C7 Z06 Discussion General Z06 Corvette Discussion, LT4 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: GEM Motorsports

Vengeance Racing C7 Z06 puts down 660 RWHP/660 RWTQ!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2014, 04:16 PM
  #81  
jdmdohcpower
Burning Brakes
 
jdmdohcpower's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by minytrker
I have not seen anything like that out there for GM like the imports. I have dyno'd several imports with setups like your talking about. Its pretty neat to change the tune with the steering wheels controls. I was pretty shocked by what alot of them could do by button sequences.

If you flash the factory ecm in a c7 gm will be able to tell .
That sucks a little. Is it worth the warranty?
Old 12-07-2014, 04:20 PM
  #82  
Arctic Blastoff
Drifting
 
Arctic Blastoff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2014
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 1,540
Received 49 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Callsign_Vega
Many tracks have straights that go well above 120 in a car with 650hp.

M7 is a much simpler and direct way to get power to the rear wheels. Torque converter in fluid and wet clutches = wasted power. A M7 will put down more WHP than a A8. The only thing an A8 is more efficient at is shifting speed. The A8 also gets worse gas mileage, and you pay for it. The last facet would be gearing. The lower gearing of the A8's lower gears may mean traction will be more of an issue and harder to control on non-prepped surfaces. That's not even getting into trans cooling issues that would arise first on the A8 before the M7 IMO. Looking forward to real world results.
I havnt found too many applications where the autos didnt have heating problems...were the ones on the track autos????thats would explain alot.
Old 12-07-2014, 04:33 PM
  #83  
TX Tahoe Z71
Instructor
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great results! Thanks for posting!

Subscribed
Old 12-07-2014, 04:35 PM
  #84  
z06vettewannabe
Racer

 
z06vettewannabe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2014
Posts: 343
Received 152 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ron@Vengeance Racing
Baseline #s on day one with 34 miles on the car were 585RWHP/611RWTQ....



Tuning netted us an addtional 32RWHP/13RWTQ for a total of 617RWHP/624RWTQ...





This morning we installed a slightly smaller upper pulley and picked up another 10RWHP/16RWTQ for a total of 627RWHP/640RWTQ









Next we added a modified AFE cold air intake for the C7 Stingray. Final results so far are 660RWHP/663RWTQ with only tuning/pulley/cold air!!!!









Within 48 hours of owning the car we have added 75RWHP/52RWTQ !!




Thank you General Motors!!!




We will be back at it tomorrow/Monday and will keep everyone updated with step by step results of each modification we perform.
So badass!!!!!!!!
Old 12-07-2014, 04:49 PM
  #85  
Chicago1
Race Director
 
Chicago1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Rio Rancho NM
Posts: 12,053
Received 321 Likes on 208 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z06vettewannabe
So badass!!!!!!!!
What is it with you guys quoting all the pics to say a simple one liner? Geeez
Old 12-07-2014, 05:01 PM
  #86  
KustomsbyKev
Melting Slicks
 
KustomsbyKev's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,126
Received 64 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chicago1
What is it with you guys quoting all the pics to say a simple one liner? Geeez
Old 12-07-2014, 05:28 PM
  #87  
z06vettewannabe
Racer

 
z06vettewannabe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2014
Posts: 343
Received 152 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Sorry, didn't realize it would do that.....
Old 12-07-2014, 07:45 PM
  #88  
ElFingers
Advanced
 
ElFingers's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2013
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Thank you, thank you for sharing you initial insights into the LT4 and what the Z will be capable of! This is EXACTLY why I love this forum and most of the vendors on it.

Quick question: Did ya'll get a chance to evaluate the PVC system and whether or not it seems better engineered than the one found on the Stingray? As you know, lots of posts related to issues with the PVC system...especially in upgraded LT1s.

Keep up the great work! This is like car ****!
Old 12-07-2014, 07:59 PM
  #89  
freeman1215
Pro
 
freeman1215's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2014
Location: Etiwanda California
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ElFingers
Thank you, thank you for sharing you initial insights into the LT4 and what the Z will be capable of! This is EXACTLY why I love this forum and most of the vendors on it.

Quick question: Did ya'll get a chance to evaluate the PVC system and whether or not it seems better engineered than the one found on the Stingray? As you know, lots of posts related to issues with the PVC system...especially in upgraded LT1s.

Keep up the great work! This is like car ****!
There is a new thread on this site titled "Things you don't like" about the new Z06 and the owner is citing Heat Soak and loss of power after 3-4 runs. Are you guys experiencing this problem? Given your HP and tests, I would have imagined that this would have come up, IF it is a real problem? I'm wondering if it isn't internal tuning on his car, but just a guess.
Old 12-07-2014, 08:12 PM
  #90  
0Ron@Vengeance Racing
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Ron@Vengeance Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Cumming Georgia
Posts: 2,050
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by freeman1215
There is a new thread on this site titled "Things you don't like" about the new Z06 and the owner is citing Heat Soak and loss of power after 3-4 runs. Are you guys experiencing this problem? Given your HP and tests, I would have imagined that this would have come up, IF it is a real problem? I'm wondering if it isn't internal tuning on his car, but just a guess.

