the factory to mend the car, returned, tested and then invited us to drive this "standard" 599. They must have been having a laugh.
Sad to say it, but the ecstasy of driving a new Ferrari is now almost always eradicated by the pain of dealing with the organization. Why am I bothering to tell you this? Because I'm pissed with the whole thing now. It's gotten out of control; to the point that it will soon be pointless believing anything you read about its cars through the usual channels, because the only way you get access is playing by its rules.

Last edited by fasttoys; 10-19-2019 at 09:38 AM.
Old 10-19-2019, 09:37 AM
  #48  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

^^^^
Thanks. I am unclear if this was "new tire verses new tire" and the article isn't clear. The only way this is definitive is they used 2 new sets of tires, run laps with one set, come in and mount the 2nd set and do it again. I don't think that's what happened.
Old 10-19-2019, 09:44 AM
  #49  
thill444
Le Mans Master
 
thill444's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2017
Location: New England
Posts: 5,363
Received 4,100 Likes on 2,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
^^^^
Thanks. I am unclear if this was "new tire verses new tire" and the article isn't clear. The only way this is definitive is they used 2 new sets of tires, run laps with one set, come in and mount the 2nd set and do it again. I don't think that's what happened.
That would be the best way, but they are not going to track the car if it does not have proper tread on the tires.

From a logical standpoint tire technology continues to evolve and improve. I have no reason to think that Michelin was not able to improve the PSS tire when they rolled out the PS4S. Otherwise why would they spend all the money on R&D, testing, etc?
Old 10-19-2019, 10:05 AM
  #50  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

^^^^
I agree that Michelin didn't do it for the exercise. But 1.4 seconds is an ETERNITY. Going back 7 or 8 years, that was the difference between the Goodyear runflats and the MPSS.
Old 10-19-2019, 10:08 AM
  #51  
23/C8Z
Race Director
 
23/C8Z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 12,511
Received 5,773 Likes on 3,184 Posts

Default

Any time you introduce that much driver variable into a test — somebody who cannot best a Spec Miata around Grattan in a C7 Corvette Z51 by more than a second — I think that casts the validity of the test in doubt. I will give C/D credit for actually putting a timed lap on record, which a lot of mags are hesitant to do, but I can’t say that they’ve gotten anything close to the true potential of either of these cars on track.

However, let’s assume that His Holiness Juan Pablo (Montoya) himself was behind the wheel for these laps. The C7 in this test was wearing Michelin Pilot Super Sports, which are a fine tire if you happen to find yourself in an Avengers: Endgame type of time heist in the year 2012. The C8 was shod (when does one use the word “shod” other than discussing tires?) with Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, which are about six years newer tech. I hate linking to Motor Trend, but here’s an example of how putting the Pilot Sport 4 S on a car previously equipped with Pilot Super Sports can affect lap times. MT found an improvement of 1.44 seconds per lap with the PS4S over a circuit of very similar length to Grattan, not to mention improved braking, acceleration, and lateral grip. I have the PS4S on my own Focus RS, and was able to take second place at the SCCA Time Trials Nationals in 2018 with them, competing against cars equipped with trackday-special tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R. In other words, the PS4S would easily be worth the delta in time between then C7 and the C8 in C/D’s test.

Therefore, one can rightfully make the assumption that a C7, equipped with modern tires, would absolutely be just as fast and potentially faster than the C8. Keep in mind, we are not talking about a suspension modification, or an engine tune ⁠— we are talking about replacing the OEM tires with another set of tires that happen to be the most popular tire for the C7 sold on tirerack.com.
here's the good news for any corvette lover.... The first run at this new platform is STILL as fast OR faster than the BEST front engine Corvette ever designed... that should be enough to satisfy any fan but NO... some of you guys wanted the "base C8 Z51" to out run everything sans a ZR1 before it. Well, according to these tests (of which i hold little faith until someone like Brooks from Drag Times or others get their hands on them and post vbox and dragy results) the new C8 Z51 is quicker from ZERO to 60 than all before it... the rest? well 495hp and 470tq will only take you so far... but the car and engineering team, must be scratching their heads thinking what do these people want for 65k????????????

And to be clear.. i am not a fan of ME design.. i like a GT touring car but love(d) the corvettes because of that GT tour adaptability... I cannot stand the look of this gen and hope it flies by as i'm of that mindset that this will be like C5 to C6 (fan of the C6 looks... C5 was a bit funny looking to me, albeit BETTER than the 20yr run of the C4s)...

I've sat in both seats of every model and trim of this car and love the quality inside (not the button wall which is so dumb to me)..

ANY C8 FAN before the reviews should be happy with the results.. god stop complaining...

And has ANYONE heard from "JVP"?? dying to hear what his take is on the handling of the new car and if he still believes that the C8 Z51 will outrun a C7 GS..

Last edited by 23/C8Z; 10-19-2019 at 10:13 AM.
Old 10-21-2019, 07:43 PM
  #52  
baron95
Racer
 
baron95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 489
Received 271 Likes on 140 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 16/C7Z
here's the good news for any corvette lover.... The first run at this new platform is STILL as fast OR faster than the BEST front engine Corvette ever designed... that should be enough to satisfy any fan but NO... some of you guys wanted the "base C8 Z51" to out run everything sans a ZR1 before it. Well, according to these tests (of which i hold little faith until someone like Brooks from Drag Times or others get their hands on them and post vbox and dragy results) the new C8 Z51 is quicker from ZERO to 60 than all before it... the rest? well 495hp and 470tq will only take you so far... but the car and engineering team, must be scratching their heads thinking what do these people want for 65k????????????
It is only good news for those interested exclusively in 0-60MPH and straight line acceleration. I.e. those that like a Tesla Model S, family sedan that accelerates faster and is just as supple.

