C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why didn't Chevy Revise Gear Ratios on 7sp?

Old 07-11-2013, 05:34 PM
  #21  
McGirk94LT1
Drifting
 
McGirk94LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Coatesville PA
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ELP_JC
At least 6th should have been revised. I have the 'Z51' tranny on my '12 GS, and even though it has closer ratios than the base car, 6th is almost too tall already at 83 mph at 2K rpm. Leaving the ratios the same and just adding 7th was pretty stupid IMO. Since the biggest jump is from 5th to 6th, at least 6th should have been made closer, and 7th just a hair taller than the current 6th. But the GS has some weird ratios, to be honest, so a full revision would have been warranted, especially when the damn car lasts 9 or more years.
Gearing isn't designed with idea of people doing 83. Where is cruising at 83 legal again? You gotta be realistic here.

Besides, now at 83mph in a z51 you'll be a tick UNDER the rpms a base car's 6th gear are/will be. GS with the m12 gearset(is that what they are called still?) have great gears. Just enough added umph over base 6 speed gears but not gas guzzling.

If I had a choice of a non... Zxx model, a 2008 z51 would be my choice, between the lighter weight and z51 trans its gotta be a blast.
Old 07-11-2013, 09:23 PM
  #22  
C7s
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
C7s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 986
Received 274 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

So at no time did the engineers explain the ratios of the new 7sp? I would love to hear from Chevy their explanation. I thought they may have at the bash, 60th ann, etc.
Old 07-11-2013, 09:57 PM
  #23  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Obviously a conspiracy theory to give people something to bitch about besides the Camaro tail lights. I'd rather have too many gears than not enough. If you don't like seventh, don't use it.
Old 07-11-2013, 10:39 PM
  #24  
CarBoy
Drifting
 
CarBoy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: O'Fallon MO
Posts: 1,282
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Daekwan06
What I like about 7th more than anything.. is that it puts reverse in its natural place. I've always hated cars where you need to shift up or left for reverse. Reverse should be the last selection on the right side.

AMEN!! No more accidentally bumping into reverse when the lock out solenoid fails
Old 07-11-2013, 11:29 PM
  #25  
4GS7
Melting Slicks
 
4GS7's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Posts: 2,378
Received 114 Likes on 78 Posts

Default

The 7th gear is for when you're crossing middle America at 75mph. The car will barely be idling. I approve.

All of you folks who think having a 5th gear 1:1 is great, it really isn't. I end up skipping gears a lot. I have that in my Mustang paired with 3.73s, and honestly, I wish I had less gear. Also, the ratios in the Tremec are naturally stepped. For me, 5th to 6th goes 1:1 to .65. That's a big drop. A set of 3.31s would do me nicely, but I don't want to crack open my pumpkin to do it.
Old 07-11-2013, 11:30 PM
  #26  
Corvette Monkey
Advanced
 
Corvette Monkey's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I think it'd be fun to have a lower first gear instead of a higher highway gear.

I'm not sure if the tires could take a lot more torque, but doing rolling digs up to a 30 or 35 mph speed limit and actually getting into the power band would be fun.

My C5 does 50+ in first gear (and I believe the C6/C7 do more), which means it's rare for me to even have a chance to hit the power band or do a 1-2 shift on my commute without being obnoxious and/or illegal.
Old 07-11-2013, 11:49 PM
  #27  
theseal
Drifting
 
theseal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,333
Received 52 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

The gearing is really nonsensical. 7 speeds. 1st gear will go 60. The car almost certainly tops out in 5th. It will finish the quarter in 3rd probably. Yet the car is still overreved cruising at 99-100, which is not speeding in many jurisdictions.

