Vengeance Racing C7 Z06 puts down 660 RWHP/660 RWTQ!!
#81
I have not seen anything like that out there for GM like the imports. I have dyno'd several imports with setups like your talking about. Its pretty neat to change the tune with the steering wheels controls. I was pretty shocked by what alot of them could do by button sequences.
If you flash the factory ecm in a c7 gm will be able to tell .
If you flash the factory ecm in a c7 gm will be able to tell .
#82
Drifting
Many tracks have straights that go well above 120 in a car with 650hp.
M7 is a much simpler and direct way to get power to the rear wheels. Torque converter in fluid and wet clutches = wasted power. A M7 will put down more WHP than a A8. The only thing an A8 is more efficient at is shifting speed. The A8 also gets worse gas mileage, and you pay for it. The last facet would be gearing. The lower gearing of the A8's lower gears may mean traction will be more of an issue and harder to control on non-prepped surfaces. That's not even getting into trans cooling issues that would arise first on the A8 before the M7 IMO. Looking forward to real world results.
M7 is a much simpler and direct way to get power to the rear wheels. Torque converter in fluid and wet clutches = wasted power. A M7 will put down more WHP than a A8. The only thing an A8 is more efficient at is shifting speed. The A8 also gets worse gas mileage, and you pay for it. The last facet would be gearing. The lower gearing of the A8's lower gears may mean traction will be more of an issue and harder to control on non-prepped surfaces. That's not even getting into trans cooling issues that would arise first on the A8 before the M7 IMO. Looking forward to real world results.
#84
Baseline #s on day one with 34 miles on the car were 585RWHP/611RWTQ....
Tuning netted us an addtional 32RWHP/13RWTQ for a total of 617RWHP/624RWTQ...
This morning we installed a slightly smaller upper pulley and picked up another 10RWHP/16RWTQ for a total of 627RWHP/640RWTQ
Next we added a modified AFE cold air intake for the C7 Stingray. Final results so far are 660RWHP/663RWTQ with only tuning/pulley/cold air!!!!
Within 48 hours of owning the car we have added 75RWHP/52RWTQ !!
Thank you General Motors!!!
We will be back at it tomorrow/Monday and will keep everyone updated with step by step results of each modification we perform.
Tuning netted us an addtional 32RWHP/13RWTQ for a total of 617RWHP/624RWTQ...
This morning we installed a slightly smaller upper pulley and picked up another 10RWHP/16RWTQ for a total of 627RWHP/640RWTQ
Next we added a modified AFE cold air intake for the C7 Stingray. Final results so far are 660RWHP/663RWTQ with only tuning/pulley/cold air!!!!
Within 48 hours of owning the car we have added 75RWHP/52RWTQ !!
Thank you General Motors!!!
We will be back at it tomorrow/Monday and will keep everyone updated with step by step results of each modification we perform.
#88
Thank you, thank you for sharing you initial insights into the LT4 and what the Z will be capable of! This is EXACTLY why I love this forum and most of the vendors on it.
Quick question: Did ya'll get a chance to evaluate the PVC system and whether or not it seems better engineered than the one found on the Stingray? As you know, lots of posts related to issues with the PVC system...especially in upgraded LT1s.
Keep up the great work! This is like car ****!
Quick question: Did ya'll get a chance to evaluate the PVC system and whether or not it seems better engineered than the one found on the Stingray? As you know, lots of posts related to issues with the PVC system...especially in upgraded LT1s.
Keep up the great work! This is like car ****!
#89
Pro
Member Since: Nov 2014
Location: Etiwanda California
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
10 Posts
Thank you, thank you for sharing you initial insights into the LT4 and what the Z will be capable of! This is EXACTLY why I love this forum and most of the vendors on it.
Quick question: Did ya'll get a chance to evaluate the PVC system and whether or not it seems better engineered than the one found on the Stingray? As you know, lots of posts related to issues with the PVC system...especially in upgraded LT1s.
Keep up the great work! This is like car ****!
Quick question: Did ya'll get a chance to evaluate the PVC system and whether or not it seems better engineered than the one found on the Stingray? As you know, lots of posts related to issues with the PVC system...especially in upgraded LT1s.
Keep up the great work! This is like car ****!
#90
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
There is a new thread on this site titled "Things you don't like" about the new Z06 and the owner is citing Heat Soak and loss of power after 3-4 runs. Are you guys experiencing this problem? Given your HP and tests, I would have imagined that this would have come up, IF it is a real problem? I'm wondering if it isn't internal tuning on his car, but just a guess.
With the OE calibration we did experience the same thing... The timing tables are EXTREMELY conservative and the ECU will pull timing for almost any situation. I am waiting for owners to complain about "tip in" as the ECU pulls a massive amount of timing when slightly touching the gas pedal.
All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
#91
The Consigliere
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,256
Received 5,449 Likes
on
2,273 Posts
With the OE calibration we did experience the same thing... The timing tables are EXTREMELY conservative and the ECU will pull timing for almost any situation. I am waiting for owners to complain about "tip in" as the ECU pulls a massive amount of timing when slightly touching the gas pedal.
All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
#92
Pro
Member Since: Nov 2014
Location: Etiwanda California
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
10 Posts
With the OE calibration we did experience the same thing... The timing tables are EXTREMELY conservative and the ECU will pull timing for almost any situation. I am waiting for owners to complain about "tip in" as the ECU pulls a massive amount of timing when slightly touching the gas pedal.
All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
#93
Scraping the splitter.
With the OE calibration we did experience the same thing... The timing tables are EXTREMELY conservative and the ECU will pull timing for almost any situation. I am waiting for owners to complain about "tip in" as the ECU pulls a massive amount of timing when slightly touching the gas pedal.
All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
All that being said, MOST of the loss of power can be addressed in the ECU.. IAT2 temps are actually quite impressive, even after multiple pulls on the chassis dyno. We will get on the highway in the next couple of days and make some back to back "multi gear" runs for comparison sake.
It was posted that you were seeing ~20* deltas between IAT1 and IAT2. Did you guys see any major IAT2 increases after those multiple pulls and were they back to back pulls?
S.
#94
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Average time between pulls so far has been 5 to 7 minutes... We are obviously reviewing data from the runs as well as making changes to the ECU between each run... All of this takes a bit of time so we haven't made run after run just yet.... As I said, we will continue to hit it hard this week and will provide more data for everyone each step of the way.
#95
Safety Car
Great info Ron with regards to the "heat soak" and timing pull issue. Thanks again for your R&D.
#98
Scraping the splitter.
Just to point out...Ron stated that the IAT2's were "quite impressive".
Until there is more data, I am not yet sure that heat soak is the issue.
S.
Until there is more data, I am not yet sure that heat soak is the issue.
S.
#100
Wonder if GM was desperately trying to avoid the gas guzzler tax and put an extremely lean tune in the new Z... Might explain why so much timing is being pulled at just a few short runs. And also excellent that just a tune to richen it up can fix it