Merge thread - GM announces E-Ray and all electric Corvette
#402
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,136
Received 2,061 Likes
on
1,313 Posts
The only reason why Wall Street cares now is because of the well known government mandates and subsidies that helped with the rise of Tesla and the EV market. This market, instead of being allowed to organically grow, was influenced and manipulated by these subsidies and CAFE requirements.
Tesla had a big jump start in this once emerging market and is definitely an innovative company, hence why they are a Wall Street darling. Wall Street loves growth potential and Tesla has had this market basically to themselves. Now the other manufacturers are way behind the curve trying to play catchup to grab some of that market share. But make no mistake, this full on push towards 100% EV is driven by the government’s manipulation of the automobile industry.
Tesla had a big jump start in this once emerging market and is definitely an innovative company, hence why they are a Wall Street darling. Wall Street loves growth potential and Tesla has had this market basically to themselves. Now the other manufacturers are way behind the curve trying to play catchup to grab some of that market share. But make no mistake, this full on push towards 100% EV is driven by the government’s manipulation of the automobile industry.
Last edited by PRE-Z06; 04-28-2022 at 11:03 PM.
#403
Dig
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Port Saint Lucie FLORIDA & HONDURAS
Posts: 4,824
Received 761 Likes
on
517 Posts
The good news is there is still a lot of time before the only option for someone will be an EV - but we should be looking forward today. In CA all new homes have to be wired for an EV charger. New multi-family units require 10% of parking spaces to be able to have EV charging. The same requirement should be for all new buildings were cars will be parking. Presently @ 2/3rds of Americans are already homeowners. Some cities are adding charging stations to street light posts for people who park on the streets. If we are proactive it will be less expensive and be ready for the EV transformation.
Maybe I’ll get banned here but I’m going to say .... I despise your thought process and posts 😉
God help us all
#404
GM has proven itself to be the ultimate opportunist. They prep for an EV Corvette, but just beforehand they finally create and release a flat plane crank ZO6 with all the bells and whistles, which underlines they just kept releasing the same old pushrod crap just to make a buck up until the announcement of an EV, and were then suddenly like "meh, lets give them what they wanted for the past thirty years then pull the plug on it a year later for an EV". So... they will make their money selling EV's up until a lithium crisis becomes prevalent and scarce, then it will be back to drawing board. Maybe another pushrod engine. It's opportunism, has nothing to do with emissions because the real future is in Hydrogen powered engines whebn it comes to clean air. Not the electric hydrogen crap, the real engines. Whether sourcing it through ammonia running an internal comnbustion engine, or pure hydrogen powering the new rotary engines that are absiolutely unreal. IMO, nothing that special about a Tesla Plaid, it's not the 100% torque, its the fact that it is running a 7.50 gear ratio while spinning 18,000 RPM. They literally need the weight to keep it grounded. But then again the new pistonless rotary engine spins to 25,000-RPM, so we shall see...
As you stated hydrogen might be another way to go, either as the engine for the means of propulsion or the generator to provide the electricity to the motors. Interesting times indeed
#405
Melting Slicks
Well that is quite an emotional ad hominem attack. Are you against all building codes or just those regarding EV's? Living in a civilized society the government will require a lot of things. Not all will agree with all things. That is why a specific objection in public discourse would be more productive than a simple blanket objection. We know the auto industry is going electric - you may not like that. Some may want to deny it and bury their head in the sand. However, as some have pointed out, that reality puts those without houses and/or garages at a disadvantage. It would be incompetence at this point to know that and not try to do something to be ready for the future. Infrastructure has been built to advance society and help prepare for the future. The government requires storm drains because we know in the future there will be storms and it is better to control the excess rain than let it cause damage. Dams, levees, fire stations etc. It is not a novel concept. The costs to add wiring in new construction for the future need of an EV is a fraction of the costs of retrofitting. Why would ANYONE be against this? Many people building a new house add "infrastructure" to be ready for future additions in many ways. Likewise, I do not understand your objection to my thought process that we have "time" to get this done before EV's dominate the roads - if we start acting now. Do you have a different solution for the future problem of people trying to charge their EV's? Because I am sorry, but your god is not going to help solve this problem.
The following 4 users liked this post by msm859:
#406
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,598
Received 9,657 Likes
on
6,653 Posts
Now for racing, like Formula E can always swap cars! Or more like model electric car's can replace battery packs (like fuel stops.) OR short races!
Pic is from leaked article with many details. I added the words from that 2019 article to the top of the pic. Time and the pressure for "no fossil fuel" has changed so expect battery size might increase.
Last edited by JerryU; 04-29-2022 at 06:50 AM.
