Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Z51 axle ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2019, 09:13 AM
  #101  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,278
Received 13,213 Likes on 6,018 Posts

Default

Guys... put the moron on your ignore list and move on. He doesn't stop.
The following users liked this post:
JerryU (08-22-2019)
Old 08-22-2019, 10:28 AM
  #102  
mirage2991
Safety Car
 
mirage2991's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 4,857
Received 250 Likes on 163 Posts

Default

If you do the math assuming 1:1 trans gear, at 475lbft there will be about 90lbft difference at the wheels

I might be incorrect but 90lb on a 3.62 would be the same as adding 24lbft of tq at the rear wheel if you kept the 3.62...

gearing like high stall converters benefits can be hard to visualize until you run it at the drag or a 0-16 0-100 test. My opinion of course, but remember the c6zr1 achieved 205 in 6th gear and when gm changed
the gearing to match the z06, if memory serves me right the zr1 would slow
down if put in 6th during a top end run.

Last edited by mirage2991; 08-22-2019 at 10:29 AM.
Old 08-22-2019, 12:00 PM
  #103  
BJ67
Melting Slicks
 
BJ67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: SUFFIELD CONNECTICUT
Posts: 2,908
Received 591 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PRE-Z06
I don’t think it’s that much in 0-60 being 5% of 470ftlbs is only ~20ftlbs increase in multiplication, which won’t even gain you that much in the 1/4 with this caliber of car.
If the cars is .3 quicker to 60 mph, it will be .3 quicker in the 1/4 mile. Like the difference between 12.0 and 11.7, that is significant or 3 car lengths in the 1/4 mile.
Old 08-22-2019, 04:13 PM
  #104  
PRE-Z06
Race Director

 
PRE-Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,135
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,313 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BJ67
If the cars is .3 quicker to 60 mph, it will be .3 quicker in the 1/4 mile. Like the difference between 12.0 and 11.7, that is significant or 3 car lengths in the 1/4 mile.
I hear ya, but who says it’s .3 faster to 60? If it is, then it’s not just the gears making that happen is all I’m saying.
Old 08-22-2019, 05:11 PM
  #105  
BJ67
Melting Slicks
 
BJ67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: SUFFIELD CONNECTICUT
Posts: 2,908
Received 591 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by punky
This post is so stupid that it really doesn't warrant a response, "3 car lengths 0-60". Yeah right.
I would bet the 0-60 time on a base C8 and a Z51 C8 is going to be 3 tenths difference. Much more tire grip and more gear should do it. Even if its only .2 difference, it will be couple of car lengths.
Old 08-22-2019, 06:13 PM
  #106  
Mike Jesse
Burning Brakes
 
Mike Jesse's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2016
Location: Bremerton Wa.
Posts: 869
Received 269 Likes on 198 Posts
Default

This thread was painful to read, so much misinformation.
The following 2 users liked this post by Mike Jesse:
GTX JOHN (08-23-2019), Mr. Toads (08-22-2019)
Old 08-22-2019, 06:45 PM
  #107  
C66 Racing
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
C66 Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: King George VA
Posts: 5,362
Received 35 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tool Hoarder
That's not Brad aka @Subdriver . I still see Brad at VIR as he's racing ST2 with NASA, but he rarely comes on here.

@Sub Driver is a different guy.
That is correct and sorry for the confusion. When I joined the board in 01 when I bought my 02 Z06, I posted as "Subdriver". Somewhere around 2006 or so I changed my login name to my race team, C66 Racing and created a new account with Subdriver so anyone looking for me with that name could find me (like this thread). Also correct that I was a submarine "driver". Retired a year ago this week after 31 years. Didn't go far as I am now a DoD federal civilian employee working for the Navy.

Given my work schedule, family commitments, and trying to race when I can, I don't post often anymore - but I am on the forum almost daily either answering PMs or looking up info. Just got to Mid-Ohio for a NASA ST2 race and plan on making the NASA Championships here 18-22 Sept.

Sorry for the hijack and back to the debate on gearing (which I will abstain from joining in on).
__________________


C66 Racing #66 NASA ST2, SCCA T2
AMSOIL Dealer (Forum Vendor)
AMSOIL Ordering Information (Retail sales using reference #1206638 benefit the forum.)
AMSOIL Preferred Customer Program (Members buy at Wholesale - a savings of about 25%)
AMSOIL Catalog

The following 2 users liked this post by C66 Racing:
RapidC84B (08-22-2019), xcaliber501 (08-22-2019)
Old 08-22-2019, 07:09 PM
  #108  
punky
Banned Scam/Spammer
 
punky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 8,084
Received 3,862 Likes on 1,912 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Jesse
This thread was painful to read, so much misinformation.
That is putting it very politely.
Old 08-22-2019, 08:43 PM
  #109  
johnglenntwo
Le Mans Master
 
johnglenntwo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Beaverton OR
Posts: 8,788
Received 164 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Convoluted!?

