Base vs Z51 fuel economy
#3
Safety Car
Car for car, about 1 MPG. However, I will predict that Z-51 owners have a much heavier right foot, resulting in at least 2 MPG less.
#4
The Consigliere
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,243
Received 5,431 Likes
on
2,268 Posts
I can't imagine even worrying about it on a modern Corvette. IMO they get - and have since C5 - impressive fuel mileage, particularly considering their performance.
Last edited by OnPoint; 05-31-2013 at 11:49 PM.
#5
Drifting
I'm disappointed that Z51 will not have the same 7th gear as the Base car. The 7th gear should be just for fuel economy.
#6
#7
Pro
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Anaheim Hills, Calif.
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Z51 for me, I am fine with giving up 1 or 2 or whatever mpg, hell I'm only getting 18 mpg average now with my 2010 Camaro SS. I am sure I will be very happy with the improvement in more than one way.
#8
Burning Brakes
#9
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c1-a...ar-ratios.html
#10
Drifting
I believe the automatic Z51's get a different rear end ratio.
The manuals (not sure if this includes the automatics) have a different 1st-3rd, 5th, (6th?) and 7th gears in the transmission.
#11
Melting Slicks
Correct, the Auto's standard rear axle is 2.56 and Auto Z is 2.73, internals on the 6L80 remain the same.
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,927
Received 2,046 Likes
on
1,358 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Final drive ratio takes transmission gear ratio AND differential (rear end) ratio BOTH into account in arriving at its figure. You really don't know the rear end ratio of your Corvette? Very basic concept.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c1-a...ar-ratios.html
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c1-a...ar-ratios.html
#13
Team Owner
For the manuals, all have the same rear end but the transmission gear ratios are different between the base and the Z51. The only transmission gear that is the same for both is 4th gear at 1:1
Auto trans has the same rear gear ratios at the base C6/Z06 and the manual trans base C7 has the same transmission ratios as the base C6/Z06 and the C7 Z51 has the same ratios as the c6 Z51/GS.
The manual trans is only different between the C6 and the C7 in that the C7 has that 7th gear added(.42 on the base and .48 on the Z51).
#14
The auto's have the same transmission ratios but the base has the 2.56 rear end and the Z51 has the 2.73 read end.
For the manuals, all have the same rear end but the transmission gear ratios are different between the base and the Z51. The only transmission gear that is the same for both is 4th gear at 1:1
Auto trans has the same rear gear ratios at the base C6/Z06 and the manual trans base C7 has the same transmission ratios as the base C6/Z06 and the C7 Z51 has the same ratios as the c6 Z51/GS.
The manual trans is only different between the C6 and the C7 in that the C7 has that 7th gear added(.42 on the base and .48 on the Z51).
For the manuals, all have the same rear end but the transmission gear ratios are different between the base and the Z51. The only transmission gear that is the same for both is 4th gear at 1:1
Auto trans has the same rear gear ratios at the base C6/Z06 and the manual trans base C7 has the same transmission ratios as the base C6/Z06 and the C7 Z51 has the same ratios as the c6 Z51/GS.
The manual trans is only different between the C6 and the C7 in that the C7 has that 7th gear added(.42 on the base and .48 on the Z51).
#15
Burning Brakes
It's possible that I've been using the term "final drive ratio" as a misnomer. I always thought final drive ratio referred to the ratio from the output of the transmission (so not including the transmission gearing) to the wheels. So changing anything from the driveshaft to the wheel diameter could impact it, but it sounds like my definition was wrong.
EDIT: But I guess even given that definition, the term "rear axle ratio" still can make sense if it just describes the ratio of the driveshaft to the rear axle or something?
EDIT: But I guess even given that definition, the term "rear axle ratio" still can make sense if it just describes the ratio of the driveshaft to the rear axle or something?
Last edited by RocketGuy3; 06-03-2013 at 01:52 PM.
#16
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,927
Received 2,046 Likes
on
1,358 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
It's possible that I've been using the term "final drive ratio" as a misnomer. I always thought final drive ratio referred to the ratio from the output of the transmission (so not including the transmission gearing) to the wheels. So changing anything from the driveshaft to the wheel diameter could impact it, but it sounds like my definition was wrong.
EDIT: But I guess even given that definition, the term "rear axle ratio" still can make sense if it just describes the ratio of the driveshaft to the rear axle or something?
EDIT: But I guess even given that definition, the term "rear axle ratio" still can make sense if it just describes the ratio of the driveshaft to the rear axle or something?
If it takes 3 turns of the driveshaft to get one turn of the axle, then we say it has a rear end ratio of 3.00
Understanding what's happening is easy, it's the vocabulary that trips us up.
#17
Racer
manual
The new 911TT and the s model don't even offer a manual trany. Porsche has maintained for some time that the "tipt" is faster in shifting than is the manual no matter who is driving. Thus the 0-60 times of 3.4 with the auto and 3.6I with the manual. I have had both a 911TT and a 2009 ZO6 but I still have to ask. Do the 2009-2012 GS Vette proclaim the same?...rrm
#18
AIR FORCE VETERAN
The new 911TT and the s model don't even offer a manual trany. Porsche has maintained for some time that the "tipt" is faster in shifting than is the manual no matter who is driving. Thus the 0-60 times of 3.4 with the auto and 3.6I with the manual. I have had both a 911TT and a 2009 ZO6 but I still have to ask. Do the 2009-2012 GS Vette proclaim the same?...rrm
#19
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
The new 911TT and the s model don't even offer a manual trany. Porsche has maintained for some time that the "tipt" is faster in shifting than is the manual no matter who is driving. Thus the 0-60 times of 3.4 with the auto and 3.6I with the manual. I have had both a 911TT and a 2009 ZO6 but I still have to ask. Do the 2009-2012 GS Vette proclaim the same?...rrm
#20
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,100
Received 2,478 Likes
on
1,941 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"
The new 911TT and the s model don't even offer a manual trany. Porsche has maintained for some time that the "tipt" is faster in shifting than is the manual no matter who is driving. Thus the 0-60 times of 3.4 with the auto and 3.6I with the manual. I have had both a 911TT and a 2009 ZO6 but I still have to ask. Do the 2009-2012 GS Vette proclaim the same?...rrm
Which one of the three topics above is your question?