View Poll Results: Should GM rep have a Q&A thread in C7 section
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll
Poll: Should GM have a rep in this section with Q&A thread?
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Poll: Should GM have a rep in this section with Q&A thread?
GM reps lurk in other sections, why absent here? Q&A thread seems like a great idea, or is the absence a statement on its own?
#2
Race Director
We know they lurk here. Why would they want to subject themselves to this kind of abuse?
Your poll needs a third option:
- None of the above; this is a worthless poll.
Your poll needs a third option:
- None of the above; this is a worthless poll.
#3
Drifting
I wouldn't mind asking some questions at all. Maybe if we all submit questions and compile all the most frequently asked questions, submit them, have GM rep answer them and post the Q&A here.
#4
Burning Brakes
I'm sure some of them read forum. What do you want them to do, give out pricing, performance details etc etc etc????? The C7 is like fine wine, let it breath open it up and soon all of the answers will be here. It's just not ready yet!
#6
The Consigliere
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,289
Received 5,475 Likes
on
2,278 Posts
Given the adolescent vitriol swirling in C7? Yeah, I'm sure they'd like wade into that.
#7
Le Mans Master
There is nothing they will tell us that they won't tell the motoring press and the public -- in the Internet age, they are all one and the same.
We already know everything they are willing to share.
We already know everything they are willing to share.
#8
With the abuse folks like you would dish out, why would they bother. If CF agreed to ban about 5 people (you know who you are ) then maybe someone from GM might show up
#9
Burning Brakes
#10
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
glad to see your ignore list works great, like few others who cared to donate their fine posts proving their point all the way, making sure to post in a worthless thread
#12
#14
Moderator
Wow, what a biased poll with the "reason" for your vote provided as part of the Yes/No. I would vote No, but I will not because my No vote would not be for the reason you supplied.
Last edited by Zymurgy; 04-11-2013 at 09:37 PM.
#17
Moderator
Seriously? I clearly stated why it was biased. An unbiased poll would have simply posed the question with plain Yes and No options. There should be no comments about why the Yes or No. "No-I prefer not to know and pass time guessing instead". You can't see that that statement is biased and is an attempt to influence the vote?
#18
Le Mans Master
#19
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Seriously? I clearly stated why it was biased. An unbiased poll would have simply posed the question with plain Yes and No options. There should be no comments about why the Yes or No. "No-I prefer not to know and pass time guessing instead". You can't see that that statement is biased and is an attempt to influence the vote?