LMR Procharged C7 makes 565rwhp
#1
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
LMR Procharged C7 makes 565rwhp
We just finished up another C7 supercharged entry. This car is utlizing the Procharger system and Long Tube Headers, it made 8lbs on the dyno!
Enjoy!
Enjoy!
__________________
Worlds Quickest C8 Corvette 8.83@160MPH
FIRST C7 Corvette in the 7's & 9's
FIRST C7 Corvette in the 7's & 9's
2019 ZR1 LT5 8.874 @ 155
Current C7 World Record Holder 7.55 @ 184 MPH
Quickest and Fastest GEN5 LT Powered Vehicle
LMR1200HP Supercharged C7 8.84 @ 160
LMR1200HP Twin Turbo C7 9.35@155mph-2014
2 TIME OUTLAW DRAG RADIAL LSX CHAMPION 2008/2010
9.47 ZR1 Corvette-2009
LATE MODEL RACECRAFT
713-466-9900
LateModelRacecraft.com
Too many PMs, please call or email instead, thanks!
Current C7 World Record Holder 7.55 @ 184 MPH
Quickest and Fastest GEN5 LT Powered Vehicle
LMR1200HP Supercharged C7 8.84 @ 160
LMR1200HP Twin Turbo C7 9.35@155mph-2014
2 TIME OUTLAW DRAG RADIAL LSX CHAMPION 2008/2010
9.47 ZR1 Corvette-2009
LATE MODEL RACECRAFT
713-466-9900
LateModelRacecraft.com
Too many PMs, please call or email instead, thanks!
#2
Looks AND sounds GREAT. A Few questions for clarifications purposes, please:
1) Auto or Manual? (appeared to be an auto)
2) Fuel octane?
3) SAE 5 corrected numbers?
4) ProCharger supplied tune, or custom tune (assume custom, because of headers)?
5) You stated 8 pounds of boost. Is this Procharger's base PCS-1 KIT with the 7-pound pulley?
6) Helical or straight cut gears for the blower?
PS: I could barely see the dyno sheet at the end, where the video cuts off. Can you post a picture of the dyno sheet? Thanks, and great work
1) Auto or Manual? (appeared to be an auto)
2) Fuel octane?
3) SAE 5 corrected numbers?
4) ProCharger supplied tune, or custom tune (assume custom, because of headers)?
5) You stated 8 pounds of boost. Is this Procharger's base PCS-1 KIT with the 7-pound pulley?
6) Helical or straight cut gears for the blower?
PS: I could barely see the dyno sheet at the end, where the video cuts off. Can you post a picture of the dyno sheet? Thanks, and great work
#5
Drifting
I'm confused, wasn't there another thread on here claiming a stock C7 at like 5000 plus feet of altitude made 625rwhp?
This one looks more realistic. Great job guys.
This one looks more realistic. Great job guys.
#7
#8
That was a C7 in Colorado done by Corvette Connection. it put down about 623 RWHP SAE; baseline was around 423 RWHP SAE as well. Some were saying that when dynoing on boost at altitude, STD numbers are more realistic.
#9
Safety Car
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: TEXOMA
Posts: 3,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
-Carl
#10
ProCharger mentioned that they sent a smaller pulley, only because this was at high altitude in Colorado; in order to make the same 7 pounds of boost as it would at sea level. The shop confirmed that boost was measured mechanically at 7 pounds as well.
#11
Team Owner
Yah and high elevation correction factors mess everything up. Nothing like adding 20% to the actual numbers.
#12
I remember you asking for the STD numbers; which they posted. You were the one now that I remember stating that STD correction was more accurate on boosted cars at high altitude.: thumbs:
#13
Let me make a point here.
Whether the car puts down 565 or 595 rwhp, you're still gonna buy the damn supercharger.
Quit playing semantics with dyno #'s that are within 5% of each other.
You want more power? Add more boost or throw in a cam. Problem solved.
Anyone looking beyond 600whp is not looking for that extra 20hp anyways, they are looking for that extra 200.
