C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C7 LT1 91 vs 93 Octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2021, 04:31 PM
  #1  
The Successful Plumber
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
The Successful Plumber's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2018
Location: North Western Wyoming
Posts: 1,111
Received 577 Likes on 358 Posts
Default C7 LT1 91 vs 93 Octane

I have never been able to use 93 octane in my C7 LT1.

Those of you that have used both 91 and 93 octane in their C7 LT1, is there any noticeable differences, smoother idle, better MPG, increased performance?

The main thing I was interested in was idle smoothness. The C7 LT1 has a rough idle, not like the idle of a high lift and duration cam shaft. So I was wondering if the rough idle was caused by the use of 91 octane instead of 93 as recommended.


Last edited by The Successful Plumber; 11-07-2021 at 09:15 AM.
The following users liked this post:
livenupe (11-06-2021)
Old 11-06-2021, 09:04 PM
  #2  
dbj216
Instructor
 
dbj216's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2019
Location: Conifer, Colorado
Posts: 131
Received 81 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I live in the Colorado mountains near Denver. 93 octane fuel is not available around here that I have found, so I use the 91. It has something to do with the altitude where we live. The owner's manual says to use 93 octane fuel for maximum performance. I trust the anti-knock sensors will protect me. My 2017 C7 LT2 seems to run just fine on 91 at my higher altitude. I'm sure owner's have made errors and accidently filled up with 87 octane fuel. I doubt this error is fatal to the engine.

David
Old 11-06-2021, 09:32 PM
  #3  
Vetteman Jack
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Vetteman Jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 343,487
Received 19,452 Likes on 14,055 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran


Default

I have used both and really have not noticed a difference between the two octane levels. My car runs just fine on 91 octane, which is about the highest we can find here.
The following users liked this post:
The Successful Plumber (11-07-2021)
Old 11-06-2021, 09:56 PM
  #4  
Dads2kconvertible
Drifting
 
Dads2kconvertible's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2021
Location: Temple Texas
Posts: 1,455
Received 651 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dbj216
I live in the Colorado mountains near Denver. 93 octane fuel is not available around here that I have found, so I use the 91. It has something to do with the altitude where we live. The owner's manual says to use 93 octane fuel for maximum performance. I trust the anti-knock sensors will protect me. My 2017 C7 LT2 seems to run just fine on 91 at my higher altitude. I'm sure owner's have made errors and accidently filled up with 87 octane fuel. I doubt this error is fatal to the engine.

David
Your lower air pressure at higher elevation results in lower octane requirements.
Old 11-06-2021, 10:12 PM
  #5  
aklim
Team Owner
 
aklim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford WI
Posts: 24,362
Received 2,260 Likes on 1,965 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Successful Plumber
I have never been able to use 93 octane in my C7 LT1.

Those of you that have used both 91 and 93 octane in their C7 LT1, is there any noticeable differences, smoother idle, better MPG, increased performance?
Wouldn't the better way be to put away what you feel and check the knock counts between the 2 fuels?
Old 11-06-2021, 11:09 PM
  #6  
The Successful Plumber
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
The Successful Plumber's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2018
Location: North Western Wyoming
Posts: 1,111
Received 577 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aklim
Wouldn't the better way be to put away what you feel and check the knock counts between the 2 fuels?
The main thing I was interested in was idle smoothness not knocking. The C7 LT1 has a rough idle, not like the idle of a high lift and duration cam shaft. So I was wondering if the rough idle was caused by the use of 91 octane instead of 93 as recommended.

Last edited by The Successful Plumber; 11-06-2021 at 11:11 PM.
Old 11-06-2021, 11:46 PM
  #7  
aklim
Team Owner
 
aklim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford WI
Posts: 24,362
Received 2,260 Likes on 1,965 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Successful Plumber
The main thing I was interested in was idle smoothness not knocking. The C7 LT1 has a rough idle, not like the idle of a high lift and duration cam shaft. So I was wondering if the rough idle was caused by the use of 91 octane instead of 93 as recommended.
​​​​​​All things being equal, 93 should have more knock resistance than 91. Not much else is different so not sure how that affects idle quality. Besides, the ECM should compensate as much as it can.
Old 11-07-2021, 05:50 AM
  #8  
449er
Race Director
 
449er's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2016
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,732
Received 4,741 Likes on 3,019 Posts
2023 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Default

93 octane would be the best way to go but your car's ecm will adjust accordingly for 91 octane
Old 11-07-2021, 10:19 AM
  #9  
The Successful Plumber
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
The Successful Plumber's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2018
Location: North Western Wyoming
Posts: 1,111
Received 577 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aklim
​​​​​​All things being equal, 93 should have more knock resistance than 91. Not much else is different so not sure how that affects idle quality. Besides, the ECM should compensate as much as it can.
Originally Posted by 449er
93 octane would be the best way to go but your car's ecm will adjust accordingly for 91 octane
I thought the ECM might advance the timing and help smooth out the idle using the recommended 93 octane.
Old 11-07-2021, 10:21 AM
  #10  
aklim
Team Owner
 
aklim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford WI
Posts: 24,362
Received 2,260 Likes on 1,965 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Successful Plumber
I thought the ECM might advance the timing and help smooth out the idle using the recommended 93 octane.
It might adjust but the adjustment might also be so slight your butt dyno misses it. Kinda why I suggested getting it scanned. Data can tell you what is happening and someone here might be able to better interpret the data and we can learn from it
The following users liked this post:
76-Vetteman (11-07-2021)
Old 11-07-2021, 10:30 AM
  #11  
mbaessler
Racer
 
mbaessler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Posts: 456
Received 94 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

As far as idle goes, to me they set it to low, but I assume that is for gas mileage reasons. If you press the gas peddle and add 50-100 rpm it smooths right out. I asked if I could get to adjusted just a little higher but most respondents on this forum said it's programed into the ECM and can't do much about it. I agree it is pretty rough almost like it wants to stumble.
The following users liked this post:
The Successful Plumber (11-07-2021)
Old 11-07-2021, 11:30 AM
  #12  
The Successful Plumber
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
The Successful Plumber's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2018
Location: North Western Wyoming
Posts: 1,111
Received 577 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aklim
It might adjust but the adjustment might also be so slight your butt dyno misses it. Kinda why I suggested getting it scanned. Data can tell you what is happening and someone here might be able to better interpret the data and we can learn from it
The way my C7 LT1 idles is similar to the other three that I have driven. There’s nothing wrong with mine.