I, and many others here, are interested in a driving a car with communicative steering, excellent brake pedal feel, and superb handling with great lateral grip and adjustability as we approach the limit. That is the full measure of a sports car. That is what makes you feel accomplished.

Not pointing the car straight, smashing the gas and letting the computers take you to 60MPH where you keep one foot and two hands completely stationary through the process, and use a grand total of 5 neurons to perform the task.



Last edited by baron95; 10-24-2019 at 01:41 PM.
The following users liked this post:
PurpleLion (10-28-2019)
Old 10-22-2019, 03:35 PM
  #53  
Pisswilly
Melting Slicks
 
Pisswilly's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,154
Received 836 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Glad I’m keeping my C7 another couple of more years till the C8 is baked and ready to come out of the oven.
Old 10-22-2019, 04:13 PM
  #54  
Lashedup
Pro
 
Lashedup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2019
Posts: 526
Received 525 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

Do they provide tin foil hats with a purchase of a new Corvette? :P

Going back to the OP, if the VIN was #19 then the car wasn't preproduction. Early production for sure, but not technically what would still be considered preproduction any more.

PR/Communications 101 - don't give a car to journalists for testing if you aren't completely satisfied with how it will perform. It is up to GM what they loan out. Maybe another six months of development time would have helped dial some more understeer out, but I'm guessing they needed to get this to market. Good news is with the Z51 they can flash new updates to software that may help improve things over time. For the tinkers and track guys, they know what they need to do to improve things.

In the end the C8 Stingray is still pretty far up there in the sports car world as far as numbers go. Will it improve over time? Absolutely. Will they sell lots of them to happy customers? Yup. I don't understand what all the bickering is about.
Old 10-22-2019, 04:23 PM
  #55  
Ivan Viera
Instructor
 
Ivan Viera's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Posts: 174
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The HACK
I'm sorry but if GM's team of engineers and testers can't figure out what was wrong with a car, and require magazine feedback to let them know what to do...Then they should be FIRED.

This isn't some $500 phone or $1,000 computer or $50 game. This is a $60K purchase. Likely the second largest purchase in dollar amount in just about most buyer's lives. You don't ask your buyers to beta test this for you.

Yeap GM even has their own Milford Proving grounds and they have professional drivers that right away after a hot lap they can tell you what its wrong with the car. So far they had not made public any lap time with video from a U.S track so that tells me that until the car issues are iron out they are not going to make public any lap time.

Last edited by Ivan Viera; 10-22-2019 at 04:25 PM.
Old 10-22-2019, 08:27 PM
  #56  
MDeg
Racer
 
MDeg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 444
Received 484 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

The early reviews were not nearly as bad as some are making them out to be.... C+D literally called it "more than the best Corvette ever". It looks amazing, its fast as hell, the interior is premium, its relatively cheap. These arent debatable facts. Lets just enjoy our cars.
Old 10-23-2019, 11:47 PM
  #57  
Reciprocal
Burning Brakes
 
Reciprocal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: Aurora Colorado
Posts: 994
Received 30 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MDeg
The early reviews were not nearly as bad as some are making them out to be.... C+D literally called it "more than the best Corvette ever". It looks amazing, its fast as hell, the interior is premium, its relatively cheap. These arent debatable facts. Lets just enjoy our cars.
Neither is it a debatable fact that it is a GM product. Everyone knows you never buy the first year.

Get notified of new replies

To PSA: It was a pre-production C8

Old 10-24-2019, 01:46 PM
  #58  
baron95
Racer
 
baron95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 489
Received 271 Likes on 140 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lashedup

In the end the C8 Stingray is still pretty far up there in the sports car world as far as numbers go. Will it improve over time? Absolutely. Will they sell lots of them to happy customers? Yup. I don't understand what all the bickering is about.
Sure. I think the discussion is due to the inflated expectations. The C8 had all the ingredients to be a home run, But with the understeer, lower lateral grip and inconsistent brakes, it is only a double. The disappointment is that it is not at least a triple or a home run.

Some people are satisfied with a double. Some wanted the home run.
The following users liked this post:
PurpleLion (10-28-2019)
Old 10-25-2019, 12:31 PM
  #59  
colossians323
Racer
 
colossians323's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2019
Posts: 260
Received 123 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Pretty new here and must admit the hate and love for the C8 on these forums is humorous.
It seems to be Black and White for members here
I personally am new to corvettes and only came over because of the mid engine
Old 10-25-2019, 01:43 PM
  #60  
Vetterook
Instructor
 
Vetterook's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2019
Posts: 219
Received 216 Likes on 82 Posts
Default Let’s all stop generalizing from the specific

While the straight line performance of the Z51 is easy to establish with 2-3 separate sets of 0-60 and 1/4 mile tests using idiot-proof launch control, road course performance and overall ride/handling/braking will require a more extended regime across a range of tracks against a range of competitors. The only thing we actually know about the C8, performance-wise, is that it’s faster to 60 than nearly every other mid-engine, rear-wheel drive car ON THE PLANET. Everything else is fundamentally TBD, with the early returns skewed by a small number of very vocal journalists.


Quick Reply: PSA: It was a pre-production C8



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 PM.