With the OE calibration we did experience the same thing... The timing tables are EXTREMELY conservative and the ECU will pull timing for almost any situation. I am waiting for owners to complain about "tip in" as the ECU pulls a massive amount of timing when slightly touching the gas pedal.

All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
Old 12-07-2014, 08:14 PM
  #91  
OnPoint
The Consigliere
Support Corvetteforum!
 
OnPoint's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,256
Received 5,449 Likes on 2,273 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ron@Vengeance Racing
With the OE calibration we did experience the same thing... The timing tables are EXTREMELY conservative and the ECU will pull timing for almost any situation. I am waiting for owners to complain about "tip in" as the ECU pulls a massive amount of timing when slightly touching the gas pedal.

All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
That is very interesting. If IATs are good, then a simple tune may correct this problem.
Old 12-07-2014, 08:17 PM
  #92  
freeman1215
Pro
 
freeman1215's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2014
Location: Etiwanda California
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ron@Vengeance Racing
With the OE calibration we did experience the same thing... The timing tables are EXTREMELY conservative and the ECU will pull timing for almost any situation. I am waiting for owners to complain about "tip in" as the ECU pulls a massive amount of timing when slightly touching the gas pedal.

All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
Thanks Ron! As I mentioned before, my first modifications after break in will be the Air Intake and a Dyno Tune, so it looks like that should decrease the possibility of my having this problem on the occasional track day. Please keep us informed as this could be a big deal to the new owner of a $100K car!
Old 12-07-2014, 08:17 PM
  #93  
Snorman
Scraping the splitter.
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Snorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,115
Received 1,028 Likes on 486 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14-'15

Default

Originally Posted by Ron@Vengeance Racing
With the OE calibration we did experience the same thing... The timing tables are EXTREMELY conservative and the ECU will pull timing for almost any situation. I am waiting for owners to complain about "tip in" as the ECU pulls a massive amount of timing when slightly touching the gas pedal.

All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
Great info.
It was posted that you were seeing ~20* deltas between IAT1 and IAT2. Did you guys see any major IAT2 increases after those multiple pulls and were they back to back pulls?
S.
Old 12-07-2014, 08:20 PM
  #94  
0Ron@Vengeance Racing
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Ron@Vengeance Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Cumming Georgia
Posts: 2,050
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Snorman
Great info.
It was posted that you were seeing ~20* deltas between IAT1 and IAT2. Did you guys see any major IAT2 increases after those multiple pulls and were they back to back pulls?
S.
Average time between pulls so far has been 5 to 7 minutes... We are obviously reviewing data from the runs as well as making changes to the ECU between each run... All of this takes a bit of time so we haven't made run after run just yet.... As I said, we will continue to hit it hard this week and will provide more data for everyone each step of the way.
Old 12-07-2014, 08:37 PM
  #95  
WA 2 FST
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
WA 2 FST's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Allen TX
Posts: 4,074
Received 556 Likes on 359 Posts

Default

Great info Ron with regards to the "heat soak" and timing pull issue. Thanks again for your R&D.
Old 12-07-2014, 09:11 PM
  #96  
Slo-Poc
Burning Brakes
 
Slo-Poc's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,169
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Car looks great, impressive so far keep up the good work! Would like to see how far yall can go before touching the exhaust and cam...!?
Old 12-07-2014, 09:21 PM
  #97  
freeman1215
Pro
 
freeman1215's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2014
Location: Etiwanda California
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WA 2 FST
Great info Ron with regards to the "heat soak" and timing pull issue. Thanks again for your R&D.
Yes Ron. Thank you VERY Much! I think that owners, like myself, are going to need to address this heat soak issue before we go any further with HP gains!

Get notified of new replies

To Vengeance Racing C7 Z06 puts down 660 RWHP/660 RWTQ!!

Old 12-07-2014, 09:23 PM
  #98  
Snorman
Scraping the splitter.
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Snorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,115
Received 1,028 Likes on 486 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14-'15

Default

Just to point out...Ron stated that the IAT2's were "quite impressive".
Until there is more data, I am not yet sure that heat soak is the issue.
S.
Old 12-07-2014, 09:34 PM
  #99  
freeman1215
Pro
 
freeman1215's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2014
Location: Etiwanda California
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snorman
Just to point out...Ron stated that the IAT2's were "quite impressive".
Until there is more data, I am not yet sure that heat soak is the issue.
S.
To me the issue is that GM did not address this problem before they released these cars!!!!!! And now I am wondering if I proceed with my " maybe" allocation this week!
Old 12-07-2014, 09:49 PM
  #100  
z06time
Heel & Toe
 
z06time's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wonder if GM was desperately trying to avoid the gas guzzler tax and put an extremely lean tune in the new Z... Might explain why so much timing is being pulled at just a few short runs. And also excellent that just a tune to richen it up can fix it


Quick Reply: Vengeance Racing C7 Z06 puts down 660 RWHP/660 RWTQ!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.