C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Have the HP numbers changed your buying decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2013, 10:15 PM
  #81  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ck9887
How bout the new Porsche 991 Carrera? It's roughly 200 lbs ligher than the C7. This is the car that apperantly the C7 targets.

Even the new Viper with it's 8.4 liter V10 with 640hp is in the 3300-3400lb range. Right on with the C7.
There's a good bit of difference between 350/290 and 455/460. Even the S is only putting out 400/325. Pretty simikar to what we'll see with the C7, maybe a bit lighter than the Z51 version. The last 991S Road and Track tested came in at 3309 without a driver.

The Viper is about the same, I forgot about that car. Have to remember that both cars are $100K+ though. It still has weight advantage over the R8, F-Type, GT-R, GT500, ZL1, RS5, C63...

In comparison, the Corvette is still not heavy at all for its power/torque output.

Last edited by Kappa; 05-28-2013 at 10:18 PM.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:19 PM
  #82  
tail_lights
Race Director
 
tail_lights's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: SE TEX
Posts: 10,581
Received 252 Likes on 210 Posts

Default

I'll admit the Halltech thread had me working the numbers on trading in the Grand Sport. But now, nah.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:19 PM
  #83  
bigterpsfan
Melting Slicks
 
bigterpsfan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Odenton MD
Posts: 2,151
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jschindler
Google "SAE Certified".
I see thanks.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:22 PM
  #84  
haveblue
Instructor
 
haveblue's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Posts: 106
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No, it hasn't changed my opinion. The numbers are a big upgrade from what I'm currently driving and I'm grateful for that.

I think when the magazines and CF members get their hands on the car, the big revelation won't be numbers, it will be a car that drives smaller and feels more nimble. 911 type feel with V8 type shove will be great if it happens. That's what I want.

Never mind the histrionic CF members. The people bothered by numbers are really just a different type of poser. They aren't racing professionally. They won't use their cars to put food on the table. They don't line up on the weekend against other guys for a paycheck. GM didn't derail their promising racing careers with the C7. It's still just alot of wanking at the end of the day
Old 05-28-2013, 10:23 PM
  #85  
ck9887
Burning Brakes
 
ck9887's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 907
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

The specs I pulled showed the 991 Carrera S weighing in at 3100 lbs, so not sure what source is correct. But it is an example of a car that has added a bunch of tech and still shed weight from the previous gen.

And for the Viper being about the same weight with roughly 200 more HP is pretty impressive. Keep in mind that when the HI-PO C7 comes out, if it's in the 600HP range, we are going to be talking probably close to 200lb in added weight... Now we are in the 3500-3600lb range. Unacceptable for any Corvette in my book.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:24 PM
  #86  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ck9887
So now your comparing the C6 Z with a GT500 in terms of lacking everything but HP? Sorry, but the C6 Z is going to out perform the C7 on the track... So I'd rather have the HP AND weight advantage
LOL! I didn't say the C6Z wasn't going to outperform the C7. I said that if all you care about is HP, sell the C6Z and buy the GT500. It has way more HP. And as only YOU know, HP is everything.

I'll take the refinement of the C7 over a C6 any day. That's the reason I didn't buy a C6, and instead bought another C5Z. (I like to daily my Corvette even if I don't have to.)

But, don't fret. We all know what makes us tick. HP makes you tick. Being comfortable in my car makes me tick. At the end of the day, you're not going to use the 505HP in your C6Z more than I'm going to use the 200-300HP in the lower end of the RPM range on my car. In fact, I'm pretty sure you're not going to be revving the **** out of your car 100% of the time it's on. So when you drive your Z on the streets, it's just a badge.

Have a nice day.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:27 PM
  #87  
JerriVette
Race Director
 
JerriVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Bergen county NJ
Posts: 15,826
Received 3,948 Likes on 2,177 Posts

Default

I own a c6. I enjoy running to redline all the time. I also agree the new c7 will. Be the faster driving machine and hot dam if it's not sexy as he'll.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:28 PM
  #88  
Big Dan 427
Safety Car
 
Big Dan 427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Location: Danbury CT
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JustinStrife
I only stray in the sub-forums for the cars I own, have owned, or intend to own. When I was saving up for a C6z, I posted a few times in there, but once I bought my 800hp FRC priorities shifted. Now I'm on a 3 year plan to save up and buy a C7 to go along with my FRC. So the two places I stay in, are the C5 and C7 section.

I do not go into other sub-forums and **** all over the owners and future owners who are interested in the cars. Otherwise, I could laugh at the C6 guys who's steering wheels resemble Cobalts, and ask how many still have their roofs intact.

I don't, as those cars don't interest me anymore, and I don't want to alienate a group of Corvette enthusiasts, in their neighborhood. Let them enjoy their cars. Let us C7 enthusiasts focus on our future purchases. And grow the hell up, rather than staying around here just to stir things up and **** people off with your unfounded complaints on a car that you have no intention of buying. You are adding NOTHING of value to this sub-forum.
If you read carefully you will find one of your supporters who I no longer will address (BLUE OX) pisses all over the LS7 and its owners every day so before you start throwing stones check your own my friend!
Old 05-28-2013, 10:31 PM
  #89  
JustinStrife
Team Owner
 
JustinStrife's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 27,567
Received 96 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Big Dan 427
If you read carefully you will find one of your supporters who I no longer will address (BLUE OX) pisses all over the LS7 and its owners every day so before you start throwing stones check your own my friend!
Does he go into the C6 section when he does it Dan? Because if he doesn't, your whole argument has been ripped to shreds.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:36 PM
  #90  
Big Dan 427
Safety Car
 
