C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Rear Body Kit w/ ROUND TAILS for C7!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2013, 08:44 AM
  #501  
Vette Daddy
Le Mans Master
 
Vette Daddy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Pendleton IN
Posts: 7,182
Received 95 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SgtRod
Its a little too early for people to defend the c7 as if it were one of their children....We're sure it will deserve praise overall but...damn if you cant admit the rear is too close for comfort.. then you have been dying to buy a camaro...lol
Old 02-24-2013, 08:46 AM
  #502  
Vette Daddy
Le Mans Master
 
Vette Daddy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Pendleton IN
Posts: 7,182
Received 95 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jkcam6017
When did the C7 General Discussion become someone's section? The vehicle hasn't been released yet, nor has final specs, etc. No one owns one yet, so all discussion is speculative. The loudest C7 fan, may be the last person to ever own one. Over enthusiastic assumptions are no more valuable than "negative thoughts". In fact, the negativity may be the basis for positive change. You can bet that many aspects of the C7 are the result of negative thoughts of previous owners and prospective buyers. Otherwise, there would never have been the impetus for the C7. If everyone was happy with the c6, c5, etc. there never would have been a new version.

Going to an existing section and saying you think the C1 is crap is a personal opinion about a vehicle owned by an individual. Coming to the C7 section and saying the Stingray medallion sticky taped to the side of the greatest innovation in Corvettes looks like a cheap Cracker Jack's toy is only a shot at GM.
Well said
Old 02-24-2013, 09:45 AM
  #503  
Zee0hSix
Drifting
 
Zee0hSix's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Delaware County Pa
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by sfc rick
500th post!!!

I find it hillarious that the C7 fanboys are fighting with every keystroke to keep the C7 critics quiet.

FUNNY!
Hmmmm......and I thought it was the critics who were crying loudest.
Old 02-24-2013, 09:54 AM
  #504  
Bill17601
AIR FORCE VETERAN
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Bill17601's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,223
Received 439 Likes on 196 Posts

Default

I hear both sides beating the drum for their opinion...I love all Corvettes. Problem is in this day and age you have to be a winner..which brings a lot venom. IMO
Old 02-24-2013, 10:07 AM
  #505  
AdamMeh
Melting Slicks
 
AdamMeh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Peoria Arizona
Posts: 3,372
Received 212 Likes on 113 Posts

Default

just putting lipstick on a pig.
Old 02-24-2013, 10:59 AM
  #506  
jkcam6017
Burning Brakes
 
jkcam6017's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,106
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdamMeh
just putting lipstick on a pig.
This may not fit my theory that positive change comes from criticism.
Old 02-24-2013, 06:15 PM
  #507  
tail_lights
Race Director
 
tail_lights's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: SE TEX
Posts: 10,581
Received 252 Likes on 210 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bill17601
Problem is in this day and age you have to be a whiner..which brings a lot venom. IMO
See what I did there?
Old 02-24-2013, 06:57 PM
  #508  
1analguy
Pro
 
1analguy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: S.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 640
Received 68 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SCM_Crash
...The 96 LT4 was slower than the 97 LS1. And we're only talking a difference of 25 HP...
As long as we're counting, the difference in ratings was 15 HP, not 25 HP. Sorry to be touchy about this, but the LT4 already got short-changed in the rating department, without stretching it even more. If a '97 LS1 really was noticeably quicker than a '96 LT4, then it must have had a gearing advantage. Weren't their weights similar?
Old 02-25-2013, 01:13 AM
  #509  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1analguy
As long as we're counting, the difference in ratings was 15 HP, not 25 HP. Sorry to be touchy about this, but the LT4 already got short-changed in the rating department, without stretching it even more. If a '97 LS1 really was noticeably quicker than a '96 LT4, then it must have had a gearing advantage. Weren't their weights similar?
Oops! Sorry. You're right. The LT4 was 330HP. Not 320.

I don't know what the gearing was on the LT4's ZF6. But the LS1 car was still definitely faster. I don't think it had anything to do with gearing as much as the huge leap in suspension and mechanical grip. The C5 was quite a bit faster on the track than the LT4.



Quick Reply: New Rear Body Kit w/ ROUND TAILS for C7!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 AM.