#407
Instructor
#408
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,136
Received 2,061 Likes
on
1,313 Posts
Well that is quite an emotional ad hominem attack. Are you against all building codes or just those regarding EV's? Living in a civilized society the government will require a lot of things. Not all will agree with all things. That is why a specific objection in public discourse would be more productive than a simple blanket objection. We know the auto industry is going electric - you may not like that. Some may want to deny it and bury their head in the sand. However, as some have pointed out, that reality puts those without houses and/or garages at a disadvantage. It would be incompetence at this point to know that and not try to do something to be ready for the future. Infrastructure has been built to advance society and help prepare for the future. The government requires storm drains because we know in the future there will be storms and it is better to control the excess rain than let it cause damage. Dams, levees, fire stations etc. It is not a novel concept. The costs to add wiring in new construction for the future need of an EV is a fraction of the costs of retrofitting. Why would ANYONE be against this? Many people building a new house add "infrastructure" to be ready for future additions in many ways. Likewise, I do not understand your objection to my thought process that we have "time" to get this done before EV's dominate the roads - if we start acting now. Do you have a different solution for the future problem of people trying to charge their EV's? Because I am sorry, but your god is not going to help solve this problem.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (04-29-2022)
#411
Racer
not sure why anyone would want a hybrid, it's just twice as much that can go wrong. If you want an EV torque wait til the EV. Personally, I dont like the look and dont like electric, so its a hard pass for me. I'll stick to ICE corvette with curves.
The following users liked this post:
Hunter25 (04-29-2022)
#412
Drifting
#413
Banned Scam/Spammer
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Philadelphia PA (Birthplace of the USA, UNESCO World Heritage City)
Posts: 4,004
Received 3,916 Likes
on
1,616 Posts
Agreed but a plug-in hybrid has advantages. No range limit like a pure EV; plus for a sports car you can choose between EV mode for fuel economy or ICE for thrills/sound/feel.
#414
Le Mans Master
Well that is quite an emotional ad hominem attack. Are you against all building codes or just those regarding EV's? Living in a civilized society the government will require a lot of things. Not all will agree with all things. That is why a specific objection in public discourse would be more productive than a simple blanket objection. We know the auto industry is going electric - you may not like that. Some may want to deny it and bury their head in the sand. However, as some have pointed out, that reality puts those without houses and/or garages at a disadvantage. It would be incompetence at this point to know that and not try to do something to be ready for the future. Infrastructure has been built to advance society and help prepare for the future. The government requires storm drains because we know in the future there will be storms and it is better to control the excess rain than let it cause damage. Dams, levees, fire stations etc. It is not a novel concept. The costs to add wiring in new construction for the future need of an EV is a fraction of the costs of retrofitting. Why would ANYONE be against this? Many people building a new house add "infrastructure" to be ready for future additions in many ways. Likewise, I do not understand your objection to my thought process that we have "time" to get this done before EV's dominate the roads - if we start acting now. Do you have a different solution for the future problem of people trying to charge their EV's? Because I am sorry, but your god is not going to help solve this problem.
The following users liked this post:
msm859 (04-29-2022)
#415
Instructor
I have a new hybrid Sienna. It's faster and quieter than my old ICE one, plus 41 mpg on the first tank wasn't hard to take.
#417
Instructor
#418
Drifting
The Hybrid Vette will for sure be quicker to 0-100 of the 3 C8 Variants IMO. AWD but with battery assist vs the traditional extra transaxle that takes power away. Plus other advantages.
#419
Melting Slicks
Yes. This country would be better if we had true majority rule. Of course that would mean we would get rid of the electoral collage and gerrymandering. We would have to revise the Senate so that it is proportional to population. Get rid of the filibuster - which is anti-majority. The majority of Americans are pro choice, believe in climate change, want universal healthcare and reasonable gun laws. So do you believe in majority rule?
The following 2 users liked this post by msm859:
blueapplepaste (04-30-2022),
Dominic Sorresso (04-29-2022)
#420
Banned Scam/Spammer
This might... not be the best example.. but......Its like that special point in all men's life of choosing to marry a naughty girl or a good girl. You can now have both(without breaking polygamy laws)
-Your not reliant on any one technology .. so if the engine gives out (valve spring) you might be able to ride ev to a safe place or vice versa
- You will have close to Z06 power at a cheaper price(maybe), but will have no gas tax which can be high.
- You will have AWD and maybe TQ vectoring
- You will have the EV TQ and yet still have the ICE sound of beauty
- Depending on Batt size people may save ALLOT on GAS
- No doubt GM will use the next battery tech
The E-ray is the stepping stone between different worlds.. it will be a big collectors car when we are all running around in..... high powered eggs.