Big Dan 427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Location: Danbury CT
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JustinStrife
Does he go into the C6 section when he does it Dan? Because if he doesn't, your whole argument has been ripped to shreds.
You keep thinking argument in every thread, that is your mentality I guess. And for what its worth slander is slander no matter where it's stated.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:36 PM
  #91  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tail_lights
I'll admit the Halltech thread had me working the numbers on trading in the Grand Sport. But now, nah.
Right!!! Even he called the numbers a Flop.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:37 PM
  #92  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ck9887
The specs I pulled showed the 991 Carrera S weighing in at 3100 lbs, so not sure what source is correct. But it is an example of a car that has added a bunch of tech and still shed weight from the previous gen.

And for the Viper being about the same weight with roughly 200 more HP is pretty impressive. Keep in mind that when the HI-PO C7 comes out, if it's in the 600HP range, we are going to be talking probably close to 200lb in added weight... Now we are in the 3500-3600lb range. Unacceptable for any Corvette in my book.
Porsche, Ferrari and Lambo all like to quote weight without fluids. The C7 is something like 3150 when dry.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:38 PM
  #93  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JustinStrife
Does he go into the C6 section when he does it Dan? Because if he doesn't, your whole argument has been ripped to shreds.
And....

Game!
Old 05-28-2013, 10:39 PM
  #94  
JWell
Racer
 
JWell's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Well considering that I paid the same money for a 436 hp car I would say no.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:41 PM
  #95  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gthal
With similar power/torque curves to the Z06 to almost 5,000RPM, there is little doubt that this statement is true.
Whats the 0-60 for both gthal?
Old 05-28-2013, 10:41 PM
  #96  
ck9887
Burning Brakes
 
ck9887's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 907
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SCM_Crash
LOL! I didn't say the C6Z wasn't going to outperform the C7. I said that if all you care about is HP, sell the C6Z and buy the GT500. It has way more HP. And as only YOU know, HP is everything.

I'll take the refinement of the C7 over a C6 any day. That's the reason I didn't buy a C6, and instead bought another C5Z. (I like to daily my Corvette even if I don't have to.)

But, don't fret. We all know what makes us tick. HP makes you tick. Being comfortable in my car makes me tick. At the end of the day, you're not going to use the 505HP in your C6Z more than I'm going to use the 200-300HP in the lower end of the RPM range on my car. In fact, I'm pretty sure you're not going to be revving the **** out of your car 100% of the time it's on. So when you drive your Z on the streets, it's just a badge.

Have a nice day.
You're right, it isn't just about HP. But again, if the C6 Z will outperform the C7 on the track then the C6 Z has more than just big HP. Based on your logic, I think you would be happier in something like a C63 AMG... lots of refinement and still enough power for your needs.

And I'll gladly take the Z06 badge any day. It will still stand out several years from now and still be somewhat exclusive. The C7 will be on every street corner and will only be cool for the first six months.
Old 05-28-2013, 10:42 PM
  #97  
gthal
Safety Car
 
gthal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,937
Received 1,170 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
Whats the 0-60 for both gthal?
Z06 faster... that is also true.

Get notified of new replies

To Have the HP numbers changed your buying decision

Old 05-28-2013, 10:43 PM
  #98  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevebz06
No, 385 was the top number in 2001. I think base hp was like 350, which is what we really should be comparing it to. There is a large percentage of Corvette owners who are only interested in looking good, so 455 should be more than enough for them.
Waxers??
Old 05-28-2013, 10:47 PM
  #99  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SCM_Crash
LOL! I didn't say the C6Z wasn't going to outperform the C7. I said that if all you care about is HP, sell the C6Z and buy the GT500. It has way more HP. And as only YOU know, HP is everything.

I'll take the refinement of the C7 over a C6 any day. That's the reason I didn't buy a C6, and instead bought another C5Z. (I like to daily my Corvette even if I don't have to.)

But, don't fret. We all know what makes us tick. HP makes you tick. Being comfortable in my car makes me tick. At the end of the day, you're not going to use the 505HP in your C6Z more than I'm going to use the 200-300HP in the lower end of the RPM range on my car. In fact, I'm pretty sure you're not going to be revving the **** out of your car 100% of the time it's on. So when you drive your Z on the streets, it's just a badge.

Have a nice day.
Then why do you want E85 so bad if you wont use what you have?
Old 05-28-2013, 10:49 PM
  #100  
Phimosis
Advanced
 
Phimosis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Big Dan 427
455 was always weak in my book sir. A 25 hp increase just doesn't cut it w/all the new tech, should have been at least 475 if not more.
I agree on this point. Other car manufacturers are seeing a 10% hp increase, 10% torque increase and 10% fuel efficiency increase by switching over to direct injection. Why is Chevy only pulling a 5% increase?

Maybe the benefit isn't as dramatic on a slower spinning cam-in-block engine, but it seems like there would be even more to gain because 2 valve engines don't distribute the air/fuel charge as well as their 4 valve DOHC counterparts. From a physics standpoint, going to direct injection in a 2V engine should allow even more compression ratio increase and even larger gains in thermal efficiency than the 10% that we commonly see with 4V engines because the CR on port injection 2V engines is lower than on 4V port injection engines, but direct injection should allow them to become equals.


Quick Reply: Have the HP numbers changed your buying decision



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 AM.