*cryptic cliffnotes and/or real world factual numbers!?
Old 08-22-2019, 09:18 PM
  #110  
PRE-Z06
Race Director

 
PRE-Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,135
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,313 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BJ67
I would bet the 0-60 time on a base C8 and a Z51 C8 is going to be 3 tenths difference. Much more tire grip and more gear should do it. Even if its only .2 difference, it will be couple of car lengths.
.2 in the 1/4 may be 2 car lengths if traveling 120mph, but .2 at 60mph is 17.6’ or basically one car length as it’s half the speed. If the surface is prepped then the softer tire doesn’t necessarily have as much of an advantage if any. Then it comes down to the suspension possibly giving a traction advantage, the NPP, the launch control or trans gearing possibly being more aggressive.
Old 08-22-2019, 09:36 PM
  #111  
baron95
Racer
 
baron95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 489
Received 271 Likes on 140 Posts

Default

I can't believe you guys are having such a heated argument over this.

The reason Chevy went from 3.62 to 3.80 gears on the Z51 is trivially simple.

The Z51 PS4 tires likely can handle ˜5% more torque off the line (from say 1.00g to 1.05g), therefore, since they were changing from mech LSD to eLSD anyway, they specced the optimal gearing for both applications. Simple as that.


It is not a *huge* difference. It is a marginal difference. But in a competitive market, ˜0.5g of linearly acceleration, particularly when it comes at no extra cost (the eLSD had to pick a gearing ratio anyway) is not to be thrown out.

Can you feel it? I think the better gearing, combined with the faster locking eLSD can be felt by SOME people, SOME of the time.

Last edited by baron95; 08-22-2019 at 09:37 PM.
The following users liked this post:
PRE-Z06 (08-22-2019)
Old 08-22-2019, 10:11 PM
  #112  
7kroadtrips
Intermediate
 
7kroadtrips's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2019
Posts: 30
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tripjammer
You are so right!

Also why do people want a supercar with all season tires and smaller brake rotors and calipers and non adjustable sound of the exhaust?

If you do not like the Z51 rear spoiler you can always take it off or install an aftermarket one because the holes will already be there.

The better gearing and faster 0 to 60 and ESLD are the icing on the cake and all worth the extra $5k for the Z51 package.
I am raising my hand. That is the exact car I want. A supercar with all season tires and smaller brake rotors and non adjustable sound because this car will be used on remote western roads at extremely high RPM, noise will not be an issue. And as far as seat of the pants, I can easily feel the difference between a full tank of gas and a half a tank, so the debate on the the gear ratio will definitely be noticeable to those who truly drive this car as it is meant to be driven. Brakes are never an issue on public roads and the all season tires will put a trip up the ALCAN Highway right on the radar. Wish me luck, 10k miles on the new C8 Corvette before my first payment. Previously 5k on a Porsche Cayman GTS before first payment was made. All my cars end up in the junk yard, used and abused....haha.
Old 08-22-2019, 10:25 PM
  #113  
PRE-Z06
Race Director

 
PRE-Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,135
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,313 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 7kroadtrips
I am raising my hand. That is the exact car I want. A supercar with all season tires and smaller brake rotors and non adjustable sound because this car will be used on remote western roads at extremely high RPM, noise will not be an issue. And as far as seat of the pants, I can easily feel the difference between a full tank of gas and a half a tank, so the debate on the the gear ratio will definitely be noticeable to those who truly drive this car as it is meant to be driven. Brakes are never an issue on public roads and the all season tires will put a trip up the ALCAN Highway right on the radar. Wish me luck, 10k miles on the new C8 Corvette before my first payment. Previously 5k on a Porsche Cayman GTS before first payment was made. All my cars end up in the junk yard, used and abused....haha.
One of the reasons I want the z51 and you might too if going to turning high rpm for extended periods of time is for the extra cooling.
Old 08-22-2019, 10:33 PM
  #114  
PRE-Z06
Race Director

 
PRE-Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,135
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,313 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by baron95
I can't believe you guys are having such a heated argument over this.

The reason Chevy went from 3.62 to 3.80 gears on the Z51 is trivially simple.

The Z51 PS4 tires likely can handle ˜5% more torque off the line (from say 1.00g to 1.05g), therefore, since they were changing from mech LSD to eLSD anyway, they specced the optimal gearing for both applications. Simple as that.