Whether the car puts down 565 or 595 rwhp, you're still gonna buy the damn supercharger.
Quit playing semantics with dyno #'s that are within 5% of each other.
You want more power? Add more boost or throw in a cam. Problem solved.
Anyone looking beyond 600whp is not looking for that extra 20hp anyways, they are looking for that extra 200.
#15
SAE Correction:
Stock 423.42rwhp, 428.11rwtq
Blown 623.08rwhp, 556.09rwtq
Gain: 199.66rwhp, 127.98
Standard Correction:
Stock 423.54rwhp, 426.24rwtq
Blown 620.66rwhp, 553.93rwtq
Gain: 197.12rwhp 127.69rwtq
Uncorrected:
Stock 348.01rwhp, 351.87rwtq
Blown 514.07rwhp, 458.80rwtq
Gain: 166.06rwhp 106.93rwtq
No matter what "correction" factor gets used, still rocking a 166-199rwhp gain on a stick car, in altitude, with the stock "canned" tune is pretty dang awesome.
To back up what "C7Pimp" said about someone not really caring about the difference between 565 and 595, we have seen stock BETA cars dyno numbers range from 395rwhp to 424rwhp (stock) which a 29hp variance right there.
Again, WAY to go LMR on putting up a killer video, making good numbers, with a nice smooth graph. Its going to see shops like this really push these cars, can't wait to see more ProCharged cars running around with cams, making big boost!!!
Happy Friday everyone!
ATI
#16
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
This car is an automatic guys, and of course, one of our custom tunes. I think there maybe 1 or 2 other people in the world right now that can tune these cars properly.
#17
Numbers from "that" car....
SAE Correction:
Stock 423.42rwhp, 428.11rwtq
Blown 623.08rwhp, 556.09rwtq
Gain: 199.66rwhp, 127.98
Standard Correction:
Stock 423.54rwhp, 426.24rwtq
Blown 620.66rwhp, 553.93rwtq
Gain: 197.12rwhp 127.69rwtq
Uncorrected:
Stock 348.01rwhp, 351.87rwtq
Blown 514.07rwhp, 458.80rwtq
Gain: 166.06rwhp 106.93rwtq
No matter what "correction" factor gets used, still rocking a 166-199rwhp gain on a stick car, in altitude, with the stock "canned" tune is pretty dang awesome.
To back up what "C7Pimp" said about someone not really caring about the difference between 565 and 595, we have seen stock BETA cars dyno numbers range from 395rwhp to 424rwhp (stock) which a 29hp variance right there.
Again, WAY to go LMR on putting up a killer video, making good numbers, with a nice smooth graph. Its going to see shops like this really push these cars, can't wait to see more ProCharged cars running around with cams, making big boost!!!
Happy Friday everyone!
ATI
SAE Correction:
Stock 423.42rwhp, 428.11rwtq
Blown 623.08rwhp, 556.09rwtq
Gain: 199.66rwhp, 127.98
Standard Correction:
Stock 423.54rwhp, 426.24rwtq
Blown 620.66rwhp, 553.93rwtq
Gain: 197.12rwhp 127.69rwtq
Uncorrected:
Stock 348.01rwhp, 351.87rwtq
Blown 514.07rwhp, 458.80rwtq
Gain: 166.06rwhp 106.93rwtq
No matter what "correction" factor gets used, still rocking a 166-199rwhp gain on a stick car, in altitude, with the stock "canned" tune is pretty dang awesome.
To back up what "C7Pimp" said about someone not really caring about the difference between 565 and 595, we have seen stock BETA cars dyno numbers range from 395rwhp to 424rwhp (stock) which a 29hp variance right there.
Again, WAY to go LMR on putting up a killer video, making good numbers, with a nice smooth graph. Its going to see shops like this really push these cars, can't wait to see more ProCharged cars running around with cams, making big boost!!!
Happy Friday everyone!
ATI
#18
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 10,763
Received 2,379 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
#19
Drifting