Gen V LT1 Destroker
#3
#4
I don't think there are any short stroke crankshafts on the market yet.
I built a short stroke big block for my 68. I wanted 800hp but less tq. I did a 3.76" x 4.5" for 477ci. The 477 made 810hp at 7000rpm. The same top end on a bbc 540, 4.25" x 4.5" would have made 810hp at 6000rpm.
Low end tq is hard on drive train components. I was able to get the tq down to 669 versus 800 or so. The lower tq saved me $4k in drive train mods.
The following users liked this post:
Patrick Runge (03-05-2016)
#5
Instructor
Thread Starter
This is a subject that I'm very interested in. With erl you can now get a sleeved block for a 4.185 bore, na build or 4.125 for fi. When after market heads arrive a decent build would be a stock stroke 388.
I don't think there are any short stroke crankshafts on the market yet.
I built a short stroke big block for my 68. I wanted 800hp but less tq. I did a 3.76" x 4.5" for 477ci. The 477 made 810hp at 7000rpm. The same top end on a bbc 540, 4.25" x 4.5" would have made 810hp at 6000rpm.
Low end tq is hard on drive train components. I was able to get the tq down to 669 versus 800 or so. The lower tq saved me $4k in drive train mods.
I don't think there are any short stroke crankshafts on the market yet.
I built a short stroke big block for my 68. I wanted 800hp but less tq. I did a 3.76" x 4.5" for 477ci. The 477 made 810hp at 7000rpm. The same top end on a bbc 540, 4.25" x 4.5" would have made 810hp at 6000rpm.
Low end tq is hard on drive train components. I was able to get the tq down to 669 versus 800 or so. The lower tq saved me $4k in drive train mods.