It is not a *huge* difference. It is a marginal difference. But in a competitive market, ˜0.5g of linearly acceleration, particularly when it comes at no extra cost (the eLSD had to pick a gearing ratio anyway) is not to be thrown out.

Can you feel it? I think the better gearing, combined with the faster locking eLSD can be felt by SOME people, SOME of the time.
I agree, they wanted to distinguish the z51 from the base model as much as possible. The launch control may be programmed differently between the two as well for all we know, is it different for an msrc equipped model? One thing about the dct is you don’t have the control of throttle and clutch engagement like a manual nor even as much control as a traditional automatic when it comes to launching the car, you are relying on the computer to do its best to control wheelspin. Taking it to a prepped dragstrip that limits wheelspin will show the difference best, can’t wait for them to get into customer’s hands to see results. I wonder if GM is waiting for cooler weather to post 1/4 mile results?

Last edited by PRE-Z06; 08-22-2019 at 10:34 PM.
Old 08-22-2019, 11:19 PM
  #115  
7kroadtrips
Intermediate
 
7kroadtrips's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2019
Posts: 30
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PRE-Z06
One of the reasons I want the z51 and you might too if going to turning high rpm for extended periods of time is for the extra cooling.
True. One of the reasons I am so excited about getting this car is the engine. There is a Russian guy I believe on Youtube driving a C6 Z06 on the Ring, and the motor just sounds insane revved out! He ran a 7:17 BTG I believe; Denis Malevanyl Sept 18 2014, on Youtube
Old 08-22-2019, 11:32 PM
  #116  
johnglenntwo
Le Mans Master
 
johnglenntwo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Beaverton OR
Posts: 8,788
Received 164 Likes on 148 Posts
Default Wheel spin and prep track!? ;)

The following users liked this post:
Poorhousenext (08-24-2019)
Old 08-23-2019, 12:05 AM
  #117  
PRE-Z06
Race Director

 
PRE-Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,135
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,313 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johnglenntwo
The nsx is awd and heavier, but I expect similar numbers out of the C8

Get notified of new replies

To Z51 axle ratio

Old 08-23-2019, 12:38 AM
  #118  
johnglenntwo
Le Mans Master
 
johnglenntwo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Beaverton OR
Posts: 8,788
Received 164 Likes on 148 Posts
Default My point is I think it makes sense for GM to go that route! ;)

Originally Posted by PRE-Z06
The nsx is awd and heavier, but I expect similar numbers out of the C8
Adding and/or switching modular components versus dropping four hundred pounds makes more sense on a GM assembly line to me.
Old 08-23-2019, 04:02 AM
  #119  
NASTYC7
Drifting
 
NASTYC7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,319
Received 433 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Base...…. 3.1 sec 0-60.... Top speed 194mph
Z51...…… 2.95 sec 0-60.... top speed 187mph

There's your difference in gearing and tires..... Is this really earth shattering? When you have 2 cars really close together it's about the driver at that point... You think .15 seconds is going to be noticeable? Hell that's if you could even get 2 people to launch at the exact same time…. What about different fuels being used, Tire pressure, Driver weight, Passenger or not and secondly none of this will mater once the Z06 comes out...

When I had my non Z51 Stingray on the road course a Z06 started 1/2 lap behind me.... After watching the video.. He was trying but he never caught me... Never even closed in to 1/4 track.. I'm no expert but I was obviously better than the Z06 driver who had 200 more HP..
The following users liked this post:
PRE-Z06 (08-23-2019)
Old 08-23-2019, 03:55 PM
  #120  
johnglenntwo
Le Mans Master
 
johnglenntwo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Beaverton OR
Posts: 8,788
Received 164 Likes on 148 Posts
Default What Aero!? ;)

Originally Posted by NASTYC7
Base...…. 3.1 sec 0-60.... Top speed 194mph
Z51...…… 2.95 sec 0-60.... top speed 187mph

There's your difference in gearing and tires..... Is this really earth shattering? When you have 2 cars really close together it's about the driver at that point... You think .15 seconds is going to be noticeable? Hell that's if you could even get 2 people to launch at the exact same time…. What about different fuels being used, Tire pressure, Driver weight, Passenger or not and secondly none of this will mater once the Z06 comes out...

When I had my non Z51 Stingray on the road course a Z06 started 1/2 lap behind me.... After watching the video.. He was trying but he never caught me... Never even closed in to 1/4 track.. I'm no expert but I was obviously better than the Z06 driver who had 200 more HP..
Brake Ducts!?

Last edited by johnglenntwo; 08-23-2019 at 03:55 PM.


Quick Reply: Z51 axle ratio



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.