When my car was new I took my 88 year old father in law for a ride and he immediately commented on the rough idle. It rough idles at sea level with 91 and now at 5000 plus feet where the 91 should now should have enrich the air fuel ratio to where it’s more like run 93 octane. I guess it’s just characteristic of the way these LT1’s idle.
Old 11-07-2021, 12:00 PM
  #13  
aklim
Team Owner
 
aklim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford WI
Posts: 24,362
Received 2,260 Likes on 1,965 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Successful Plumber
The way my C7 LT1 idles is similar to the other three that I have driven. There’s nothing wrong with mine.

When my car was new I took my 88 year old father in law for a ride and he immediately commented on the rough idle. It rough idles at sea level with 91 and now at 5000 plus feet where the 91 should now should have enrich the air fuel ratio to where it’s more like run 93 octane. I guess it’s just characteristic of the way these LT1’s idle.
Rough is a subjective thing. Compared to a dragster, it is silky smooth. Compared to an MB sedan, it is rough.
Old 11-07-2021, 12:11 PM
  #14  
The Successful Plumber
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
The Successful Plumber's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2018
Location: North Western Wyoming
Posts: 1,111
Received 577 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aklim
Rough is a subjective thing. Compared to a dragster, it is silky smooth. Compared to an MB sedan, it is rough.
True.
My ‘04 Chevy 2500 6.0 gas idled rough. My ‘22 Ford F-250 7.3 gas idles very smoothly.

I’ve found that running fuel injector cleaner though them and clean the mass airflow sensor and throttle body helps a little.
Old 11-07-2021, 12:33 PM
  #15  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,131
Received 8,961 Likes on 5,347 Posts

Default

The octane level won't make a difference at idle. The engine isn't under any severe load and the engine is producing between 5 and 10 HP, just enough power to keep the engine turning and powering the belt-driven accessories. The octane level affects the engine when it is under full load where engine knocking can start to happen.

Bill
The following users liked this post:
The Successful Plumber (11-07-2021)
Old 11-07-2021, 12:56 PM
  #16  
Exia
Burning Brakes
 
Exia's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2017
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 924
Received 856 Likes on 356 Posts
Default

No difference for idle or street driving for 91 vs 93. If you will be doing high performance driving 93 should be used but for street driving and the occasional highway pull, you won't notice a difference.
The following users liked this post:
The Successful Plumber (11-07-2021)
Old 11-07-2021, 01:34 PM
  #17  
aklim
Team Owner
 
aklim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford WI
Posts: 24,362
Received 2,260 Likes on 1,965 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Successful Plumber
True.
My ‘04 Chevy 2500 6.0 gas idled rough. My ‘22 Ford F-250 7.3 gas idles very smoothly.

I’ve found that running fuel injector cleaner though them and clean the mass airflow sensor and throttle body helps a little.
Different engine, different purpose, different design so idle quality might be different.

Yep. Definitely will. You put the stuff in, the mind imagines an improvement and you will see it, feel it, etc. Google Placebo Effect. Many people have put all kinds of go fast goodies on the car, felt a huge difference until they get to the dyno or racetrack and are surprised at the results. I avidly distrust my own senses since they are capable of being influenced by all kinds of things I might imagine and go for data.
The following users liked this post:
The Successful Plumber (11-07-2021)

Get notified of new replies

To C7 LT1 91 vs 93 Octane

Old 11-08-2021, 10:35 AM
  #18  
vader86
Team Owner
 
vader86's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Athens AL
Posts: 59,686
Received 1,407 Likes on 1,020 Posts
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

The octane rating here would make no difference for your idle.

Besides at your DA in Wyoming, the engine does not need the 93 octane, thus why local stations don't have it. If you put in 93 and don't need it, you'll actually get slightly worse gas mileage.
Old 11-08-2021, 08:40 PM
  #19  
robert miller
Team Owner
 
robert miller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,847
Received 1,762 Likes on 1,529 Posts

Default ttt

May get a few haters here, But from watching a show on T V this last weekend. They did a show on 89 then 91 then 93 then 110 & 116 racing gas. With that said wasnt per say no diff in it at all as long as you are not at a track the only diff I saw from it would be when it would start knocking from the lower octane in it. But for a daily driver no diff at all. Robert
Old 11-08-2021, 09:28 PM
  #20  
aklim
Team Owner
 
aklim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford WI
Posts: 24,362
Received 2,260 Likes on 1,965 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robert miller
May get a few haters here, But from watching a show on T V this last weekend. They did a show on 89 then 91 then 93 then 110 & 116 racing gas. With that said wasnt per say no diff in it at all as long as you are not at a track the only diff I saw from it would be when it would start knocking from the lower octane in it. But for a daily driver no diff at all. Robert
What car? What compression? On lower compression, sure. On a modified car with high compression? Good luck with that. I have seen increased knock counts on lower octane gas on higher compression motors on hot days and no difference on low compression cars. How did they test the difference? Scanner or butt dyno?


Quick Reply: C7 LT1 91 vs 93 Octane



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:11 PM.