Translator

Waiting on the pics. when you have some time.

0ProChargerTech

Will soon, currently our car is in the VERT form, awaiting our track rental day we have coming up, to put the Vertical unit through some road course abuse. (To test thermal loads)

Then we will be swapping it over to Hori, and repeating the testing.
We can get the image you are requesting then, however it will be a little longer then expected, due to the reasoning listed above.

Thanks!
ATI

ShaneFap

I just finished up the tune on a C7 with a Procharger installed at Craven performance in St.Louis MO. It was the P1SC kit.

It's a nice kit and made good gains considering the car was a completely bone stock A6 and made 524 on a MD500.

0ProChargerTech

If that is the stock A6 tune from us, it is very very conservative, just and FYI. We had to do that on the A6 tunes because for whatever reason they were just more sensitive on fuel changes, based on loading of the engine, on gear changes.

Can't wait to see photos of the instal!

ATI

robertf97

Mustang dyno reads ~13% less than the dynojet correct?

ShaneFap

Yea i ended up doing about 150 changes on the A6 file like i always do.
These are for sure different than the older computers and more sensitive as you said. I got it working on the street great and 100% TPS. Car on the dyno was great then hit the street and wouldn't go over 75% TPS. Did some more tweaking and now it's great!

ShaneFap

Like i tell all my customers i hate comparing dynos from all over the country considering all the settings you can change and how you can fudge numbers and change corrections.


I would say from my personal experience on the MD500 used here and a local dynojet at SAE correction it was 4% lower. I used my old procharged G8 to find this out and dynoed my car on the MD500 here and that dynojet within 2 days of one another.

Once again i hate comparing different dyno brands/models/lines.

robertf97

Mustang dyno reads ~13% less than the dynojet correct?

ShaneFap

Read above please.

Translator

[QUOTE=ShaneFap;1586768924]Yea i ended up doing about 150 changes on the A6 file like i always do.
These are for sure different than the older computers and more sensitive as you said. I got it working on the street great and 100% TPS. Car on the dyno was great then hit the street and wouldn't go over 75% TPS. Did some more tweaking and now it's great!

I guess there is a lot to do with custom tuning with FI; as each car reacts differently.

ShaneFap

The whole driver demand and load on these computers is for sure different over the old style systems on how they react to changes in the tuning.

sirjames_CO

We are still waiting for the pics and results...

-Jim

0ProChargerTech

If they go rich, that is usually the #1 reason they will limit throttle, with the stock tune. Its odd how the AFR's gets tied to throttle. Whats even more interesting is when you see it limit throttle sometimes, yet no change in power. D/I and this new ECU will throw a lot of people for a loop the first couple go arounds, its great news that you have it rocking and rolling!

Happy Monday!
ATI

Translator

So is the aforementioned issue (only 75% TPS) encountered by this tuner something that needs to be addressed in the handheld canned tune that you all supply for A6 cars?

0ProChargerTech

We haven't seen it on a BETA in-house, however have heard of one that did it in the field. BUT, its an easy easy fix for the customer since the tuners are unlocked if its a little rich at WOT, all you have to do is modify the tune in the handheld to remove a little fuel, reload the tune, and your set.

Every car is different, (IE: We have had dynos on stock cars range from 395-424 rwhp) So naturally the AFR's are going to vary a little bit. We however have the tune set that it will be on the rich side if anything. We don't want them to be on the other side, risking engine damage. Better to be down just a little on power (which can easily be fixed) then hurting motors.

ShaneFap

100% correct here. Rather be safe than sorry.

0ProChargerTech

AMEN! Its always easier to take away fuel.... and add timing. Then the opposite after something goes "boom"

sirjames_CO

Does ATI have any plans to include a boost gauge? Is there a way to utilize/activate the boost gauge that I am told is in the C7 firmware?

Translator

James, post videos of your car bro. You have one out there, but not good quality. Did you get your blower with straight or helical cut gears? Post some idle clips and some driving ones as well. Corvette Connection said that they were going to post, but never did.

sirjames_CO

I don't really have any videos. They are hard to shoot while I'm driving...

What would you like? I'll shoot the idle and post. I shot the one video of my son and I on our way to 158mph. Did you see that? I asked Corvette Connection to post theirs, but they are working 7 days now. Very busy crew over there.

I'm pretty sure I just got the straight/non-helical gears.

-Jim