The base car should have at least grand sport gearing in the 1st 3, and if youre going to spin the extra 11 pounds all day long for a 7th gear, it ought to be a taller od.
Old 07-11-2013, 11:50 PM
  #28  
RJ-92
Race Director
 
RJ-92's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 18,510
Received 327 Likes on 156 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vetteLT193
GM has other factors to consider while building cars. The most notable is CAFE. For each 0.1 MPG they fall under the standard they have to pay a fine of $5.50 on every car sold. GM builds millions of vehicles so this isn't exactly chump change. I don't know if it is brand specific (i.e. Chevy) or GM total but regardless the fine could really add up.
Its not brand specific. Its corporate wide. Hence the C in CAFE.
Old 07-12-2013, 12:22 AM
  #29  
4GS7
Melting Slicks
 
4GS7's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Posts: 2,378
Received 114 Likes on 78 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ramey
The gearing is really nonsensical. 7 speeds. 1st gear will go 60. The car almost certainly tops out in 5th. It will finish the quarter in 3rd probably. Yet the car is still overreved cruising at 99-100, which is not speeding in many jurisdictions.

The base car should have at least grand sport gearing in the 1st 3, and if youre going to spin the extra 11 pounds all day long for a 7th gear, it ought to be a taller od.
Is it opposite day?

1st Gear will go 60. Yes. That is correct.
The car will probably be aero limited with top speed in 5th. And then this is where you lose me.

99-100mph is DEFINITELY speeding in all jurisdictions. And in 7th, it'll be virtually idling, not overrevving.

7th IS a taller overdrive.
Old 07-12-2013, 12:26 AM
  #30  
McGirk94LT1
Drifting
 
McGirk94LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Coatesville PA
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ramey
The gearing is really nonsensical. 7 speeds. 1st gear will go 60. The car almost certainly tops out in 5th. It will finish the quarter in 3rd probably. Yet the car is still overreved cruising at 99-100, which is not speeding in many jurisdictions.

The base car should have at least grand sport gearing in the 1st 3, and if youre going to spin the extra 11 pounds all day long for a 7th gear, it ought to be a taller od.
WTF is this garbage?!? Have only a dozen or so people actually bothered to look at the trans ratios? Let alone *gasp* compare them to the current 6 speed? Its amazing what you'll discover if you do I promise.

New rule. If you havent bothered to look up/compare the ratios, dont bother posting in this transmission related threads...
Old 07-12-2013, 12:42 AM
  #31  
ZL-1
Safety Car
 
ZL-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: IL / FL .
Posts: 4,084
Received 184 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C7s
So at no time did the engineers explain the ratios of the new 7sp? I would love to hear from Chevy their explanation. I thought they may have at the bash, 60th ann, etc.
When asked about the tall 7th gear on June 28th Tadge did mention that the LT1 has so much more torque and at such low rpm that the C7 is more responsive in 7th than a C6 is in 6th. Back in April at the Bash the torque was emphasized (more torque at 1000 rpm than some Porsches produce at ANY rpm ) The only statement about the choice of gearing that I can recall was that they found the current ratios to work very well with the LT1 and that it can handle the extra 7th gear because of its great torque.

Base C6s feel a bit sluggish with the 2.66 first compared with the C6 Z51 cars' 2.97 first. But a C6 Z06 with the same 2.66 first gear feels really strong! Because of all its torque it doesn't really need more gear than the 2.66. The C7 on takeoff has almost the same torque as a Z06 so it's very likely that it too will feel quite strong even without the more aggressive gearing.

I always wonder how the Z51 2.97 gearing is now sometimes referred to as "close ratio" when the overall ratio spread is obviously wider than the 2.66 trans. Why don't they call it a "wide ratio"? With the old Muncie 4-speeds, 2.20 first gear was close ratio and 2.56 was wide ratio.


.

Last edited by ZL-1; 07-12-2013 at 12:51 AM.
Old 07-12-2013, 03:33 AM
  #32  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C7s
I just realized after the fuel economy numbers came out that on the new 7sp manual, chevy left the ratios exactly the same except added the 7th gear. Why wouldn't they revise 1-6 to make them closer and lower now that they have an extra gear? 7th should now be the highway fuel econ gear and 1-6 performance gearing. Did they explain it at all at the bash or 60th anniversary or any other time?
The gearing is based on the power band. If the motor didn't make so much power and torque over a wide power band, the gear ratios would be far closer. LSx and LTx motors make so much power and torque that it's completely unnecessary to make the gears shorter ratio.

Originally Posted by NoOne
I believe the Z51 is closer ratio.

If they close up the ratios too much its a PITA to drive, always shifting.

The big advantage of a torque laden motor is the lack of need to shift.
No. This would be mathematically incorrect. The Z51 ratios are actually wider, not closer.

The distance between each gear up until 5th gear is actually further than the standard ratios. They seem like they're closer, however, because they're actually shorter gears (larger ratios). Meaning you can't be in them as long.

To give you an example of what I'm talking about:

Z51 Ratios (first 6 speeds)
2.97:1 <-31%-> 2.07:1 <-31%-> 1.43:1 <-30%-> 1.00:1 <-16%-> 0.84:1 <-33%-> 0.56:1

Non Z51 Ratios (first 6 speeds)
2.66:1 <-33%-> 1.78:1 <-27%-> 1.30:1 <-24%-> 1.00:1 <-26%-> 0.74:1 <-32%-> 0.50:1

As you can see, the only time the ratio is closer for the Z51 gearing is 1st to 2nd, but the distance isn't that different from the other ratio. However, you can see from 2nd to 3rd and 3rd to 4th, the ratios for the non-Z51 are actually closer and the spread for the Z51 maintains about even and still wider.
Old 07-12-2013, 07:38 AM
  #33  
JerriVette
Race Director
 
JerriVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Bergen county NJ
Posts: 15,819
Received 3,945 Likes on 2,175 Posts

Default

The corvette team got the gear ratios correct on the c6 and just added 7th gear to improve fuel efficiency for the c7.

Rev matching is a cool new feature.
Old 07-12-2013, 08:14 AM
  #34  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

I think it's pretty funny that a bunch of people, who not a single one of you have driven the car, are chastising GM for getting the gearing wrong. GM's engineers have actually driven the car.
Old 07-12-2013, 09:25 AM
  #35  
travisnd
Safety Car
 
travisnd's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Chesapeake VA
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jschindler
I think it's pretty funny that a bunch of people, who not a single one of you have driven the car, are chastising GM for getting the gearing wrong. GM's engineers have actually driven the car.
Not saying they got it wrong, just curious the rational behind the choices. Having 7 gears opens up the ability to build an aggressive road-course gearbox 2-5th and then get your awesome gas mileage in 6th and 7th.

The current Z51 gearing has 2nd too short to use at most tracks and the drop off in acceleration between 3rd and 4th is too much.

The base gearing allows the car to use 2nd in more areas as it's taller and the drop from 3rd to 4th is less so the car is in the power band when you enter 4th.
Old 07-12-2013, 09:28 AM
  #36  
travisnd
Safety Car
 
travisnd's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Chesapeake VA
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

See here....



The Z51 gearing is tailored to a drag race 1st-3rd then a big drop off to 4th. The standard gearing is more evenly spaced.
Old 07-12-2013, 09:31 AM
  #37  
travisnd
Safety Car
 
travisnd's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Chesapeake VA
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

C6 ZR1 gearing... car hits top speed in 6th. 5th and 6th are geared way differently than the base/Z51 stuff.

Get notified of new replies

To Why didn't Chevy Revise Gear Ratios on 7sp?

Old 07-12-2013, 10:32 AM
  #38  
ZL-1
Safety Car
 
ZL-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: IL / FL .
Posts: 4,084
Received 184 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

When I sell my base 1YY07 Stingray in a few years I'll advertise that it has the "close-ratio 7-speed trans"
Old 07-12-2013, 11:25 AM
  #39  
Al77Vette
Instructor
 
Al77Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 230
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by travisnd
See here....



The Z51 gearing is tailored to a drag race 1st-3rd then a big drop off to 4th. The standard gearing is more evenly spaced.
very nice. This is the gearing for manual.

Would you please show the gearing for the Auto?

Thanks

Last edited by Al77Vette; 07-12-2013 at 11:28 AM.
Old 07-12-2013, 12:14 PM
  #40  
travisnd
Safety Car
 
travisnd's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Chesapeake VA
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Google image search... that's where I found the stuff above.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Why didn't Chevy Revise Gear Ratios on 7sp?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 AM.